maintainer: Anita Risch

en: exclusion swiss-national-park subalpine grassland grazing ecosystem-multifunctionality vertebrates ecosystem-coupling ecosystem-functions invertebrates

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: soil-mapping soil-ph ecological-maps soil-moisture ecological-indicator-values plants switzerland landolt

state: active

type: dataset

en: Predictors

media_type: application/zip

en: Predictors generated and used in Descombes et al. (2020)

format: ZIP

mimetype: application/zip

en: Description

en: Description of the predictors provided in this dataset

format: XLS

en:
Ecologically meaningful predictors are often neglected in plant distribution studies, resulting in incomplete niche quantification and low predictive power of species distribution models (SDMs). Because environmental data are rare and expensive to collect, and because their relationship with local climatic and topographic conditions are complex, mapping them over large geographic extents and at high spatial resolution remains a major challenge. Here, we derived environmental data layers by mapping ecological indicator values (EIVs) in space by using a large set of environmental predictors in Switzerland.

This dataset contains the predictors (raster layers) generated and used in the following publication (Descombes et al. 2020). Only predictors for which we have the rights to share them are provided. Other datasets and predictors can be accessed via the original data provider. Details on the predictors and sources are fully described in the publication. The predictors are provided as GeoTIFF files, at 93 m spatial resolution and Mercator projection ("+proj=merc +lon_0=0 +k=1 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0,0,0,0,0 +units=m +no_defs"). The excel file (xlsx) provides a short description of the raster layers.

Paper Citation:

Descombes, P. et al. (2020). Spatial modelling of ecological indicator values improves predictions of plant distributions in complex landscapes. Ecography. (accepted)

ecological-indicator-values

display_name: ecological-indicator-values

ecological-maps

display_name: ecological-maps

landolt

display_name: landolt

plants

display_name: plants

soil-mapping

display_name: soil-mapping

soil-moisture

display_name: soil-moisture

soil-ph

display_name: soil-ph

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

educ

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

en: Education, culture and sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester


diversity-of-woody-species

title_for_slug: diversity-of-woody-species

format: SERVICE

en:
Index based on the number of tree and shrub species starting at 12 cm dbh in the upper layer and the occurrence of especially ecologically valuable tree and shrub species starting at 12 cm dbh in the upper layer.

Citation:
 > _Abegg, M.; Brändli, U.-B.; Cioldi, F.; Fischer, C.; Herold-Bonardi, A.; Huber M.; Keller, M.; Meile, R.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Traub, B.; Vidondo, B. (2014). Fourth national forest inventory - result tables and maps on the Internet for the NFI 2009-2013 (NFI4b). [Published online 06.11.2014] Available from World Wide Web http://www.lfi.ch/resultate/ Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL. [doi:10.21258/1057112](https://doi.org/10.21258/1057112)_

accessible-forest-without-shrub-forest

display_name: accessible-forest-without-shrub-forest

altitudinal-vegetation-zone

display_name: altitudinal-vegetation-zone

biogeographical-region

display_name: biogeographical-region

canton

display_name: canton

diversity-of-woody-species

display_name: diversity-of-woody-species

economic-region

display_name: economic-region

production-region

display_name: production-region

protection-forest-region

display_name: protection-forest-region

en: Diversity of woody species


amount-of-dead-wood

title_for_slug: amount-of-dead-wood

en:
Wood volume of all deadwood recorded according to the NFI3 method. For standing trees and shrubs starting at 12 cm dbh, the volume of stemwood reduced due to stem breakage is recorded, and for lying deadwood the merchantable wood ( starting at 7 cm in diameter). Heaps of branches are not included.  The correction for bias with the sample Tarif trees may be so drastic that it results in negative values with small numbers of trees.

Citation:
 > _Abegg, M.; Brändli, U.-B.; Cioldi, F.; Fischer, C.; Herold-Bonardi, A.; Huber M.; Keller, M.; Meile, R.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Traub, B.; Vidondo, B. (2014). Fourth national forest inventory - result tables and maps on the Internet for the NFI 2009-2013 (NFI4b). [Published online 06.11.2014] Available from World Wide Web http://www.lfi.ch/resultate/ Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL. [doi:10.21258/1057112](https://doi.org/10.21258/1057112)_

amount-of-dead-wood

display_name: amount-of-dead-wood

lower-higher-altitudinal-zones

display_name: lower-higher-altitudinal-zones

ownership

display_name: ownership

en: Amount of dead wood


mountain-permafrost-hydrology

maintainer: Jeannette Noetzli

title_for_slug: mountain-permafrost-hydrology

en: monitoring-techniques mass-movements mountain-permafrost-hydrology ice-rich-permafrost climate-change-impacts permafrost-degradation

en: DORA Persistent URL

media_type: application/pdf

format: PDF

en: Synthesis report chapter of the Hydro-CH2018 project of the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN)

en: This report was prepared as one of the synthesis report chapters of the Hydro-CH2018 project of the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN). In earlier reports such as the CH2014-IMPACTS report (CH-Impacts 2014), the topic of mountain permafrost hydrology was not addressed. Here, we provide a baseline of the available knowledge of mountain permafrost in the Swiss Alps for future reference. We compile an overview of the current understanding of mountain permafrost in the Swiss Alps, its distribution and characteristics, observed and projected changes, and expected impacts on slope stability, infrastructure and hydrological aspects. We also briefly describe the measurement techniques and modelling approaches applied. The chapter closes with a summary of the most important open research questions. The literature cited mainly includes studies on mountain permafrost published in scientific journals and assessments of long-term observation data. We focus on permafrost hydrology interactions wherever information is available. However, systematic studies on permafrost hydrology in mountain areas are still limited.

climate-change-impacts

display_name: climate-change-impacts

ice-rich-permafrost

display_name: ice-rich-permafrost

mass-movements

display_name: mass-movements

monitoring-techniques

display_name: monitoring-techniques

mountain-permafrost-hydrology

display_name: mountain-permafrost-hydrology

permafrost-degradation

display_name: permafrost-degradation

en: Mountain Permafrost Hydrology


photogrammetric-drone-data-schurlialp

maintainer: Yves Bühler

title_for_slug: photogrammetric-drone-data-schurlialp

en: dsm orthophoto uav drone-data wingtra photogrammetry

en: Data Access

en:
- 10 cm DSM
- 10 cm HS
- 3 cm orthophoto
- original RGB images
- Agisoft Metashape Processing Report

