soil-respiration-exclosure-experiment

title_for_slug: soil-respiration-exclosure-experiment

en: grassland soil-respiration ungulates subalpine grazing

en: Soil respiration Switzerland

en:
ID: Fence number

Year	:Year of sampling

mean.CO2: soil respiration measured with PP-systems SRC-1 soil respriation chamber attached to a EGM-4 infrared gas analyser; units CO2 g m-2 h-1

Grassland: Grasslands where fences were errected. Note that on large grasslands (STAB, GRIM, MING) 2 pairs of fences were errected (2 in short, 2 in tall-grass vegetation), on small grasslands (DADA, MARG, BOTS) only one pair of fences was errected (1 short-grass; one-tallgrass vegetation)

Fence: Fence number; un-even numbers on short-grass vegetation (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17), even numbers on tall-grass vegetation (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18)

Vegetation:	1 = shortgrass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)

Treatment	: 1 = all herbivores grazing, 2 = large ungulates (red deer, chamois) excluded

en:
Location of data collection
The Swiss National Park (SNP) is located in the southeastern part of Switzerland, and covers an area of 170 km2, 50 km2 of which is forested, 33 km2 is occupied by alpine and 3 km2 by subalpine grasslands. Elevations range from 1350 to 3170 m a.s.l., and mean annual precipitation and temperature are 871 mm and 0.6°C measured at the Park’s weather station in Buffalora (1980 m a.s.l.) between 1960 and 2009 (MeteoSchweiz 2011). Founded in 1914, the SNP received minimal human disturbance for almost 100 years (no hunting, fishing, or camping, visitors are not allowed to leave the trails). Large (> 1 ha) homogeneous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation characterize the subalpine grasslands. The average vegetation height of short-grass vegetation is 2 to 5 cm. Red fescue (Festuca rubra L.), quaking grass (Briza media L.) and common bent grass (Agrostis tenuis Sipthrob) are the predominating plant species in this vegetation type. Tussocks of evergreen sedge (Carex sempervirens Vill.) and mat grass (Nardus stricta L.) are predominant in the tall-grass vegetation, which averages 20 cm in vegetation height (Schütz and others 2006). Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle and sheep rested (high nutrient input) during agricultural land-use (from 14th century until 1914); tall-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle and sheep used to graze, but did not rest (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Herbivores were shown to consume > 60% of the biomass in short-grass compared to < 20% in tall-grass vegetation (Schütz and others 2006). The herbivore community present in the SNP can be divided into four groups based on body size/weight: large [red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and chamois (Rupricapra rupricapra L.); 30 - 150 kg], medium [marmot (Marmota marmota L.) and snow hare (Lepus timidus L.); 3 – 6 kg], and small vertebrate herbivores (small rodents: e.g. Clethrionomys spp., Microtus spp., Apodemus spp.; 30 – 100 g) as well as invertebrates (e.g. grasshoppers, caterpillars, cicadas, < 5 g).

Experimental design
We selected 18 subalpine grassland sites (9 short-grass, 9 tall-grass vegetation). The sites were spread across the entire park on dolomite parent material at altitudes of 1975 to 2300 meters. At each site we established an exclosure network (fences) in spring 2009 (early June), immediately after snowmelt. Each exclosure network consisted of a total of five 2 × 3 m sized plots that progressively excluded the different herbivores listed above (further labeled according to the herbivore guilds that had access to the respective plots “All”, “Marmot/Mice/Invertebrates”, “Mice/Invertebrates”, “Invertebrates”, “None”). The “All” treatment was thus accessible to all herbivores, was not fenced and was located at least 5 m away from a 2.1 m tall and 7 × 9 m main fence that enclosed the other four treatments. This fence was constructed of 10 × 10 cm wooden posts and electrical equestrian tape (AGRARO ECO, Landi, Bern, Switzerland; 20 mm width) mounted at 0.7 m, 0.95 m, 1.2 m, 1.5 m and 2.1 m above the ground that were connected to a solar charged battery (AGRARO Sunpower S250, Landi, Bern, Switzerland). We also mounted non-electrically charged equestrian tape at 0.5 m to help exclude deer and chamois, yet allow marmots and hares to enter safely. Within each main fenced area we randomly established four 2 × 3 m plots: (1) The “Marmot/Mice/Invertebrates” plot remained unfenced, thus, with the exception of red deer and chamois, all herbivores were able to access the plot, (2) The “Mice/Invertebrates” plot consisted of a 90 cm high electric sheep fence (AGRARO Weidezaunnetz ECO, Landi, Bern, Switzerland; mesh size 10 × 10 cm) connected to the solar panel and excluded all medium sized mammals (marmots, hares), but provided access for small mammals and invertebrates, (3) The “Invertebrates” plot provided access for invertebrates only and was surrounded by 1 m high metal mesh (Hortima AG, Hausen, Schweiz; mesh size 2 × 2 cm), (4) The “None” plot was surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (Sala Ferramenta AG, Biasca, Switzerland; mesh size 1.5 × 2 mm) to exclude all herbivores. This plot was covered with a roof constructed of a wooden frame lined with mosquito mesh that was mounted on the wooden corner posts. We also treated this plot with a biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) when needed to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil.

!!! The here published data set only contains data for “All”, and “Marmot/Mice/Invertebrates” (= ungulates excluded) plots !!!

Data collection
In-situ soil CO2 emissions were measured with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyzer (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two randomly selected locations on one subplot within each of the 90 plots. For each measurement the soil chamber (15 cm high; 10 cm diameter) was placed on a permanently installed PVC collar (10 cm diameter) driven five centimeters into the soil at the beginning of the study (June 2009). The measurements were conducted between 0900 and 1700 hours every two weeks from early to early September 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2013. Freshly germinated plants growing within the PVC collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration/photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot every two weeks were averaged.

