maintainer: Anita Risch

en: swiss-national-park invertebrates exclusion grazing subalpine vertebrates ecosystem-functions ecosystem-coupling ecosystem-multifunctionality grassland

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


disdrometer-data-laret

maintainer: Daniel Wolfensberger

title_for_slug: disdrometer-data-laret

en: disdrometer precipitation visibility raclets hydrometeors

state: active

type: dataset

en: Disdrometer Data Laret

media_type: application/zip

en: The zip folder contains one netCDF file per day for Laret from February 7 to March 29 2019 with a temporal resolution of 30 seconds (time in UTC). The naming convention for the files is Laret_YYYYMMDD.nc and the files include the following: characteristics of hydrometeors (e.g. diameter, fall velocity, amount per diameter class,...), precipitation rate, radar reflectivity, visibility range, weather codes and instrument performance.

format: ZIP

mimetype: application/zip

en:
A laser optical disdrometer (Parsivel² , OTT Hydromet) was used to measure hydrometeors by extinction when passing a laser beam. The instrument can classify eight different kinds of precipitation, including rain, hail, snow, drizzle, and hybrid forms.
The dataset contains information on precipitation amount and type for the period of February 7 to March 29 2019 in Laret.

disdrometer

display_name: disdrometer

hydrometeors

display_name: hydrometeors

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

raclets

display_name: raclets

visibility

display_name: visibility

education

fr: Education, science

de: Bildung, Wissenschaft

en: Education and science

it: Formazione e scienza

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: orographic-precipitation climate-change cmip5 precipitation-amount air-temperature

en: Download Server

format: SERVICE

en:
Predicting future climatic conditions at high spatial resolution is essential for many applications in science. Here we present data for monthly time series of precipitation and minimum and maximum temperature for four downscaled global circulation models. We used model output statistics in combination with mechanistic downscaling (the CHELSA algorithm) to calculate mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures, as well as monthly precipitation sums at ~5km spatial resolution globally for the years 1850-2100. We validated the performance of the downscaling algorithm by comparing model output with observed climates for the years 1950-2069.

CHELSA_cmip5_ts is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license.

air-temperature

display_name: air-temperature

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

orographic-precipitation

display_name: orographic-precipitation

precipitation-amount

display_name: precipitation-amount

en: High resolution monthly precipitation and temperature timeseries for the period 2006-2100


maintainer: Matthias Haeni

en: swiss-forest-lab meteo long-term wind-speed temperature precipitation climate-change par meteorology relative-humidity

en: Site photo of the forest station (CIB)

media_type: image/jpeg

en: Site photo of the forest station from below (viewing upwards the slope).

mimetype: image/jpeg

en: Site photo of the field station (CIF)

en: Site photo of the field station from the side.

en: Data plot of the forest station (CIB)

media_type: application/pdf

en: Data overview for air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, PAR, wind speed.

format: PDF

mimetype: application/pdf

en: Data plot of the field station (CIF)

en: Site aerial photo (Chironico)

en: Site aerial photo from both Chironico stations. Source: Google. 2016. Site aerial photo from both Chironico stations. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://www.google.ch/maps

en: Forest station data (CIB)

media_type: text/csv

en: Data file.

format: CSV

mimetype: text/csv

en: High quality meteorological data are needed for long-term forest ecosystem research, particularly in the light of global change. The long-term data series published here comprises almost 20 years of measurements for two meteorological stations in Chironico in Switzerland where one station is located within a natural coniferous forest stand (CIB) with Norway spruce (_Picea abies_; 160-180 yrs) and European silver fir (_Abies alba_; 140-160 yrs) as dominant tree species. A second station is situated in the very vicinity outside of the forest (field station, CIF). The meteorological time series are presented in hourly time resolution of air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and wind speed. Chironico is part of the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF) established and maintained by the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.

long-term

display_name: long-term

meteo

display_name: meteo

meteorology

display_name: meteorology

par

display_name: par

relative-humidity

display_name: relative-humidity

swiss-forest-lab

display_name: swiss-forest-lab

temperature

display_name: temperature

wind-speed

display_name: wind-speed

en: Chironico, Switzerland: Long-term forest meteorological data from the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF), from 2000 onwards


en: latent-semantic-analysis agro-food-trade food-preferences national-dishes food-taste-similarity

en: National dishes, migration data and data for bilateral food trade flows

media_type: Stata dta file

en:
The data include information on national dishes, migration data and data for bilateral food
trade flows for 5 years as well as importer and exporter GDP, population, distance between
most populated cities, bilateral information on Preferential Trade Agreements, common
official primary langauge, common colonizer post-1945, colonial relationship for overall
171 countries. The final data set contains 145,350 observations (29,070 country pairs for
5 years)

en: dyadic food similarity measures, pairwise similarity and dissimilarity (chord diagram)

media_type: .zip

en:
The figures show the distribution of two dyadic food tastes similarity measures on the base of
the national dishes: (i) the Manhattan distance and the (ii) latent semantic analysis. The chord diagram
shows the results for country pairs with most and less similarity on basis of the LSA-approach.

en: information on ingredients of national dishes

media_type: .csv

en: shows information of ingredients of all national dishes of 171 countries and their names

en: The data described in this article were collected daily over the period 4 June 2018 to 23 August 2018 and contains information of several data sources. The database includes information on national recipes and their ingredients for 171 countries, measures for food taste similarities between all 171 countries as well as bilateral migration and agro-food trade data for 5 years. The database can be used for analyzing e.g., the relation between food preferences and international trade or food preferences and health outcomes (e.g., obesity) across countries.

agro-food-trade

display_name: agro-food-trade

food-preferences

display_name: food-preferences

food-taste-similarity

display_name: food-taste-similarity

latent-semantic-analysis

display_name: latent-semantic-analysis

national-dishes

display_name: national-dishes

education

en: Education and science

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Data of national dishes, their similarity and trade flows


maintainer: Leonie Schönbeck

en: fluorescence acclimation pinus-sylvestris gas-exchange photosynthesis vpd drought

en: Variable names and units

media_type: XLSX

en: Variable names, description and units for the Pfynwald Gas exchange data

format: XLS

en: Instrument details

media_type: CSV

en:
Instrument details for all LiCor instruments used during collection of dataset.

Metatdata created following guidelines from
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Methods diurnal measurements

en:
Parameters and methodology for diurnal measurements

Metadata format from
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Methods light response

en: Methods and parameters for light response curves

en: Methods ACi curves

en:
Parameters and methods for CO2 response curves of Photosynthesis.