All of the products are also available as a cloud optimized geotiff.

en: The data was collected on 16.04.2021 and on 28.05.2021 with a Wingtra Gen II and a Sony RX1 II RGB sensor to obtain snow depth and distribution data. Following the data collection, the data was processed with Agisoft Metashape. A 10cm DSM, a 10cm snow depth raster, a 3mm orthophoto and the original drone images are available for download.

drone-data

display_name: drone-data

dsm

display_name: dsm

orthophoto

display_name: orthophoto

photogrammetry

display_name: photogrammetry

uav

display_name: uav

wingtra

display_name: wingtra

en: Photogrammetric Drone Data Schürlialp


intratrait

maintainer: Christian Rixen

title_for_slug: intratrait

en: cold-adapted-plants elevation-gradient neighbour-interactions plant-traits climate-change elevation-range

media_type: text/csv

en: Plant trait data along elevation gradients on mountains

format: CSV

en:
This data set was used to test whether species specialized to high elevations or with narrow elevational ranges show more conservative (i.e. less variable) trait responses across their elevational distribution, or in response to neighbours, than species from lower elevations or with wider elevational ranges. We did so by studying intraspecific trait variation of 66 species along 40 elevational gradients in four countries (Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, China) in both hemispheres. As an indication of potential neighbour interactions that could drive trait variation, we also analysed plant species’ height ratio, its height relative to its nearest neighbour.
The following traits and parameters were measured and are available in this data set:
As an indication of plant stature, we measured vegetative and generative height, where vegetative height was distance from soil to highest vegetative leaf and generative height was distance to the highest point on the reproductive shoot. As a measure of reproductive investment, we noted the presence of flowers on the randomly chosen individuals (see below). As a measure of individual and genet basal area, we measured individual plant and patch diameters, in two dimensions (along the largest diameter and perpendicular to it). In clonal plant species, plant diameter was equivalent to an individual rosette, whereas patch diameter referred to the whole genet and could represent the size of a tuft, tussock or cushion. For genera with more singular growth forms (e.g., some Gentiana species) plant and patch diameter were the same. The two diameter measurements were made at right angles, allowing estimates of patch and plant areas to be calculated as an ellipse (i.e., area = 0.5 a 0.5 b Π). All traits were measured on ten randomly selected individuals per site. Flower count data was considered in a binary fashion on a per individual basis (because for some species individuals only produce one flower when flowering) so that the presence or absence of flower(s) was a nominal value between 0 and 10 for each species at each site. We then collected at least three leaves (up to 30 for small and light leaves) from each of the first three individuals selected from each species for determination of leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and specific leaf area (SLA). For calculations of LDMC and SLA, fresh leaves were scanned on a flatbed scanner to determine leaf area. Leaves were then weighed on a balance to a precision of +/- 0.001g, prior to being air dried and reweighed with a balance to a precision of +/- 0.0001g. LDMC was calculated by dividing dry leaf mass by fresh leaf mass. SLA was calculated by dividing leaf area by dry leaf mass. Additionally, within an area of 10 cm diameter around the target individual, we determined the tallest neighbouring species and measured its vegetative and generative height, and estimated the percent cover of the target species, other vegetation, rock, and bare soil.
For more details see Rixen et al. 2022, Journal of Ecology.

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

cold-adapted-plants

display_name: cold-adapted-plants

elevation-gradient

display_name: elevation-gradient

elevation-range

display_name: elevation-range

neighbour-interactions

display_name: neighbour-interactions

plant-traits

display_name: plant-traits

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: intratrait


en:
Sum of stem cross-section areas of all dead trees in a stand at a height of 1.3 m (dbh measurement height) recorded according to the NFI1 method.

Citation:
 > _Abegg, M.; Brändli, U.-B.; Cioldi, F.; Fischer, C.; Herold-Bonardi, A.; Huber M.; Keller, M.; Meile, R.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Traub, B.; Vidondo, B. (2014). Fourth national forest inventory - result tables and maps on the Internet for the NFI 2009-2013 (NFI4b). [Published online 06.11.2014] Available from World Wide Web http://www.lfi.ch/resultate/ Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL. [doi:10.21258/1057112](https://doi.org/10.21258/1057112)_

accessible-forest-without-shrub-forest

display_name: accessible-forest-without-shrub-forest

altitudinal-vegetation-zone

display_name: altitudinal-vegetation-zone

biogeographical-region

display_name: biogeographical-region

canton

display_name: canton

conifers-broadleaves

display_name: conifers-broadleaves

economic-region

display_name: economic-region

lower-higher-altitudinal-zones

display_name: lower-higher-altitudinal-zones

main-tree-species

display_name: main-tree-species

ownership

display_name: ownership

production-region

display_name: production-region

protection-forest-region

display_name: protection-forest-region

tree-state-standing-lying

display_name: tree-state-standing-lying

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Basal area of dead wood NFI1


scolytidae

title_for_slug: scolytidae

en: saproxylic-insects biodiversity dead-wood coleoptera bark-beetles forest

en: Data query used on Fauna Database to retrieve the submitted data.

media_type: text/plain

en: Data extract in TAB-delimted format. First row is header, first column is counter.

format: TXT

en:
Scolytidae data from all historic up to the recent projects (29.10.2019) of WSL, collected with various methods in forests of different types.
Data are provided on request to contact person against bilateral agreement.

bark-beetles

display_name: bark-beetles

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

coleoptera

display_name: coleoptera

dead-wood

display_name: dead-wood

forest

display_name: forest

saproxylic-insects

display_name: saproxylic-insects

en: Scolytidae


maintainer: Mathias Bavay

en: dew-point-temperature relative-humidity wind-direction wind-speed stillberg shortwave-radiation treeline snow-depth air-temperature air-pressure soil-temperature precipitation-sum

en: The Davos Stillberg meteorological data (Stillberg_meteo_v1.zip) consists of timeseries from five meteorological stations operated at the Stillberg treeline ecological research site. Metadata are provided in the folder 'Stillberg_meteo_metadata' and the data in the folder 'Stillberg_meteo_data' with subfolders for the three quality levels 'raw_standardized', ‘raw_edited’, and ‘filtered’.

en: The Davos Stillberg meteorological data (Stillberg_meteo_v1.1.zip) consists of timeseries from five meteorological stations operated at the Stillberg treeline ecological research site. Metadata are provided in the folder 'Stillberg_meteo_metadata' and the data in the folder 'Stillberg_meteo_data' with subfolders for the three quality levels 'raw_standardized', ‘raw_edited’, and ‘filtered’.

