flussgebiete-einzugsgebiete

regi

fr: Régions et villes

de: Regionen und Städte

en: Regions and cities

it: Regioni e città

envi

fr: Environnement

de: Umwelt

en: Environment

it: Ambiente

title_for_slug: flussgebiete-einzugsgebiete

fr: geocat.ch permalien

de: geocat.ch Permalink

en: geocat.ch permalink

it: geocat.ch link permanente

fr: Map (Preview) Aperçu map.geo.admin.ch

de: Map (Preview) Vorschau map.geo.admin.ch

en: Map (Preview)  map.geo.admin.ch

it: Map (Preview) Previsione map.geo.admin.ch

fr: Aperçu map.geo.admin.ch

de: Vorschau map.geo.admin.ch

en: Preview map.geo.admin.ch

it: Previsione map.geo.admin.ch

format: SERVICE

fr: Service WMS-IFDG, couche "Bassin fluvial"

de: WMS-BGDI Dienst, Layer "Flussgebiet"

en: WMS-FSDI service, layer "River basins"

it: Servizio WMS-IFDG, strato "Bacino fluviale"

fr: Service WMTS-IFDG, couche , Layer "Bassin fluvial"

de: WMTS-BGDI Dienst, Layer "Flussgebiet"

en: WMTS-FSDI service, layer "River basins"

it: Servizio WMTS-IFDG, strato "Bacino fluviale"

format: WMTS

fr: RESTful API de geo.admin.ch

de: RESTful API von geo.admin.ch

en: RESTful API from geo.admin.ch

it: RESTful API da geo.admin.ch

format: API

fr: Download

de: Download

en: Download

it: Download

format: HTML

fr: Les bassins fluviaux constituent le niveau d’agrégation supérieur du jeu de géodonnées de base « Bassins versants topographiques des eaux suisses ». Les grands bassins versants avec une surface de plusieurs milliers de km2 sont drainés par de grands cours d’eau : Rhin, Aar, Reuss, Limmat, Thur, Rhône, Ticino, Inn, Adda et Adige.

de: Die Flussgebiete bilden die oberste Aggregationsebene des Geobasisdatensatzes «Topographische Einzugsgebiete der Schweizer Gewässer». Die grossen Gebiete mit Flächen von meist mehreren 1000 km² werden durch grosse Fliessgewässer entwässert: Rhein, Aare, Reuss, Limmat, Thur, Rhone, Ticino, Inn, Adda und Adige.

en: The river basins form the uppermost aggregation level for the "Topographical catchment areas of Swiss waterbodies" geodata set. The large areas with a surface area of usually more than 1000km² are drained by large watercourses: the Rhine, Aar, Reuss, Limmat, Thur, Rhône, Ticino, Inn, Adda and Adige.

it: I bacini fluviali costituiscono il livello di aggregazione superiore del record di geodati di base «Bacini imbriferi topografici dei corsi d'acqua svizzeri». I grandi bacini con superfici che si estendono per lo più per diverse migliaia di km² sono drenati da grandi corsi d'acqua: Reno, Aare, Reuss, Limmat, Thur, Rodano, Ticino, Inn, Adda e Adige.

spatial: Schweiz

fr: Office fédéral de l'environnement /Division Hydrologie

de: Bundesamt für Umwelt / Abteilung Hydrologie

en: Federal Office for the Environment / Hydrology Division

it: Ufficio federale dell'ambiente / Divisione Idrologia

bundesamt-fur-umwelt-bafu

fr: Office fédéral de l'environnement OFEV

de: Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU

en: Federal Office for the Environment FOEN

it: Ufficio federale dell'ambiente UFAM

fr: L’autorité compétente pour les questions environnementales. Il est à ce titre chargé de gérer les ressources naturelles selon les principes du développement durable et de protéger l’homme contre les dangers naturels et l’environnement contre les pollutions.

de: Die Fachbehörde für die Umwelt. Es ist zuständig für die nachhaltige Nutzung der natürlichen Ressourcen sowie für den Schutz des Menschen vor Naturgefahren und den Schutz der Umwelt vor übermässigen Belastungen.

en: The federal environmental authority. It is responsible for ensuring that natural resources are used sustainably, that the public is protected against natural hazards, and that the environment is protected from unacceptable adverse impacts.

it: Il servizio specializzato in materia ambientale, è competente per quanto riguarda l'utilizzazione sostenibile delle risorse naturali, la protezione delle persone dai pericoli naturali e dell'ambiente da un inquinamento eccessivo.

value: BAFU - Geocat Harvester

fr: Bassin fluvial

de: Flussgebiete (Einzugsgebiete)

en: River basins (catchment areas)

it: Bacini fluviali (bacini imbriferi)


name: Statistisches Amt des Kantons Zürich, Analysen & Studien

de: wohnbautaetigkeit gemeinden

fr: GWR-Vorlage: Gebäude- und Wohnungsbestand, Bautätigkeit

state: active

type: dataset

de: Wohnbautätigkeit in den Gemeinden des Kantons Zürich nach Zimmerzahl und Gebäudekategorie

media_type: text/csv

de:
Der Stichtag der Datengrundlage ist jeweils der 31. Dezember des letzten ausgewiesenen Jahres.
Wohnungen in neuen/abgebrochenen Gebäuden. Aufstockungen bzw. Umbauten wurden nicht berücksichtigt.
Aufgrund von Registernachführungen können sich die Zahlen insbsondere für Zeiträume nahe beim Stichtag bei zukünftigen Auswertungen noch ändern.
Die Datenaufbereitung basiert auf der Schablone hier: https://www.web.statistik.zh.ch/ogd/daten/ressourcen/KTZH_00002162_00004263.html

format: CSV

de: Anzahl der Neubau- und Abbruchwohnungen sowie des Wohnbausaldos pro Gemeinde sowie beim CSV zusätzlich nach Zimmerzahl und Gebäudekategorie. Weitere Erläuterungen zur Auswertung (inkl. GWR-Stichtag) finden sich in den Excel-Datei oder beim CSV in den Metadaten. Die Rohdaten zur Bezifferung der Wohnbautätigkeit sind OGD (siehe 'Verwandte Datensätze') . Eine Auswertungsvorlage ist unten verlinkt (siehe 'Weitere Informationen').

gemeinden

display_name: gemeinden

wohnbautaetigkeit

display_name: wohnbautaetigkeit

statistisches-amt-kanton-zuerich

de: Statistisches Amt Kanton Zürich

de: Das Statistische Amt ist das Kompetenzzentrum für die öffentliche Statistik im Kanton Zürich. Wir versorgen Bevölkerung, Verwaltung, Politik, Gemeinden, Medien, Firmen und sonstige Organisationen mit qualitativ hochstehenden Daten, Informationen und Fakten zum Kanton Zürich. Inhaltlich arbeiten wir unabhängig und objektiv.