Please acknowledge the funding of the study: funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, SNF grant-no 31003A_122009/1 to Anita C. Risch, Martin Schütz and Flurin Filli

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

soil-respiration

display_name: soil-respiration

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

ungulates

display_name: ungulates

en: Soil respiration - exclosure experiment


maintainer: Marcia Phillips

en: permafrost gemsstock permos temperature borehole

state: active

type: dataset

en: PERMOS DATA POLICY

media_type: application/pdf

format: PDF

en: Map of PERMOS borehole network

format: SERVICE

en: DATASET & PLOTS

en: Data visualiser and download service provided by PERMOS.

en:
Processed ground temperature measurements at the Gemsstock permafrost borehole in canton Uri, Switzerland. The borehole is located at 2940 m asl on a steep (50°) North-West slope (315°). The surface material is bedrock and borehole depth is 40 m. Thermistors used YSI 44008. Year of drilling 2006. This borehole is part of the Swiss Permafrost network, PERMOS (www.permos.ch). Contact phillips@slf.ch for details of processing applied.

Publications

1. A. Haberkorn, M. Phillips, R. Kenner, H. Rhyner, M. Bavay, S.P. Galos, M. Hoelzle. Thermal regime of rock and its relation to snow cover in steep Alpine rock walls: Gemsstock, central Swiss Alps. 2015. Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography. Volume 97. Issue 3. 579–597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12101. 10.1111/geoa.12101.

2. R. Kenner, M. Phillips, C. Danioth, C. Denier, P. Thee, A. Zgraggen. Investigation of rock and ice loss in a recently deglaciated mountain rock wall using terrestrial laser scanning: Gemsstock, Swiss Alps. 2011. Cold Regions Science and Technology. Volume 67. Issue 3. 157–164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.04.006. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.04.006.

borehole

display_name: borehole

gemsstock

display_name: gemsstock

permafrost

display_name: permafrost

permos

display_name: permos

temperature

display_name: temperature

educ

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

en: Education, culture and sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester

en: Processed permafrost borehole data (2940 m asl), Gemsstock, Switzerland


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: landscape wetlands connectivity occupancy-models amphibians conservation

en: Original raw data

en: This file contains the original raw monitoring data as provided by the canton of Aargau. Access is restricted and only considered upon request and in consultation with the canton of Aargau.

format: XLS

en: Readme, v 2.0

en: Description of methods and datasets. Version 2.0, including new datasets fro structural and potential population connectivity.

en: Potential population connectivity data

media_type: text/csv

en: This file contains potential population connectivity data (three different metrics), calculated based on all existing and occupied ponds in each year, for each species, in long format. See Readme v2.0 for details. Required to run Model code 2.

format: CSV

en: Observation data

en: This file contains detection/non-detection data for the 12 amphibian species between 1999 and 2019 for 3 annual visits. Detectable denotes whether or not a visit j was made to pond i in year t. ObservedID gives a unique ID for the observer collecting the data during visit j to pond i in year t.

en: Structural connectivity data

en: This file contains structural connectivity data (three different metrics), calculated based on all existing ponds in each year, in long format. See Readme v2.0 for details. Required to run Model code 2.

en: Covariate data 1

en: This file contains covariate data that does not change over time for 856 ponds: the region the pond is in, whether the pond is old or new (constructed since 1991), elevation, water surface area, fluctuations of the water table (yes, no), the percent forest cover in 100m radius around the pond, the area or large (>6m wide) roads in 1km radius around the pond.

en: Model code

en: This R markdown file contains all code and descriptions necessary to load and format the provided data and to fit the dynamic occupancy models described in the associated publication, including JAGS code for the fitted models.

en: Covariate data 2

en: This file contains covariate data that changes over time for 856 ponds in 21 years (long format): whether or not a pond exists in year _t_, the age of constructed ponds in year _t_, structural connectivity of the pond in year _t_.

en: Model code 2

en: This R markdown file contains all code and descriptions necessary to load and format the provided data and to fit the dynamic occupancy models described in the second associated publication, including JAGS code for the fitted models.

format: OCTET

en: Model code, description

media_type: text/html

en: This is the output of the R markdown file that provides JAGS model code and describes how to format the provided data and fit the dynamic occupancy models described in the associated publication, for a quick overview.

format: HTML

en: Readme

en: Description of methods and datasets. Version 1.

en: Model code 2, description

en: This is the output of the R markdown file Model code 2 that provides JAGS model code and describes how to format the provided data and fit the dynamic occupancy models described in the second associated publication, for a quick overview.

en:
In the canton of Aargau, hundreds of new ponds have been constructed since the 1990s to benefit declining amphibian populations. This dataset consists of monitoring data for all 12 pond-breeding amphibian species in the canton of Aargau from 1999 to 2019 in 856 ponds, and environmental variables that describe the ponds and the landscape surrounding the ponds. Species observation data is detection/non-detection data from repeat visits during survey years, during which all potentially suitable ponds in an area were surveyed. Environmental variables describing the ponds are whether the pond has been newly constructed since 1991 or not, pond age (if constructed), elevation a.s.l., the water surface area, and whether the water table fluctuates or not. Environmental variables describing the surroundings of the ponds are the percent area of forest within a circular buffer of radius 100m around the pond, the area of large (width ≥6m) roads within a circular buffer of radius 1km around the pond, as well as structural and potential population connectivity, quantified by three different metrics each.
The canton of Aargau is the owner of the monitoring data; the original datafile is only disclosed upon request and in consultation with the canton of Aargau.
The edited dataset contains cleaned observation data for the 12 amphibian species, as well as compiled and edited covariate data and code to fit dynamic occupancy models.

amphibians

display_name: amphibians

connectivity

display_name: connectivity

conservation

display_name: conservation

landscape

display_name: landscape

occupancy-models

display_name: occupancy-models

wetlands

display_name: wetlands

en: Amphibian observation and pond data (Aargau, Switzerland)


data-analysis-toolkits

title_for_slug: data-analysis-toolkits

en: bayesian-inference statistics error-propagation uncertainty hypothesis-testing data-analysis

en: Toolkit 3: tools for transforming data

en: The ladder of powers and a few other cool transformations

mimetype: application/pdf

en: toolkit 6: averaging in nonlinear functions

en: The average of a nonlinear function will not equal the function evaluated at its average inputs (the mean of the function will differ from from the function of the mean). This toolkit shows how to estimate that averaging bias.

en: Toolkit 1: graphically displaying data distributions

en: Toolkit 2: quantifying data distributions using descriptive statistics

en: Toolkit 10: linear regression

en: An overview of the math, logic, and pitfalls of ordinary least-squares linear regression

en: Toolkit 4: confidence intervals

en: Toolkit 8: Hodges-Lehmann estimators

en: A quick introduction to Hodges-Lehmann estimators (nonparametric measures of effect size)

en: Toolkit 12: weighted averages and their uncertainties

en: There are two different ways to calculate the uncertainty of a weighted average. Software packages often don't tell you which one they are reporting, and the resulting errors can be huge.