en:
 Background information
The Stillberg ecological treeline research site is located in the transition zone between the relatively humid climate of the Northern Alps and the continental climate of the Central Alps. In 1975, 92,000 seedlings of the high-elevation conifer species *Larix decidua* Mill. (European larch), *Pinus cembra* L. (Cembran pine), and *Pinus mugo* ssp. *uncinata* (DC.) Domin (mountain pine) were systematically planted across an area of 5 hectares along an elevation gradient of about 150 metres, with the aim to develop ecologically, technically, and economically sustainable afforestation techniques at the treeline to reduce the risk of snow avalanches. In the course of time, additional research aspects gained importance, such as the ecology of the treeline ecotone under global change. Alongside the ecological long-term monitoring of the afforestation, several meteorological stations have recorded local meteorological conditions at the Stillberg research site. Here, we provide the Davos Stillberg meteorological timeseries of five stations from 1975 (01-01-1975), the year of the afforestation establishment, until the end of the year 2022 (31-12-2022).

 Station description
The five meteorological stations were all installed at the same location (46°46′25.015″N 9°52′01.792″E) at 2090 m a.s.l., in the lower part of the afforestation area. In general, the five stations were operated sequentially (Stillberg_meteo_metadata_stations_v1.csv). However, there are some overlapping time periods when more than one station was operated in parallel. The stations have recorded environmental parameters, such as air and soil temperature, dew point temperature, air pressure, relative humidity, wind direction and velocity, radiation, precipitation, and snow depth (Stillberg_meteo_metadata_parameters_v1.csv). The meteorological measurements were recorded hourly from 1975 until 1996 and have been recorded in 10-minute intervals since 1997.

 Data description
We processed the Davos Stillberg meteorological timeseries with the MeteoIO meteorological data pre-processing library (Bavay & Egger, 2014). Data files are provided for each station and quality level separately and named according to the station (see ‘Stillberg_meteo_metadata_stations_v1.csv’). From the raw data in their original formats, we generated three data quality levels: raw standardized (folder ‘raw_standardized’), edited (folder ‘raw_edited’) and filtered (folder ‘filtered’). The processing level is indicated in the headers of the data files. The whole processing protocol is described in a set of human-readable configuration files that are used by MeteoIO to generate the required data quality levels. This improves long-term reproducibility (Bavay et al., 2022), as the data could be regenerated in the future, even using a completely different software, to account for additional data points or to introduce new data corrections. The first quality level (raw standardized) is generated by parsing the original data files and interpreting them in order to convert all data points to a common format and meteorological parameter naming scheme, while excluding unreadable or duplicated data lines. The generated data files are derivatives of CSV files, with a standardised header that contains the metadata that are necessary to interpret and use the data (use metadata) and to populate a data index (search metadata). The latter is a textual implementation of the Attribute Convention for Data Discovery (ACDD) metadata standard (Attribute Convention for Data Discovery 1-3, 2022). The second quality level (edited) builds on the raw data by performing low-level data editing, such as removing some data periods that are known to be unusable (often based on maintenance records or anecdotal evidence) or applying undocumented calibration factors (for example, when there seems to be an obvious offset on a measured parameter for a period between two documented maintenance operations). The third quality level is generated by applying statistical filters on the data (per station and per meteorological parameter) to exclude presumably wrong values. We did not perform gap filling, as no single strategy could be relied upon that would work best for all possible data usage scenarios.

air-pressure

display_name: air-pressure

air-temperature

display_name: air-temperature

dew-point-temperature

display_name: dew-point-temperature

precipitation-sum

display_name: precipitation-sum

relative-humidity

display_name: relative-humidity

shortwave-radiation

display_name: shortwave-radiation

snow-depth

display_name: snow-depth

soil-temperature

display_name: soil-temperature

stillberg

display_name: stillberg

treeline

display_name: treeline

wind-direction

display_name: wind-direction

wind-speed

display_name: wind-speed

en: Long-term meteorological station Stillberg, Davos, Switzerland at 2090 m a.s.l.


en: forest-condition icp-forests swiss-forest-lab long-term-forest-ecosystem-research forest-vitality damage-cause-assessment

en: Data Request

en:
Assessment of damges, i.e. symptoms, extent and causes on trees.

 Purpose:

Occurrence and extent of diseases

 Manual Citation:

 * Matthias Dobbertin, Christian Hug, Andreas Schwyzer, Serge Borer, Hanna Schmalz, 2016: Aufnahmeanleitung Kronenansprachen auf den Sanasilva- und den LWF-Flächen (Version 10). Sanasilva Inventur und Langfristige Waldökosystem-Forschung, Birmensdorf, 86 S. [>>>](https://www.wsl.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/WSL/Wald/Waldentwicklung_Monitoring/LWF/Sanasilva/ssi_anleitung_v10_extern.pdf)

 * Eichhorn J, Roskams P, Potocic N, Timmermann V, Ferretti M, Mues V, Szepesi A, Durrant D, Seletkovic  I,  Schröck  H-W,  Nevalainen  S,  Bussotti  F,  Garcia  P,  Wulff  S,  2016:  Part  IV:  Visual  Assessment of Crown Condition and Damaging Agents. In: UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre (ed.): Manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems, Eberswalde, Germany, 49 p. + Annex [>>>](https://www.icp-forests.org/pdf/manual/2016/ICP_Manual_2017_02_part04.pdf )

 Paper Citation:

 * Michel A, Seidling W, Prescher A K (2018) Forest Condition in Europe. 2018 Technical Report of ICP Forests. Report under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP). BFW-Dokumentation 25/2018, BFW Austrian Research Centre for Forests, Vienna, 92 p. [>>>](http://icp-forests.net/page/icp-forests-technical-report)

 * Köhl M, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Cools N, de Vos B, Fischer R, Camia A, Granke O, Hiederer R, Lorenz M, Montanarella L, Mues V, Nagel H-D, Poker J, Scheuschner T, Schlutow A (2011) Maintenance of Forest Ecosystem Health and Vitality. State of Europe s forests: status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe 29-49. [>>>](http://www.foresteurope.org/documentos/State_of_Europes_Forests_2011_Report_Revised_November_2011.pdf)

 * Brang P., 1998: Sanasilva-Bericht 1997. Zustand und Gefährdung des Schweizer Waldes – eine Zwischenbilanz nach 15 Jahren Waldschadenforschung. Berichte der Eidg. Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft, Vol. 345. Eidg. Forschungsanstalt WSL, Birmensdorf, 102 S. [>>>](https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/wsl/islandora/object/wsl:14555)

damage-cause-assessment

display_name: damage-cause-assessment

forest-condition

display_name: forest-condition

forest-vitality

display_name: forest-vitality

icp-forests

display_name: icp-forests

long-term-forest-ecosystem-research

display_name: long-term-forest-ecosystem-research

swiss-forest-lab

display_name: swiss-forest-lab

en: Crown Condition Assessment and Damage Cause Assessment LWF


en: pinus-sylvestris disturbance windthrow castanea-sativa national-forest-inventory drought insect-outbreaks vegetation-shift switzerland picea-abies tree-recruitment

en: Site Information

en:
File containing the information on parameters of the 5521 National forest inventory sites recorded during the NFI2 and NFI4.

