maintainer: Robert Pazúr

en: grassland agriculture sentinel-2 remote-sensing phenology cropland habitat machine-learning switzerland vegetation-indices

en: Mask of unsealed surfaces of Switzerland based on 3 years Sentinel-2 NDVI 95th percentile threshold value: 0.7 (v1.0)

media_type: TIFF

en: !!! Please check out the newer version in this repository !!! Assuming that sealed surfaces have little or no phenological response we calculated a mask of unsealed surfaces based on the 3 years (2017-2019) Sentinel-2 NDVI 95th percentile threshold value: 0.7.

format: TIFF

en: (current version) Mask of unsealed surfaces of Switzerland based on 3 years Sentinel-2 NDVI 95th percentile threshold value: 0.7 (v1.5)

media_type: geotiff

format: GeoTIFF

en: Mask of unsealed surfaces of Switzerland based on 3 years Sentinel-2 NDVI 95th percentile threshold value: 0.6  (v1.0)

en:
!!! Please check out the newer version in the repository !!!
Mask of unsealed surfaces of Switzerland based on 3 years (2017-2019) Sentinel-2 NDVI 95th percentile threshold value: 0.6

en: GEE (Google Earth Engine) script (JavaScript) to derived the output map  (v1.5)

media_type: JS

en: The code used in Google Earth Engine to derive the cropland, grassland and shrubland map of Switzerland. Compare to the previous version the newer version includes the shadow masking procedure which might be important in the mountainous areas.

en: (current version) Cropland and grassland map of Switzerland (v.1.5)

en: (current version) Cropland, grassland, and shrubland map of Switzerland (v.1.5)

en: GEE (Google Earth Engine) script (JavaScript) to derived the output map  (v1.0)

en: !!! Please check out the newer version in the repository !!! The code used in Google Earth Engine to derive the cropland, grassland and shrubland map of Switzerland

en: (current version) Mask of unsealed surfaces of Switzerland based on 3 years Sentinel-2 NDVI 95th percentile threshold value: 0.6 (v1.5)

en: Assuming that sealed surfaces have little or no phenological response we calculated a mask of unsealed surfaces based on the 3 years (2017-2019) Sentinel-2 NDVI 95th percentile threshold value: 0.6.

en: Cropland, grassland, and shrubland map of Switzerland (v1.0)

en: !!! Please check out the newer version in this repository !!! (1) cropland; (2) grassland; (3) shrubland; other LC classes are masked out from the map

en: Cropland and grassland map of Switzerland  (v.1.0)

en: !!! Please check out the newer version in this repository !!! (1) cropland; (2) grassland; other LC classes are masked out from the map

en: We developed a map of cropland and grassland allocation for Switzerland based on several indices dominantly derived from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery captured over multiple growing seasons. The classification model was trained based on parcel-based data derived from landholder reporting. The mapping was conducted on Google Earth Engine platform using random forest classifier. Areas of high vegetation, shrubland, sealed surface and non-vegetated areas were masked out from the country-wide map. The resulting map has high accuracy in lowlands as well as mountainous areas.

agriculture

display_name: agriculture

cropland

display_name: cropland

grassland

display_name: grassland

habitat

display_name: habitat

machine-learning

display_name: machine-learning

phenology

display_name: phenology

remote-sensing

display_name: remote-sensing

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

vegetation-indices

display_name: vegetation-indices

en: Cropland and grassland map of Switzerland based on Sentinel-2 data


data-set-on-snow-instability

maintainer: EnviDat Support

title_for_slug: data-set-on-snow-instability

en: rutschblock snow-avalanche avalanche-forcasting slab-tensile-support snow-stability-evaluation failure-initiation crack-propagation slab weak-layer propgatoin-saw-test

state: active

type: dataset

en: Read-me file on snow instability data

media_type: application/pdf

format: PDF

mimetype: application/pdf

en: data set on snow instability

media_type: text/csv

format: CSV

mimetype: text/csv

en:
These data on snow instability include three data subsets that were analyzed and the results published by Reuter and Schweizer (2018) who suggest a novel framework on how to describe snow instability by failure initiation, crack propagation and slab tensile support.

Please refer to the Read-me file for further details on the data.

These data are the basis of the following publication:
Reuter, B. and Schweizer, J., 2018. Describing snow instability by failure initiation, crack propagation and slab tensile support. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, doi: 10.1029/2018GL078069.

avalanche-forcasting

display_name: avalanche-forcasting

crack-propagation

display_name: crack-propagation

failure-initiation

display_name: failure-initiation

propgatoin-saw-test

display_name: propgatoin-saw-test

rutschblock

display_name: rutschblock

slab

display_name: slab

slab-tensile-support

display_name: slab-tensile-support

snow-avalanche

display_name: snow-avalanche

snow-stability-evaluation

display_name: snow-stability-evaluation

weak-layer

display_name: weak-layer

education

fr: Education, science

de: Bildung, Wissenschaft

en: Education and science

it: Formazione e scienza

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester

en: Data set on snow instability


maintainer: Anita C. Risch

en: nutrient-network soil grassland herbivore mineralization fertilization nitrification climate global-change ammonification nitrogen

en: Risch et al. 2020 - Raw data for publication "Global impacts of fertilization and herbivore removal on soil net nitrogen mineralization are modulated by local climate and soil properties"

en:
we assessed how the removal of mammalian herbivores (Fence) and fertilization with growth-limiting nutrients (N, P, K, plus nine essential macro- and micronutrients; NPK) individually, and in combination (NPK+Fence), affected potential and realized soil net Nmin across 22 natural and semi-natural grasslands on five continents. Our sites spanned a comprehensive range of climatic and edaphic conditions found across the grassland biome. We focused on grasslands, because they cover 40-50% of the ice-free land surface and provide vital ecosystem functions and services. They are particularly important for forage production and C sequestration. Worldwide, grasslands store approximately 20-30% of the Earth’s terrestrial C, most of it in the soil (Schimel, 1995; White et al., 2000).