political_level: canton

kanton-zuerich

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: ZH-Kt Statistisches Amt - DCAT Harvester


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: switzerland wetlands environmental--policy environmental---history historical-carthography ecology

en: Wetlands 1850 - 2010 (shapefiles)

media_type: application/zip

en:
 History of wetlands - GIS-Layers
 Location of wetlands based on signatures in topographic maps
* Basis 1850: original measuring table sheets Dufour created between the years 1834 and 1863.
* Basis 1900/ Basis 1950: The Siegfried maps were updated and published at regular intervals between 1870 and 1949. This long period of time made it possible to reconstruct wetlands for two periods based on the Siegfried Maps: the first edition (hereinafter referred to as "1900") and the last edition ("1950").
* Basis 2010: Map sheets from the National Map from 2006 to 2011 were used for the most recent time period of the reconstruction.
 Location of wetlands due to reconstructions
The reconstruction **must not** be interpreted in the sense of a surface-accurate separation, but shows without claim to location accuracy the approximate extent of the areas that would have corresponded to the mapping criteria for wetlands used in today's topographic maps around 1850, 1900 and 1950. The basics can be found in Stuber & Bürgi 2019, chapter 5.4.

format: ZIP

mimetype: application/zip

en:
Naturally, large parts of the Swiss Plateau are characterised by wetlands
and meandering rivers. That this is no longer the case today is the result
of centuries of efforts to obtain dry land. But how did this process take
place? What were the relevant actors and what were their motivations? And
what can be said about the ecological consequences of this development?

In a research project on the history of wetlands in Switzerland since 1700,
we conducted (a) a historical analysis of the development of land use in
wetlands and the actors involved, (b) a historical-cartographic
reconstruction of wetland extent since 1850 and (c) an evaluation of
ecological effects of changes in wetlands on various organisms groups.

The series of GIS layers on wetland history stem from the second part of
the project. The area reconstruction is based on digitized and homogenized
signatures from national map series, as they have been available since
about 1850. Details about the digitalization process and the homogenization
procedures applied ("Rekonstruktionen") are included in Stuber & Bürgi
2019.

Book Citation:
 > Stuber M, Bürgi M (2019) Vom «eroberten Land» zum Renaturierungsprojekt. Geschichte der Feuchtgebiete in der Schweiz seit 1700. "Bristol Schriftenreihe", Band 59. Haupt Verlag, Bern, Stuttgart, Wien. 262 Seiten.

ecology

display_name: ecology

environmental---history

display_name: environmental---history

environmental--policy

display_name: environmental--policy

historical-carthography

display_name: historical-carthography

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

wetlands

display_name: wetlands

educ

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

en: Education, culture and sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

value: Envidat Harvester

en: History of wetlands in Switzerland since 1850


en: snow-depth-distribution snow-hydrology photogrammetry davos dischma avalanches

en: Snowdepth maps

format: GeoTIFF

en:
The available datasets are snow depth maps with a spatial resolution of 0.5 m derived from images of the survey camera Vexcel Ultracam mounted on a piloted airplane. Image acquisition was carried out during the approximately peak of winter (time when the thickest snowpack is expected) in spring. The snow depth maps are calculated by the subtraction of a summer-DTM from the processed winter- DSM of the corresponding date. The summer-DTM used was derived from a point cloud of an airborne laser scanner from 2020.

Due to the occurrence of inaccuracies of the calculated snow depth values caused by the photogrammetric method, we applied different masks to significantly increase the reliability of the snow depth maps. We masked out settled areas, high-frequented streets and technical constructions, pixels with high vegetation (height > 0.5 m) , outliers and unrealistic snow depth values. In addition, we modified the snow depth values of snow-free pixels to 0.
The information on buildings and infrastructure comes from the exactly classified ALS point cloud and the TLM dataset from Swisstopo (https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/de/geodata/landscape/tlm3d.html#links). High vegetation is also derived from the classification and the calculated object height from the point cloud.
Outliers and unrealistic snow depth values are defined as negative snow depth values and snow depths exceeding 10 m. The classification of each pixel of the corresponding orthophoto into snow-covered or snow-free is based on the application of a threshold of the NDSI or manually determined ratios of the RGB values.

An extensive accuracy assessment proves the high accuracy of the snow depth maps with a root mean square error of 0.25 m for the year 2017 and 0.15 m for the following snow depth maps.

The work is published in:

avalanches

display_name: avalanches

davos

display_name: davos

dischma

display_name: dischma

photogrammetry

display_name: photogrammetry

snow-depth-distribution

display_name: snow-depth-distribution

snow-hydrology

display_name: snow-hydrology

en: Snow depth mapping by airplane photogrammetry (2017 -  ongoing)


en: sediment-transport snow mars erosion model

media_type: text/plain

en: Datasets of Figure 4b

format: TXT

mimetype: text/plain

en: Datasets of Figure 3a

en: Datasets of Figure 2

en: Datasets of Figure 4a

en: Datasets of Figure 3b

en:
The files contain the datasets used to produce Figures 2, 3, and 4 of the manuscript ([doi: 10.1002/2016GL071822](http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071822)).

 Manuscript Abstract:
Despite being the main sediment entrainment mechanism in aeolian transport, granular splash is still poorly understood. We provide a deeper insight into the dynamics of sand and snow ejection with a stochastic model derived from the energy and momentum conservation laws. Our analysis highlights that the ejection regime of uniform sand is inherently different from that of heterogeneous sand. Moreover, we show that cohesive snow presents a mixed ejection regime, statistically controlled either by energy or momentum conservation depending on the impact velocity. The proposed formulation can provide a solid base for granular splash simulations in saltation models, leading to more reliable assessments of aeolian transport on Earth and Mars.

erosion

display_name: erosion

mars

display_name: mars

model

display_name: model

sediment-transport

display_name: sediment-transport

snow

display_name: snow

en: Energy- and momentum-conserving model of splash entrainment in sand and snow saltation


en: radiation atmospheric-conditions wind temperature-profiles precipitation

en: Site photo 1

en: This site photo is outdated and has been replaced with an updated version (see description).

en: DATA ACCESS

en: This data access is outdated and has been replaced with an updated version (see description).

en: STB2 CSV

en: This dataset is outdated and has been replaced with an updated version (see description).

mimetype: text/csv

en: Site photo 2

en: Site photo 3

en: Latest data from Stillberg climate station

en: Overview plot

media_type: image/png

en: This overview plot is outdated and has been replaced with an updated version (see description).

format: PNG

en: README

en: This description is outdated and has been replaced with an updated version (see description).

en:
 Important
This EnviDat entry is outdated. The most recent, usable version of the data can be found under the new EnviDat entry "Long-term meteorological station Stillberg, Davos, Switzerland at 2090 m a.s.l.." The entry can be found under this link <https://www.envidat.ch/#/metadata/meteo-stillberg> and with this DOI <https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.396>.