Metatdata format by
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Pfynwald gas exchange

en:
Full dataset of Pfynwald gas exchange data taken in the period from June 2013 to October 2020.
All metdata can be found in attached documents.
Data uploaded after quality control using guidelines by Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Methods survey

en: Parameters and methods for point measurements / survey measurements

en: Methods fluorescence

en:
Parameters and methodology for Fluorescence measurements

Metadata format from
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en:
Gas exchange was measured on control, irrigated and irrigation-stop trees at the irrigation experiment Pfynwald, during the years 2013, 2014, 2016-2020. The measurement campaigns served different purposes, resulting in a large dataset containing survey data, CO2 response curves of photosynthesis, light response curves of photosynthesis, and fluorescence measurements. Measurements were done with LiCor 6400 and LiCor 6800 instruments. Until 2016, measurements were done on excised branches or branches lower in the canopy. From 2016 onwards, measurements were done in the top of the canopy using fixed installed scaffolds.
All metadata can be found in the attached documents.

acclimation

display_name: acclimation

drought

display_name: drought

fluorescence

display_name: fluorescence

gas-exchange

display_name: gas-exchange

photosynthesis

display_name: photosynthesis

pinus-sylvestris

display_name: pinus-sylvestris

vpd

display_name: vpd

en: 2013-2020 gas exchange at Pfynwald


en: relative-humidity climate-change temperature wind-speed meteorology long-term meteo precipitation swiss-forest-lab par

en: Site photo of the forest station (NEB)

en: Site photo of the forest station from below (viewing upwards the slope).

en: Site aerial photo (Neunkirch)

en: Site aerial photo from both Neunkirch stations. Source: Google. 2016. Site aerial photo from both Neunkirch stations. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://www.google.ch/maps

en: Data plot of the field station (NEF)

en: Data overview for air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, PAR, wind speed.

en: Data plot of the forest station (NEB)

en: Field station data (NEF)

en: Data file.

en: Site photo of the field station (NEF)

en: Site photo of the field station from the side.

en: Forest station data (NEB)

en: High quality meteorological data are needed for long-term forest ecosystem research, particularly in the light of global change. The long-term data series published here comprises almost 20 years of measurements for two meteorological stations in Neunkirch in Switzerland where one station is located within a natural deciduous forest stand (NEB) with European beech (_Fagus sylvatica_; 160 yrs), sycamore maple (_Acer pseudoplatanus_; 160 yrs) and lime trees (_Tilia sp._; 110 yrs) as dominant tree species. A second station is situated in the very vicinity outside of the forest (field station, NEF). The meteorological time series are presented in hourly time resolution of air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and wind speed. Neunkirch is part of the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF) established and maintained by the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

long-term

display_name: long-term

meteo

display_name: meteo

meteorology

display_name: meteorology

par

display_name: par

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

education

en: Education and science

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Neunkirch, Switzerland: Long-term forest meteorological data from the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF), from 1997 onwards


en: carrion decomposition fungi yellowstone biogeochemical-cycling detritus soil-biodiversity wolf bacteria carcass

en:
Site	ID for different carcasses across the Yellowstone Landscape
Location	Sampling location, either under carcass or control plot
Species	Indicating whether carcass was from bison or elk
Gender	Gener of carcass; F = female, M = male, ? = unknown
Lat	Latitude
Long	Longitude
DSK	Days since kill; in days
Soil.N	Soil N concentration (%)
Soil.C	Soil C concentration (%)
Veg.C	Vegetation C concentration (%); dominant grasses sampled
Veg.N	Vegetation N concentration (%); dominant grasses sampled
Veg.CtoN	Vegetation C to N ratio; dominant grasses sampled
Soil.resp	Soil respiration (g m-2 h-1)
soil.temp	Soil temperature (°C)
Soil.moist	Soil moisture (volumentric; %)
CRR	Cotton rotting rate
bacteria.richness	Bacteria richness
bacteria.diversity	Bacteria diverstiy
fungi.richness	Fungi richness
fungi.diversity	Fungi diversity
bacteria.abundance	Bacteria abundance
fungi.abundance	Fungi abundance

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:

Risch, A.C., Frossard, A., Schütz, M., Frey, B., Morris, A.W., Bump, J.K. (accepted) Effects of elk and bison carcasses on soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions in Yellowstone, USA. (accepted). Functional Ecology
doi: ...

Methods
Study area and study sites
This study was conducted in YNP’s Northern Range (NR), located in north-western Wyoming and south-western Montana, USA (~44.9163° N, 110.4169° W). The NR expands over ~1000 km2 and features long cold winters and short dry summers. Grasslands and shrublands dominate the NR that is the home of large migratory herds of bison (winter counts 2017: ~3919 individuals; Geremia, Wallen, & White, 2017) and elk (~5349 individuals) as well as their main predators, approximately five packs of wolves with a total of 33 individuals (Smith et al., 2017). As part of a long-term research program within YNP, wolf predation has been studied since their reintroduction in 1995.
For our study, we received ground-truthed coordinates of bison and elk carcasses from winter 2016/17 (November 2016 through April 2017) from the YNP Wolf Project. Between June 20 and July 1, 2017, we visited 24 carcasses in total. At five sites, we could not sample as the carcasses were no longer found. In total we located remains (hairmats, rumen content, bones, teeth) of 19 adult male and female carcasses (7 bison, 12 elk; Supplementary Table 1). Live body weights of adult bison and elk are approximately 730 kg (male bison), 450 kg (female bison), 330 kg (male elk), and 235 kg (female elk, Meagher, 1973; Quimby & Johnson, 1951).
The kills and subsequent consumption happened between 34 and 173 days prior to our sampling (hereafter “days since kill”, DSK), for which we accounted in our statistics. Note that wolves and other scavengers consumed the soft tissue of the carcasses quickly, hence, there is close to no soft tissue left for decomposition as compared to an intact body left on the soil surface. The 19 carcass sites covered the extent of YNP’s NR, with both bison and elk carcasses showing similar distributions; elevation ranged from 1703 to 2884 m a.s.l. (Supplementary Fig 1 & Supplementary Table 1). The carcasses were all located in grassland or sage-brush shrubland, with or without sparsely scattered trees, and both bison and elk carcasses showed the same distribution of DSK. At each study site, we selected a reference plot (hereafter “control”) that was of comparable size, slope aspect and vegetation to the carcass location (hereafter “carcass”). The control was at least 10 m away (Danell, Berteaux, & Brathen, 2002; Melis et al., 2007) from the carcass itself to ensure the absence of potential direct and indirect carcass effects (paired design; (Bump, Webster, et al., 2009; Bump, Peterson, et al., 2009).