Study sites and experimental design
The 22 sites contributing to this project are part of the Nutrient Network Global Research Cooperative (NutNet, https://nutnet.umn.edu/). Mean annual temperature across our 22 sites ranged from -4 to 22°C, mean annual precipitation from 252 to 1,592 mm, and elevations from 6 to 4,261 m above sea level (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S1). Soil organic C varied from 0.8 to 7.8%, soil total N from 0.1 to 0.6%, and the soil C:N ratio from 9.1 to 21.5. Soil clay content spanned from 3.0 to 35%, and soil pH from 3.4 to 7.6 (Supplementary Table S2). Thus, the sites covered a wide range of environments in which grasslands occur (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S1 & S2).
At each site, the effects of nutrient addition and herbivore removal were tested via a randomized-block design (Borer et al., 2014; Supplementary Fig. S1a). Three replicate blocks with 10 treatment plots each were established at each site, with the exception of the site at bldr.us, where only two blocks were established (Supplementary Fig. S1a). The 10 plots were randomly assigned to a nutrient or fencing treatment, but only a subset of four plots was used in the current study, each with a different treatment (see below; Supplementary Fig. S1a). All plots were 5 x 5 m and divided into four 2.5 x 2.5 m subplots (Supplementary Fig. S1b). Each subplot was further divided into four 1 x 1 m square sampling plots, one of which was set aside for soil sampling (Borer et al., 2014; Supplementary Fig. S1b). Plots were separated by at least 1 m wide walkways.
In this study, we collected data from the following four treatments: (i) untreated control plots (Control), (ii) herbivore removal plots (Fence), (iii) plots fertilized with N, P, K, plus nine essential macro and micronutrients (NPK), and (iv) plots with simultaneous fertilizer addition and herbivore removal (NPK+Fence; Supplementary Fig. S1a). The number of years of treatment differed among sites (2 – 9 years since start of treatment; Supplementary Table S1). For the nutrient additions, all sites applied 10 g N m-2 yr-1 as time-release urea; 10 g P m-2 yr-1 as triple-super phosphate; 10 g K m-2 yr-1 as potassium sulfate. A micro-nutrient mix (Fe, S, Mg, Mn, Cu, Zn, B, Mo, Ca) was applied at 100 g m-2 together with K in the first year of treatments but not thereafter.
The vertebrate herbivore removal treatment (Fence) was established by fencing two plots, one control and one NPK plot, within each of the blocks (Supplementary Fig. S1a). We designed the fences so that they would effectively exclude aboveground mammalian herbivores with a body mass of over 50 g (Borer et al., 2014). At the majority of sites, the height of the fences was 180 cm, and the fence design included wire mesh (1 cm holes) on the first 90 cm along with a 30 cm outward-facing flange stapled to the ground to exclude burrowing animals; climbing and subterranean animals may potentially still access these plots (Borer et al., 2014). For slight modifications in fence design at a few sites see Supplementary Table S3. While most sites only had native herbivores, a few sites (4) were also grazed by domestic animals (Supplementary Table S1).
Potential and realized soil net N mineralization, ammonification, nitrification and other soil properties
Each site participating in the study received a package containing identical material from the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL) to be used for sampling and on-site N incubations. For the field incubation, we followed the protocol by Risch et al. (2015, 2019). Briefly, we drove a 5 x 15 cm (diameter x depth) steel cylinder 13.5 cm deep into the soil after clipping the vegetation at randomized locations in each plot. The top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty to capture incoming N from run-off or deposition with a polyester mesh bag (mesh-size 250 µm) filled with 13.2 ± 0.9 g of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (1:1 mixture; ion-exchanger I KA/ion-exchanger III AA, Merck AG, Darmstadt). The bag was fixed in place with a metal Seeger ring (Bruetsch-Rüegger Holding, Urdorf, Switzerland). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed another resin bag to capture N leached from the soil column. The exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags by stirring the mixture in 1.2M HCl for 1 h and then rinsing it with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 μS/cm. The cylinders were then re-inserted into the cored hole, level with the soil surface, and incubated for an average of 42 days (range 40 to 57days). The individual site coordinators chose the timing of incubation to start approximately six weeks prior to peak plant biomass production. All incubations were completed between February 2015 and January 2016 accounting for differences in growing season between northern and southern hemispheres. At the end of the incubation, the cylinders were re-collected and immediately shipped to WSL in an insulated box together with cold packs to halt further mineralization. Gloves were worn at all times to avoid contamination of the samples. Upon arrival at WSL, we extracted the resin bags and a 20 g subsample of sieved soil (4 mm) separately in a 100 ml PE-bottle with 80 ml 1 M KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and filtered through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience). We measured NO3- (colorimetrically; Norman & Stucki, 1981) and NH4+concentrations (flow injection analysis; FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer) on these filtrates.
At the start of the field incubation, we additionally collected two soil cores of 5 x 12 cm (diameter x depth) in each sampling plot and composited them to measure potential soil net Nmin, soil chemical and biological properties (see below). We also collected an additional sample (5 x 12 cm) to assess soil physical properties, which remained within the steel cylinder. Both ends were tightly closed with plastic caps. Cores were carefully packed to avoid further disturbance, and together with the composited soil samples, were shipped to the laboratory at WSL within a few days after collection.
From the composited samples, we extracted an equivalent of 20 g dry soil with KCl, as described above, and measured NO3- and NH4+concentrations. Realized soil net Nmin was then calculated as the difference between the inorganic N content of samples collected at the end of the incubation (plus N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation; values were scaled to represent daily mineralization rates (mg N kg-1soil d-1; Risch et al., 2015). Realized soil net Nmin values represent an average period of 42 days prior to peak biomass, typically the highest period of biological activity, and not the entire year (Risch et al., 2019).
A second subsample of the composited sample was used to determine potential soil net Nmin in the laboratory (Risch et al., 2019). Briefly, we weighed duplicate samples (8 g dry soil) into 50-ml Falcon tubes. Soil moisture was brought to 60% of the field capacity of each plot, the Falcon tubes tightly closed and then incubated at 20°C for 42 days in a dark room. Every week the Falcon tubes were opened and ventilated. At the end of the incubation, the soil samples were extracted the same way as described above and NO3- and NH4+ was determined. Potential soil net Nmin was calculated as the difference between the N content before and after the incubation and scaled to represent daily values (mg N kg-1soil d-1). Using our NO3- and NH4+ measures we also calculated potential and realized soil net nitrification and soil net ammonification to be able to better understand the drivers of fertilization and herbivore removal effects on potential and realized soil net Nmin.
A third subsample of the composite soil sample was sieved (2 mm mesh) and microbial biomass (μg Cmic g-1 soil dry weight) was estimated by measuring the maximal respiratory response to the addition of glucose solution (4 mg glucose per g soil dry weight dissolved in distilled water; substrate-induced respiration method) on approximately 5.5 g of soil (Anderson & Domsch, 1978). The rest of the composited sample was dried at 65°C for 48 h, ground and sieved (2 mm mesh) to assess a series of soil chemical properties (Risch et al., 2019). We measured the percentage of clay as an indicator of soil texture (Gee & Bauder, 1986; Risch et al., 2019).
Statistical analyses
Potential and realized soil net Nmin were square root transformed to account for a highly skewed data distribution (yt = sign(y)*sqrt|y|; negative values in the data set impeded log transformation). To assess treatment effects on potential and realized soil net Nmin, we used linear mixed effects models (LMMs) fitted by maximum likelihood using the lme function from the nlme package (version 3.131.1; Pinheiro et al., 2016), R version 3.6.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Treatment (Control, Fence, NPK, NPK+Fence) was a fixed factor, with site and block as random factors, where block was nested within site. We also tested for effects of time since start of treatments in preliminary analyses by adding total treatment years as an additional fixed factor. We did not find a significant effect of years of treatment, and thus dropped this variable from the models. The LMMs were corrected using varIdent if the homogeneity of variance criterion was not met (Pinheiro et al., 2016). To visualize our results, we calculated treatment effects using Cohens’ d statistic (Cohen, 1977; Koricheva et al., 2013). Note that calculating response ratios (or log response ratios) was not possible with our data, as we have both negative and positive values. We also fitted LMMs for potential and realized soil net ammonification and nitrification to gain more insight into how global change affects the processes underpinning potential and realized soil net Nmin. We also sqrt-transformed (see above) these dependent variables. Treatment was included as a fixed factor with random factors as described above. In addition, we assessed how potential and realized soil net Nmin were related to potential and realized soil net ammonification and nitrification, respectively. For this, we calculated site averages for each treatment separately. We then ran LMMs, with potential and realized soil net Nmin as the dependent variable, potential and realized soil net ammonification/nitrification as the independent ones. Site was included as a random factor.
Based on our previous work (Risch et al., 2019) and the existing literature (Schimel & Bennett, 2004; Liu et al., 2017), we developed a priori causal conceptual models of relationships among treatments, environmental drivers, and potential and realized soil net Nmin (Supplementary Fig. S2) to test with structural equation modelling (SEM) using a d-sep approach (Shipley, 2009; Lefcheck, 2016). The variables included in the model were long-term climatic conditions, specifically, site-level mean annual precipitation (MAP) and temperature of the wettest quarter (T.q.wet), plot-level soil texture (clay content) and soil microbial biomass. Mean annual precipitation and T.q.wet were obtained from WorldClim (Hijmans et al., 2005) (http://www.worldclim.org/) and together with the experimental treatments were predicted to directly affect soil properties and soil net Nmin (Supplementary Fig. S2). Soil clay content was, in turn, predicted to affect microbial biomass and soil net Nmin. Because we determined microbial biomass prior to incubating the samples in the laboratory or field, we assumed that the abundance of these microbes would be responsible for N process rates and not vice versa (Supplementary Fig. S2). We tested our conceptual model (Supplementary Fig. S2) using the piecewiseSEM package (version 2.0.2; Lefcheck, 2016) in R 3.4.0, in which a structured set of linear models are fitted individually. This approach allowed us to account for the nested experimental design, and overcome some of the limitations of standard structural equation models, such as small sample sizes (Shipley, 2009; Lefcheck, 2016). We used the lme function of the nlme package to model response variables, including site as a random factor. Good fit of the SEM was assumed when Fisher’s C values were non-significant (p > 0.05). For all significant interactions between covariates and experimental treatments detected in the SEMs, we calculated treatment effect sizes, i.e. the differences in potential or realized soil net Nmin between Control and treatments (Fence, NPK, NPK+Fence) and plotted these values against the climate or soil covariates. Finally, we fitted LMMs for the soil variables included in our SEMs, with treatment as the fixed factor, and with site and block as random factors, where block was nested within site.