CLNR = Number of site in the National Forest Inventory
INVNR = Information on which National Forest Inventory
Elevation = Elevation above sea level
Perc_Conifers = Proportional contribution of Conifer species to the total basal area of a site
DominantTreeSp = Dominant tree taxa of a site as defined by maximum basal area contribution
DMGTYP = Type of damage observed between NFI2 and NFI4 (up to four observations possible)
DMGYEAR = In case a DMGTYPE event was observed here is the corresponding year marked.
BioReg = Biogeographic region of the site
Ggrob = NaiS site type (Potential natural forest vegetation of a site)
DisturbanceType = Type of disturbance recorded on the site between NFI2 and NFI4.

en: ReadMe

en: A detailed description of the data.

en: R-Scripts for Figures and Data tables

en:
This archive contains the R-Scripts to reproduce the Figures 2-4, S1-S4 and the data tables S4-S10 in the associated publication.

Scherrer, D., Ascoli, D., Conedera, M., Fischer, C., Maringer, J., Moser, B., . . . T., W. (2021). Canopy disturbances catalyse tree species shifts in Swiss forests. Ecosystems, in revision.

en: Species-specific biomass per NFI site

en:
File containing the information about taxa-specific basal area, sapling density and polestage density for the different National Forest Inventory sites during NFI2 (1993-1995) and NFI4 (2009-2017).

INVNR = Information on which National Forest Inventory
CLNR = Number of site in the National Forest Inventory
Species = Information on the species
BA = basal area per hectare
Sapling = Sapling (< 4 cm DBH) density as stems per hectare
Polestage = Polestage (DBH 4 - 11.9 cm) density as stems per hectare

en:
The files refer to the data used in Scherrer et al. (2021) "Canopy disturbances catalyse tree species shifts in Swiss forests" in _Ecosystems_.

The two data files contain information about site factors (e.g. disturbance events, dominant tree species, elevation) and species-specific biomass of 5521 plots of the Swiss National Forest Inventory visited during the second (NFI2 1993-1995) and fourth (NFI4 2009-2017) inventory.
In addition, we provide all the R-scripts necessary to reproduce the Figures and data tables of the related publication.

For more detailed information about the data files please check the ReadMe.docx file.

castanea-sativa

display_name: castanea-sativa

disturbance

display_name: disturbance

drought

display_name: drought

insect-outbreaks

display_name: insect-outbreaks

national-forest-inventory

display_name: national-forest-inventory

picea-abies

display_name: picea-abies

pinus-sylvestris

display_name: pinus-sylvestris

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

tree-recruitment

display_name: tree-recruitment

vegetation-shift

display_name: vegetation-shift

windthrow

display_name: windthrow

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: Effects of canopy disturbance on Swiss forests


en: strategic-plans urban-region spatial-information europe development-priorities

en: Planning intentios

en:
The present dataset is part of the report titled Gradinaru S.R., Hersperger A.M., Schmid F. (2021). Deriving Planning Intentions from written planning documents. Report on CONCUR Project- From plans to land change: how strategic spatial planning contributes to the development of urban regions.
The data corresponds to the data collected as part of the DPI Method for deriving all PIs contained in a plan (open coding) as detailed in section 4 of the report. The method involved reading the plans to break down of information in meaningful discrete “incidents” or planning intentions. To identify the planning intentions, the starting points were represented by a) the structuring of the plans in chapters and sub chapters and b) the themes that the plans addressed. Thus, the collected information was not grouped according to pre-defined categories of planning intentions, but rather put together as a list of intentions as revealed by each plan. As a result, we provide, for each case study, a document (named [Urban region name] PI as defined in the plan) which contains:
	Date when the information was filled in.
	Name of the urban region and analysed strategic spatial plan .
	A list of all planning intentions contained in a plan, with each PI being addresses as follows:
	Name of PI as it appears in the plan
	Translated name of the PI (i.e. short name for easy understanding of the meaning)
	Explanation regarding the meaning of the PI
	Why the PI is considered a priority for the urban region
	Spatial information on the PI (text and cartographic representations).
In total, 14 documents are available, one for each case study. Documents contain up to 20 pages of information extracted from the plans together with explanations and notes taken during plan reading.

development-priorities

display_name: development-priorities

europe

display_name: europe

spatial-information

display_name: spatial-information

strategic-plans

display_name: strategic-plans

urban-region

display_name: urban-region

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Planning intentions in strategic plans of European urban regions


automatic-detection-of-avalanches

maintainer: Matthias Heck

title_for_slug: automatic-detection-of-avalanches

en: avalanche-activity snow hidden-markov-model monitoring seismic

en: Results and Scripts

en: This zip package contains the classification results, coherence results, reference data set, python scripts used for the classification and the start and end times for the pre-processed continuous seismic data. A further readme file is also include for more detailed information.

en: This dataset contains the results obtained by an automatic classification using hidden Markov models of a continuous seismic dataset. To avoid long computational times, we reduced the seismic data using pre-processing step. The start and end times of the windows used for the classification are also included in this dataset. Furthermore, an avalanche reference data set is included and the python scripts used to perform the processing steps and the classification.

avalanche-activity

display_name: avalanche-activity

hidden-markov-model

display_name: hidden-markov-model

monitoring

display_name: monitoring

seismic

display_name: seismic

snow

display_name: snow

en: Automatic detection of avalanches


biomass-of-standing-dead-trees

title_for_slug: biomass-of-standing-dead-trees

en:
Dry weight (mass) of dead, standing trees and shrubs starting at 12 cm dbh. This consists of the tree parts: roots, stemwood and also, depending on the degree of decomposition, the branch coarse wood.