en: Toolkit 7: hypothesis testing, significance, and power

en: An overview of basic concepts -- and common pitfalls -- in statistical hypothesis testing, statistical significance, and power analysis

en: Toolkit 11: serial correlation

en: Tools for detecting and correcting for serial correlation in analyses of time series

en: Toolkit 9: Experimentwise error rates and statistical fishing expeditions

en: Statistical fishing expeditions, and how to avoid being misled by them

en: Toolkit 5: uncertainty analysis and error propagation

en: Gaussian error propagation, monte carlo methods, and first-order, second-moment error propagation

en:
These are condensed notes covering selected key points in data analysis and statistics. They were developed by James Kirchner for the course "Analysis of Environmental Data" at Berkeley in the 1990's and 2000's. They are not intended to be comprehensive, and thus are not a substitute for a good textbook or a good education!

License: These notes are released by James Kirchner under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) license.

bayesian-inference

display_name: bayesian-inference

data-analysis

display_name: data-analysis

error-propagation

display_name: error-propagation

hypothesis-testing

display_name: hypothesis-testing

statistics

display_name: statistics

uncertainty

display_name: uncertainty

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Data analysis toolkits


en: urbanization modeling statistical-model land-use-change switzerland land-use landscape-services

en: Data for Assessing potential landscape service trade-offs driven by urbanization in Switzerland

media_type: application/zip

en:
The provided folder structure follows the set up of the scripts.
Data is only provided when it has been fully produced by us, otherwise dummies are given.
For data that will be produced by one of the scripts, no dummies are given.
The folders may contain sub-folders, which would be filled if the scripts were all run

 00_Analysis_Data
Data produced throughout the process of the calibration and projection that is later needed for analysis

 01_Raw_Data
Primary data from external sources that were used to compile the rasters and numbers used during the calibration and projection of landscape transitions as well as service calculation

 02_Prepared_Data
Data that will be prepared for further use by scripts are put in here
Additionally it contains the parameter sheets for the transition predictors that we compiled

 03_Model_Data
 Model outputs
Folder were the projection models statistics will be saved
 Models
Folder into which the actual transition models will be saved
 Residuals
Folder into which data on models residuals will be saved for future use

 04_Projected_Data
The output of the projections will be saved into this folder

 05_Service_Data
Any service calculations will be saved in here

 06_Results_Analysis
Any Analysis plots and tables as well as intermediate data will be saved here in the respective sub-folder

format: ZIP

mimetype: application/zip

en: Scripts for Assessing potential landscape service trade-offs driven by urbanization in Switzerland

en:
Scripts ordered by their main purpose within sequential folders in this ReadMe marked with

Within the folders the capital letters refer to the parallel or sequential use of the scripts; scripts here in ReadMe are marked with

 00_Function Scripts
 Functions.r
Script containing several functions for analyzing statistical models: cohen.kappa, meva.table, D2, max-Tss, plot-TSS

 Service_functions.R
Script containing functions for calculating all services and returning sums (and median for bd and rec) as well as rasters

 01_Data Preparation
 A_AS_raster_preparation.R
Preparation of the land use rasters for the years 1985, 1997, and 2009 based on the original Arealstatistik (AS/ASCH); Assigning our categories and assining new values to all "construction sites" for calibrating the models
For model projection starting point (2009) and for service calculations (all ASCH years) the "other" categories were assigned to the land use categories based on dominant neighbor, so that there were no empty cells
Creation of water & mountainous area raster that stayed stable throughout the projections
Creation of MFH raster (2009), to have as base for all new projection years, as this category never becames any other

 B_Factors_preparation.R
Preparation of the factor rasters that were used to calculate service values per cell (see Table 2): LWfactor, Transportation, Vol, Rivers, Lakes, slope, TWW, Hazard_risk

 B_Predictors_preparation.R
Preparation of the raster of the predictors used for calibrating (ASCH years) and projecting (stable) the transition models that do not depend on the land use categories: Temperature (ASCH years), solar radiation (stable), Public transportation access (stable), Elevation (stable), Workers density (ASCH years), Population change (ASCH transitions)

 B_Regions_preparation.R
Preparation of bioregions as raster to be used to mask asxxxx later to calculated services and land use area just for one region

 C_Pred_proj.R
Projecting the dynamic predictors into the future for projecting the land use transitions with the model: Linear extrapolations for workers densities and population; more detailed extrapolation of temperature (based on data for all stations that matched between the temp table we used for the calibration period and the projections from CS2M, and then making a spatial interpolation for all years based on the interpolation of temperature for all years per station)

 02_Model calibration
 A_Bioreg_pred_corr.R
Calculating correlation between the predictors for each bioregion and land use category, Output are those with too high correlation so that one predictor can be removed from transitions were both predictors occur

 A_trans_numbers_bioreg.R
Calculate transition numbers for each bioregion to decide which transitions to primarily consider

 B_Bioreg_ext_eval.R
Calculating TSS based on the external evaluation for the bioregion transitions that happened often enough to try to model them (calibration data: 85-97, evaluation data: 97-09)

 B_Bioreg_int_eval.R
Calculating TSS based on the internal evaluation for the bioregion transitions that happened often enough to try to model them (calibration data: 70%, evaluation data: 30%)

 C_Bioreg_TSS_analysis.R
Extracting TSS numbers from internal and external evaluation, calculating mean and median for each transition for each region for each evaluation method and saving as csv per region to be able to select only the transitions with high enough model performance

 D_Bioreg_Models_for_prediction.R
Calibration of the models that were then used to project land use transitions into the future; calibrated separately for each bioregion

 E_Residuals_trans_models.R
Calculation of Moran's I statistics to analyze the residuals of the land use transition models

 03_Projections
 A_Bioreg_Projections_run.R
Master script for: Extrapolaitng into the future with the regional models and then assembling for each time step to calculate new AS predictors; Several Outputs: txt file to test for NAs in Predictors, txt file with random seed number for sampling, txt file with times for calculation steps (check progress of script while running), csv sheet with projected transition frequencies, tif-rasters for every region and time step, pdf with raster plot for every region and time step