format: XLS

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:

Risch Anita C., Zimmermann, Stefan, Moser, Barbara, Schütz, Martin, Hagedorn, Frank, Firn, Jennifer, Fay, Philip A., Adler, Peter B., Biederman, Lori A., Blair, John M., Borer, Elizabeth T., Broadbent, Arthur A.D., Brown, Cynthia S., Cadotte, Marc W., Caldeira, Maria C., Davies, Kendi F., di Virgilio, Augustina, Eisenhauer, Nico, Eskelinen, Anu, Knops, Johannes M.H., MacDougall, Andrew S., McCulley, Rebecca L., Melbourne, Brett A., Moore, Joslin L., Power, Sally A., Prober, Suzanne M., Seabloom, Eric W., Siebert, Julia, Silveira, Maria L. , Speziale, Karina L., Stevens, Carly J., Tognetti, Pedro M., Virtanen, Risto, Yahdjian, Laura, Ochoa-Hueso, Raul (accepted). Global impacts of fertilization and herbivore removal on soil net nitrogen mineralization are modulated by local climate and soil properties. Global Change Biology

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

We assessed how the removal of mammalian herbivores (Fence) and fertilization with growth-limiting nutrients (N, P, K, plus nine essential macro- and micronutrients; NPK) individually, and in combination (NPK+Fence), affected potential and realized soil net Nmin across 22 natural and semi-natural grasslands on five continents. Our sites spanned a comprehensive range of climatic and edaphic conditions found across the grassland biome. We focused on grasslands, because they cover 40-50% of the ice-free land surface and provide vital ecosystem functions and services. They are particularly important for forage production and C sequestration. Worldwide, grasslands store approximately 20-30% of the Earth’s terrestrial C, most of it in the soil (Schimel, 1995; White et al., 2000).

ammonification

display_name: ammonification

climate

display_name: climate

fertilization

display_name: fertilization

global-change

display_name: global-change

grassland

display_name: grassland

herbivore

display_name: herbivore

mineralization

display_name: mineralization

nitrification

display_name: nitrification

nitrogen

display_name: nitrogen

nutrient-network

display_name: nutrient-network

soil

display_name: soil

en: Anthropogenic change and soil net N mineralization


en: terrestrial-laser-scans depth-of-snowfall gridded-data antarctica terrestiral-laserscanning

en: Scan from 11 January 2019, 10 cm resolution

media_type: ascii x, y, z

format: SERVICE

en: Scan from 21 December 2018, 10 cm resolution

en: Scan from 4 January 2019, 10 cm resolution

en: Scan from 27 December 2018, 10 cm resolution

en: Scan from 2 January 2019, 1 mm resolution

en: Scan from 27 December 2018, 1 mm resolution

en: Scan from 2 January 2019, 10 cm resolution

en: Scan from 4 January 2019, 1 mm resolution

en: Scan from 11 January 2019, 1 mm resolution

en: Scan from 21 December 2018, 1 mm resolution

en:
Surface topography maps (spatial extent: 400 m x 400 m) obtained at approximately 300 m from the top of the Hammarryggen Ice Rise in Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica, using a Riegl VZ-6000 Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS). Scans were obtained on 5 days in the 2018-2019 Austral summer: on December 21 and 27, and January 2, 4 and 11. By using reflectors installed on bamboo poles, scans were registered with respect to the reflectors, such that the difference between two successive scans reveals the spatial patterns of erosion and deposition of snow. On each scan day, we used multiple scan positions to create one combined point cloud. After applying an octree filter on the point cloud, a 3D surface was obtained. For each day, the dataset contains a 1 mm and a 10 cm octree filter resolution file, only including points in a 400 m x 400 m area centered around the scan positions.

Notes:

* All files in the dataset are in the same coordinate system. However, this coordinate system is arbitrary (i.e., not related to any global coordinate system).

* From the installed reflectors, 4 reflectors could be used over the full period. The scan accuracy is generally higher within the area enclosed by the reflectors.

* The scans from January 2 were found to have exhibited small tilt during the scan and are of lesser accuracy.