Ecosystem functions and soil properties
We randomly collected 50 g of mineral soil from three locations on both control and carcass plots to a depth of 5 cm with sterile techniques and gently mixed the material to obtain a composite sample. Half the soil sample was immediately bagged in plastic bags (whirl packs), stored in a cooler with ice packs (~5 ºC), sieved (2-mm) and frozen within 4-6 hours of collection to assess soil microbial communities. For this purpose, we extracted total genomic DNA from 0.5 g soil using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentrations were measured using PicoGreen (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). PCR amplifications of partial bacterial small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes (region V3–V4 of 16S rRNA) and fungal ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (region ITS2) were performed as described previously (Frey et al., 2016). Each sample consisting of 40 ng DNA was amplified in triplicate and pooled before purification with Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Colter, Berea, CA, USA) and quantified with the Qubit 2.0 fluorometric system (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). Amplicons were sent to the Genome Quebec Innovation Center (Montreal, Canada) for barcoding using the Fluidigm Access Array technology and paired-end sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq v3 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Quality control of bacterial and fungal reads was performed using a customized pipeline (Supplementary Table 2; Frey et al., 2016). Paired-ends reads were matched with USEARCH (Edgar & Flyvbjerg, 2015), substitution errors were corrected using Bayeshammer (Nikolenko, Korobeynikov, & Alekseyev, 2013) and PCR primers were trimmed (allowing for 1 mismatch, read length >300 bp for 16S and >200 bp for ITS primers) using Cutadapt (M. Martin, 2011). Sequences were dereplicated and singleton reads removed prior to clustering into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% identity using USEARCH (Edgar, 2013). The remaining centroid sequences were tested for the presence of ribosomal signatures using Metaxa2 (Bengtsson-Palme et al., 2015) or ITSx (Bengtsson-Palme et al., 2013). Taxonomic assignments of the OTUs were obtained using Bayesian classifier (Wang, Garrity, Tiedje, & Cole, 2007) with a minimum bootstrap support of 60% implemented in mothur (Schloss et al., 2009) by querying the bacterial and fungal reads against the SILVA Release 128 (Quast et al., 2013) and UNITE 8.0 (Abarenkov et al., 2010) reference databases for 16S and ITS OTUs, respectively.
Abundances of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) on an ABI7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described previously (Frossard et al., 2018). The same primers (without barcodes) and cycling conditions as for the sequencing approach were used for the 16S and ITS qPCR. Three standard curves per target region were obtained using tenfold serial dilutions of plasmids generated from cloned targets (Frey, Niklaus, Kremer, Lüscher, & Zimmermann, 2011). Data were converted to represent mean copy number of targets per gram of soil (dry weight).
The other half of the soil sample was bagged in paper, dried to constant weight at 60°C, passed through a 2 mm sieve and analyzed for total C and N concentration with a CE Instruments NC 2100 soil analyzer (CE Elantech Inc., Lakewood NJ, USA). We also collected 20 mature and undamaged leaves of the dominant grass species growing on control and carcass sites, but taxa were not recorded. The plant material was dried at 60°C, finely ground till homogenized and also analyzed to obtain total C and N concentrations. Soil temperature (10 cm depth) was measured with a waterproof digital thermometer (Barnstead International, Dubuque IA, USA) at three locations each at the control and carcass site. Soil moisture (0 – 10 cm depth) was measured with time domain reflectometry (Field-Scout TDR-100; Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield IL, USA) at five randomly chosen points on control and carcass sites. We measured soil respiration at five randomly chosen points at both control and carcass sites with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyzer (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA). For each measurement the soil chamber (15 cm high; 10 cm diameter) was tightly placed on the soil surface, after clipping plants to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. Measurements were conducted over 120 s.
In addition, we assessed the decomposition rates of standardized OM using the cotton strip assay (Latter & Howson, 1977; Latter & Walton, 1988). Cotton cloth tensile strength loss (CTSL) is a measure of decomposition, and an index to express the combined effect of soil microclimatic, physical, chemical and biological properties on decomposition while accounting for OM quality (Latter & Walton, 1988; Risch, Jurgensen, & Frank, 2007; Withington & Sanford Jr., 2007). We placed five 20 cm wide x 13 cm long sheets of 100% unbleached cotton cloth (American Type SM 1/18’’, Warp: 34/1, Weft: 20/1, Weave plain, 29.5 picks/cm warp, 22 picks/cm weft, 237 g/m2; Daniel Jenny & Co., Switzerland;) at each carcass and control site vertically into the soil by making slits with a flat spade to a depth of 12 cm. We inserted each cloth with the spade, and then pushed the slit closed to assure tight contact with the soil. The cloths were retrieved after 18 to 27 days. After retrieval, the cloths were air-dried, remaining soil gently removed by hand, and 1.5 cm wide strips were cut at the 3.5-5.0 cm (top) and the 9-10.5 cm (bottom) soil depth. The strips were equilibrated at 50 % relative humidity and 20°C for 48 hours (climate chamber) prior to strength testing (Scanpro Awetron TH-1 tensile strength tester; AB Lorentzen and Wettre, Kista, Sweden). Cotton rotting rate (CRR) = (CTScontrol - CTSfinal/CTSfinal)1/3 * (365/t), where CTScontrol is the cotton tensile strength of a control cloth and CTSfinal the cotton tensile strength of the incubated sample, t is the incubation period in days. Control cloths were inserted into the ground and immediately retrieved to account for tensile strength loss associated with cloth insertion. We averaged the CRR of top and bottom strips for further analyses as no difference was found between the two. All sampling and cloth insertion took place between June 20 and July 1, 2017, cloths were retrieved between July 17 and 20, 2017. Soil respiration, average CRR, vegetation N concentration and vegetation C:N ratio are defined as ecosystem functions, soil C and N concentration, soil temperature and moisture as soil abiotic properties, and bacterial and fungal richness (number of taxa), diversity (Shannon) and abundance as soil biotic properties.

Statistical analyses
Univariate analyses for ecosystem functions, soil biotic and abiotic properties
We tested whether individual ecosystem functions, soil biotic and abiotic properties differed between carcass and control (“Location”), bison and elk (“Species”) and days since kill (“DSK”). For this purpose, we used linear mixed effect models (LMM, “nlme” package v 3.1 – 131.1 in R v 3.4.4; Pinheiro, Bates, DebRoy, & Sarkar, 2018; R Core Team, 2019) with Location, Species, Location x Species and DSK as fixed effects. Site was included as random effect to account for the paired design. We developed a separate model for all dependent variables. All but bacterial richness, fungal richness, fungal diversity and vegetation N concentration were natural-log transformed to meet model assumptions. For each LMM, we calculated contrasts to assess the specific comparisons we were interested in with the “lsmeans” package v 2.27-62 (Lenth & Love, 2018): 1) carcass vs control, 2) carcass bison vs control bison, and 3) carcass elk vs control elk. We also tested whether we had differences between bison and elk carcasses or the sites where bison and elk were killed and included contrasts 4) carcass bison vs carcass elk and 5) control bison vs control elk.
We calculated the log response ratio (LRR = ln[carcass/control]) to obtain carcass effects for all variables for both species separately. LRR < 0 indicates higher value at control compared to carcass, LRR > 0 indicates higher values at carcass compared control. We used LRRs for visualization and to assess spatial patterns in carcass effects across YNP. For this purpose we calculated the Moran’s I statistic for each ecosystem function, soil biotic and abiotic property based on a latitude-longitude matrix with the “moran.test” function in the “spdep” package version 1.1-3 (Bivand et al., 2019).
Multivariate analyses
Rare OTUs, defined as OTUs with a low abundance of reads, were retained in multivariate methods because they only marginally influence these analyses (Gobet, Quince, & Ramette, 2010). Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices were generated based on square-root-transformed matrices. We used Principal Coordinate Analyses (PCoA) to assess how soil bacterial and fungal communities differed between control and carcass of bison and elk (“vegan” package v 2.5-4, Oksanen et al., 2019). We then extracted PCoA axes scores 1 and 2 and used LMM (“nlme” package) with Location, Species, Location x Species and DSK as fixed effects. Site was, again, included as random effect. We again calculated the contrasts as described above using the “lsmeans” package. We also assessed how ecosystem functions, and soil abiotic and biotic properties were related to the soil bacteria and fungi community structure associated with bison and elk control and carcasses using the “envfit” function in the “vegan” package (Oksanen et al., 2019).
Indicator species analyses were performed using the multipatt function implemented in the “indicspecies” package version 1.7.6 with 100000 permutations (De Caceres & Jansen, 2016). This step allowed to identify OTUs that led to changes in multivariate patterns between control and carcass of both bison and elk separately (De Cáceres, Legendre, & Moretti, 2010). The multipatt function uses a point biserial correlation coefficient statistical test. Indicator OTUs were defined as bacterial and fungal OTUs with more than 50 sequences, i.e., removing rare taxa and taxa with low abundances containing little indicator information (Rime et al., 2015) and that were significantly correlated with Location (p < 0.05, correlation coefficient > 0.3). A heatmap of these OTUs were generated with the vegan and ggplot2 packages. The indicator analyses were performed in R version 3.3.3 (R Core Team, 2017).

