maintainer: Markus Schlegel

en: air-sampling metabarcoding monitoring environmental-dna spore-dispersal

en: Data files and analysis scripts (Version 2)

en: This ZIP archive contains the data and source code necessary to reproduce the analyses for the manuscript "A case study on the application of spore sampling for the monitoring of macrofungi". Please refer to README.pdf inside the archive for more information.

en: Data files and analysis scripts (Version 1)

en: This ZIP archive contains the data and source code necessary to reproduce the analyses for the manuscript "A case study on the application of spore sampling for the monitoring of fungi". Please refer to README.pdf inside the archive for more information.

en:
Resources associated with the manuscript *A case study on the application of spore sampling for the monitoring of macrofungi* ([Schlegel et al. 2024](https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13941)).
Airborne environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring of fungi was evaluated on a species-rich grassland site. Extensive fruiting body surveys yielded 29 waxcap and clavarioid species, 19 of which were also detectable in air eDNA. The analysis indicates that spores of locally occurring fruiting bodies were detected, in addition to a large diversity of common fungal species, while rare and threatened species were under-represented in the air.
*Version 1* of the dataset was submitted during the review phase. *Version 2* contains minor changes and clarifications, and is up to date with the [published supplement](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/downloadSupplement?doi=10.1111%2F1755-0998.13941&file=men13941-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdf) of the study.
The contents of the ZIP archive:
* analysis scripts in [R-Markdown](https://rmarkdown.rstudio.com) format, including the rendered PDF output with figures and tables (*analysis* directory)
* eDNA sample metadata (*amplicon_meta*) and results of the amplicon clustering (*amplicon_data*) and the source code of the pipeline (*amplicon_pipeline*)
* positions of all fruiting body groups found in the surveys (3838 GPS points) (*surveys*)
* positions of the spore traps, taxonomy of studied grassland fungi and red-list species, and many more resources
Please refer to `README.pdf` inside the archive for a complete description of the file structure and information on how to reproduce the analyses.

air-sampling

display_name: air-sampling

environmental-dna

display_name: environmental-dna

metabarcoding

display_name: metabarcoding

monitoring

display_name: monitoring

spore-dispersal

display_name: spore-dispersal

en: Supporting information for case study on the application of spore sampling for the monitoring of macrofungi


maintainer: Virginie Marques

en: switzerland vert01 freshwater vertebrates edna sper01 environmental-dna spermatophytes

state: active

type: dataset

en: Data access

format: SERVICE

en:
Catchment-based sampling of river eDNA integrates terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity of alpine landscapes

From 22-Jun-2020 to 26-Jun-2020, we sampled five sites comprising one low, two intermediate and two high-elevation sites per catchment (Fig. 1a). We visited two catchments per day—one in the morning and one in the afternoon—for a total of ten catchments. All samples per catchment were collected within a maximum four-hour period by three groups of samplers. The intermediate and high-elevation sites were situated along two tributaries leading into the low-elevation site of the river. We used three filters for each relative elevation class and filtered 60 L per relative elevation class. We sampled 30 L per tributary for a combined volume of 60 L at the intermediate and high-elevation sites. In total, 180 L were sampled in total per catchment. A filtration device composed of either the Athena® peristaltic pump (Proactive Environmental Products LLC; 1 L/min nominal flow) or the Subspace® underwater peristaltic pump (Subspace Pictures; 1 L/min nominal flow), combined with a VigiDNA® 0.2 µM cross-flow filtration capsule (VigiDNA, SPYGEN) was used in order to filter a large water volume. We used a finer mesh than the recommended VigiDNA® 0.45 µM cross-flow filtration capsule to maximise the capture of biological material since mountain water does not transport high quantities of sediments. For each filtration capsule, we used disposable sterile tubing. At the end of each filtration, we emptied the water inside the capsules, replaced it with 80 ml of CL1 conservation buffer (SPYGEN), and stored it at room temperature. We followed a strict contamination control protocol in both field and laboratory stages (Goldberg et al. 2016; Valentini et al. 2016). Each water sample was processed using disposable gloves and single-use filtration equipment. We used two primer sets targeting vertebrates (Vert01, forward: − TTAGATACCCCACTATGC, reverse: − TAGAACAGGCTCCTCTAG, mean marker length: 97 bp) and spermatophytes (g-h/Sper01, forward: − GGGCAATCCTGAGCCAA, reverse: CCATTGAGTCTCTGCACCTATC, mean marker length: 48 bp). Though both primers are relatively broad with low species-level resolution, we selected them as the goal was to minimise cost and effort and maximise the identification of a broad range of taxa which can represent the species assemblages of the region. Libraries were prepared with ligation using the MetaFast protocol (Fasteris).