atmospheric-conditions

display_name: atmospheric-conditions

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

radiation

display_name: radiation

temperature-profiles

display_name: temperature-profiles

wind

display_name: wind

en: Long-term meteorological and snow station at 2090 m a.s.l., Stillberg, Davos, Switzerland (1975 - present)


en: traits dispersal reef-fish ecology biodiversity

en: Main text figures

en: R Script used for figures in main text in: Donati et al. 2019: "A process-based-model supports an association between dispersal and the prevalence of species traits in tropical reef fish assemblages" accepted in Ecography, August 2019.

en: Input for spatial congruence test overlap between proportions of low and high dispersal and observed low- and high- dispersal-related traits in assemblages (30-50% threshold). see Table 2.

en: Coral reef grid cells (shape, dbf, etc. files)

en:
Grid cells of 5 × 5°, corresponding to circa 555 × 555 km at the Equator (see Parravicini et al. 2013, Leprieur et al. 2016)

Parravicini, V. et al. 2013. Global patterns and predictors of tropi- cal reef sh species richness. – Ecography 36: 1254–1262.

Leprieur, F. et al. 2016. Plate tectonics drive tropical reef biodiver- sity dynamics. – Nat. Commun. 7: 11461.

en: Donati et al. main script

en:
Main script used in : Donati et al. 2019 "A process-based-model supports an association between dispersal and the prevalence of species traits in tropical reef fish assemblages"
accepted in Ecography, August 2019

en: Functions used in R scripts in: Donati et al. 2019 "A process-based-model supports an association between  # dispersal and the prevalence of species traits in tropical reef fish assemblages" accepted in Ecography, August 2019

en: Functions for Figures illustrated in Donati et al. 2019 "A process-based-model supports an association between dispersal and the prevalence of species traits in tropical reef fish assemblages" accepted in Ecography, August 2019.

en: Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures illustrated in Donati et al. 2019 "A process-based-model supports an association between dispersal and the prevalence of species traits in tropical reef fish assemblages". accepted in Ecography, August 2019

en: Tropical reef fish trait data

en:
Species trait (i.e. adult body size, home range mobility behaviour, circadian activity and schooling) data gathered from the General Approach to Species Abundance Relationships (GASPAR) database (Kulbicki et al. 2013, Parravicini et al. 2013).

Kulbicki, M. et al. 2013. Global biogeography of reef shes: a hier- archical quantitative delineation of regions. – PLoS One 8: e81847.

Parravicini, V. et al. 2013. Global patterns and predictors of tropi- cal reef sh species richness. – Ecography 36: 1254–1262.

To complement the trait data with Pelagic Larval Duration information refer to the following publication:

Luiz, Osmar J., et al. "Adult and larval traits as determinants of geographic range size among tropical reef fishes." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110.41 (2013): 16498-16502.

In Donati et al. "A process-based model supports an association between dispersal and the prevalence of species traits in tropical reef fish assemblages" accepted in Ecography in August 2019, we used the PLD gathered from Luiz et al. 2013 as described in the methods - section "Species trait data".

en: Global coast files from https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/shorelines/gshhs.html used in the Figures

en: Global simulated distribution of species under a range of dispersal parameter values

en:
Global distribution of simulated species richness under a range of dispersal parameter values d
d ∈ [1.75°: 5.45°].

en: Dispersal parameter value d per simulation starting with a minimum dispersal value, where each species is able to colonise each adjacent cell, and ending with the value of d for which all the extant habitats, including the most remote Pacific islands, have been colonised (d ∈ [1.75°: 5.45°]).

en: Simulated rates of speciation and extinction under a range of dispersal parameters. Net diversification rates are calculated from the difference between speciation and extinction rates. This data allows the creation of Figure A4 in Supporting information, Appendix 1.

en: Global species distribution of tropical reef fish species

en: Each species corresponds to a "Gaspar_code" gathered from the General Approach to Species Abundance Relationships (GASPAR) database (Kulbicki et al. 2013, Parravicini et al. 2013) and is linked to a specific Fishned ID corresponding to a specific Latitude and Longitude.

en: Input for the Global distribution maps for proportions of species richness for (a) simulated dispersal parameter value (b) observed dispersal-related traits

en: Geographic distribution data (species richness and proportions of high/low dispersal-related traits) on predominantly low dispersing and high dispersing species expected based on the simulations, and those where low- and high- dispersal related traits values are observed for the five investigated traits.

en:
This dataset contains all data and R codes (R Development Core Team, https://www.R-project.org) used in the following publication: Donati GFA, Parravicini V, Leprieur F, Hagen O, Gaboriau T, Heine C, Kulbicki M, Rolland J, Salamin N, Albouy C, Pellissier L. "A process-based model supports an association between dispersal and the prevalence of species traits in tropical reef fish assemblages" accepted by Ecography in August 2019. When using this data and R scripts the above publication should be cited.

The interaction of habitat dynamics with species dispersal abilities could generate gradients
in species diversity and prevalence of life-history and ecological traits, when the latter are associated with dispersal potential. In this dataset, we use a spatial mechanistic model of speciation, extinction and dispersal, constrained by a dispersal parameter. This model allows to simulate the interplay between reef habitat dynamics over the past 140 million years and dispersal, shaping lineage diversification history and global assemblage composition of over 6000 tropical reef fish species. Global trait distribution data of tropical reef fish are used to evaluate the congruence between simulations and observations.

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

dispersal

display_name: dispersal

ecology

display_name: ecology

reef-fish

display_name: reef-fish

traits

display_name: traits

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Simulated and observed prevalence of dispersal-related traits in tropical reef fish assemblages worldwide


maintainer: Yohann Chauvier

en: conservation large-scale range-maps synonyms species-distribution gbif occurrence-records landsca flags accepted-name taxonomy species-observations ecoregions hard-limit r-package filtering

en: gbif.range R package version 0.2 (deprecated)

en: gbif.range R package version 1.1 (current)

en: GitHub URL

en: wsl.gbif R package version 0.1 (deprecated)

en: Test version, not to be used.