References
Abarenkov, K., Henrik Nilsson, R., Larsson, K.-H., Alexander, I. J., Eberhardt, U., Erland, S., … Kõljalg, U. (2010). The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi – recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytologist, 186(2), 281–285. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x
Bengtsson-Palme, J., Hartmann, M., Eriksson, K. M., Pal, C., Thorell, K., Larsson, D. G. J., & Nilsson, R. H. (2015). metaxa2: improved identification and taxonomic classification of small and large subunit rRNA in metagenomic data. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15(6), 1403–1414. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12399
Bengtsson-Palme, J., Ryberg, M., Hartmann, M., Branco, S., Wang, Z., Godhe, A., … Nilsson, R. H. (2013). Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(10), 914–919. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12073
Bivand, R., Altman, M., Anselin, L., Assuncao, R., Berke, O., Blanchet, G., … Yu, D. (2019). spdep: Spatial dependence, weighthing schemes, statistics. R package version 1.1-3.
Bump, J. K., Peterson, R. O., & Vucetich, J. A. (2009). Wolves modulate soil nutrient heterogeneity and foliar nitrogen by configuring the distribution of ungulate carcasses. Ecology, 90(11), 3159–3167.
Bump, J. K., Webster, C. R., Vucetich, J. A., Peterson, R. O., Shields, J. M., & Powers, M. D. (2009). Ungulate carcasses perforate ecological filters and create biogeochemical hotspots in forest herbaceous layers allowing trees a competitive advantage. Ecosystems, 12(6), 996–1007. doi:10.1007/s10021-009-9274-0
Danell, K., Berteaux, D., & Brathen, K. A. (2002). Effect of muskox carcasses on nitrogen concentration in tundra vegetation. Arctic, 55(4), 389392.
De Caceres, M., & Jansen, F. (2016). indicspecies: relationship between species and groups of species. R package version 1.7.6.
De Cáceres, M., Legendre, P., & Moretti, M. (2010). Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos, 119(10), 1674–1684. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18334.x
Edgar, R. C. (2013). UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods, 10, 996.
Edgar, R. C., & Flyvbjerg, H. (2015). Error filtering, pair assembly and error correction for next-generation sequencing reads. Bioinformatics, 31(21), 3476–3482. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv401
Frey, B., Niklaus, P. A., Kremer, J., Lüscher, P., & Zimmermann, S. (2011). Heavy-machinery traffic impacts methane emissions as well as methanogen abundance and community structure in oxic forest soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(17), 6060–6068. doi:10.1128/AEM.05206-11
Frey, B., Rime, T., Phillips, M., Stierli, B., Hajdas, I., Widmer, F., & Hartmann, M. (2016). Microbial diversity in European alpine permafrost and active layers. FEMS Microbial Ecology, 92(3), fiw018.
Frossard, A., Donhauser, J., Mestrot, A., Gygax, S., Bååth, E., & Frey, B. (2018). Long- and short-term effects of mercury pollution on the soil microbiome. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120, 191–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.028
Geremia, C., Wallen, R., & White, P. J. (2017). Status report of the Yellowstone bison population, September 2017. Yellowstone National Park, Mammoth, WY, USA: National Park Service, Yellowstone Center for Resources.
Gobet, A., Quince, C., & Ramette, A. (2010). Multivariate cutoff level analysis (MultiCoLA) of large community data sets. Nucleic Acids Research, 38(15), e155–e155. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq545
Latter, P., & Howson, G. (1977). The use of cotton strips to indicate cellulose decomposition in the field. Pedobiologia, (17), 145–155.
Latter, P., & Walton, D. (1988). The cotton strip assay for cellulose decomposition studies in soil: history of the assay and development. In Cotton strip assay: an index for decomposition in soils (pp. 7–9). ITE Symposium, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Natural Environment Research Council, UK.
Lenth, R., & Love, J. (2018). lsmeans: least-squares means. R package version 2.27-62.
Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.Journal, 17(1), 10–12.
Meagher, M. M. (1973). The bison of Yellowstone National Park. NPS Scientific Monograph (Vol. 1). National Park Service, Yellowstone Center for Resources.
Melis, C., Selva, N., Teurlings, I., Skarpe, C., Linnell, J. D. C., & Andersen, R. (2007). Soil and vegetation nutrient response to bison carcasses in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. Ecological Research, 22(5), 807–813. doi:10.1007/s11284-006-0321-4
Nikolenko, S. I., Korobeynikov, A. I., & Alekseyev, M. A. (2013). BayesHammer: Bayesian clustering for error correction in single-cell sequencing. BMC Genomics, 14(1), S7. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-S1-S7
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Friendly, M., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., McGlinn, D., … Wagner, H. H. (2019). vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-4.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., & Sarkar, D. (2018). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. R package version 3.1-131.1.
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., … Glöckner, F. O. (2013). The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(Database issue), D590–D596. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219
Quimby, D. C., & Johnson, D. E. (1951). Weights and measurements of Rocky Mountain elk. Journal of Wildlife Management, 15, 57–62.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Zurich, Switzerland.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rime, T., Hartmann, M., Brunner, I., Widmer, F., Zeyer, J., & Frey, B. (2015). Vertical distribution of the soil microbiota along a successional gradient in a glacier forefield. Molecular Ecology, 24(5), 1091–1108. doi:10.1111/mec.13051
Risch, A. C., Jurgensen, M. F., & Frank, D. A. (2007). Effects of grazing and soil micro-climate on decomposition rates in a spatio-temporally heterogeneous grassland. Plant and Soil, 298(1–2), 191–201. doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9354-x
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., … Weber, C. F. (2009). Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(23), 7537–7541. doi:10.1128/AEM.01541-09
Smith, D., Stahler, D., Cassidy, K., Stahler, E., Metz, M., Cassidy, B., … Cato, E. (2018). Yellowstone National Park wolf project annual report 2017. Yellowstone National Park, Mammoth, WY, USA: National Park Service, Yellowstone Center of Resources.
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M., & Cole, J. R. (2007). Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(16), 5261–5267. doi:10.1128/AEM.00062-07
Withington, C., & Sanford Jr., R. (2007). Decomposition rates of buried substances increase with altitude in a forest-alpine tundra ecotone. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, (39), 68–75.