edna

display_name: edna

freshwater

display_name: freshwater

spermatophytes

display_name: spermatophytes

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

educ

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

en: Education, culture and sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester

en: Environmental DNA Freshwater Switzerland VaudCatchment Modipl 2020


root-traits

maintainer: Ivano Brunner

title_for_slug: root-traits

en: soil-coring belowground-biomass fine-root-traits drought ingrowth-cores

en: Root-traits

media_type: application/zip

format: ZIP

mimetype: application/zip

en:
Fine-root traits of Scots pine in response to enhanced soil water availability deriving from long-term irrigation in the Pfynwald

Data_Fig.1.xlsx
Fine-root biomass of the topsoil (0-10 cm) in the dry and irrigated treatment of the Scots pine forest of the years 2003 to 2016 recorded by soil coring

Data_Tab1+2_2005.xlsx
Fine-root traits from roots of ingrowth cores from 2005 after two years of growth in the dry and irrigated treatment of the Scots pine forest

Data_Tab1+2_2016.xlsx
Fine-root traits from roots of ingrowth cores from 2016 after two years of growth, and from roots of the soil-coring sampling from 2016 in the dry and irrigated treatment of the Scots pine forest

belowground-biomass

display_name: belowground-biomass

drought

display_name: drought

fine-root-traits

display_name: fine-root-traits

ingrowth-cores

display_name: ingrowth-cores

soil-coring

display_name: soil-coring


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: precipitation temperature soil-water-balance relative-humidity growing-degree-days growing-season-length solar-radiation

en: CHELSA-BIOCLIM+ Technical Documentation

media_type: application/pdf

en: Technical documentation document including the variable names, units, scaling, offset, and background.

format: PDF

en: CHELSA-BIOCLIM+

en: Global extented set of bioclimatic variables at different temporal (e.g. monthly, annual, long term normals) resolution in Geotiff format.

format: GeoTIFF

en: A multitude of physical and biological processes on which ecosystems and human societies depend are governed by climatic conditions. Understanding how these processes are altered by climate change is central to mitigation efforts. Based on mechanistically downscaled climate data, we developed a set of climate-related variables at yet unprecedented spatiotemporal detail as a basis for environmental and ecological analyses. We created gridded data for near-surface relative humidity (hurs), cloud area fraction (clt), near-surface wind speed (sfcWind), vapour pressure deficit (vpd), surface downwelling shortwave radiation (rsds), potential evapotranspiration (pet), climate moisture index (cmi), and site water balance (swb), at a monthly temporal and 30 arcsec spatial resolution globally starting 1980 until 2018. At the same spatial resolution, we further estimated climatological normals of frost change frequency (fcf), snow cover days (scd), potential net primary productivity (npp), growing degree days (gdd), and growing season characteristics for the periods 1981-2010, 2011-2040, 2041-2070, and 2071-2100, considering three shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP126, SSP370, SSP585) and five Earth system models. Time-series variables showed high accuracy when validated against observations from meteorological stations. Climatological normals were also highly correlated to observations although some variables showed notable biases, e.g., snow cover days (scd). Together, the data sets presented here allow improving our understanding of patterns and processes that are governed by climate, including the impact of recent and future climate changes on the world’s ecosystems and associated services to societies.