Citation:
 > _Abegg, M.; Brändli, U.-B.; Cioldi, F.; Fischer, C.; Herold-Bonardi, A.; Huber M.; Keller, M.; Meile, R.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Traub, B.; Vidondo, B. (2014). Fourth national forest inventory - result tables and maps on the Internet for the NFI 2009-2013 (NFI4b). [Published online 06.11.2014] Available from World Wide Web http://www.lfi.ch/resultate/ Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL. [doi:10.21258/1057112](https://doi.org/10.21258/1057112)_

accessible-forest-without-shrub-forest

display_name: accessible-forest-without-shrub-forest

biogeographical-region

display_name: biogeographical-region

biomass-of-standing-dead-trees

display_name: biomass-of-standing-dead-trees

canton

display_name: canton

conifers-broadleaves

display_name: conifers-broadleaves

economic-region

display_name: economic-region

production-region

display_name: production-region

protection-forest-region

display_name: protection-forest-region

en: Biomass of standing dead trees


maintainer: Dirk Nikolaus Karger

en: iucn reptiles generalized-linear-models generalized-additive-models amphibians climate-variablity chelsa range-maps species-distribution-models niche-models random-forests interannual-climate-variability sdm mammals

en: Readme file containing the file naming convention, file dimensions, and variable names

en: File containing the record dimension, genus, and species of the respective netcdf files

en: File containing the climate predictors as SAGA grid files (.sgrd)

en: Mammals

en: Species distribution models based on different climate predictor groups

en: Amphibians

en: Reptiles

en: We modelled the global distribution of 730 amphibian, 1276 reptile, and 1961 mammal species globally as a function of current climate at a 0.5° spatial resolution using four different predictor groups composed of different combinations of input variables: mean climatic conditions, spatial climatic variability, and temporal (interannual) climatic variability.

amphibians

display_name: amphibians

chelsa

display_name: chelsa

climate-variablity

display_name: climate-variablity

generalized-additive-models

display_name: generalized-additive-models

generalized-linear-models

display_name: generalized-linear-models

interannual-climate-variability

display_name: interannual-climate-variability

iucn

display_name: iucn

mammals

display_name: mammals

niche-models

display_name: niche-models

random-forests

display_name: random-forests

range-maps

display_name: range-maps

reptiles

display_name: reptiles

sdm

display_name: sdm

species-distribution-models

display_name: species-distribution-models

en: Global species distributions for mammals, reptiles, and amphibians


en: ground-classification uav drone-data dsm photogrammetry

en: Geodata and Ground Classification Wolfgang Arelen

en: Original RGB images and generated products.

format: GeoTIFF

en: We conducted two drone flights with the Wingtra and DJI Phantom 4 RTK drones in Davos Wolfgang Arelen, on 25.08.2021. The data was processed with the Agisoft Metashape Professional Software.The Wingtra point cloud was further processed to derive a ground classification in individual LASTools and Terrasolid workflows.

drone-data

display_name: drone-data

dsm

display_name: dsm

ground-classification

display_name: ground-classification

photogrammetry

display_name: photogrammetry

uav

display_name: uav

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Photogrammetric Drone Data and derived Ground Classification Wolfgang Arelen


en: ritigraben ground-temperature borehole permafrost permos

en: PERMOS DATA POLICY

en: Map of PERMOS borehole network

en: DATA ACCESS

en:
_ENVIDAT NOTE: Data currently unvailable and measures are being taken to recover and restore the data files._

Processed ground temperature measurements at the Ritigraben permafrost borehole (RIT_0102) in canton Valais, Switzerland. The borehole is located at 2690 m asl on a flat site. The surface material is coarse blocks and borehole depth is 30 m. Thermistors used YSI 44006. Year of drilling 2002. This borehole is part of the Swiss Permafrost network, PERMOS (www.permos.ch). Contact phillips@slf.ch for details of processing applied.

borehole

display_name: borehole

ground-temperature

display_name: ground-temperature

permafrost

display_name: permafrost

permos

display_name: permos

ritigraben

display_name: ritigraben

en: RIT1: Processed permafrost borehole data (2690  m asl), Ritigraben, Switzerland


maintainer: Elisabeth Hafner

en: satellite snow avalanche-hazard-mapping validation avalanche

en: Satellite Avalanche Mapping Validation data and data description

en: 14 shapefiles to be used only together with the data description also provided as a pdf.

en:
Validation points, validation area, ground truth coverage, SPOT 6 avalanche outlines, Sentinel-1 avalanche outlines, Sentinel-2 avalanche outlines, Davos avalanche mapping (DAvalMap) avalanche outlines as shapefiles and a detailed attribute description (DataDescription_EvalSatMappingMethods.pdf).

Coordinate system: CH1903+_LV95

The generation of this dataset is described in detail in:

Hafner, E. D., Techel, F., Leinss, S., and Bühler, Y.: Mapping avalanches with satellites – evaluation of performance and completeness, The Cryosphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-272, 2021.

avalanche

display_name: avalanche

avalanche-hazard-mapping

display_name: avalanche-hazard-mapping

satellite

display_name: satellite

snow

display_name: snow

validation

display_name: validation

en: Satellite avalanche mapping validation data


endsplit

title_for_slug: endsplit

en: evapotranspiration precipitation end-member-mixing isotopes end-member-splitting tracer streamflow

en: demonstration input data

en: demonstration output files

en: EndSplit_demo version 1.0 build 2020.05.16

en:
EndSplit_demo_v1.0_20200516.R demonstrates the application of EndSplit to the Hubbard Brook Watershed 3 isotope data set. It calls EndSplit_v1.0_20200516.R.

Both of these scripts are copyright (C) 2020 ETH Zurich and James Kirchner. Public use is permitted under GNU General Public License 3 (GPL3); for details see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/

But… READ THIS CAREFULLY:
ETH Zurich and James Kirchner make ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, including NO WARRANTIES, expressed or implied, that this software is free of errors or is suitable for any particular purpose. Users are solely responsible for determining the suitability and reliability of this software for their own purposes.

These scripts implement end-member mixing and end-member splitting, as described in Kirchner and Allen, "Seasonal partitioning of precipitation between streamflow and evapotranspiration, inferred from end-member splitting analysis", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24, 17-39, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-17-2020, 2020. Users publishing results based on these scripts should cite that paper.

en: EndSplit version 1.0 build 2020.05.16

en:
EndSplit_v1.0_20200516.R implements end-member mixing and splitting.