* By walking along fixed corridors, disturbance of the snow was limited.

antarctica

display_name: antarctica

depth-of-snowfall

display_name: depth-of-snowfall

gridded-data

display_name: gridded-data

terrestiral-laserscanning

display_name: terrestiral-laserscanning

terrestrial-laser-scans

display_name: terrestrial-laser-scans

en: Terrestrial laser scans on Hammarryggen Ice Rise, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica


maintainer: Jana von Freyberg

en: snowpack-outflow solutes stable-water-isotopes snowmelt-lysimeter snowmelt-rate

en: The dataset contains volumes, solutes and stable water isotopes of snowpack outflow at daily resolution. 10-minute data are provided of the measurements taken by three snowmelt lysimeter systems at spatially-distributed locations.

en:
This data contain volumes, solutes and isotopes of snowpack outflow measured by a snowmelt lysimeter system at three locations in the southern Alp catchment, situated Central Switzerland. The river Alp is a snow-dominated catchment situated in Central Switzerland characterized by an elevation range from 840 to 1898 m a.s.l.
The dataset provides solutes (major anions and cations, trace metals) and stable water isotopes and water fluxes (snowpack outflow volumes) at daily intervals from several sampling locations. Additionally, the data measured by the snowmelt lysimeter system are provided in 10-minute resolution.

snowmelt-lysimeter

display_name: snowmelt-lysimeter

snowmelt-rate

display_name: snowmelt-rate

snowpack-outflow

display_name: snowpack-outflow

solutes

display_name: solutes

stable-water-isotopes

display_name: stable-water-isotopes

education

en: Education and science

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Daily data of the volumes, solutes and isotopes in snowpack outflow measured at three locations in the southern Alp catchment


maintainer: Tessa Hegetschweiler

en: recreational-activities forest adolescents teenagers childhood

en: Questionnaire school survey

en: The questionnaire used in the survey at 8 schools aimed at teenagers in German.

en: Survey at schools 2017

en: The dataset of the questionnaire survey at schools in SPSS-format.

en: Dataset comments

en: The codebook to the dataset

en: Dataset survey at schools

en: The dataset of the questionnaire survey at schools in excel format.

en: The data results from a questionnaire survey conducted at 8 schools in the cantons Zurich, Aargau and St. Gallen. Respondents aged 13-22 years. The aim of the survey was to gain insight into teenagers' relationship to the forest, reasons for visiting or not visiting the forest and activities in the forest.

adolescents

display_name: adolescents

childhood

display_name: childhood

forest

display_name: forest

recreational-activities

display_name: recreational-activities

teenagers

display_name: teenagers

en: Factors influencing teenagers' forest visit frequency


en: incoming longwave-radiation shortwave-radiation outgoing weissfluhjoch

en: DATA ACCESS

en: Parameter file

media_type: text/plain

format: TXT

mimetype: text/plain

en: Processing doc

en: Metadata

en:
Corrected incoming and outgoing shortwave and longwave 2 min radiation measurements at the Weissfluhjoch summit, Davos, CH.

 References
1. Marty, C., Philipona, R., Frohlich, C., Ohmura, A.. Altitude dependence of surface radiation fluxes and cloud forcing in the alps: results from the alpine surface radiation budget network. 2002. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. Volume 72. Issue 3-4. 137-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007040200019. 10.1007/s007040200019.
2. Christoph Marty. Surface Radiation, Cloud Forcing and Greenhouse Effect in the Alps. 2000. Institute fuer Klimaforschung ETH. Zuercher Klima-Schriften. Volume 79. http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:23491/eth-23491-01.pdf.

incoming

display_name: incoming

longwave-radiation

display_name: longwave-radiation

outgoing

display_name: outgoing

shortwave-radiation

display_name: shortwave-radiation

weissfluhjoch

display_name: weissfluhjoch

en: ASRB_WFJ: Shortwave and longwave radiation measurements (2 min) at the Weissfluhjoch research site, Davos


maintainer: Achille Capelli

en: liquid-water-content snow snow-water-equivalent gnss swe lwc gps

en: Daily observer data for the site Weissfluhjoch at 2540 m a.s.l (46°49’47’’ N, 9°48’34’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: Snow profiles data for the site Weissfluhjoch at 2540 m a.s.l (46°49’47’’ N, 9°48’34’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: Snow and meteo data from automatic sensors for the site Weissfluhjoch at 2540 m a.s.l (46°49’47’’ N, 9°48’34’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: Snow profiles data from Küblis at 820 m a.s.l. (46°54’48’’N, 9°46’54’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: Daily data for Laret at 1510 m a.s.l. (46°50’2’’N, 9°52’17’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020. These data were processed to daily values from the other data files.

en: GNSS derived SWE, LWC and HS from Küblis at 820 m a.s.l. (46°54’48’’N, 9°46’54’’E) for the two winters 2018-20

en: Daily data from Küblis at 820 m a.s.l. (46°54’48’’N, 9°46’54’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020. These data were processed to daily values from the other data files.

en: Daily data for the site Weissfluhjoch at 2540 m a.s.l (46°49’47’’ N, 9°48’34’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020. These data were processed to daily values from the other data files.

en: Profile data for Laret at 1510 m a.s.l. (46°50’2’’N, 9°52’17’’E) for the two winter 2018-2020.

en: Daily observer data from automatic sensors from Klosters (1210 m a.s.l. ,46°51’49’’N, 9°53’17’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: GNSS derived SWE, HS, and LWC for the site Weissfluhjoch at 2540 m a.s.l (46°49’47’’ N, 9°48’34’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

media_type: .csv

en: GNSS derived data for Laret at 1510 m a.s.l. (46°50’2’’N, 9°52’17’’E) for the two winter 2018-2020.

en: Snow and meteo data from automatic sensors from Küblis at 820 m a.s.l. (46°54’48’’N, 9°46’54’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: Snow profiles data from Klosters (1210 m a.s.l. ,46°51’49’’N, 9°53’17’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: GNSS derived SWE, LWC and HS from Klosters (1210 m a.s.l. ,46°51’49’’N, 9°53’17’’E) for the two winters 2018-20

en: Webcam images

media_type: ZIP

en: Webcam images showing some typical differences in the snow conditions at the four sites (Küblis, Klosters, Laret and Weissfluhjoch) for two time periods (14-18.3.2019 and 27.1-11.2.2020). Both time periods included a precipitation event with partial rain-on–snow occurring at the lower locations.

format: ZIP

en: Manual profiles

media_type: .zip

en: Data of the traditional manual profiles for the locations Weissfluhjoch, Klosters and Küblis. For the location of Küblis there are no traditional manual profile data. We provided the data as both PDF and .CAAML format (See https://niviz.org/ or http://caaml.org/Schemas/V5.0/Profiles/SnowProfileIACS/CAAMLv5_SnowProfileIACS.pdf). Moreover, we added LWC and density profiles when available (all locations).

en: Daily observer data from Küblis at 820 m a.s.l. (46°54’48’’N, 9°46’54’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: Snow and meteo data from automatic sensors from Klosters (1210 m a.s.l. ,46°51’49’’N, 9°53’17’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020.

en: Snow and meteo data from automatic sensors for Laret at 1510 m a.s.l. (46°50’2’’N, 9°52’17’’E) for the two winter 2018-2020.

en: Daily data from Klosters (1210 m a.s.l. ,46°51’49’’N, 9°53’17’’E) for the two winters 2018-2020. These data were processed to daily values from the other data files.

en: This database contains GNSS derived snow water equivalent (SWE), liquid water content (LWC), and snow height (HS) and reference data collected during the two winter 2018-2020 at 4 sites Weissfluhjoch (2540 m asl, 46°49’47’’ N, 9°48’34’’E), Laret (1515 m asl, . 46°50’2’’N, 9°52’17’’E), Klosters (1200 m asl, 46°51’49’’N, 9°53’17’’E), and Küblis (815 m asl, 46°54’48’’N, 9°46’54’’E).