en: Although species range may be obtained using expert maps or modeling methods, expert data is often species-limited and statistical models need more technical expertise as well as many species observations. When unavailable, such information may be extracted from the Global Biodiversity Information facility (GBIF), the largest public data repository inventorying georeferenced species observations worldwide. However, retrieving GBIF records at large scale may be tedious if users are unaware of specific tools and functions that need to be employed. Here we present *gbif.range*, an R library that contains automated methods to generate species range maps from scratch using in-house ecoregions shapefiles and an easy-to-use GBIF download wrapper. Finally, this library also offers a set of additional very useful parameters and functions for large GBIF datasets (generate doi, extract GBIF taxonomy, records filtering...). [gbif.range R project](https://github.com/8Ginette8/gbif.range)

accepted-name

display_name: accepted-name

conservation

display_name: conservation

ecoregions

display_name: ecoregions

filtering

display_name: filtering

flags

display_name: flags

gbif

display_name: gbif

hard-limit

display_name: hard-limit

landsca

display_name: landsca

large-scale

display_name: large-scale

occurrence-records

display_name: occurrence-records

r-package

display_name: r-package

range-maps

display_name: range-maps

species-distribution

display_name: species-distribution

species-observations

display_name: species-observations

synonyms

display_name: synonyms

taxonomy

display_name: taxonomy

en: gbif.range - An R package to generate species range maps based on ecoregions and a user-friendly GBIF wrapper


en: wet-snow-avalanche avalanche snow snow-stratigraphy dry-snow-avalanche climate-projections snow-instability climate-change

en: Projections of avalanche activity

en: contains one file per IMIS station that indicates the daily probability for the occurrence of dry- or wet-snow avalanches in the vicinity of the respective station for each day during the time period 1.12.1981-31.05.2099 (months December to May) and all climate model chains and RCP scenarios.

en: Climate scenarios .smet

en: contains one .smet file per combination of station, climate model chain and RCP scenario. Each .smet file contains the downscaled meteorological data (time span 1.9.1981-31.8.2099) that was used to drive the SNOWPACK simulations.

en: SNOWPACK settings

en: contains .ini and .sno file indicating the settings used to drive SNOWPACK with the climate scenarios

en:
This data set includes 21st century projections of dry- and wet-snow avalanche activity for seven sites in the Swiss Alps as well as the downscaled climate scenarios and SNOWPACK configuration files used to produce these projections. The methods used to produce these data are described in the research article:
Mayer, S., Hendrick, M., Michel, A., Richter, B., Schweizer, J., Wernli, H., and van Herwijnen, A.: Changes in snow avalanche activity in response to climate warming in the Swiss Alps, EGUsphere, 2024, 1-32, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1026, 2024.
We used downscaled climate projections to drive the snow cover model SNOWPACK and evaluated future dry- and wet-snow avalanche occurrences in the vicinity of seven automatic weather stations from the IMIS network using machine learning models trained with observed records of avalanche activity. Projections are available for three different emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and eight climate model chains from the CH2018 ensemble. The output of the model chain is given by a daily probability for dry- or wet-snow avalanche occurrences. These probabilities can then be used to classify a day as a dry- and wet-snow avalanche day (AvD) or non-avalanche day.

avalanche

display_name: avalanche

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

climate-projections

display_name: climate-projections

dry-snow-avalanche

display_name: dry-snow-avalanche

snow

display_name: snow

snow-instability

display_name: snow-instability

snow-stratigraphy

display_name: snow-stratigraphy

wet-snow-avalanche

display_name: wet-snow-avalanche


aerosol-data-davos-wolfgang

title_for_slug: aerosol-data-davos-wolfgang

en: aerosol inp drincz particles ice-nucleation raclets

en: SMPS Dataset Davos Wolfgang

en: The SMPS file contains aerosol data (particle concentration, total number concentration, median, mean, geometric mean, mode and geometric standard deviation of the size distribution) in a size range between 12 and 460 nm (electrical mobility diameter) as well as instrument characteristics (sample temperature, pressure, relative humidity, mean free path and gas viscosity), in a temporal resolution of 2 minutes, with time in UTC, measured at Davos Wolfgang.

mimetype: application/x-netcdf

en: OPC GT-526S Dataset Davos Wolfgang

en: Particle counts were recorded in six size channels (0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1.5, 2.5 and 5 μm) in a resolution of 20 seconds (time in UTC) by a particle counter (GT-526S, Met One Instruments, Inc.).

en: DRINCZ Dataset Davos Wolfgang

en: The DRINCZ file contains information on temperature (in °C) dependent frozen fractions, number of Ice Nuleating Particles (INP, per standard liter) and differential INP concentrations (per standard liter and Kelvin).

en: OPC-N3 Dataset Davos Wolfgang

en: Particle concentrations in a size range of 0.35 μm to 40 μm were measured with an OPC-N3 (Alphasense, Inc.) in a resolution of 20 seconds (time in UTC). PM₁, PM₂,₅ and PM₁₀ were directly derived.

en: APS Dataset Davos Wolfgang

en: The APS file contains aerosol data (total number concentration, median, mean, geometric mean, mode and geometric standard deviation of the size distribution) for aerodynamic diameters between 0.5 μm and ~20 μm as well as instrument characteristics, in a temporal resolution of 20 seconds, with time in UTC, measured at Davos Wolfgang.

en:
Aerosol properties were measured between February 8 and March 31 2019 at the measurement site Davos Wolfgang (LON: 9.853594, LAT: 46.835577). Optical and aerodynamic particle counters, as well as a scanning mobility particle size spectrometer and an ice nuclei counter were deployed to report particle concentrations and size distributions in fine (10-1000 nm) and coarse mode (> 1000 nm), cloud condensation nuclei concentrations (CCNCs) and ice nuclei particle concentrations (ICNCs). The ambient particles were transported via a heated inlet to be distributed to the particle detecting devices inside the setup room.

Optical Particle Counter (OPC): Light scattering of a diode laser beam caused by travelling particles is used in the both, the OPC-N3 (0.41 - 38.5 μm) and GT-526S (0.3 – 5 μm), to determine their size and number concentration. For the OPC-N3, particle size spectra and concentration data are used afterwards to calculate PM₁, PM₂,₅ and PM₁₀ (assumptions: particle density: 1.65 g cmˉ³, refractive index: 1.5+i0).

Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS): The APS (3321, TSI Inc.) measured the particle size distribution for aerodynamic diameters between 0.5 μm and ~20 μm by the particle’s time-of-flight and light-scattering intensity (assumptions: particle density 1 g cmˉ³).

Scanning Mobility Particle Size Spectrometer (SMPS): Particle number concentrations in a size range between 12 and 460 nm (electrical mobility diameter) were measured at Davos Wolfgang, using a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer Spectrometer (3938, TSI Inc.). The classifier (3082, TSI Inc.) was equipped with a neutralizer (3088, TSI Inc.) and a differential mobility analyzer working with negative polarity (3081, TSI Inc.). The size selected particles were counted by a water-based condensation particle counter (3788 , TSI Inc.). The TSI AIM software was used to provide particle size distributions by applying multiple charge and diffusion loss corrections (assumptions: particle density 1 g cmˉ³).