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

bacteria

display_name: bacteria

biogeochemical-cycling

display_name: biogeochemical-cycling

carcass

display_name: carcass

carrion

display_name: carrion

decomposition

display_name: decomposition

detritus

display_name: detritus

fungi

display_name: fungi

soil-biodiversity

display_name: soil-biodiversity

wolf

display_name: wolf

yellowstone

display_name: yellowstone

en: Elk and bison carcasses in Yellowstone, USA


kof-konjunkturbarometer

maintainer: KOF Datenservice

title_for_slug: kof-konjunkturbarometer

fr: suisse conjoncture

de: konjunktur vorlaufindikator schweiz

en: switzerland business-cycle leading-indicator fli

fr: KOF Baromètre conjoncturel

de: KOF Konjunkturbarometer

en: KOF Economic Barometer

fr: Depuis les années 70, le KOF publie un indicateur phare pour l’économie suisse, le baromètre conjoncturel, lequel prévoit l’évolution de la conjoncture suisse dans un avenir proche. La méthode de calcul a été révisée en 1998 puis en 2006. La dernière révision a eu lieu en 2014.

de: Seit den 1970er Jahren veröffentlicht die KOF einen vorlaufenden Sammelindikator, das Konjunkturbarometer, welches anzeigt, wie sich die Schweizer Konjunktur in der nahen Zukunft entwickeln dürfte. Die Methodik wurde 1998 revidiert, dann nochmals 2006. Die letzte umfassende Revision erfolgte im Jahr 2014.

en: Since the 1970s, the KOF Swiss Economic Institute is publishing a leading composite indicator, the KOF Economic Barometer, predicting how the Swiss economy should perform in the near future. The methodology was overhauled in 1998 and again in 2006. The last thorough revision was conducted in 2014.

en: Data description

fr: Description des données

de: Datenbeschreibung

business-cycle

display_name: business-cycle

conjoncture

display_name: conjoncture

fli

display_name: fli

konjunktur

display_name: konjunktur

leading-indicator

display_name: leading-indicator

schweiz

display_name: schweiz

suisse

display_name: suisse

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

vorlaufindikator

display_name: vorlaufindikator

national-economy

fr: Economie nationale

de: Volkswirtschaft

en: National economy

it: Economia

kof-konjunkturforschungsstelle

fr: KOF Centre de recherches conjoncturelles

de: KOF Konjunkturforschungsstelle

en: KOF Swiss Economic Institute

it: KOF Centro di ricerca congiunturale

fr: Le KOF, Centre de recherches conjoncturelles, fournit des informations tangibles dans le domaine de la recherche économique et conjoncturelle. Il établit une multitude de prévisions et d’indicateurs utiles à l’observation de la conjoncture. Sa base de données, issue d’enquêtes menées auprès des entreprises, est unique en Suisse. Ces données permettent au KOF de générer divers indicateurs (baromètre, indicateur de l’emploi, indicateur bancaire), qui reflètent le climat de l’économie suisse. Les résultats de ces enquêtes sont évalués chaque trimestre et communiqués au public, tout comme les prévisions conjoncturelles. Le KOF analyse également l’activité d’innovation des entreprises suisses, effectue des études sur les dépenses de santé et commente les derniers développements de l’économie. Il participe aussi (en collaboration avec le centre Ifo de Munich) à l’élaboration des prévisions conjoncturelles allemandes (« Gemeinschaftsdiagnose »), lesquelles servent de base au gouvernement allemand en ce qui concerne l’évolution future de l’économie.

en: KOF delivers profund insight into the field of Economic Research. Next to conducting surveys in all branches of the Swiss economy, it also creates forecasts and indicators for business cycle analysis. KOF's data pool of business surveys is unique in Switzerland. KOF uses these data sets to mirror the economic situations and moods of Swiss companies through the generation of indicators. The KOF Economic Barometer, KOF Employment Indicator, KOF Business Situation, etc., are crucial for assessing economic developments in Switzerland. Many of these surveys are carried out monthly and results are evaluated quarterly to be presented to the public. KOF also analyzes the innovation of Swiss companies, provides studies on health issues and comments on current economic developments. KOF is also (together with the Ifo Institute in Munich) involved in the joint economic forecast in Germany, which is used by the German Government as a directional measure of future economic development.

de: Das KOF Institut liefert fundierte Informationen im Bereich der Wirtschafts- und Konjunkturforschung. Sie erstellt eine Vielzahl von Prognosen und Indikatoren zur Konjunkturbeobachtung. Ihr Datenpool aus Unternehmensbefragungen ist einmalig in der Schweiz. Aus diesen Daten generiert die KOF verschiedene Indikatoren (KOF Konjunkturbarometer, KOF Beschäftigungsindikator, KOF Geschäftslageindikator, u.a.), die ein Stimmungsbild der Schweizer Wirtschaft wiedergeben. Ihre Umfrageresultate wertet sie vierteljährlich aus und stellt sie der Öffentlichkeit vor, ebenso ihre Konjunkturprognosen. Sie analysiert aber auch die Innovationstätigkeit Schweizer Unternehmen, liefert Studien zum Arbeitsmarkt, den Gesundheitsausgaben und kommentiert aktuelle wirtschaftliche Entwicklungen. So ist die KOF auch (zusammen mit dem ifo Institut in München) an der Gemeinschaftsdiagnose in Deutschland beteiligt, die der deutschen Regierung als Richtmass für die zukünftige wirtschaftliche Entwicklung dient.

it: l KOF fornisce informazioni approfondite in materia di ricerca economica e congiunturale, producendo svariati indicatori e previsioni per il monitoraggio congiunturale. Il pool di dati derivante da indagini tra le aziende è unico in Svizzera. A partire da questi dati, il KOF genera diversi indicatori (barometro congiunturale, indicatore di occupazione, situazione commerciale, e così via) che riflettono la realtà dell'economia svizzera. Valuta trimestralmente i risultati delle indagini e li presenta al pubblico, unitamente alle previsioni congiunturali. Ma il KOF analizza anche l'attività di innovazione delle imprese svizzere, svolge studi sulla spesa sanitaria o commenta gli ultimi sviluppi economici. Il KOF, inoltre (insieme all'Istituto ifo di Monaco di Baviera) partecipa alla previsione congiunta in Germania, che il governo tedesco utilizza come riferimento per gli sviluppi economici futuri.