gnss

display_name: gnss

gps

display_name: gps

liquid-water-content

display_name: liquid-water-content

lwc

display_name: lwc

snow

display_name: snow

envidat

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Snow water equivalent measurements with low-cost GNSS receivers along a steep elevation gradient in the East-ern Swiss Alps


maintainer: Anita Risch

en: exclusion invertebrates swiss-national-park grazing vertebrates subalpine ecosystem-coupling grassland ecosystem-multifunctionality ecosystem-functions

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

education

en: Education and science

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


maintainer: Sven-Eric Hopf

en: iap fraxinus forest monitoring ash-dieback

en: Monitoring of ash trees as part of the Intercantonal Forest Observation Programme

media_type: .pdf

en: Packgroun information on data for the publication: Spread and Severity of Ash Dieback in Switzerland – Tree Characteristics and Landscape Features Explain Varying Mortality Probability, (Klesse et al. 2021, Front. For. Glob. Change 4:645920., doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.645920)

en:
In 2013, the Institute for Applied Plant Biology (IAP) started a monitoring programme to study the development and the spatial variation of the ash dieback disease with the aim to find some partially resistant European ash trees (Fraxinus excelsior).
We collaborate as co-authors for the publication: Spread and Severity of Ash Dieback in Switzerland - Tree Characteristics and Landscape Features Explain Varying Mortality Probability (Klesse et al. 2021 in frontiers)

ash-dieback

display_name: ash-dieback

forest

display_name: forest

fraxinus

display_name: fraxinus

iap

display_name: iap

monitoring

display_name: monitoring


waldgesellschaften

agriculture

fr: Agriculture, sylviculture

de: Land- und Forstwirtschaft

en: Agriculture, forestry

it: Agricoltura, selvicoltura

geography

fr: Géographie

de: Geographie

en: Geography

it: Geografia

territory

fr: Territoire et environnement

de: Raum und Umwelt

en: Territory and environment

it: Territorio e ambiente

title_for_slug: waldgesellschaften

label: geocat.ch permalink

spatial: Kanton Glarus (GL)

de: Waldgesellschaften

de: WMS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.biota.waldgesellschaften

format: WMS

de: WFS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

format: WFS

de: Waldgesellschaften, Waldtypen.

en: Office of Geoinformation, Canton of Glarus

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus. Zuständig für die kantonale Geodaten-Infrastruktur inklusive Geoportal und Datenbereitstellung.

political_level: canton

value: Glarus-kt - Geocat Harvester


stromversorgungssicherheit-netzgebiete

culture

fr: Culture, médias, société de l'information, sport

de: Kultur, Medien, Informationsgesellschaft, Sport

en: Culture, media, information society, sport

it: Cultura, media, società dell'informazione, sport

energy

fr: Energie

de: Energie

en: Energy

it: Energia

title_for_slug: stromversorgungssicherheit-netzgebiete

de: energie strom stromnetz

de: Stromversorgungssicherheit Netzgebiete

de: Stromversorgungssicherheit, Netzgebiete (Versorger) sowie kantonale Ausnahmen.

name: Abteilung Umweltschutz und Energie (DBU)

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus


de: schutz naturgefahr naturereignis

de: Schutzwald

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.naturalhazards.schutzwald

de: Schutzwald - Schutz vor Naturgefahren.


waldstrassen

geography

de: Geographie

mobility

fr: Mobilité et transports

de: Mobilität und Verkehr

en: Mobility and Transport

it: Mobilità e trasporti

title_for_slug: waldstrassen

de: verkehrsnetz strasse forststrasse waldnutzung

de: Waldstrassen

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.transportation.waldstrassen

de: Forstwirtschaftliche Waldstrassen.


territory

de: Raum und Umwelt

de: raumentwicklung richtplan richtplanung

de: Richtplankarte 2004

de: WMS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.planning.richtplan2004

de: Kantonaler Richtplan 2004 (Neudruck 2016).

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus. Zuständig für die kantonale Geodaten-Infrastruktur inklusive Geoportal und Datenbereitstellung.


statische-waldgrenzen-glarus

agriculture

de: Land- und Forstwirtschaft

title_for_slug: statische-waldgrenzen-glarus

de: raumentwicklung nutzungsplanung waldfeststellung oreb

de: Statische Waldgrenzen Glarus

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.biota.waldgrenzen-1632

de: WFS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Statische Waldgrenzen in Bauzonen, Datensatz der Gemeinde Glarus (1632). Statische Waldgrenzen werden vom Kanton auf der Grundlage eines Waldfeststellungsverfahrens festgelegt.

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus


statische-waldgrenzen-glarus-sud

geography

de: Geographie

title_for_slug: statische-waldgrenzen-glarus-sud

de: Statische Waldgrenzen Glarus Süd

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.biota.waldgrenzen-1631

de: Statische Waldgrenzen in Bauzonen, Datensatz der Gemeinde Glarus Süd (1631). Statische Waldgrenzen werden vom Kanton auf der Grundlage eines Waldfeststellungsverfahrens festgelegt.


kulturguterschutz-objekte

culture

de: Kultur, Medien, Informationsgesellschaft, Sport

population

fr: Population

de: Bevölkerung

en: Population

it: Popolazione

title_for_slug: kulturguterschutz-objekte

de: Kulturgüterschutz-Objekte

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.society.kgs-objekte_lokal,ch.gl.society.kgs-objekte_national-regional

de: Inventar der Kulturgüterschutzobjekte (KGS-Objekte) von nationaler, regionaler und lokaler Bedeutung (Kategorien A, B, C).


fruchtfolgeflachen-fff

territory

de: Raum und Umwelt

title_for_slug: fruchtfolgeflachen-fff

de: fruchtfolgeflachen-fff kulturflache landwirtschaftliche-bewirtschaftung raumentwicklung richtplanung

de: Fruchtfolgeflächen FFF

de: WMS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.planning.fruchtfolgeflaechen

de: Sachplan Fruchtfolgeflächen (FFF). Fruchtfolgeflächen (FFF) sind die wertvollsten Landwirtschaftsflächen der Schweiz. Mit dem Sachplan FFF werden die besten Ackerflächen geschützt.

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus. Zuständig für die kantonale Geodaten-Infrastruktur inklusive Geoportal und Datenbereitstellung.


agriculture

de: Land- und Forstwirtschaft

de: forstkreis forstrevier waldnutzung

de: Forstreviere

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.biota.forstreviere

de: WFS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Einteilung der Forstreviere im Kanton Glarus.