Coriolis μ and DRINCZ: A microbial air sampler (Coriolis μ, bertin Instruments) was used to collect airborne particles for investigating their ice nucleating ability with a droplet freezing device. Particles larger than 0.5 μm were drawn with an air flow rate of up to 300 l minˉ¹ into the cone and centrifuged into the wall of the cone due to the forming vortex. The liquid sample was transferred into the DRoplet Ice Nuclei Counter Zurich (DRINCZ, ETH Zurich) to study heterogeneous ice formation (immersion freezing mode) of ambient airborne particles.

aerosol

display_name: aerosol

drincz

display_name: drincz

ice-nucleation

display_name: ice-nucleation

inp

display_name: inp

particles

display_name: particles

raclets

display_name: raclets

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Aerosol Data Davos Wolfgang


maintainer: Nander Wever

en: antarctica snow-density snowmicropen microstructure snow-density-profile

en: Jupyter notebook for processing the SnowMicroPen files.

en: Manual snow pits and other snow density measurements

en: List of SnowMicroPen measurements

en: List of all SnowMicroPen measurements, including date and location, and processing status. This list has been generated by the python code (see other resources in this dataset).

en: Documentation SnowMicroPen measurements

en: This *.zip archive contains all available documentation of the SnowMicroPen measurements, including the mapping of the SMP measurements in the terrestrial laser scan field at PEA (see documentation for 20161220) and at the Hammarryggen Ice Rise (see documentation for 20190104 and 20190111).

en: Python code exported from the Jupyter notebook for processing the SnowMicroPen files

en: SnowMicroPen pts files and processed txt files

en: Zip archive containing the acquired *.pts files (binary files recorded by the SnowMicroPen), and the converted *.txt files using the SMP.ipynb jupyter notebook (see the python code in the other resources in this dataset)

en: SnowMicroPen (SMP) measurements and manual snowpits from Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Belgium Princess Elisabeth Station (PEA), in a transect towards the coast, and on the Lokeryggen and Hammarryggen Ice Rises near the coast. Measurements were taken during 3 individual campaigns in the 2016-2017, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 field seasons.

antarctica

display_name: antarctica

microstructure

display_name: microstructure

snow-density

display_name: snow-density

snow-density-profile

display_name: snow-density-profile

snowmicropen

display_name: snowmicropen

en: SnowMicroPen measurements and manual snowpits from Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica


maintainer: Elisabeth D. Hafner

en: avalanche-activity aerial-imagery remote-sensing avalanche avalanche-mapping

en: 1999 avalanche data

en:
**for English see below**
Dieser Datensatz enthält die **Umrisse der 11'120 Lawinen** die aus schwarzweiss Luftbildern, welche zwischen dem 25.2.1999 und dem 1.3.1999 aufgenommen wurden, kartiert wurden. Die Lawinenumrisse haben verschiedene Attribute welche im **beigelegten Beispielschlüssel** beschrieben sind (Beispielschluessel_1999_d.pdf).
Es gibt drei Shapefiles:
* **avalanches1999_endversion1.shp**: die kartierten Lawinen (für Attribute siehe Beispielschlüssel!)
* **area_images_1999.shp**: Fläche die durch die Luftbilder abgedeckt wurde
* **clouds_1999.shp**: grobe Umrisse der Wolken in den Bildern
#
 *******************************************************************************
This dataset contains the **outlines of 11'120 avalanches** mapped from panchromatic aerial imagery taken between February 25, 1999 and March 1, 1999. The avalanche outlines have various attributes which are described in the **attached example key** (ExampleKey_AvalMapping_1999_e.pdf).
There are three shapefiles:
* **avalanches1999_endversion1.shp**: the mapped avalanches (for attributes see example key!)
**area_images_1999.shp**: Area covered by the aerial images
**clouds_1999.shp**: rough outlines of the clouds in the images

en:
**for English see below**
*******************************************************************************

 Datenbeschrieb

Dieser Datensatz enthält die **Umrisse der 11'120 Lawinen** die aus schwarzweiss Luftbildern, welche zwischen dem 25.2.1999 und dem 1.3.1999 aufgenommen wurden, kartiert wurden. Die Lawinenumrisse haben verschiedene Attribute welche im **beigelegten Beispielschlüssel** beschrieben sind (Beispielschluessel_1999_d.pdf).

Es gibt drei Shapefiles:
* **avalanches1999_endversion1.shp**: die kartierten Lawinen (für Attribute siehe Beispielschlüssel!)
* **area_images_1999.shp**: Fläche die durch die Luftbilder abgedeckt wurde
* **clouds_1999.shp**: grobe Umrisse der Wolken in den Bildern

 Bildverfügbarkeit:

Die entzerrten Luftbilder können von der [Swisstopo](https://s.geo.admin.ch/rpq3hufnb588) einzeln über den Downloadlink heruntergeladen werden (herzlichen Dank an Holger Heisig für die Prozessierung und ans BAFU für die Finanzierung der Prozessierung!!). Über "Erweiterte Werkzeuge"/ "Datei importieren" können die Bilder nach hereinziehen des Orthofotolinks direkt im map.geo.admin.ch angezeigt werden.

 Weiterführende Litertaur:
Details zu den Luftbildern und zur Kartierung, sowie eine kleine Analyse und Empfehlungen zur Verwendung der Daten finden sich unter

- **FAN Publikation** (Info folgt)

- Dal, F. J., Hafner, E. D., Peters, T., Narnhofer, D., Caye Daudt, R., Heisig, H., & Bühler, Y. (2024). Automated snow avalanche mapping with deep learning in aerial imagery from the extreme avalanche winter of 1999. In K. Gisnås, P. Gauer, H. Dahle, M. Eckerstorfer, A. Mannberg, & K. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the international Snow Science Workshop 2024 (pp. 1264-1271). Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.

- Hafner, E. D., Techel, F., Heisig, H., Dal, J. F., & Bühler, Y. (2024). Remotely sensed avalanche activity during three extreme avalanche periods in Switzerland. In K. Gisnås, P. Gauer, H. Dahle, M. Eckerstorfer, A. Mannberg, & K. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the international Snow Science Workshop 2024 (pp. 1222-1229). Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.

*******************************************************************************

 Data description

This dataset contains the **outlines of 11'120 avalanches** mapped from panchromatic aerial imagery taken between February 25, 1999 and March 1, 1999. The avalanche outlines have various attributes which are described in the **attached example key** (ExampleKey_AvalMapping_1999_e.pdf).

There are three shapefiles:
* **avalanches1999_endversion1.shp**: the mapped avalanches (for attributes see example key!)
**area_images_1999.shp**: Area covered by the aerial images
**clouds_1999.shp**: rough outlines of the clouds in the images

 Image availability:
The rectified aerial images can be downloaded individually from [Swisstopo](https://s.geo.admin.ch/bg6beetinfdc) via the download link (many thanks to Holger Heisig for processing and to BAFU for financing the processing!!). The images can be displayed directly in map.geo.admin.ch via “Advanced tools”/“Import file” after dragging in the orthophoto link.