 04_Service calculation
 A_Bioreg_as_services.R
Calculate services per bioregion for years 1985, 1997, 2009

 A_Service_calculation_bioregions.R
Extracting service numbers(sums) per bioregions for all projection runs and storing them in a list of matrixes to be available for further plotting; can be run for swiss wide projections or regional ones

 05_Analysis
 A_Bioreg_ASCH_development.R
Extracting the occurrence of each category per region for all runs (first part), then for ASCH years, and then plotting them nicely; only works for regional projections

 A_Bioreg_Predictors_importanceD2.R
Calculating D2 for each transition and each considered predictor from bivariate models to get value of importance

 B_Bioreg_Pred_imp_analysis.R
Using calculated D2 to sort Predictors according to their importance for each transition

 A_Bioreg_Spatial_results_analysis.R
Plotting randomly sampled runs for ASCH and services to analyses their spatial development

 A_Bioreg_Transition_numbers_check_v1.R
Analyzing the frequency for all transitions for all regions and producing the point plots for each transition separately

 A_Bioreg_Transition_numbers_check_v2.R
Analyzing percentage and numbers of all transitions but plotting them per region and originating ASCH category

 B_Transition_Analysis.R
Further Analysis of transition numbers

 A_Service_analysis.R
Plotting of the service development for bioregions in several ways for analyzing

en:
Data and scripts of publication:

Madleina Gerecke, Oskar Hagen, Janine Bolliger, Anna M. Hersperger, Felix Kienast, Bronwyn Price, Loïc Pellissier (2019) Assessing potential landscape service trade-offs driven by urbanization in Switzerland. Palgrave communications.

Contains land use projections for Switzerland and scripts and data for these projections as well as the calculation of landscape services.

Data Folder:
Contains sub-folder with the data necessary for this study (provided were no copyright issues, otherwise placeholders with descriptions), and folders where produced data may be stored

Scripts Folder:
Contains scripts organized into subfolders depending on their purpose

Note: Some abbreviations within the scripts and data are derived from German words and not English.

land-use

display_name: land-use

land-use-change

display_name: land-use-change

landscape-services

display_name: landscape-services

modeling

display_name: modeling

statistical-model

display_name: statistical-model

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

urbanization

display_name: urbanization

en: Land use projections and services for Switzerland


en: fagus-sylvatica beech tree-ring dendrochronology dendroecology network-analysis

en:
R code to run the model behind the results of the research article "No future growth enhancement expected at the northern edge for European beech due to continued water limitation".
Requires beech_rawtrw.txt.

en: Model output

en: Output of the Mixed-effects model

media_type: text/plain

en:
This dataset contains the raw ring-width and climate data (1952-2020) used in the research article "No future growth enhancement expected at the northern edge for European beech due to continued water limitation".
RW= ring width
Year= Calendar year
CN = core number
ID3= plot identifier
longitude = longitude (°)
latitude = latitude (°)
elevation = elevation (m)
age= estimated age in calendar year
radius= estimated radius in calendar year (mm)
MAT= mean annual temperature (°C)
MAP= mean annual precipitation (mm)
MCWB= mean climatic water balance (P-PET; mm)
amplitude= simple continentality measure (July - January mean maximum temperatures)
MATspline1 and 2, MCWBspline1 and 2, radiusspline4 and 5= natural spline transformed values of MAT, MCWB and radius ns(x,2)
CWD_pMay_Jun= Climatic Water Balance of previous year May to June !!!#please note CWD here is NOT Climatic Water Deficit, this was a labeling error in the creation of the dataset headers
CWD_May_Jun= Climatic Water Balance of current year May to June
Tmax_pMay_Jun= mean monthly maximum temperature of previous year May to June
Tmax_May_Jun= mean monthly maximum temperature of current year May to June
weight = site replication-based weighting input for model
SOM= membership of regional cluster 1-8 based on Supervised Organized Mapping

format: TXT

en: This dataset contains the raw ring-width and climate data (1952-2020), as well as the R code to run the model and the model output used in the research article "No future growth enhancement expected at the northern edge for European beech due to continued water limitation".

beech

display_name: beech

dendrochronology

display_name: dendrochronology

dendroecology

display_name: dendroecology

fagus-sylvatica

display_name: fagus-sylvatica

network-analysis

display_name: network-analysis

tree-ring

display_name: tree-ring

en: European Beech tree-ring dataset 1952-2020


maintainer: Yohann Chauvier

en: gbif taxonomy range-maps flags accepted-name conservation species-observations species-distribution large-scale occurrence-records synonyms hard-limit r-package ecoregions filtering landsca

en: gbif.range R package version 1.1 (current)

en: wsl.gbif R package version 0.1 (deprecated)

en: Test version, not to be used.

en: gbif.range R package version 0.2 (deprecated)

en: GitHub URL

en: Although species range may be obtained using expert maps or modeling methods, expert data is often species-limited and statistical models need more technical expertise as well as many species observations. When unavailable, such information may be extracted from the Global Biodiversity Information facility (GBIF), the largest public data repository inventorying georeferenced species observations worldwide. However, retrieving GBIF records at large scale may be tedious if users are unaware of specific tools and functions that need to be employed. Here we present *gbif.range*, an R library that contains automated methods to generate species range maps from scratch using in-house ecoregions shapefiles and an easy-to-use GBIF download wrapper. Finally, this library also offers a set of additional very useful parameters and functions for large GBIF datasets (generate doi, extract GBIF taxonomy, records filtering...). [gbif.range R project](https://github.com/8Ginette8/gbif.range)

accepted-name

display_name: accepted-name

conservation

display_name: conservation

ecoregions

display_name: ecoregions

filtering

display_name: filtering

flags

display_name: flags

gbif

display_name: gbif

hard-limit

display_name: hard-limit

landsca

display_name: landsca

large-scale

display_name: large-scale

occurrence-records

display_name: occurrence-records

r-package

display_name: r-package

range-maps

display_name: range-maps

species-distribution

display_name: species-distribution

species-observations

display_name: species-observations

synonyms

display_name: synonyms

taxonomy

display_name: taxonomy

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: gbif.range - An R package to generate species range maps based on ecoregions and a user-friendly GBIF wrapper


en: sustainability nutrient beech mass-balance soil

en: With this study, our aim was to estimate the nutrient fluxes relevant for assessing nutrient sustainability as accurately as possible and to calculate nutrient balances for alternative forest management scenarios. Furthermore, we tested whether mapping units from existing geologic maps can serve as a basis for forest practitioners to estimate nutrient sustainability or whether more detailed data is needed. Positive fluxes include deposition and weathering, while negative fluxes include losses due to leaching and nutrient removal through timber harvesting in the balance. Weathering and leachate losses were modeled with a geochemical model. The SwissStandSim model was used to simulate the biomass growth under different harvesting and silvicultural strategies, allowing sustainability to be assessed for each nutrient at a given intensity of use. This assessment was made per rotation period of 100 years based on two criteria: i) nutrient supply; and ii) total stocking volume.