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus


landwirtschaftliche-nutzung

geography

de: Geographie

title_for_slug: landwirtschaftliche-nutzung

de: Landwirtschaftliche Nutzung

de: Landwirtschaftliche Nutzung: Betriebsstandorte/Bauernhöfe, Bewirtschaftungseinheiten, Nutzungsflächen, Biodiversitätsförderflächen Qualitätsstufe II, Biodiversitätsförderflächen Vernetzung.


de: Bienenstände

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.farming.bienenstandorte


gewassernetz-gewasserrevitalisierung

territory

de: Raum und Umwelt

title_for_slug: gewassernetz-gewasserrevitalisierung

de: revitalisierung okomorphologie

de: Gewässernetz, Gewässerrevitalisierung

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.inlandwaters.revitalisierung-strategische-planung-flaechen,ch.gl.inlandwaters.oekomorphologie,ch.gl.inlandwaters.revitalisierung-strategische-planung-linien

de: Ökomorphologie, Gewässerrevitalisierungsmassnahmen (strategische Planung).


statische-waldgrenzen-glarus-nord

agriculture

de: Land- und Forstwirtschaft

title_for_slug: statische-waldgrenzen-glarus-nord

de: raumentwicklung nutzungsplanung waldfeststellung oreb

de: Statische Waldgrenzen Glarus Nord

de: WMS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.biota.waldgrenzen-1630

de: Statische Waldgrenzen in Bauzonen, Datensatz der Gemeinde Glarus Nord (1630). Statische Waldgrenzen werden vom Kanton auf der Grundlage eines Waldfeststellungsverfahrens festgelegt.

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus. Zuständig für die kantonale Geodaten-Infrastruktur inklusive Geoportal und Datenbereitstellung.


waldbestande

geography

de: Geographie

title_for_slug: waldbestande

de: Waldbestände

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.biota.waldbestand

de: WFS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Waldbestände, Entwicklungsstufen.

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus


territory

de: Raum und Umwelt

de: Kataster der belasteten Standorte

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.environmentalprotection.kbs

de: Kataster der belasteten Standorte (KBS), «Altlasten-Kataster».


de: natur schutz waldfunktion waldnutzung oreb waldentwicklung begegnungsort

de: Waldreservate

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.natureprotection.waldreservate,ch.gl.natureprotection.waldperlen

de: Waldreservate, Vertragsflächen und «Waldperlen».


bodenkartierung

agriculture

de: Land- und Forstwirtschaft

title_for_slug: bodenkartierung

de: bodeneigenschaften bodenkartierung bodeneignung landwirtschaftliche-bewirtschaftung grundigkeit fruchtfolgeflachen-fff

de: Bodenkartierung

de: WMS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.soils.bodeneignung-bodentyp,ch.gl.soils.bodeneignung-gruendigkeit,ch.gl.soils.bodeneignung-nutzung-fff,ch.gl.soils.bodeneignung-wasserhaushalt

de: Bodeneignungskarte für die landwirtschaftliche Nutzung. Die kartierten Böden werden nach Bodenty, Gründigkeit, Wasserhaushalt und ihrer Eignung für Fruchtfolgeflächen klassiert.


maintainer: Bundesamt für Energie BFE

fr: Contenu des bassins d'accumulation, dimanche 24:00 heures, bulletin hebdomadaire

it: Grado di riempimento dei bacini di accumulazione, domenica alle ore 24, rapporto settimanale livello di accumulazione

author: Bundesamt für Energie BFE

media_type: CSV

media_type: SERVICE

fr:
Ce relevé, élaboré chaque dimanche à 24h00, recense le contenu (en GWh et en %) des bassins d'accumulation suisses dans 4 régions différentes.
Le taux de remplissage des bassins d'accumulation est relevé dans le cadre de la Statistique de l'électricité, qui fait partie de la statistique publique de la Suisse (base légale: LSF).

de: Der Füllungsgrad der Speicherseen, Sonntag 24h, Wochenbericht Speicherinhalt gibt Auskunft über den Speicherinhalt der Schweizer Speicherseen für vier Regionen in GWh und als Füllgrad in % jeweils am Sonntag 24h auf wöchentlicher Basis. Der Füllungsgrad der Speicherseen wird im Rahmen der Elektrizitätsstatistik erhoben, welche Teil der öffentlichen Statistik der Schweiz ist (gesetzliche Grundlage: BStatG).

statistical-basis

fr: Bases statistiques

de: Statistische Grundlagen

en: Statistical basis

it: Basi statistiche

national-economy

fr: Economie nationale

de: Volkswirtschaft

en: National economy

it: Economia

energy

de: Energie

bundesamt-fur-energie-bfe

fr: Office fédéral de l'énergie OFEN

de: Bundesamt für Energie BFE

en: Swiss Federal Office of Energy SFOE

it: Ufficio federale dell'energia UFE

fr: L'Office fédéral de l'énergie (OFEN) est le centre de compétences du Département fédéral de l'environnement, des transports, de l'énergie et de la communication (DETEC) pour les questions liées à l'approvisionnement en énergie et à son utilisation.

de: Das Bundesamt für Energie (BFE) ist das Kompetenzzentrum für Fragen der Energieversorgung und der Energienutzung im Eidgenössischen Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation (UVEK).

en: The Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) is the country's competence centre for issues relating to energy supply and energy use at the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC).

it: L'Ufficio federale dell'energia (UFE) è il centro di competenza in materia di approvvigionamento e di impiego dell'energia in seno al Dipartimento federale dell'ambiente, dei trasporti, dell'energia e delle comunicazioni (DATEC).

political_level: confederation


landschaftsqualitats-objekte

geography

de: Geographie

title_for_slug: landschaftsqualitats-objekte

de: Landschaftsqualitäts-Objekte

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.farming.landschaftsqualitaet-punkte,ch.gl.farming.landschaftsqualitaet-flaechen,ch.gl.farming.landschaftsqualitaet-linien

de: WFS-Dienst Kanton Glarus

de: Landschaftsqualitäts-Objekte in der Landwirtschaft. Direktzahlungsberechtigte Ganzjahres- und Sömmerungsbetriebe können dabei auf Flächen im Projektperimeter Massnahmen anmelden, mit welchen die Landschaft gefördert wird. Für die Umsetzung dieser Massnahmen werden ein Vertrag abgeschlossen und jährlich Landschaftsqualitätsbeiträge ausbezahlt.

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus. Zuständig für die kantonale Geodaten-Infrastruktur inklusive Geoportal und Datenbereitstellung.


perimeter-ln-sommerungsgebiet

agriculture

de: Land- und Forstwirtschaft

title_for_slug: perimeter-ln-sommerungsgebiet

de: Perimeter LN/Sömmerungsgebiet

de: Folgende Layer stehen zur Verfügung: ch.gl.farming.alpnamen,ch.gl.farming.perimeter-ln-soemmerung,ch.gl.farming.soemmerungsgebiet

de: Perimeter landwirtschaftliche Nutzungsflächen, Sömmerungsgebiet (Alpen). Der Layer enthält bis auf weiteres nur den Perimeter der LN-Flächen. Sömmerungsgebiete werden in einem anderen Layer publiziert: «ch.gl.farming.soemmerungsgebiet / Landwirtschaft Sömmerungsgebiet Alpen». Namen der Alpen, Alpstafel. Aggregierung der Einzelflächen zwecks nutzerfreundlicher Beschriftung.