 Further Reading:
Details on the aerial images and mapping, as well as a brief analysis and tips on using the data can be found at

- **FAN Publication** (info to follow)

- Dal, F. J., Hafner, E. D., Peters, T., Narnhofer, D., Caye Daudt, R., Heisig, H., & Bühler, Y. (2024). Automated snow avalanche mapping with deep learning in aerial imagery from the extreme avalanche winter of 1999. In K. Gisnås, P. Gauer, H. Dahle, M. Eckerstorfer, A. Mannberg, & K. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the international Snow Science Workshop 2024 (pp. 1264-1271). Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.

- Hafner, E. D., Techel, F., Heisig, H., Dal, J. F., & Bühler, Y. (2024). Remotely sensed avalanche activity during three extreme avalanche periods in Switzerland. In K. Gisnås, P. Gauer, H. Dahle, M. Eckerstorfer, A. Mannberg, & K. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the international Snow Science Workshop 2024 (pp. 1222-1229). Norwegian Geotechnical Institute.

aerial-imagery

display_name: aerial-imagery

avalanche

display_name: avalanche

avalanche-activity

display_name: avalanche-activity

avalanche-mapping

display_name: avalanche-mapping

remote-sensing

display_name: remote-sensing

en: Avalanche outlines February and March 1999 from aerial imagery


automatic-classification-of-avalanches

maintainer: Alec van Herwijnen

title_for_slug: automatic-classification-of-avalanches

en: localization avalanche seismic monitoring machine-learning

en:
This tar file contains classification results for two seismic geophone arrays deployed above Davos, Switzerland. The of the first array located at the Dischma Valley was used to automatically identify all seismic events produced by avalanches, whereas the classification perfomed at the second array located at the Wannengrat field site was used to identify airplanes and earthquakes.
Furthermore, this tar file also contains the median back-azimuth of all classified events at the Dischma field site.

mimetype: application/x-tar

en: This dataset contains the classification and localization results obtained during the automatic classification of avalanches during the winter season 2017.

localization

display_name: localization

machine-learning

display_name: machine-learning

monitoring

display_name: monitoring

seismic

display_name: seismic

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Automatic Classification of Avalanches


en: bumblebees bombus-pasquorum nutrient-intake dietary-patterns lad-use-chages rural basel zurich bombus-lapidarius bern urban macronutrients foraging-behaviour pollen-metabarcoding bees

en:
Processed data. The dataset contains the phylogeneitc diversity metrics based on the plant composition from the leg-baskets per bumblebee individual. It contains:
- SampleID: Combining bumblebee ID, location, landscape and replica
- Location: canton, levels: Bern =BE; Basel = BS; Zurich =ZH
- Landscape: landscape type, levels: Urban = U; Rural = R
- Replicate: sampling place (800-m buffer) within location and landscape. Levels: A-E.
- LocationLandscape: combining location and landscape
- Bumblebee_species: the two studied species, levels: B.pasquorum; B. lapidarius
- PVar: phylogenetic variance
- PRic: Phylogenetic richness
- PEve: Phylogenetic evenness
- PClu: Phylogenetic clustering

en:
The dataset contains the amino acid content and ratios for the two bumblebees. Measures are taken only from pollen from the leg-baskets. SampleID is not the same as in the metabarcoding, several samples from different bumblebees were merged within a Location ,Landscape and Replica. Not for all the samples there is information on both amino acids and fatty acids. The columns are:
- SampleID_chemical: The ID for chemical analyses
- Location: the three Swiss cantons studied. Levels: Bern =BE; Basel = BS; Zurich =ZH
- Landscape: the two typea of human-dominated ecosystems, nested to the Swiss canton. Levels: Urban = U; Rural = R
- Replicate: sampling place (800-m buffer) nested with the location and the landscape. Levels: A-E.
- Bumblebee_species: the two studied species, levels: B.pasquorum; B. lapidarius
- LocationLandscape: Combining location and landscape
- Asp, Thr, ..., Arg: Content of individual amino acids. Amino acids are written as abbreviated names. FUll names be checked here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amino_acid
- sum: total sum of amino acid content (mg)
- sumessential: total sum essential amino acids (mg)
-sumnon-essential: total sum non-essential amino acids (mg)
- proportionnonessentialessential: proportion between essential and non-essential amino acids.

en:
The dataset contains the fatty acid content and ratios for the two bumblebees. Measures are taken only from pollen from the leg-baskets. SampleID is not the same as in the metabarcoding, several samples from different bumblebees were merged within a Location ,Landscape and Replica. Not for all the samples there is information on both amino acids and fatty acids. The columns are:
- SampleID_chemical: The ID for chemical analyses
- Location: the three Swiss cantons studied. Levels: Bern =BE; Basel = BS; Zurich =ZH
- Landscape: the two typea of human-dominated ecosystems, nested to the Swiss canton. Levels: Urban = U; Rural = R
- Replicate: sampling place (800-m buffer) nested with the location and the landscape. Levels: A-E.
- Bumblebee_species: the two studied species, levels: B.pasquorum; B. lapidarius
- LocationLandscape: combination between location and landscape
- Caprylic, Pelargonic, ..., Lacceroic: Content of individual fatty acids acids.
- sum: total sum of fatty acid content (mg)
- unsaturatedsum: total sum unsaturated fatty acids (mg)
- saturatedsum: total sum saturated fatty acids (mg)
- omega3sum: total sum Omega 3 fatty acids (mg)
- omega6sum: total sum Omega 6 fatty acids (mg)
- omega9sum: total sum Omega 9 fatty acids (mg)
- omega6to3ratio: ratio Omega 6 to Omega3 fatty acids
-saturatedtounsaturatedration: ratio between saturated and unsaturated fatty acids

en:
Processed data. The dataset contains the functional diversity metrics based on the plant composition from the leg-baskets per bumblebee individual. It contains:
- SampleID: Combining bumblebee ID, location, landscape and replica
- Location: canton, levels: Bern =BE; Basel = BS; Zurich =ZH
- Landscape: landscape type, levels: Urban = U; Rural = R
- Replicate: sampling place (800-m buffer) within location and landscape. Levels: A-E.
- LocationLandscape: combining location and landscape
- Bumblebee_species: the two studied species, levels: B.pasquorum; B. lapidarius
- Fric.w: Weighted functional richness
-Fric: functional richness
-FEve.w: Weighted functional evenness
- FEve: functional evenness
- FDiv.w: weighted functional divergence
- FDiv: functional divergence

en:
Processed data. The dataset contains the plant species richness in the leg-baskets per bumblebee individual. It contains:
- SampleID: Combining bumblebee ID, location, landscape and replica
- Location: canton, levels: Bern =BE; Basel = BS; Zurich =ZH
- Landscape: landscape type, levels: Urban = U; Rural = R
- Replicate: sampling place (800-m buffer) within location and landscape. Levels: A-E.
- LocationLandscape: combining location and landscape
- Bumblebee_species: the two studied species, levels: B.pasquorum; B. lapidarius
- Plant species richness: the number of plant species found in the pollen of the leg-baskets.