beech

display_name: beech

mass-balance

display_name: mass-balance

nutrient

display_name: nutrient

soil

display_name: soil

sustainability

display_name: sustainability

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Nutrient sustainability in beech forests


en: cloud-droplets pmcamx-uf nucleation total-number modeling

en: data_JRL_New particle formation events can reduce cloud droplets in boundary layer clouds at the continental scale.Paper_2023GL106182.zip

en: This repository contains PMCMx-UF model outputs used for the paper: D. Patoulias K. Florou S. N. Pandis and A. Nenes: New particle formation events can reduce cloud droplets in boundary layer clouds at the continental scale, Geophysical Research Letters, in review, 2023.

cloud-droplets

display_name: cloud-droplets

modeling

display_name: modeling

nucleation

display_name: nucleation

pmcamx-uf

display_name: pmcamx-uf

total-number

display_name: total-number

en: Dataset for the publication New particle formation events can reduce cloud droplets in boundary layer clouds at the continental scale


en: zenodo database forest-fire smouldering holdover lightning-location-system

en: No description

en: This database contains open, harmonized, and ready-to-use global data on holdover time. Holdover time is defined as the time between lightning-induced fire ignition and fire detection. The first version of the database is composed of three data files (censored data, non-censored data, ancillary data) and three metadata files (description of database variables, list of references, reproducible examples). These data were collected through a literature review of LIW studies and some datasets were assembled by authors of the original studies, covering more than 150,000 LIW from 13 countries in five continents and a time span of a century from 1921 to 2020. Censored data are the core of the database and consist of frequency data reporting the number or relative frequency of LIW per interval of holdover time. Ancillary data provide additional information on the methods and contexts in which the data were generated in the original studies. Potential contributors to the database are encouraged to contact the corresponding author in the readme file.

database

display_name: database

forest-fire

display_name: forest-fire

holdover

display_name: holdover

lightning-location-system

display_name: lightning-location-system

smouldering

display_name: smouldering

zenodo

display_name: zenodo

en: Database on holdover time of lightning-ignited wildfires


maintainer: Ana Beatriz Pierri Daunt

en: ecosystem-services landscape-perception resilience landscape-planning green-infrastructure sense-of-place literature-review multifunctionality planning pdfsearch landscape-services decision-making socio-ecological-system landscape-ecology

en: 3. Use of any early concept.

en: 1. Frequency of early concepts.

en: 6. Protocol

en: 4. Use of any additional concept.

en: 2. Frequency of additional concepts.

en: 5. Planning steps.

en:
Table of content: 1. Frequency of early concepts; 2. Frequency of additional concepts; 3. Use of any early concept; 4. Use of any additional concept, 5. Planning steps; 6. Protocol.

The present dataset is part of the published scientific paper entitled “Landscape ecological concepts in planning: review of recent developments” (Hersperger et al., 2021). The goal of this research was to review recent publications to assess the use of landscape ecological concepts in planning. Specifically, we address the following research questions: Q1. Landscape ecological concepts: What are they? How frequently are they mentioned in current research? Q2. How are landscape ecological concepts integrated in landscape planning?

We analysed all empirical and overview papers that have been published in four key academic journals in the field of landscape ecology and landscape planning in the years 2015–2019 (n = 1918). Four key journals in the field of landscape ecology were selected to conduct the analysis, respectively Landscape Ecology (LE), Landscape Online (LO), Current Landscape Ecology Reports (CLER), and Landscape and Urban Planning (LUP). The title, abstract and keywords of all papers were read in order to identify landscape ecological concepts. Then, all 1918 papers went through a keyword search to identify the use of early and additional concepts. We used the “pdfsearch” package in R programming language and searched for singular and plural forms and different variations of the concepts (see Supplementary material 1, Table A). As a result, we provided four outputs:

  1. Frequency of early concepts. This data provides the total number of times each article used each early concept (Q1). This data was used to produce the Figure 2a at the original publication.

  2. Frequency of additional concepts. This data provides the total number of times each article used each additional concept (Q1). This data was used to produce the Figure 2b at the original publication.

  3. Use of any early concept. This data provides the total number of times each article used any early concept (Q1).
This data was used to produce the Figure 3a at the original publication.

  4. Use of any additional concept. This data provides the total number of times each article used any additional concept (Q1). This data was used to produce the Figure 3b at the original publication.

To address the second question (Q2), the title, abstract and keywords of the papers included in our sample (n=1918 articles) were screened to identify papers that might show how landscape ecological concepts are integrated into planning. We selected 52 empirical papers (see Supplementary material – 4 Integration of landscape ecological concepts into planning), and we provided two outputs:

  5. Planning steps. This data provides the number of times landscape ecological concepts were addressed in each
planning steps in 52 empirical papers analysed in detail (Q2). This data was used to produce the Figure 4 at the
original publication.