de: Fachstelle Geoinformation des Kantons Glarus


territory

de: Raum und Umwelt

de: geodaten naturschutz landschaftsschutz landschaftsschutz moor naturschutzgebiet nationales-umweltschutzprogramm raumplanung

en: geodata nature-conservation landscape-conservation landscape-conservation bog national-reserve national-conservation-programme physical-planning

it: geodati conservazione-della-natura conservazione-del-paesaggio conservazione-del-paesaggio torbiera-acida riserve-nazionali programma-nazionale-di-conservazione pianificazione-dello-spazio-fisico

label: Geobasisdatenkatalog

spatial: Kanton Thurgau (TG)

de: Schutzpläne der Hoch- und Übergangsmoore von nationaler Bedeutung

de: Definiert den Perimeter des nationalen Schutzgebietes. Rechtlich gesichert mit einer kantonalen Schutzanordnung. Die dargestellten Perimeter sowie die Unterteilung der einzelnen Schutzbereiche weichen von den Datensätzen des Bundes ab. Es handelt sich um eine Präzisierung der Bundesdaten. Ebenso sind Abweichungen zu den analogen Originalplänen möglich. Rechtlich bindend sind die in der Schutzanordnung dargestellten Pläne, einsehbar über den ÖREB-Kataster.

kanton-thurgau

fr: Canton de Thurgovie

de: Kanton Thurgau

en: Canton of Thurgau

it: Cantone di Turgovia

de: Der Kanton Thurgau veröffentlicht hier schrittweise OGD-Datensätze der kantonalen Verwaltung.

value: TG-Kt - Geocat Harvester


offizieller-stadtplan

geography

de: Geographie

title_for_slug: offizieller-stadtplan

label: Öffentliches Auskunftssystem des Kantons Basel-Stadt

spatial: Basel-Stadt (Stadtplanperimeter)

de: Geodaten-Shop

de: Öffentlich zugänglicher Geodaten-Downloaddienst des Kantons Basel-Stadt

de: WMS BS

de: Die derzeit im WMS BS verfügbaren Datenebenen entsprechen, bis auf wenige Ausnahmen, den Geodaten, welche auch in MapBS dargestellt sind. Der WMS BS ist kostenlos nutzbar und bietet Zugriff auf öffentliche sowie beschränkt öffentliche Geodaten, wobei gegebenenfalls Benutzername und Passwort benötigt werden (Zugangsdaten von MapBS).

de: Offizielle Stadtpläne im Rasterformat (farbig, Graustufen und Schwarz-Weiss)

kanton-basel-stadt

fr: Canton de Bâle-Ville

de: Kanton Basel-Stadt

en: Canton of Basel-City

it: Cantone di Basilea-Città

de: Der Kanton Basel-Stadt veröffentlicht nach und nach Open Government-Datensätze von kantonalen Ämtern und Dienststellen. Die kantonale Fachstelle für Open Government Data ist als Koordinationsorgan zuständig für die Unterstützung der datenpublizierenden Verwaltungsstellen.

value: BS - Geocat Harvester

de: Offizieller Stadtplan


en: alptal streamflow groundwater stable-water-isotopes runoff

en: Deuterium groundwater and baseflow August 2017

en:
This data is collected at the Studibach catchment (Alptal, Switzerland) by Leonie Kiewiet (University of Zürich)
For any questions about the data, please contact leonie.kiewiet@geo.uzh.ch or leoniekiewiet@gmail.com

Date: Date (year-month-day)
Location: Well number or outlet
X: X coordinate (CH1903 LV03)
Y: Y coordinate (CH1903 LV03)
riparian: riparian wells (i.e. from the riparian-like cluster as presented in Kiewiet et al. (2019)) are marked a one, all other wells are marked a zero
d.D (per mil): Deuterium composition (per mil)

en: Deuterium streamwater extra event

en:
This data is collected at the Studibach catchment (Alptal, Switzerland) by Leonie Kiewiet (University of Zürich)
For any questions about the data, please contact leonie.kiewiet@geo.uzh.ch or leoniekiewiet@gmail.com

datetime: Date and time of sample collection (UTC; year-month-day, hours:minutes)
Q d.D: Deuterium composition (per mil) of streamwater sampled at the catchment outlet (697234,210472); the first sample is used as pre-event streamflow sample

en: Precipitation and discharge event B

en:
This data is collected at the Studibach catchment (Alptal, Switzerland) by Leonie Kiewiet (University of Zürich)
With any questions about the data, please contact leonie.kiewiet@geo.uzh.ch or leoniekiewiet@gmail.com

datetime: Date (year-month-day) and time (hours:minutes:seconds) in UTC
Q: Discharge in mm per hour at catchment outlet (697234,210472)
P: Rainfall in mm per hour averaged for two rain gauges (697494,210675) and (698004, 210680)

en: Deuterium streamwater event C

en: Deuterium rainfall event A

en:
This data is collected at the Studibach catchment (Alptal, Switzerland) by Leonie Kiewiet (University of Zürich)
For any questions about the data, please contact leonie.kiewiet@geo.uzh.ch or leoniekiewiet@gmail.com

datetime: Date (year-month-day) and time (hours:minutes:seconds) in UTC
P d.D: Deuterium composition of the rainfall samples (per mil)
X: X coordinate (CH1903 LV03)
Y: Y coordinate (CH1903 LV03)

en: Precipitation and discharge event C

en: Deuterium rainfall extra event

en: Deuterium rainfall event B

en: Precipitation and discharge extra event

en: Deuterium streamwater event A

en: Deuterium streamwater event B

en: Deuterium groundwater and baseflow October 2016

en: Deuterium groundwater and baseflow October 2017

en: Precipitation and discharge event A

en: Deuterium rainfall event C

en:
This dataset includes discharge and rainfall measurements and deuterium compositions of streamflow, rainfall and groundwater, for four rainfall events and three baseflow snapshot campaigns in the Studibach (Alptal, Switzerland). More specifically, we present the following data:

- Specific discharge at the catchment outlet at 5-minute resolution (mm per hour);
- Rainfall at 5-minute resolution (mm per hour);
- Rainfall deuterium composition (‰);
- Stormflow deuterium composition (‰);
- Groundwater and baseflow deuterium compositions (‰).

For the files containing rainfall and discharge timeseries (QP), and rainfall and streamwater deuterium compositions ("Deuterium_Rainfall" and "Deuterium_Streamwater"), we added the corresponding event identifier (A, B, C or extra) to the file names. For the files containing the groundwater and baseflow deuterium values ("Deuterium_Snapshot") we added the sample collection date to the file name. We included the X and Y coordinates for each data point (coordinate system: CH1903 LV3) as well as the date and time (UTC).