This script is copyright (C) 2020 ETH Zurich and James Kirchner. Public use is permitted under GNU General Public License 3 (GPL3); for details see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/

But… READ THIS CAREFULLY:
ETH Zurich and James Kirchner make ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, including NO WARRANTIES, expressed or implied, that this software is free of errors or is suitable for any particular purpose. Users are solely responsible for determining the suitability and reliability of this software for their own purposes.

This script implements end-member mixing and end-member splitting, as described in Kirchner and Allen, "Seasonal partitioning of precipitation between streamflow and evapotranspiration, inferred from end-member splitting analysis", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24, 17-39, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-17-2020, 2020. Users publishing results based on these scripts should cite that paper.

en:
R scripts and demonstration data for end-member mixing and splitting: using isotopes and other tracers to determine where streamflow comes from (end-member mixing) and where precipitation goes (end-member splitting).

 This package includes two R scripts:

"EndSplit_v1.0_20200516.R" implements end-member mixing and splitting.
"EndSplit_demo_v1.0_20200516.R" demonstrates the application of EndSplit to the Hubbard Brook Watershed 3 isotope data set (see below).

Both of these scripts are copyright (C) 2020 ETH Zurich and James Kirchner. Public use is permitted under GNU General Public License 3 (GPL3); for details see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/

But… READ THIS CAREFULLY:
ETH Zurich and James Kirchner make ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, including NO WARRANTIES, expressed or implied, that this software is free of errors or is suitable for any particular purpose. Users are solely responsible for determining the suitability and reliability of this software for their own purposes.

These scripts implement end-member mixing and end-member splitting, as described in Kirchner and Allen, "Seasonal partitioning of precipitation between streamflow and evapotranspiration, inferred from end-member splitting analysis", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24, 17-39, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-17-2020, 2020. Users publishing results based on these scripts should cite that paper.

Build 2020.05.16 is a minor bug fix of build 2019.10.25, which was previously released as EndSplit_v1.0_20191025.R.

 The zip file "demonstration input data.zip" contains 8 demonstration data files (all tab-delimited text):

"Hubbard Brook WS3 isotope data split by sampling date.txt" contains streamflow and precipitation isotope data from Hubbard Brook Watershed 3 isotope data (Campbell and Green, 2019).
"Hubbard Brook WS3 daily P and Q 1956-2014.txt" contains daily precipitation and streamflow totals for Hubbard Brook Watershed 3. (USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, 2016a and 2016b).

"Hubbard Brook WS3 isotope data WY2007.txt", "Hubbard Brook WS3 isotope data WY2008.txt", "Hubbard Brook WS3 isotope data WY2009.txt", "Hubbard Brook WS3 daily P and Q WY2007.txt", "Hubbard Brook WS3 daily P and Q WY2008.txt", and "Hubbard Brook WS3 daily P and Q WY2009.txt" contain subsets of these data for the designated water years.

As the work product of US federal employees, the data in these files are in the public domain. However, any users of these data should cite the original sources:

Campbell, J. L., and Green, M. B.: Water isotope samples from Watershed 3 at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, 2006-2010, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/f5740876b68ec42b695c39d8ad790cee, 2019.

USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station: Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (US Forest Service): Daily Streamflow by Watershed, 1956 - present, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/38b11ee7531f6467bf59b6f7a4d9012b, 2016a.

USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station: Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (US Forest Service): Total Daily Precipitation by Watershed, 1956 - present, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/163e416fb108862dc6eb857360fa9c90, 2016b.

 The zip file "demonstration output files.zip" contains demonstration output files

These tab-delimited text files were generated by running EndSplit_demo_v1.0_20200516.R (which in turn calls EndSplit_v1.0_20200516.R) under R version 3.6.0, using the input files contained in "demonstration input data.zip"

end-member-mixing

display_name: end-member-mixing

end-member-splitting

display_name: end-member-splitting

evapotranspiration

display_name: evapotranspiration

isotopes

display_name: isotopes

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

streamflow

display_name: streamflow

tracer

display_name: tracer

en: EndSplit


maintainer: Thorsten Bartels-Rausch

en: snow antartic arctic sea-salt-aerosol polar laboratory-study cryosphere

en: Experimental results of uptake coefficient vs. temperature and ozone concentration

en:
Data to Figure 3: Measured uptake coefficients as a function of temperature at 5E12 molecules per cm3 ozone concentration.

Data to Figure 6: Measured uptake coefficients at different temperatures as a function of gas- phase ozone concentration.

mimetype: text/csv

en: Experimental Results: Uptake coefficients vs. temperature and ozone concentration

en:
* Final Data to Figure 3: Uptake coefficients as a function of temperature at 5E12 molecules per cm3 ozone concentration.
* Final Data to Figure 6: Uptake coefficients at different temperatures as a function of gas- phase ozone concentration.

The average ozone uptake coefficients of the three cycles between the bypass and the flow tube per repeat is taken as the mean uptake coefficient for each experiment. Gamma was corrected for gas phase diffusion limitation following the Cooney–Kim– Davis (CKD) method52 (see supporting material of publication for details).

en: The reaction of ozone with bromide in polar regions results in the formation of reactive bromide species with impacts on ozone budget and the oxidative capacity of the lower atmosphere. Here, we present a data investigating the temperature dependence of bromide oxidation by ozone using a coated wall flow tube reactor coated with an aqueous mixture of citric acid and sodium bromide, a proxy for sea salt aerosol in snow or the free troposphere. Thus study shows the effect of of organic species at relatively mild temperatures between the freezing point and eutectic temperature as typical for Earth's cryosphere.

antartic

display_name: antartic

arctic

display_name: arctic

cryosphere

display_name: cryosphere

laboratory-study

display_name: laboratory-study

polar

display_name: polar

sea-salt-aerosol

display_name: sea-salt-aerosol

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Kinetic experiments on the oxidation of bromide by ozone from 289-245 K.


en: weisfluhjoch davos radiation longwave-radiation shortwave-radiation

en: Processing doc

en: Description of processing code that was ported to R by P. Frei (2016).

mimetype: application/pdf

en: Parameter file

en: Description of ASRB parameters.

mimetype: text/plain

en: Metadata

en: DATA ACCESS

en: ASRB radiation station at the Weissfluhjoch versuchsfeld.

en:
Incoming and outgoing shortwave and longwave 2 min radiation measurements at the Weissfluhjoch research site, Davos, CH. The experimental site at the Weissfluhjoch (WFJ, 46.83 N, 9.81 E) is located at an altitude of 2540 m in the Swiss Alps near Davos. During the winter months, almost all precipitation falls as snow at this altitude. As a consequence, a continuous seasonal snow cover builds up every winter, with a maximum snow height ranging from 153–366 cm over the period 1934–2012. The measurement site is located in an almost flat part of a southeast oriented slope.