  6. Protocol for assessing the integration of landscape ecological concepts into planning. To systematically collect the
data, we used this protocol which addressed the following questions: (a) which type of planning is addressed by the
paper? (b) to which planning level does the paper refer to? (c) which concepts are integrated in any of the planning
steps described above?

decision-making

display_name: decision-making

ecosystem-services

display_name: ecosystem-services

green-infrastructure

display_name: green-infrastructure

landscape-ecology

display_name: landscape-ecology

landscape-perception

display_name: landscape-perception

landscape-planning

display_name: landscape-planning

landscape-services

display_name: landscape-services

literature-review

display_name: literature-review

multifunctionality

display_name: multifunctionality

pdfsearch

display_name: pdfsearch

planning

display_name: planning

resilience

display_name: resilience

sense-of-place

display_name: sense-of-place

socio-ecological-system

display_name: socio-ecological-system

en: The usage of landscape ecological concepts in the planning literature


en: shortwave-radiation winter-energy-production snow photovoltaic albedo

en: Data Forward Scattering

en: GROUNDEYE model for multiple forward scattering in snow-covered terrain. Meteorological and topographical input data set for the Meierhofertäli near Davos, Switzerland, September 2017 - August 2018. Output data for September 2017 - August 2018 at hourly resolution and every pixel. Post-processing scripts for plotting and analysis.

en:
 Overview
We present GROUNDEYE, a new model of radiative transfer over mountainous terrain, which considers for the first time the forward scattering properties of snow.
Embedded in the surface process model Alpine3D, the new terrain radiation model GROUNDEYE receives interpolated real weather data with diffuse and direct broadband shortwave radiation for each pixel as well as a spatially variable plane albedo from the module SNOWPACK.

 Format
The GROUNDEYE model is written in c++, as is the entire environment of Alpine3d. The input and output data sets are .xlsx or .txt format, pre- and postprocessing including the generation of all figures is in .R format.

 Structure
In Data_Forward_Scattering.zip you will find all necessary data and model details to
reproduce the results of the JGR publication "How forward-scattering snow and terrain change the Alpine radiation balance with application to solar panels"

 - 	Model Input Data contains the meteorological and topographic input data sets, the BRDF, and preprocessing scripts.
 - Model Code contains the full model Alpine3d including the radiative transfer module GROUNDEYE.
 - Model Output Data contains the results of the simulation of terrain irradiance and irradiance of solar panels; hourly resolution, 1. Sptember 2017 - 31. August 2018.
 - Measurements Solar Testsite contains information and measurements of the solar testsite at the Totalp near Davos, Switzerland.
 - Postprocessing contains all R-Scripts used for the analysis and
plotting of the corresponding data.

In each of these folders you will find detailed information in
the file 'About this Folder.txt'.

albedo

display_name: albedo

photovoltaic

display_name: photovoltaic

shortwave-radiation

display_name: shortwave-radiation

snow

display_name: snow

winter-energy-production

display_name: winter-energy-production

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Data, Code Link and Metadata on Forward Scattering of Snow at Totalp


digitizing-historical-plague

maintainer: Christian Ginzler

title_for_slug: digitizing-historical-plague

en: yersinia-pestis plague-outbreaks plague-mapping historical-plague bubonic-plague palaeo-epidemiology plague-inventory black-death

en: We present newly digitized data on 6,929 plague outbreaks that occurred between 1347 and 1900 AD across Europe. The data base on an inventory initially published 1976. For georeferencing the information of Tele Atlas 2009 was used. The coordinates are in the reference systems ETRS89 and WGS84.

black-death

display_name: black-death

bubonic-plague

display_name: bubonic-plague

historical-plague

display_name: historical-plague

palaeo-epidemiology

display_name: palaeo-epidemiology

plague-inventory

display_name: plague-inventory

plague-mapping

display_name: plague-mapping

plague-outbreaks

display_name: plague-outbreaks

yersinia-pestis

display_name: yersinia-pestis

en: Digitizing historical plague


maintainer: Frank Techel

en: avalanche-accident-statistics avalanche-accident avalanche-statistics avalanche-fatalities long-term-trends

en: Data avalanche fatalities 1969/1970 - 2014/2015

en: The data comprises avalanche fatality data from the Alpine regions in the seven countries Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Liechtenstein, Slovenia, and Switzerland.

mimetype: text/plain

en:
During the last 45 years, about 100 people lost their lives in avalanches in the European Alps each year. Avalanche fatalities in settlements and on transportation corridors have considerably decreased since the 1970s. In contrast, the number of avalanche fatalities during recreational activities away from avalanche-secured terrain doubled between the 1960s and 1980s and has remained relatively stable since, despite a continuing strong increase in winter backcountry recreational activities.

Data complementing Figure 2 in:
_"Avalanche fatalities in the European Alps: long-term trends and statistics"_, by Techel, F., Jarry, F., Kronthaler, G., Mitterer, S., Nairz, P., Pavšek, M., Valt, M., and Darms, G.

Data description:
please refer to section 2 (Data and Methods) in the mentioned publication

avalanche-accident

display_name: avalanche-accident

avalanche-accident-statistics

display_name: avalanche-accident-statistics

avalanche-fatalities

display_name: avalanche-fatalities

avalanche-statistics

display_name: avalanche-statistics

long-term-trends

display_name: long-term-trends

en: Avalanche fatalities in the European Alps (1969/1970 - 2014/2015)


snow-drift-station-flowcapt

maintainer: Benjamin Walter

title_for_slug: snow-drift-station-flowcapt

en: wind-speed raclets snow-blowing snowdrift acoustic-mass-flux flowcapt

en: avergaged mass flux

en: Average mass flux of 10 min measurement interval. The Cycle duration is 1 min which includes 6 s observation and 54 s stand-by. The time is given in UTC+1.

en: minimum mass flux

en: The data file contains the minimum mass flux of 10 minute intervalls. The duration of one cycle was 1 min and contained 6s observations and 54 s stand-by. The time is given in UTC+1.

en: maximum wind speed

en: The data file contains the maximum wind speed in 10 minute intervalls. The duration of one cycle was 1 min and contained 6 s observations and 54 s stand-by. The time is given in UTC+1.

en: minimum wind spees

en: The data file contains the minimum wind speed in 10 minute intervalls. The duration of one cycle was 1 min and contained 6s observations and 54 s stand-by. The time is given in UTC+1.

en: average wind speed

en: The data file contains the average wind speed in 10 minute intervalls. The duration of one cycle was 1 min and contained 6s observations and 54 s stand-by. The time is given in UTC+1.

en: maximum mass flux

en: The data file contains the maximum mass flux of 10 minute intervalls. The duration of one cycle was 1 min and contained 6s observations and 54 s stand-by. The time is given in UTC+1.