growing-degree-days

display_name: growing-degree-days

growing-season-length

display_name: growing-season-length

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

relative-humidity

display_name: relative-humidity

soil-water-balance

display_name: soil-water-balance

solar-radiation

display_name: solar-radiation

temperature

display_name: temperature

en: CHELSA-BIOCLIM+ A novel set of global climate-related predictors at kilometre-resolution


en: snow-temperature surface-roughness sentinel-1 wet-snow satellite radar snow-density snow-roughness snow-ssa snow-melt snow-lwc snow-profiles

media_type: text/plain

en: General metadata and detailed data description.

format: TXT

media_type: text/csv

en: Manually measured time series of snow water equivalent (2022-2023).

format: CSV

en: Manually measured time series of surface roughness (2022-2023).

en: Manually measured time series of snow water equivalent (2023-2024).

en: Snow profiles collected on the snow season 2023-2024.

en: Snow water equivalent time series automatically recorded from the snow scale (2022-2024).

format: OCTET

en: Runoff time series automatically recorded from the lysimeter (2022-2024).

en: Manually measured time series of surface roughness (2023-2024).

en: Snow profiles collected on the snow season 2022-2023.

en:
*Currently, this dataset is intended solely for article review purposes and may not be used for any other purposes.*
This dataset consists of a series of full snow profiles collected at the field site of Weissfluhjoch, Davos, Switzerland over the two snow seasons of 2022-2023 and 2023-2024. This series of snow profiles was collected with a high vertical and temporal resolution, with a specific focus on the melting seasons, during which up to 3 snow profiles per week were sampled. This dataset is part of the measurement campaign carried out within the SnowTinel project, whose aim is to explore the Sentinel-1 SAR backscattering response to melting Alpine snowpacks. Therefore, this dataset contains manual measurements of the main properties of snow which are responsible for scattering, i.e. temperature, density, specific surface area (SSA), liquid water content (LWC), surface roughness and snow water equivalent (SWE).
The dataset is composed of a total of 85 snow profiles, 38 carried out in 2022-2023 and 47 in 2023-2024.
 - Profiles of snow **temperature** were sampled at a vertical resolution of 10 cm (2022-2023) and 5 cm (2023-2024) using HI98501 Checktemp from Hanna Instruments;
  - Profiles of snow **density** were sampled at a vertical resolution of 3 cm using a box density cutter and a digital scale;
  - Profiles of snow **specific surface area** were sampled at a vertical resolution of 4 cm using the InfraSnow sensor from FPGA;
  - Profiles of snow **liquid water content** were sampled at a vertical resolution of 2 cm using the Denothmeter (2022-2023) and the New Capacitive Sensor from FPGA (2023-2024). In conditions of ripe snow, dielectric measurements were backed up by melting calorimetry measurements following a recently revised field protocol;
  - Snow **surface roughness** is expressed by the Root Mean Square of the Heights (RMSH) and the correlation length (CL), both computed from a digitized snow transect obtained by a digital photograph of a panel vertically inserted into the snow.
- **Snow water equivalent** was sampled in sections from the surface to the bottom of the snowpack with a cylinder cutter.

Additionally, **runoff** was automatically measured in the close proximity to the measurement field at a sub-hourly resolution by a lysimeter. The instrument was unfortunately discovered to be clogged at the start of the runoff in 2023 and only repaired in late May 2023. Therefore, the time series is not explanatory for the runoff start in 2023. The instrument was inspected timely and assessed as fully functional for the following snow season. The manually measured values of **SWE** are complemented by an automatically recorded time series at sub-hourly time intervals with a SSG1000 snow scale manufactured by Sommer Messtechnik, Austria.