en:
The dataset contains the information on the 16 study sites:
- Location: the three Swiss cantons studied. Levels: Bern =BE; Basel = BS; Zurich =ZH
- Landscape: the two typea of human-dominated ecosystems, nested to the Swiss canton. Levels: Urban = U; Rural = R
- Replicate: sampling place (800-m buffer) nested with the location and the landscape. Levels: A-E.
- Site_ID: combination of location, landscape and replicate
- X: X coordinate, WGS84
- Y: Y coordinate WGS84
- Plant S in landscape: Plant species richness within the 800 m calculated using both information from the Global Biodiversity Information. Facility (GBIF) and InfoFlora (www.infoflora.ch).
- % Buildings: the proportion of buildings and other impervious surfaces within 800 m radius.
- % Agricultural: the proportion of agricultural land and other impervious surfaces within 800 m radius.
- % Water: the proportion of water and other impervious surfaces within 800 m radius.
- % Meadows & grasslands: the proportion of meadows and grasslands and other impervious surfaces within 800 m radius.
The raw metabarcoding data is archived in NCBI project PRJNA1137320.

en:
The dataset contains the filtered plant composition1 (removing species with too low relative abundances) and the relative abundance obtained from DNA metabarcoding on pollen samples for both the leg-baskets and the body. The dataset contains the following columns:
- SampleID: Combining bumblebee ID, location, landscape and replica
- Abundance: numeric, relative abundance
- BumblebeeID: numerical ID for each bumblebee individual within a location, landscape and replicate sampling place.
- Location: canton, levels: Bern =BE; Basel = BS; Zurich =ZH
- Landscape: landscape type, levels: Urban = U; Rural = R
- Replicate: sampling place (800-m buffer) within location and landscape. Levels: A-E.
- LocationLandscape:
- Bumblebee_species: the two studied species, levels: B.pasquorum; B. lapidarius
- Transportation_structure: bumblebee pollen transportation structure, levels: B = Body; L = leg-baskets (i.e. corbicula)
- Kingddom: taxonomic
- Phylum: taxonomic
- Order: taxonomic
- Family: taxonomic
- Genus: taxonomic
- Species: plant sicentific name
-Binomial_abundance: Logic, indicating if the plant species is included (1).
The raw metabarcoding data is archived in NCBI project PRJNA1137320

en:
The dataset contains the plant trait values obtined from published sources. It contains:
- Kingddom: taxonomic
- Phylum: taxonomic
- Order: taxonomic
- Family: taxonomic
- Genus: taxonomic
- Species: species name
- plant.species: full scientific name
- native_exotic: origin status. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- pollination mode: vector of pollination. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- Flowering_months_duration: Number of flowering months. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- start_flowering: month of the starting of the flowering. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- growth_form_category: plant growth form. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- plant-height: plant heght in meters. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- inflorescence: Logic, plant with single flowers (0) or inflorescences (1). As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- structural_blossom_class: depicting the accessibility of the flowers. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- symmetry: floral symmetry. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- nectar: logic, nectar present. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- pollen: logic, pollen rewards present. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- oil: logic. oil present. As presented in https://www.doi.org/10.16904/envidat.210
- sugar.concentration: the amount of sugar present in the nectar, in mg.
Additional information can be found in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107243

en:
Data on the diet of urban and rural bumblebees individuals, Bombus lapidarius and Bombus pascuorum, collected in Switzerland (cantons Bern, Basel and Zürich) obtained using metabarconding and chemical analyses from two pollen transportation structures, that is, the body and the leg-baskets (i.e., corbicula). The bumblebees were collected by Egenberger et al., 2019 (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qt8mr4v)
The data contains:
- The composition and relartive abundance of plant species in the body and the leg-baskets, separately.
- The content and ratios of two groups of macronutrients, that is, amino acids and fatty acids.
The dataset contains the data used in the paper "Urban bumblebees diversify their foraging strategy to maintain nutrient intake" as well as unpublished data.

basel

display_name: basel

bees

display_name: bees

bern

display_name: bern

bombus-lapidarius

display_name: bombus-lapidarius

bombus-pasquorum

display_name: bombus-pasquorum

bumblebees

display_name: bumblebees

dietary-patterns

display_name: dietary-patterns

foraging-behaviour

display_name: foraging-behaviour

lad-use-chages

display_name: lad-use-chages

macronutrients

display_name: macronutrients

nutrient-intake

display_name: nutrient-intake

pollen-metabarcoding

display_name: pollen-metabarcoding

rural

display_name: rural

urban

display_name: urban

zurich

display_name: zurich


en: cosmo-wrf snow-precipitation complex-terrain orographic-precipitation precipitation-variability

en: StationData

en: Snow depth maps over Dischma valley for 26 January 2016 and 9 March 2016 and snow depth differences between the two dates.

en:
The data presented here corresponds to the publication "Spatial variability in snow precipitation and accumulation in COSMO-WRF simulations and radar estimations over complex terrain" (Gerber et al., 2018a), which investigates the precipitation variability of snow precipitation in the central northern part of the Grisons (CH) and the publication "The importance of near-surface winter precipitation processes in complex alpine terrain" (Gerber et al., 2018b). The dataset contains:

* WRFsimulations: WRF simulation output for simulations with 4x (14x) terrain smoothing with an output timestep of 30 min/5 min and horizontal grid spacings of 1350 m, 450 m, 150 m and 50 m (currently: data available upon request).
* StationData: Meteorological station data of 18 meteorological stations in the central northern part of the Grisons with 30 minute resolution for the period 1 January 2016 till 1 May 2016.
* ADS80data: Photogrammetrically determined snow depth distribution data over the Dischma valley for the 26 January 2016 and 9 March 2016. Snow heights are corrected for buildings, vegetation (> 1m), outliers, and pixles, which are obivously snow-free on the pictures (Bühler et al., 2015). In addition the snow depth differences (snow depth on 9 March 2016 minus snow depth on 26 January 2016) are provided.

For more details about the simulation and observation data, see Gerber et al., 2018 and Gerber and Sharma (2018).

Publications:

Bühler, Y., Marty, M., Egli, L., Veitinger, J., Jonas, T., Thee, P., and Ginzler, C.: Snow depth mapping in high-alpine catchments using digital photogrammetry. Cryosphere, 9, 229–243, doi:10.5194/tc-9-229-2015, 2015.

Gerber, F., Besic, N., Sharma, V., Mott, R., Daniels, M., Gabella, M., Berne, A., Germann, U., and Lehning, M.: Spatial variability in snow precipitation and accumulation in COSMO-WRF simulations and radar estimations over complex terrain, The Cryosphere, 12, 3137–3160, doi:10.5194/tc-12-3137-2018, 2018.

Gerber, F., Mott, R. and Lehning, M.: The importance of near-surface winter precipitation processes in complex alpine terrain, Journal of Hydrometeorology, accepted, 2018.