en: The FlowCapt is an ultra-robust instrument measuring solid particle acoustic mass - flux intensities (g m‾ ² s‾ ¹) and wind speeds (m s‾ ¹). It was deployed at Gotschnagrat (LON: 46.859 LAT: 9.849). The vertical tube with a length of 1 m monitors snowdrift and snow-blowing; and is mounted at a height between 0.1 an 1.1 m above snow surface. The time within each data set is given in UTC+1.

acoustic-mass-flux

display_name: acoustic-mass-flux

flowcapt

display_name: flowcapt

raclets

display_name: raclets

snow-blowing

display_name: snow-blowing

snowdrift

display_name: snowdrift

wind-speed

display_name: wind-speed

en: Snow Drift Station - Flowcapt


maintainer: Avalanche Warning Service SLF

en: Avalanche fatalities per year in Switzerland since 1936/1937

mimetype: text/csv

en:
Attention: this data is not updated after 2022 anymore.
This dataset contains the statistics on the number of avalanche fatalities per hydrological year in Switzerland. The data set commences with the beginning of the hydrological year 1936/37 on 01/10/1936. After the completion of a hydrological year, the new data is appended to the existing dataset.
The following information is contained (by column and column title):
 - hydrological year
 - number of fatalities in the backcountry (=tour)
 - number of fatalities in terrain close to ski areas (=offpiste)
 - number of fatalities on transportation corridors including ski runs, roads, railway lines (=transportation.corridors)
 - number of fatalities in or around buildings or in settlements (= buildings)
 - sum (of all four categories)
The definition for these four categories as described in the guidelines to the avalanche accident database:
**tour**:
activities include back-country ski, snowboard or snow-shoe touring
**offpiste**:
access from ski area, generally from the top of a skilift with short hiking distances
**transportation.corridors** ([Techel et al., 2016](http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/147/2016/ )):
people travelling or recreating on open or temporarily closed
transportation corridors (e.g. a road user or a skier on a ski run) and people working on open or closed transportation corridors (e.g. maintenance crews on roads, professional rescue teams)
**buildings** ([Techel et al., 2016](http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/147/2016/ )):
people inside or just outside buildings, and workers on high alpine building
sites

avalanche-accidents

display_name: avalanche-accidents

fatalities-in-or-around-buildings

display_name: fatalities-in-or-around-buildings

fatalities-in-settlements

display_name: fatalities-in-settlements

fatalities-in-the-backcountry

display_name: fatalities-in-the-backcountry

fatalities-on-transportation-corridors

display_name: fatalities-on-transportation-corridors

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Number of avalanche fatalities per hydrological year in Switzerland since 1936-1937


en: snow-stratigraphy climate-projections snow-instability snow avalanche climate-change dry-snow-avalanche wet-snow-avalanche

en: Projections of avalanche activity

en: contains one file per IMIS station that indicates the daily probability for the occurrence of dry- or wet-snow avalanches in the vicinity of the respective station for each day during the time period 1.12.1981-31.05.2099 (months December to May) and all climate model chains and RCP scenarios.

en: SNOWPACK settings

en: contains .ini and .sno file indicating the settings used to drive SNOWPACK with the climate scenarios

en: Climate scenarios .smet

en: contains one .smet file per combination of station, climate model chain and RCP scenario. Each .smet file contains the downscaled meteorological data (time span 1.9.1981-31.8.2099) that was used to drive the SNOWPACK simulations.

en:
This data set includes 21st century projections of dry- and wet-snow avalanche activity for seven sites in the Swiss Alps as well as the downscaled climate scenarios and SNOWPACK configuration files used to produce these projections. The methods used to produce these data are described in the research article:
Mayer, S., Hendrick, M., Michel, A., Richter, B., Schweizer, J., Wernli, H., and van Herwijnen, A.: Changes in snow avalanche activity in response to climate warming in the Swiss Alps, EGUsphere, 2024, 1-32, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1026, 2024.
We used downscaled climate projections to drive the snow cover model SNOWPACK and evaluated future dry- and wet-snow avalanche occurrences in the vicinity of seven automatic weather stations from the IMIS network using machine learning models trained with observed records of avalanche activity. Projections are available for three different emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and eight climate model chains from the CH2018 ensemble. The output of the model chain is given by a daily probability for dry- or wet-snow avalanche occurrences. These probabilities can then be used to classify a day as a dry- and wet-snow avalanche day (AvD) or non-avalanche day.

avalanche

display_name: avalanche

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

climate-projections

display_name: climate-projections

dry-snow-avalanche

display_name: dry-snow-avalanche

snow

display_name: snow

snow-instability

display_name: snow-instability

snow-stratigraphy

display_name: snow-stratigraphy

wet-snow-avalanche

display_name: wet-snow-avalanche


en: complex-terrain snow-precipitation precipitation-variability cosmo-wrf orographic-precipitation

en: Snow depth maps over Dischma valley for 26 January 2016 and 9 March 2016 and snow depth differences between the two dates.

en: StationData

en:
The data presented here corresponds to the publication "Spatial variability in snow precipitation and accumulation in COSMO-WRF simulations and radar estimations over complex terrain" (Gerber et al., 2018a), which investigates the precipitation variability of snow precipitation in the central northern part of the Grisons (CH) and the publication "The importance of near-surface winter precipitation processes in complex alpine terrain" (Gerber et al., 2018b). The dataset contains:

* WRFsimulations: WRF simulation output for simulations with 4x (14x) terrain smoothing with an output timestep of 30 min/5 min and horizontal grid spacings of 1350 m, 450 m, 150 m and 50 m (currently: data available upon request).
* StationData: Meteorological station data of 18 meteorological stations in the central northern part of the Grisons with 30 minute resolution for the period 1 January 2016 till 1 May 2016.
* ADS80data: Photogrammetrically determined snow depth distribution data over the Dischma valley for the 26 January 2016 and 9 March 2016. Snow heights are corrected for buildings, vegetation (> 1m), outliers, and pixles, which are obivously snow-free on the pictures (Bühler et al., 2015). In addition the snow depth differences (snow depth on 9 March 2016 minus snow depth on 26 January 2016) are provided.

For more details about the simulation and observation data, see Gerber et al., 2018 and Gerber and Sharma (2018).

Publications:

Bühler, Y., Marty, M., Egli, L., Veitinger, J., Jonas, T., Thee, P., and Ginzler, C.: Snow depth mapping in high-alpine catchments using digital photogrammetry. Cryosphere, 9, 229–243, doi:10.5194/tc-9-229-2015, 2015.