More information on the data collection and preparation can be found in Kiewiet et al. (in review). A detailed description of the baseflow snapshot campaigns can also be found in Kiewiet et al., 2019.

alptal

display_name: alptal

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

en: Discharge, rainfall, and deuterium compositions of streamwater, rainwater and groundwater, for four rainfall events in the Studibach, Alptal, Switzerland


espace-reserve-aux-eaux-ere

geography

en: Geography

territory

en: Territory and environment

title_for_slug: espace-reserve-aux-eaux-ere

fr: amenagement-des-cours-deau amenagement-local planification-de-lespace-physique cours-deau amenagement-du-territoire

de: wasserbau ortsplanung raumplanung wasserlauf raumordnung-und--planung

en: river-management local-planning physical-planning watercourse land-management-and-planning

it: sistemazione-dei-corsi-dacqua pianificazione-locale pianificazione-dello-spazio-fisico corso-dacqua sfruttamento-razionale-del-territorio

spatial: Canton de Fribourg (FR)

fr: Accès aux données (fr) : téléchargement et services web (Géoportail cantonal)

fr: Datenzugriff (de): Download und Webservices (Kantonales Geoportal)

fr: L'espace réservé aux eaux (ERE) est un corridor bordant les eaux superficielles dans lequel les constructions sont interdites. Il a pour but non seulement de sauvegarder les fonctions naturelles des cours d'eau et des étendues d’eau, mais également d'améliorer la protection contre les crues. Dans le canton de Fribourg, l'ERE est associé à trois données géographique : - la limite de l'ERE : délimitation de l'ERE au sens strict (art. 41a OEaux); - la limite de construction : distance de construction minimale aux cours d'eau et aux étendues d’eau; - la largeur naturelle : largeur naturelle du fond du lit, utilisée pour la délimitation de l'ERE. Les dispositions légales par rapport à l'interdiction de construire dans l'ERE figurent dans l’ordonnance fédérale sur la protection des eaux et dans la loi cantonale sur les eaux.

fr: Geoinformation Canton Fribourg

de: Geoinformation Kanton Freiburg

en: Geoinformation Canton Fribourg

it: Geoinformazione Canton Friburgo

fr: Les géodonnées publiques du Canton Fribourg sont gérées par le Centre de compétence SIT du Service du cadastre et de la géomatique SCG et mises à disposition sous forme de services web et de téléchargement via le géoportail cantonal.

en: The public geodata of the Canton Fribourg are managed by the GIS Competence Center of the Office of Surveying and Geomatics (VGA) and made available via the cantonal geoportal as web services and for download.

de: Die öffentlichen Geodaten des Kantons Freiburg werden durch das GIS-Kompetenzzentrum des Amtes für Vermessung und Geomatik VGA verwaltet und über das kantonale Geoportal als Webservices und zum Download bereitgestellt.

it: I geodati pubblici del Canton Friburgo sono gestiti dal Centro di competenza GIS dell'Ufficio della Misurazione e della Geomatica (SCG) e messi a disposizione tramite il geoportale cantonale come servizi web e per il download.

value: Fribourg-Kt - Geocat Harvester

fr: Espace réservé aux eaux (ERE)


fr: bilan-electricite ogd51-bfe production-nette production-d-electricite statistique-electricite energie-hydraulique consommation-de-courant saldo-import energies-renouvelables consommation-nationale pompes-d-accumulation energie-atomique production-d-electricite-thermique

de: stromverbrauch thermische-stromproduktion landesverbrauch elektrizitaetsbilanz nettoerzeugung wasserkraft kernkraft ogd51-bfe elektrizitaetsstatistik importsaldo speicherpumpen stromproduktion erneuerbare-energien

it: produzione-netta produzione-d-elettricita energie-rinnovabili saldo-importazioni pompe-d-accumulo consumo-nazionale bilancio-elettricita energia-idrica statistica-elettricita produzione-d-elettricita-termica ogd51-bfe energia-atomica consumo-di-corrente

fr: Statistiques heddomadaires: production et consommation d'énergie électrique en Suisse

it: Bilancio dell'elettricità: statistica settimanale - produzione e consumo di energia elettrica in Svizzera

label: BFE - Elektrizitätsstatistik

mimetype: SERVICE

fr: Cette statistique, élaborée chaque mercredi, recense la production, l'importation, l'exportation et la consommation d'électricité en Suisse. Elle présente la production hydraulique (centrales au fil de l'eau/centrales à accumulation), la production des centrales nucléaires ainsi que la production thermique classique et d'autres modes de production. Elle indique aussi la consommation des installations de pompage d'accumulation. Elle est établie dans le cadre de la Statistique de l'électricité, qui fait partie de la statistique publique de la Suisse (base légale: LSF).

de: Die Wochenstatistik Elektrizitätsbilanz - Erzeugung und Abgabe elektrischer Energie in der Schweiz gibt Auskunft über Produktion, Import / Export und Verbrauch von Elektrizität in der Schweiz jeweils am Mittwoch auf wöchentlicher Basis. Bei der Produktion werden die Hydrologische Erzeugung (Lauf- und Speicherwerke), die Erzeugung der Kernkraftwerke sowie die Konv.-therm. und andere Erzeugung unterschieden. Der Verbrauch der Speicherpumpen wird ausgewiesen. Die Wochenstatistik Elektrizitätsbilanz wird im Rahmen der Elektrizitätsstatistik erhoben, welche Teil der öffentlichen Statistik der Schweiz ist (gesetzliche Grundlage: BStatG).

bilan-electricite

display_name: bilan-electricite

bilancio-elettricita

display_name: bilancio-elettricita

consommation-de-courant

display_name: consommation-de-courant

consommation-nationale

display_name: consommation-nationale

consumo-di-corrente

display_name: consumo-di-corrente

consumo-nazionale

display_name: consumo-nazionale

elektrizitaetsbilanz

display_name: elektrizitaetsbilanz

elektrizitaetsstatistik

display_name: elektrizitaetsstatistik

energia-atomica

display_name: energia-atomica

energia-idrica

display_name: energia-idrica

energie-atomique

display_name: energie-atomique

energie-hydraulique

display_name: energie-hydraulique

energie-rinnovabili

display_name: energie-rinnovabili

energies-renouvelables

display_name: energies-renouvelables

erneuerbare-energien

display_name: erneuerbare-energien

importsaldo

display_name: importsaldo

kernkraft

display_name: kernkraft

landesverbrauch

display_name: landesverbrauch

nettoerzeugung

display_name: nettoerzeugung

pompe-d-accumulo

display_name: pompe-d-accumulo

pompes-d-accumulation

display_name: pompes-d-accumulation

production-d-electricite

display_name: production-d-electricite

production-d-electricite-thermique

display_name: production-d-electricite-thermique

production-nette

display_name: production-nette

produzione-d-elettricita

display_name: produzione-d-elettricita

produzione-d-elettricita-termica

display_name: produzione-d-elettricita-termica

produzione-netta

display_name: produzione-netta

saldo-import

display_name: saldo-import

saldo-importazioni

display_name: saldo-importazioni

speicherpumpen

display_name: speicherpumpen

statistica-elettricita

display_name: statistica-elettricita

statistique-electricite

display_name: statistique-electricite

stromproduktion

display_name: stromproduktion

stromverbrauch

display_name: stromverbrauch

thermische-stromproduktion

display_name: thermische-stromproduktion

wasserkraft

display_name: wasserkraft

statistical-basis

de: Statistische Grundlagen

en: Statistical basis

national-economy

de: Volkswirtschaft

en: National economy

bundesamt-fur-energie-bfe

de: Das Bundesamt für Energie (BFE) ist das Kompetenzzentrum für Fragen der Energieversorgung und der Energienutzung im Eidgenössischen Departement für Umwelt, Verkehr, Energie und Kommunikation (UVEK).

en: The Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) is the country's competence centre for issues relating to energy supply and energy use at the Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications (DETEC).