value: KOF Harvester


kof-beschaftigungsindikator

title_for_slug: kof-beschaftigungsindikator

fr: emploi marche-de-lemploi

de: arbeitsmarkt beschaftigung

en: employment labour-market

fr: KOF Indicateur de l'emploi

en: KOF Employment Indicator

de: KOF Beschäftigungsindikator

fr: Le KOF indicateur de l’emploi est calculé à partir des enquêtes conjoncturelles trimestrielles du KOF. Dans le cadre de ses enquêtes, le KOF interroge des entreprises privées de Suisse sur leur appréciation du nombre actuel de leurs salariés et sur leur intention de modifier ses effectifs dans les trois mois qui suivent.

de: Der KOF Beschäftigungsindikator wird aus den vierteljährlichen Konjunkturumfragen der KOF berechnet. Im Rahmen dieser Umfragen befragt die KOF privatwirtschaftliche Unternehmen in der Schweiz, wie sie ihren gegenwärtigen Bestand an Beschäftigten beurteilen und ob sie diesen in den nächsten drei Monaten verändern wollen.

en: The KOF Employment Indicator is calculated on the basis of the quarterly KOF Business Tendency Surveys. As part of these surveys, the KOF asks private businesses in Switzerland how they consider their current staffing levels to be and whether they intend to change them over the coming three months.

arbeitsmarkt

display_name: arbeitsmarkt

beschaftigung

display_name: beschaftigung

emploi

display_name: emploi

employment

display_name: employment

labour-market

display_name: labour-market

marche-de-lemploi

display_name: marche-de-lemploi

work

fr: Travail, rémunération

de: Arbeit, Erwerb

en: Work and income

it: Lavoro e reddito


kof-economic-sentiment-indicator

title_for_slug: kof-economic-sentiment-indicator

fr: KOF Indice du climat économique

en: KOF Economic Sentiment Indicator

de: KOF Economic Sentiment Indicator

fr: Le KOF Indice du climat économique pour la Suisse (KOF Economic Sentiment Indicator) se base sur les résultats d’enquêtes conjoncturelles du KOF et de celle menées auprès des consommateurs par le Secrétariat d’État à l’économie (SECO). La méthode de calcul des indices pour la Suisse s’appuie sur la méthodologie de la Commission européenne. La Commission européenne calcule de cette manière les indices pour tous les pays membres de l’UE ainsi que pour différents agrégats, tels que l’UE dans son ensemble ou la zone euro.

en: The KOF Economic Sentiment Indicator for Switzerland is based on the results of the KOF Business Tendency Surveys and the Consumer Confidence Survey conducted by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). The calculation method used for the Swiss indicators follows the method employed by the EU Commission to calculate indicators for all EU member states as well as various aggregates, for instance total EU or Euro area.

de: Der KOF Economic Sentiment Indicator für die Schweiz basiert auf den Konjunkturumfragen der KOF und der Konsumentenbefragung des Staatssekretariats für Wirtschaft (SECO). Die Berechnungsmethode der Indikatoren für die Schweiz lehnt sich an die Methodik der EU-Kommission an. Die EU-Kommission berechnet auf diese Weise Indikatoren für alle Mitgliedsländer der EU sowie für verschiedene Aggregate, etwa der EU insgesamt oder den Euro-Raum.

climat-economique

display_name: climat-economique

economic-sentiment

display_name: economic-sentiment

okonomische-stimmung

display_name: okonomische-stimmung


globale-konjunkturbarometer

title_for_slug: globale-konjunkturbarometer

fr: Baromètres conjoncturels mondiaux

en: Global Economic Barometers

de: Globale Konjunkturbarometer

fr: Les Baromètres conjoncturels mondiaux sont un système d’indicateurs destiné à l’analyse en temps réel de l’évolution conjoncturelle mondiale. Il s’agit d’un projet de coopération du KOF Centre de recherches conjoncturelles de l’ETH Zürich et de la Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) de Rio de Janeiro (Brésil). Le système comprend deux sous- indicateurs : un indicateur coïncident et un indicateur avancé.

en: The Global Economic Barometers are a system of indicators that enables a timely analysis of global economic development. They represent a collaboration between the KOF Swiss Economic Institute and Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) based in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The system consists of two indicators: a coincident indicator and a leading indicator.

de: Die globalen Konjunkturbarometer sind ein Indikatorensystem für die zeitnahe Analyse der globalen Konjunkturentwicklung. Sie sind ein Kooperationsprojekt der KOF Konjunkturforschungsstelle der ETH Zürich und der Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) in Rio de Janeiro, Brasilien. Das System besteht aus zwei Teilindikatoren: einem Koinzidenz- und einem Frühindikator.

economie-mondiale

display_name: economie-mondiale

global-economy

display_name: global-economy

weltwirtschaft

display_name: weltwirtschaft


kof-business-situation-indicator

title_for_slug: kof-business-situation-indicator

fr: suisse situation-des-affaires

de: schweiz geschaftslageindikator

fr: KOF Indicateur de la situation des affaires

de: KOF Business Situation Indicator

en: KOF Geschäftslageindikator

fr: The KOF Business Situation Indicator is based on over 4,500 Swiss enterprise respondents. Each month, a survey is conducted among companies active in industry, retail, construction, project engineering as well as financial and insurance services. Companies in hotel and catering, wholesale and other services are interviewed in the first month of every quarter.

en: L’indicateur de la situation des affaires du KOF se fonde sur plus de 4500 informations d’entreprises de Suisse. Chaque mois, les entreprises des secteurs de l’industrie, du commerce de détail, du bâtiment, des bureaux d’études et des services financiers et assurantiels sont interrogées. Les entreprises de l’hôtellerie, du commerce de gros et des autres services font l’objet d’une enquête trimestrielle, à chaque fois le premier mois d’un nouveau trimestre.

de: Die KOF Geschäftslage basiert auf mehr als 4500 Meldungen von Unternehmen in der Schweiz. Monatlich werden Unternehmen in den Wirtschaftsbereichen Industrie, Detailhandel, Baugewerbe, Projektierung sowie Finanz- und Versicherungsdienstleistungen befragt. Unternehmen im Gastgewerbe, im Grosshandel und in den übrigen Dienstleistungen werden vierteljährlich, jeweils im ersten Monat eines Quartals, befragt.

bussiness-situation

display_name: bussiness-situation

economics

display_name: economics

geschaftslageindikator

display_name: geschaftslageindikator

situation-des-affaires

display_name: situation-des-affaires


maintainer: OGD-Koordinationsstelle St.Gallen

de: wahlen resultate abstimmungen

de: json

media_type: application/json

de: Wahlen und Abstimmungen Kanton St.Gallen (json)

format: JSON

mimetype: application/json

license: CC BY

de: csv

de: Wahlen und Abstimmungen Kanton St.Gallen (csv)

de: Wahl- und Abstimmungsresultate in den Jahren 2002-2022 aus dem Archiv des Portals wab.sg.ch des Kantons St.Gallen.