 References
1. Marty, C., Philipona, R., Frohlich, C., Ohmura, A.. Altitude dependence of surface radiation fluxes and cloud forcing in the alps: results from the alpine surface radiation budget network. 2002. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. Volume 72. Issue 3-4. 137-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007040200019. 10.1007/s007040200019.
2. Christoph Marty. Surface Radiation, Cloud Forcing and Greenhouse Effect in the Alps. 2000. Institute fuer Klimaforschung ETH. Zuercher Klima-Schriften. Volume 79. http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch/eserv/eth:23491/eth-23491-01.pdf.

davos

display_name: davos

longwave-radiation

display_name: longwave-radiation

radiation

display_name: radiation

shortwave-radiation

display_name: shortwave-radiation

weisfluhjoch

display_name: weisfluhjoch

en: ASRB_WFJVF: Shortwave and longwave radiation measurements (2 min) at the Weissfluhjoch research site, Davos


maintainer: Avalanche Warning Service SLF

en: Avalanche fatalities per year in Switzerland since 1936/1937

en:
Attention: this data is not updated after 2022 anymore.
This dataset contains the statistics on the number of avalanche fatalities per hydrological year in Switzerland. The data set commences with the beginning of the hydrological year 1936/37 on 01/10/1936. After the completion of a hydrological year, the new data is appended to the existing dataset.
The following information is contained (by column and column title):
 - hydrological year
 - number of fatalities in the backcountry (=tour)
 - number of fatalities in terrain close to ski areas (=offpiste)
 - number of fatalities on transportation corridors including ski runs, roads, railway lines (=transportation.corridors)
 - number of fatalities in or around buildings or in settlements (= buildings)
 - sum (of all four categories)
The definition for these four categories as described in the guidelines to the avalanche accident database:
**tour**:
activities include back-country ski, snowboard or snow-shoe touring
**offpiste**:
access from ski area, generally from the top of a skilift with short hiking distances
**transportation.corridors** ([Techel et al., 2016](http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/147/2016/ )):
people travelling or recreating on open or temporarily closed
transportation corridors (e.g. a road user or a skier on a ski run) and people working on open or closed transportation corridors (e.g. maintenance crews on roads, professional rescue teams)
**buildings** ([Techel et al., 2016](http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/147/2016/ )):
people inside or just outside buildings, and workers on high alpine building
sites

avalanche-accident-statistics

display_name: avalanche-accident-statistics

avalanche-accidents

display_name: avalanche-accidents

avalanche-fatalities

display_name: avalanche-fatalities

fatalities-in-or-around-buildings

display_name: fatalities-in-or-around-buildings

fatalities-in-settlements

display_name: fatalities-in-settlements

fatalities-in-the-backcountry

display_name: fatalities-in-the-backcountry

fatalities-on-transportation-corridors

display_name: fatalities-on-transportation-corridors

en: Number of avalanche fatalities per hydrological year in Switzerland since 1936-1937


backward-trajectories

maintainer: Michael Sprenger

title_for_slug: backward-trajectories

en: raclets backward-trajectories lagrangian-analysis cosmo atmospheric-dynamics complex-topopgraphy alps

en: Backward Trajectories

en: The trajectories are started from surface up to 5000 m altitude, with an equidistant vertical spacing of 200 m, and calculated 120 h backward in time. As long as the trajectories stay in the COSMO1 domain (essentially the Alpine region), as run operationally at MeteoSwiss, the COSMO analysis wind fields are used. When the trajectories leave this domain, they are extended further backward in time based on ECMWF analysis data. The following fields are traced along the trajectories: longitude, latitude, geopotential height, pressure, specific humidity, temperature and surface topography. Furthermore, it is indicated for each trajectory time instance on which model data, COSMO or ECMWF, the trajectory time is based. Finally, the trajectories are started every hour in the specified time period, and positions and fields are available every 10 min. Each day is saved as a separate file. The last 8 digits of the file names indicate the starting date of the trajectories.

en: Backward trajectories were calculated from two positions: Davos Wolfgang (LON: 9.85361, LAT: 46.83551) and Weissfluhjoch (LON: 9.80646 LAT: 46.83304) for the time period February 2 until March 27 2019 using COSMO or ECMWF, respectively.

alps

display_name: alps

atmospheric-dynamics

display_name: atmospheric-dynamics

backward-trajectories

display_name: backward-trajectories

complex-topopgraphy

display_name: complex-topopgraphy

cosmo

display_name: cosmo

lagrangian-analysis

display_name: lagrangian-analysis

raclets

display_name: raclets

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: Backward  Trajectories


dischmex-meteorological-measurements

maintainer: Rebecca Mott

title_for_slug: dischmex-meteorological-measurements

en: dischmex dischma meteo-station meteorological-measurements meteorological-data

en: Meteorological measurement 2015

en: data

en: Meteorological measurements 2014

en: Location of the meteorological stations

en: Meteorological measurements 2016

en: Overview sensors

en: Meteorological measurement 2014

en:
Meteorological measurements recorded in the Dischma valley from 2014-2016. In 2014 and 2015 we used 11 mobile weather stations from sensorscope to record meteorological parameter in the upper Dischma valley in the closer surroundings of the Gletschboden area. The meteorological stations are eqiupped with at least air temperature/humidity, wind velocity and wind direction sensors. Some stations are additionally equipped with precipitation, shortwave radiation and snow surface temperature sensors.
Three transects were installed at different aspects and were equipped with air temperature/humidity and wind sensors. Transect 1 (stations 2-4) provides meteorological Information on an east-north-east facing slope at elevations ranging between 2100 m and 2500 m. Transect 2 (stations 5-7) provides meteorological Information on a south-west slope and transect 3 (stations 8-10) on a north-west slope. Station 1 is fully equipped with meteorological sensors (temperature/humidity, wind, IR, up and downwand shortwave radiation and precipitation).
In 2016, mobile stations from sensorscope were replaced with six permanent meteorological stations. Meteorological stations 1-3 are equipped with an air temperature/humidity sensor, two wind speed sensors, a wind direction sensor and an incoming and outgoing shortwave radiation sensor. Stations 4 and 6 are equipped with an air temperature/humidity sensor and a wind speed/direction sensor. Station 5 is a equipped with an air temperature/humidity sensor, a wind speed/direction sensor, a snow surface temperature sensor, an incoming and outgoing shortwave radiation sensor and an incoming longwave radiation sensor.