Gerber, F., Besic, N., Sharma, V., Mott, R., Daniels, M., Gabella, M., Berne, A., Germann, U., and Lehning, M.: Spatial variability in snow precipitation and accumulation in COSMO-WRF simulations and radar estimations over complex terrain, The Cryosphere, 12, 3137–3160, doi:10.5194/tc-12-3137-2018, 2018.

Gerber, F., Mott, R. and Lehning, M.: The importance of near-surface winter precipitation processes in complex alpine terrain, Journal of Hydrometeorology, accepted, 2018.

Gerber, F., and Sharma, V.: Running COSMO-WRF on very-high resolution over complex terrain. Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences CRYOS, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland. doi:10.16904/envidat.35, 2018.

complex-terrain

display_name: complex-terrain

cosmo-wrf

display_name: cosmo-wrf

orographic-precipitation

display_name: orographic-precipitation

precipitation-variability

display_name: precipitation-variability

snow-precipitation

display_name: snow-precipitation

en: DISCHMEX - High-resolution WRF simulations in complex alpine terrain and station measurements


maintainer: Anita Risch

en: ecosystem-multifunctionality grazing grassland ecosystem-functions vertebrates swiss-national-park subalpine ecosystem-coupling invertebrates exclusion

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


en: active-layer plastisphere biodiversity swiss-alps fungi collections biobank bacteria permafrost arctic extreme-habitat conservation glaciers

en: Complete collection of bacterial and fungal isolates from Permafrost, active layer and glaciers in Switzerland, Svalbard, northern Greenland and Russia.

en:
The cold habitats of the Swiss Alps and the Arctic are undergoing change and are at risk of disappearing completely or partially in the future. Along with them, a poorly known diversity of microorganisms that have adapted to life in these supposedly hostile places. By cryopreserving microorganisms from these habitats, some of today's biodiversity can be preserved in biobanks.
The collection contains cryopreserved bacteria and fungi isolated from permafrost and active layer of Muot da Barba Peider and Val Lavirun, from the glacier forefield and glacier toe of the Damma glacier, from active layer in northern Greenland and from plastic waste in Svalbard, as well as isolates from plastic incubations in Muot da Barba Peider, northern Greenland and arctic Russian soils.
Project overview: https://www.wsl.ch/en/projects/life-at-chilly-temperatures-a-collection-of-microorganisms-from-extreme-habitats/

active-layer

display_name: active-layer

arctic

display_name: arctic

bacteria

display_name: bacteria

biobank

display_name: biobank

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

collections

display_name: collections

conservation

display_name: conservation

extreme-habitat

display_name: extreme-habitat

fungi

display_name: fungi

glaciers

display_name: glaciers

permafrost

display_name: permafrost

plastisphere

display_name: plastisphere

swiss-alps

display_name: swiss-alps

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Life at chilly temperatures - A collection of microorganisms from extreme habitats


en: rain-on-snow meteorological-data snow-hydrology snowpack catchment-data

en: The file contains all data needed to run simulations with the snow cover model SNOWPACK.

en: Meteorological data used to run SNOWPACK for 58 catchments in the Swiss Alps. The data consists of a 2 km grid of "virtual meteorological stations" for each catchment. It was used to simulate snow cover processes during rain-on-snow events, therefore meteorological data of each catchment contains at least one rain-on-snow event. Further information can be found in the attached readme.txt and in Würzer & Jonas et al. (2017), currently under review in Hydrological Processes.

catchment-data

display_name: catchment-data

meteorological-data

display_name: meteorological-data

rain-on-snow

display_name: rain-on-snow

snow-hydrology

display_name: snow-hydrology

snowpack

display_name: snowpack

en: Meteorological data for investigation of rain-on-snow events in 58 catchments in Switzerland


en: seilaplan geodata-processing raster-processing qgis-plugin cable-yarding digital-planning digital-elevation-model swiss-geodata open-source geoinformation-system

en: View video on youtube!

en: DHM-Kacheln zusammenfügen

en:
In order to use the QGIS plugin ‘Seilaplan’ for digital cable line planning, a digital terrain model (DTM) is required. In this tutorial video, we show how to merge multiple DTM raster tiles into one file, using the QGIS tool ‘Virtual Raster’. This simplifies the digital planning of a cable line using the QGIS plugin ‘Seilaplan’. Please note that the tutorial language is German!

Link to Seilaplan website: https://seilaplan.wsl.ch

***************************

Für die Verwendung des QGIS Plugins Seilaplan zur digitalen Seillinienplanung ist ein digitales Höhenmodell (DHM) nötig. In diesem Tutorialvideo zeigen wir, wie man mit dem QGIS-Plugin Virtuelles Raster mehrere DHM-Kacheln zu einem einzigen Rasterfile zusammenfügen und abspeichern kann. Für die Seillinienplanung mit Seilaplan muss nun nur noch eine Datei, mein neues virtuelles Raster, ausgewählt werden.

Link zur Seilaplan-Website: https://seilaplan.wsl.ch

cable-yarding

display_name: cable-yarding

digital-elevation-model

display_name: digital-elevation-model

digital-planning

display_name: digital-planning

geodata-processing

display_name: geodata-processing

geoinformation-system

display_name: geoinformation-system

open-source

display_name: open-source

qgis-plugin

display_name: qgis-plugin

raster-processing

display_name: raster-processing

seilaplan

display_name: seilaplan

swiss-geodata

display_name: swiss-geodata

en: Seilaplan Tutorial: Merge DTM tiles


maintainer: Vanessa Burg

en: bioenergy switzerland review biogas manure

en: Biogas from animal manure in Switzerland: energy potential, technology development and resource mobilization

en: Aim of this white paper is to provide decision-makers, administrations and stakeholders with the most current research findings in order to promote the optimal use of bioenergy from manure in the Swiss energy transition. For this purpose, the results of the Swiss competence center for bioenergy research - SCCER BIOSWEET - are summarized and presented in a broader context. If nothing else is mentioned, the results refer to Switzerland and in case of the feedstock to the domestic biomass potentials.

bioenergy

display_name: bioenergy

biogas

display_name: biogas

manure

display_name: manure

review

display_name: review

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

educ

en: Education, culture and sport