abstimmungen

display_name: abstimmungen

resultate

display_name: resultate

wahlen

display_name: wahlen

politics

fr: Politique

de: Politik

en: Politics

it: Politica

staatskanzlei-kanton-st-gallen

de: Staatskanzlei Kanton St.Gallen

de:
Die Staatskanzlei ist als Stabsstelle von Kantonsrat und Regierung die zentrale Schaltstelle in der kantonalen Staatsverwaltung. Die Staatskanzlei nimmt vielfältige Unterstützungs- und Koordinationsaufgaben wahr und verbindet die verschiedenen Akteure miteinander. Ob beratend, koordinierend oder federführend in gewissen Sachbereichen, die Staatskanzlei muss in ihrer Rolle immer durch Qualität, Verlässlichkeit und dienstleistungsorientierte Zusammenarbeit überzeugen. Dies bringt die Vision der Staatskanzlei auf den Punkt:

«Wir verbinden und überzeugen. Ihre Staatskanzlei.»

political_level: canton

value: DCAT Staatskanzlei Kanton St.Gallen


label: Geometadaten Kanton Zürich: GeoLion

label: geocat.ch permalink

media_type: WFS

format: WFS

name:
Amt für Raumentwicklung
               - Geoinformation

geoinformation-kanton-zuerich

fr: Département de Géoinformation du Canton de Zurich

de: Geoinformation Kanton Zürich

en: Department of Geoinformation of the Canton of Zurich

it: Dipartimento della geoinformazione del Cantone di Zurigo

fr:
Le département de géomatique est le centre de compétence du system d'information géographique du canton de Zurich.
Nous coordinons l'aquisition des géodonnées d'intérêt commun sur le territoire cantonal et les mettons à disposition des
secteurs public et privé et des particuliers.

en:
The department of geoinformation is the geospatial competency center of the Canton of Zurich.
We coordinate the acquisition of geodata within the cantonal territory and provide public, private, and government sectors with data of outstanding quality.

de: Die Abteilung Geoinformation ist das Kompetenzzentrum für räumliche Informationen im Kanton Zürich. Wir versorgen Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft und öffentliche Verwaltung mit qualitativ hochstehenden Geodaten und Informationen über den Kanton Zürich.

it: La divisione della geoinformazione è il centro d'eccellenza del Cantone di Zurigo per dati georeferenziati. Mettiamo a disposizione dati geografici e informazioni di alta qualità per l'economia, la società e la pubblica amministrazione su tutto il cantone.

value: ZH - Geocat Harvester

de: Allgemeiner WFS für Open-Government-Data des Kantons Zürich (OGD ZH WFS)


de: auszahlungen abstimmungen real-time wahlen

de: Aktuelle Wahl- bzw. Abstimmungsresultate Kanton St.Gallen (csv)

de: Aktuelle Wahl- bzw. Abstimmungsresultate Kanton St.Gallen (json)

de: Der Datensatz bildet eine Schnittstelle zu wab.sg.ch und liefert während des Wahl- oder Abstimmungssonntags die Auszählungen der Wahl- und Abstimmungsresultate des Kantons St.Gallen in Echtzeit. Der Datensatz wird alle 15 Minuten aktualisiert.Anmerkung: Zwischen Wahlen und Abstimmungen kann es sein, dass die Schnittstelle keine Daten liefert, da die neuen Wahlen und Abstimmungen bereits aufgeschaltet werden.

auszahlungen

display_name: auszahlungen

real-time

display_name: real-time


de: real-time wahlen api abstimmungen resultate

de: Schnittstelle zum Portal "Wahlen & Abstimmungen" des Kantons St.Gallen (wab.sg.ch) (json)

de: Schnittstelle zum Portal "Wahlen & Abstimmungen" des Kantons St.Gallen (wab.sg.ch) (csv)

de: Das Portal "Wahlen & Abstimmungen" des Kantons St.Gallen (wab.sg.ch) bietet eine Schnittstelle an, um auf die verfügbaren Abstimmungs- und Wahlresultate zugreifen zu können. Damit kann das gesamte Archiv oder auch die aktuellen Abstimmungs- oder Wahlresultate in Echtzeit abgefragt und genutzt werden.Unter folgendem Link ist die Nutzung der API-Schnittstelle ausführlich erklärt:https://github.com/OneGov/onegov-cloud/blob/master/docs/api/election_day/open_data_de.md

api

display_name: api


media_type: WMS

de: WMS Orthofotos Kanton Zürich in Echtfarben und als Falschfarbeninfrarot

format: WMS

de: WMS Orthofotos


de: Gemeindegrenzen in Übersichtsplangenauigkeit. Es stehen drei Datensätze zur Verfügung: Gemeinden: Offizieller Verlauf der Gemeindegrenzen, d.h. die Grenze der Stadt Zürich verläuft durch den Zürichsee, die Grenzen der übrigen Zürichsee- und der Greifenseegemeinden verlaufen entlang der Seeufer. Gemeinde-, Bezirks- und Kantonsgrenzen: Anhand dieser Linienversion können für kartografische Zwecke Gemeinde-, Bezirks- und Kantonsgrenzen sowie Grenzen auf Seeflächen unterschieden werden. Gemeinden mit Berücksichtigung von Seen: In dieser Variante sind Zürich-, Greifen-, Pfäffiker-, Chatzen- und Türlersee voll ausgespart.

de: WFS Gemeindegrenzen 1:5000


geography

fr: Géographie

de: Geographie

en: Geography

it: Geografia

health

fr: Santé

de: Gesundheit

en: Health

it: Sanità

label: Link zum Geoportal

spatial: Schweiz-BAG-Faeller

fr: Map (Preview) Aperçu map.geo.admin.ch

de: Map (Preview) Vorschau map.geo.admin.ch

en: Map (Preview)  map.geo.admin.ch

it: Map (Preview) Previsione map.geo.admin.ch

fr: Aperçu map.geo.admin.ch

de: Vorschau map.geo.admin.ch

en: Preview map.geo.admin.ch

it: Previsione map.geo.admin.ch

fr: Serveur de téléchargement de geo.admin.ch

de: Download Server von geo.admin.ch

en: Download server from geo.admin.ch

it: Server di download di geo.admin.ch

fr: RESTful API de geo.admin.ch

de: RESTful API von geo.admin.ch

en: RESTful API from geo.admin.ch

it: RESTful API da geo.admin.ch

format: API

fr: La méningo-encéphalite à tiques (FSME) est une infection transmise par les tiques, soumise à l'obligation légale de déclarer. Entre 2012 et 2022, au moins un cas de FSME a été déclaré dans les communes figurant en orange sur la carte.

de: Die Frühsommer-Meningoenzephalitis (FSME) ist eine durch Zecken übertragene Erkrankung, für die eine gesetzlich verankerte Meldepflicht besteht. Diese Karte zeigt in Orange die Gemeinden auf, in denen im Zeitraum 2012-2022 mindestens 1 Fall von FSME gemeldet wurden.

en: Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an infectious viral disease transmitted by ticks, which is subject to a statutory duty to report. This map shows in orange the communes in which at least one case of TBE was reported in the period 2012-2022.

it: La meningoencefalite primaverile-estiva (FSME) è una malattia trasmessa dalle zecche, per la quale è stato sancito per legge l'obbligo di dichiarazione. La presente cartina mostra in arancio i Comuni in cui nel periodo 2012-2022 è stato dichiarato almeno un caso di FSME.