dischma

display_name: dischma

dischmex

display_name: dischmex

meteo-station

display_name: meteo-station

meteorological-data

display_name: meteorological-data

meteorological-measurements

display_name: meteorological-measurements

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: DISCHMEX - Meteorological measurements


en: nature-conservation peat raised-bog vegetation sphagnum switzerland restoration indicator-values

en: Data Hagenmoos

en: The data file contains mean indicator values for light, moisture, pH, nutrients, humus, temperature and continentality and strategy values for stress, competition and ruderality for each plot and year. It further contains for each plot and year species richenss values for the following groups: (1) all plant species, (2) all vascular plant species, (3) bog specialists among vascular plant species, (4) all bryophyte species, (5) bog specialists among bryophyte species. As bog specialist species, we considered all plant species listed as characteristic species of raised bogs by Feldmeyer-Christe and Küchler (2018: Moore der Schweiz. Haupt, Bern).

en: This dataset includes data from three vegetation surveys in a restored raised bog (Hagenmoos) in the lowland of the canton of Zürich (Switzerland). The bog Hagenmoos was restored by cutting shrubs and trees within the formerly peat-cutting pits and by blocking drainages. The vegetation surveys were carried out before (1989), ten years after (1999) and 30 years after restoration (2020). In each vegetation survey, all vascular plant and bryophyte species within 72 permanent plots were recorded. Of these plots, 34 are located within the formerly peat-cutting pits and 38 are located outside the peat pits. Based on presence-absence data of vascular plants and bryophytes, mean ecological indicator and strategy values based on Landolt et al. (2010) were calculated and are provided in the Excel sheet. Indicator values for light, moisture, pH, nutrients, humus, temperature and continentality and strategy values for stress, competition and ruderality were considered. Furthermore, species richness for the following groups were calculated: (1) all plant species, (2) all vascular plant species, (3) bog specialists among vascular plant species, (4) all bryophyte species, (5) bog specialists among bryophyte species. As bog specialist species, we considered all plant species listed as characteristic species of raised bogs by Feldmeyer-Christe and Küchler (2018: Moore der Schweiz. Haupt, Bern).

indicator-values

display_name: indicator-values

nature-conservation

display_name: nature-conservation

peat

display_name: peat

raised-bog

display_name: raised-bog

restoration

display_name: restoration

sphagnum

display_name: sphagnum

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

vegetation

display_name: vegetation

en: Restoration of the lowland raised bog Hagenmoos (Switzerland): Data on vegetation, ecological indicator values and species richness from 1989 until 2020


en: occurrences caribbean america fish marine

en: Fish observations of Greater Caribbean and Tropical East Pacific

en:
combined and cleaned occurrences of marine fish species of the Greater Caribbean and Tropical East Pacific.

Data were obtain from the following sources in 2019/2020:
https://gbif.org
https://idigbio.org
https://biogeodb.stri.si.edu/sftep/en/pages
https://biogeodb.stri.si.edu/caribbean/en/pages

america

display_name: america

caribbean

display_name: caribbean

fish

display_name: fish

marine

display_name: marine

occurrences

display_name: occurrences

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: marine fish occurrences of Tropical America


en: long-term-forest-ecosystem-research icp-forests coarse-woody-debris swiss-forest-lab deadwood

en: Data Request

en:
Assessment of coarse woody debris on Sanasilva plots (16x16 km grid) using the full count methods on subplots applying BioSoil protocoll

 Purpose:

Assessing the amount of coarse woody debris

 Manual Citation:

 * A. Bastrup-Birk, P. Nevile, G. Chirici, T. Houston, 2006: The BioSoil ForestBiodiversity Field Manual Version 1.0/1.1/1.1A for the Field Assessment 2006-07. Working Group on ForestBiodiversity, Forest Focus Demonstration Project BioSoil 2004-2005, 47 S.

coarse-woody-debris

display_name: coarse-woody-debris

deadwood

display_name: deadwood

icp-forests

display_name: icp-forests

long-term-forest-ecosystem-research

display_name: long-term-forest-ecosystem-research

swiss-forest-lab

display_name: swiss-forest-lab

en: Deadwood survey Sanasilva 2013


en:
Volume of stemwood with bark of all trees and shrubs starting at 12 cm dbh removed from the forest due to damage occurring (e.g. windthrow, avalanches, insects or rockfall), and not as the result of management planning. This feature is derived on the level of a sample plot from the cuttings of the sample trees and the salvage cut proportion (according to information from the forester).  The correction for bias with the sample Tarif trees may be so drastic that it results in negative values with small numbers of trees.

Citation:
 > _Abegg, M.; Brändli, U.-B.; Cioldi, F.; Fischer, C.; Herold-Bonardi, A.; Huber M.; Keller, M.; Meile, R.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Traub, B.; Vidondo, B. (2014). Fourth national forest inventory - result tables and maps on the Internet for the NFI 2009-2013 (NFI4b). [Published online 06.11.2014] Available from World Wide Web http://www.lfi.ch/resultate/ Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL. [doi:10.21258/1057112](https://doi.org/10.21258/1057112)_

avalanches-silvaprotect

display_name: avalanches-silvaprotect

biogeographical-region

display_name: biogeographical-region

cause-of-salvage-logging

display_name: cause-of-salvage-logging

economic-region

display_name: economic-region

landslide-mudflow-silvaprotect

display_name: landslide-mudflow-silvaprotect

main-type-of-harvest

display_name: main-type-of-harvest

potential-cost-for-timber-harvesting

display_name: potential-cost-for-timber-harvesting

processes-in-channels-silvaprotect

display_name: processes-in-channels-silvaprotect

production-region

display_name: production-region

protection-forest-region

display_name: protection-forest-region

rockfall-silvaprotect

display_name: rockfall-silvaprotect

salvage-logging

display_name: salvage-logging

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: Salvage logging