Gerber, F., and Sharma, V.: Running COSMO-WRF on very-high resolution over complex terrain. Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences CRYOS, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland. doi:10.16904/envidat.35, 2018.

complex-terrain

display_name: complex-terrain

cosmo-wrf

display_name: cosmo-wrf

orographic-precipitation

display_name: orographic-precipitation

precipitation-variability

display_name: precipitation-variability

snow-precipitation

display_name: snow-precipitation

en: DISCHMEX - High-resolution WRF simulations in complex alpine terrain and station measurements


maintainer: EnviDat

en: meteorological-data-format csv research-data-management nead metadata-convention

en: PyNEAD (future reference implementation)

en: NEAD syntax v0.1 (EBNF)

en: MeteoIO (future reference implementation)

mimetype: text/html

en: NEAD on GitHub

media_type: text/html

en:
Acknowledgement: The NEAD format includes NetCDF metadata and is proudly inspired by both SMET and NetCDF formats. NEAD is designed as a long-term data preservation and exchange format.

The NEAD specifications were presented at the "WMO Data Conference 2020 - Earth System Data Exchange in the 21st Century" (Virtual Conference).

-----------------------

Summary:
The Non-Binary Environmental Data Archive (NEAD) format is being developed as a generic and intuitive format that combines the self-documenting features of NetCDF with human readable and writeable features of CSV. It is designed for exchange and preservation of time series data in environmental data repositories.

License: The NEAD specifications are released to the public domain under a Creative Commons CC0 "No Rights Reserved" international license. You can reuse the information contained herein in any way you want, for any purposes and without restrictions.

csv

display_name: csv

metadata-convention

display_name: metadata-convention

meteorological-data-format

display_name: meteorological-data-format

nead

display_name: nead

research-data-management

display_name: research-data-management

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Non-Binary Environmental Archive Data (NEAD) format


maintainer: Anita Risch

en: ecosystem-functions exclusion invertebrates grazing vertebrates ecosystem-coupling swiss-national-park subalpine ecosystem-multifunctionality grassland

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

format: XLS

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


maintainer: Athanasios Nenes

en: raclets supersaturation cloud-droplets wolfgangpass cloud-modeling sigma-w

en: Predicted cloud droplet numbers (kappa=0.1) Davos Wolfgang

en:
In-situ measurements of aerosol size distributions along with updraft velocities collected from a wind Doppler Lidar are coupled with a state-of-the art droplet activation parameterization (Morales and Nenes, 2014) to determine the cloud droplet number and maximum in-cloud supersaturation that can potentially form over the Davos Wolfgang station between February 24 and March 8 2019. For this, as a sensitivity test, a hygroscopicity parameter of 0.1 is assumed, which is the lower limit determined from the analysis carried out for Weissfluhjoch (https://www.envidat.ch/dataset/ccn-hygroscopicity-predicted-cloud-droplet-numbers-weissfluhjoch). The data file contains:

* Date and time (DD/MM/YYYY hh:mm:ss) in UTC
* The wind-lidar derived standard deviation of updraft velocities (sigma-w) in m/s, used to apply the parameterization employing a single characteristic velocity (Morales and Nenes, 2010)
* The maximum predicted cloud parcel supersaturation (Smax%)
* The total in-situ aerosol number concentration (Naer) in cmˉ³, measured by the SMPS
* The predicted cloud droplet numbers (Nd) in cmˉ³
* The activation fraction (%)

en: Predicted cloud droplet numbers (kappa=0.25) Weissfluhjoch

en:
In-situ measurements of aerosol size distributions along with updraft velocities collected from a wind Doppler Lidar are coupled with a state-of-the art droplet activation parameterization (Morales and Nenes, 2014) to determine the cloud droplet number and maximum in-cloud supersaturation that can potentially form over the Davos Wolfgang station between February 24 and March 8 2019. For this, as a sensitivity test, a hygroscopicity parameter of 0.25 is assumed, which is the upper limit determined from the analysis carried out for Weissfluhjoch (https://www.envidat.ch/dataset/ccn-hygroscopicity-predicted-cloud-droplet-numbers-weissfluhjoch). The data file contains:

* Date and time (DD/MM/YYYY hh:mm:ss) in UTC
* The wind-lidar derived standard deviation of updraft velocities (sigma-w) in m/s, used to apply the parameterization employing a single characteristic velocity (Morales and Nenes, 2010)
* The maximum predicted cloud parcel supersaturation (Smax%)
* The total in-situ aerosol number concentration (Naer) in cmˉ³, measured by the SMPS
* The predicted cloud droplet numbers (Nd) in cmˉ³
* The activation fraction (%)

en: Cloud droplet properties were predicted between February 24 and March 8 2019 for the measurement site Davos Wolfgang (1630 m a.s.l., LON: 9.853594, LAT: 46.835577). Droplet calculations are carried out with the physically based aerosol activation parameterization of Morales and Nenes (2014), employing the “characteristic velocity” approach of Morales and Nenes (2010). Aerosol size distribution observations required to predict the cloud droplet numbers and maximum in-cloud supersaturation are obtained from a Scanning Mobility Particle Size Spectrometer (SMPS) instrument deployed at Davos Wolfgang (https://www.envidat.ch/dataset/aerosol-data-davos-wolfgang). The required vertical velocity measurements are derived from the wind Doppler Lidar (https://www.envidat.ch/dataset/lidar-wind-profiler-data) deployed at the same station and are extracted from the first bin of the instrument, being 200 m above ground level. The hygroscopic properties of the particles measured at Davos Wolfgang could not be estimated, owing to a lack of concurrent CCN measurements. As a sensitivity test, droplet calculations are performed assuming two different values of the aerosol hygroscopicity parameter, 0.1 and 0.25, based on the analysis carried out for Weissfluhjoch. Additional information can be found in Section 2.3 [here](https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2020-1036/).

cloud-droplets

display_name: cloud-droplets

cloud-modeling

display_name: cloud-modeling

raclets

display_name: raclets

sigma-w

display_name: sigma-w

supersaturation

display_name: supersaturation

wolfgangpass

display_name: wolfgangpass

en: Predicted cloud droplet numbers Davos Wolfgang


en: raclets ice-nucleation backward-trajectories aerosol clouds

en: This dataset contains number concentrations of ice-nucleating particles active at -15 °C observed at Weissfluhjoch during February and March 2019, as well as complementary data (measured aerosol number concentrations and modelled total precipitation along air mass trajectories). This data formed the basis of our paper with the title “Towards parameterising atmospheric concentrations of ice-nucleating particles active at moderate supercooling”.

aerosol

display_name: aerosol

backward-trajectories

display_name: backward-trajectories

clouds

display_name: clouds

ice-nucleation

display_name: ice-nucleation

en: Ice nucleating particle concentrations active at -15 °C at Weissfluhjoch