bundesamt-fur-gesundheit-bag

fr: Office fédéral de la santé publique OFSP

de: Bundesamt für Gesundheit BAG

en: Federal Office of Public Health FOPH

it: Ufficio federale della sanità pubblica UFSP

fr: L'Office fédéral de la santé publique (OFSP) fait partie du Département fédéral de l'intérieur. De concert avec les cantons, il assume la responsabilité des domaines touchant à la santé publique ainsi que la mise en œuvre de la politique sanitaire. Autorité à vocation nationale, il représente les intérêts sanitaires de la Suisse dans les organisations internationales et auprès d'autres Etats.

de: Das Bundesamt für Gesundheit (BAG) ist Teil des Eidgenössischen Departements des Innern. Es ist - zusammen mit den Kantonen - verantwortlich für die Gesundheit der Schweizer Bevölkerung und für die Entwicklung der nationalen Gesundheitspolitik. Zudem vertritt das BAG als nationale Behörde die Schweiz in Gesundheitsbelangen in internationalen Organisationen und gegenüber anderen Staaten.

en: The Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) is part of the Federal Department of Home Affairs. Along with the cantons it is responsible for public health in Switzerland and for developing national health policy. As the national health authority, the FOPH also represents Switzerland's interests in the field of health in international organisations and with respect to other countries.

it: L'Ufficio federale della sanità pubblica (UFSP) è incorporato nel Dipartimento federale dell'interno. Unitamente ai Cantoni, è responsabile della salute della popolazione svizzera e dello sviluppo della politica nazionale in materia di salute. In qualità di autorità nazionale rappresenta inoltre gli interessi della Svizzera in materia di sanità in seno a organizzazioni internazionali e nei rapporti con altri Stati.

political_level: confederation

value: BAG - Geocat Harvester

fr: Lieux déclarés de piqûre pour la méningo-encéphalite à tiques (FSME), Suisse, 2012-2022

de: Gemeldete Stichorte der Frühsommer-Meningoenzephalitis (FSME), Schweiz, 2012-2022

en: Site of tick bite reported for tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), Switzerland, 2012-2022

it: Luoghi in cui sono stati dichiarati casi di meningoencefalite primaverile-estiva (FSME), Svizzera, 2012-2022


wfs-warmenutzungsatlas

title_for_slug: wfs-warmenutzungsatlas

de: Gebiete der Zulässigkeiten der verschiedenen Wärmenutzungen aus dem Untergrund und des Grundwassers. Tiefenbeschränkungen für Erdwärmesonden. Die Zone A wird im ÖREB geführt, die Zonen B-F sind im Datensatz Wärmenutzung (Vektor) enthalten.

name:
Amt für Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft
               - Abteilung Gewässerschutz

geoinformation-kanton-zuerich

de: Geoinformation Kanton Zürich

de: Die Abteilung Geoinformation ist das Kompetenzzentrum für räumliche Informationen im Kanton Zürich. Wir versorgen Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft und öffentliche Verwaltung mit qualitativ hochstehenden Geodaten und Informationen über den Kanton Zürich.

de: WFS Wärmenutzungsatlas


de: Dieser WFS beinhaltet die Standorte der Kandelaber im Kanton Zürich entlang Kantonsstrassen, kantonalen Hochleistungsstrassen (inkl. Rampen) und der Glattalbahn mit Informationen zu Status Bauart und Kandelabernummer.

name:
Tiefbauamt
               - Stab

de: WFS Beleuchtung


de: Gebiete in Objekten von überkommunaler Bedeutung oder Kant. Fördergebieten vor den ökologischen Ausgleich in denen der Kanton Zürich Zusatzbeiträge leistet.

name:
Amt für Landschaft und Natur
               - Fachstelle Naturschutz

de: WMS der kantonalen Fördergebiete für den ökologischen Ausgleich


de: Naturgefahrenkarte - Wassertiefenkarten - Intensitätsflächen

name:
Amt für Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft
               - Abteilung Wasserbau

de: WMS Naturgefahrenkarte - Intensitätsflächen


wfs-naturgefahrenkarte

title_for_slug: wfs-naturgefahrenkarte

de: WFS Naturgefahrenkarte


wms-klimamodell-zh-analysekarten-vektor

title_for_slug: wms-klimamodell-zh-analysekarten-vektor

de: Klimaanalysekarten aus der Anwendung des Klimamodells FITNAH für das Gebiet des Kantons ZH. Punktdaten des Windfeldes (Windrichtung und -geschwindigkeit) über den ganzen Kanton. Räumliche Genauigkeit: 25m.

name:
Amt für Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft
               - Abteilung Luft, Klima und Strahlung

de: WMS Klimamodell ZH: Analysekarten (Vektor)


de: Wild-Karte oder Topographische Karte des Kantons Zürich 1:25000.

de: WMS Historische Karte J. Wild (~1850) (OGD)


de: Risikokarte Naturgefahren mit den Teilen Hochwasser und Massenbewegungen (mit Hangmuren, permanente und spontane Rutschungen und Steinschlag).

de: WMS Risikokarte Naturgefahren


wms-gebaudevolumen-im-ha-raster

title_for_slug: wms-gebaudevolumen-im-ha-raster

de: Durchschnittliches Gebäudevolumen pro Hektare. Hektaren mit 3 oder wenigeren Bauten sind aus Gründen des Datenschutzes nicht aufgenommen.

name:
Amt für Abfall, Wasser, Energie und Luft
               - Abteilung Energie

de: WMS Gebäudevolumen im ha-Raster


de: Die Verkehrtechnische Abteilung der Kantonspolizei ist zuständig für die Verkehrsanordnungen im Kantonsgebiet (ohne Städte Zürich und Winterthur) und stellt die Verfügungen sämtlicher Strassensignalisationen/Markierungen aus. Diese Verfügungen bilden die Grundlage zur Nachführung der Höchstgeschwindigkeitssignale in der Strassendatenbank LOGO durch das TBA. Aus diesen Daten werden Abschnitte generiert. Halbjährlich werden die Daten ins SDE und in den GIS-Browser (inkl. WMS/WFS) exportiert. Die Datengrundlage ist das Geodatenelement GIS-ZH Nr. 54.3 (aus Geodatensatz GIS-ZH Nr. 54).

geoinformation-kanton-zuerich

de: Geoinformation Kanton Zürich

de: Die Abteilung Geoinformation ist das Kompetenzzentrum für räumliche Informationen im Kanton Zürich. Wir versorgen Gesellschaft, Wirtschaft und öffentliche Verwaltung mit qualitativ hochstehenden Geodaten und Informationen über den Kanton Zürich.

de: WFS Signalisierte Geschwindigkeit Kantonsstrassen


de: WMS der Rasterdarstellung der überkommunalen aktuellen Natur- und Landschaftsschutzverodnungen, SVO

de: WMS der überkommunalen Natur- und Landschaftsschutzverodnungen