 ---

- References:
 - HI98501 Checktemp: [https://www.hannainstruments.co.uk/modules/teapotknowledgehub/uploads/ist98501_06_18-60d496ca2cd31.pdf](https://www.hannainstruments.co.uk/modules/teapotknowledgehub/uploads/ist98501_06_18-60d496ca2cd31.pdf)
 - InfraSnow sensor: Wolfsperger, Fabian & Ziegler, Silvio & Schneebeli, Martin & Löwe, Henning. (2022). Evaluation of the InfraSnow: a handheld device to measure snow specific surface (SSA). 10.13140/RG.2.2.31566.95047; [https://snow-sen.com/infrasnow-ssa-sensor-2/](https://snow-sen.com/infrasnow-ssa-sensor-2/)
 - Denothmeter: Denoth, A. “An Electronic Device for Long-Term Snow Wetness Recording.” Annals of Glaciology 19 (1994): 104–6. [https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500011058](https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500011058)
 - New Capacitive Sensor: Wolfsperger, Fabian & Geisser, Michel & Ziegler, Silvio & Löwe, Henning. (2023). A NEW HANDHELD CAPACITIVE SENSOR TO MEASURE SNOW DENSITY AND LIQUID WATER CONTENT; [https://snow-sen.com/slf-snowpro-40/](https://snow-sen.com/slf-snowpro-40/)
 - Melting calorimetry: Barella, R., Bavay, M., Carletti, F., Ciapponi, N., Premier, V., and Marin, C.: Unlocking the potential of melting calorimetry: a field protocol for liquid water content measurement in snow, The Cryosphere, 18, 5323–5345, [https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024](https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5323-2024), 2024.
 - Surface roughness: B. Riccardo, C. Marin, M. Callegari, M. Gianinetto, T. Moranduzzo and C. Notarnicola, "A Low-Cost Portable Automatic System for Snow Surface Roughness Measurements Based on Digital Photography," 2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS, Brussels, Belgium, 2021, pp. 5562-5565, doi: [https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553989](https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553989).
 - SSG: [https://www.sommer.at/de/produkte/schnee-eis/schneewaage-ssg-2](https://www.sommer.at/de/produkte/schnee-eis/schneewaage-ssg-2)

radar

display_name: radar

satellite

display_name: satellite

snow-density

display_name: snow-density

snow-lwc

display_name: snow-lwc

snow-melt

display_name: snow-melt

snow-profiles

display_name: snow-profiles

snow-roughness

display_name: snow-roughness

snow-ssa

display_name: snow-ssa

snow-temperature

display_name: snow-temperature

surface-roughness

display_name: surface-roughness

wet-snow

display_name: wet-snow

en: SnowTinel high-temporal-resolution ground truth dataset for SAR remote sensing of snow


maintainer: Stephan Zimmermann

en: biogeochemical-cycling magnesium calcium potassium fagus-orientalis-lipsky

en: Concentrations of Ca, Mg, K, and Na in throughfall, litterflow and soil solution of a Hyrcanian forst in Northern Iran

format: XLS

en:
Throughfall, litterflow and soil solution were sampled during one whole year under five Oriental beech trees in a mixed Hyrcanian beech forest. The amounts of Ca2+, Mg2+, K+ and Na+ in these fluxes were calculated based on their concentrations and the sampled volumes, and subsequently compared with the respective fluxes in the rainfall and soil solution of an adjacent forest gap.
In addition six soil profiles, one close to every single tree and one in the forest gap, were analyzed for pH, CaCO3, organic matter and texture.

biogeochemical-cycling

display_name: biogeochemical-cycling

calcium

display_name: calcium

fagus-orientalis-lipsky

display_name: fagus-orientalis-lipsky

magnesium

display_name: magnesium

potassium

display_name: potassium

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Base cation dynamics in an Oriental beech forest


en: vertical-wind-motion snow-depth boundary-layer-winds saltation snow-cover

en: Data Compilation

en: Compressed TXT files

en:
The data correspond to the experiments presented and discussed in a paper regarding the interaction between turbulent wind fluctuations and snow saltation mass-fluxes (Paterna, 2016). Each of the nine data files corresponds to a different experiment presented in the paper and conducted in the winter 2014/2015 in the WSL/SLF cold wind tunnel in Davos. For each file the five columns indicate the time from the beginning of the experiment, the streamwise (u’) and the vertical (w’) wind velocity fluctuations, the streamwise (qx) and the vertical (qz) snow mass-flux components. From these time-series the scales of the snow saltation and of the turbulent flow are obtained with respect to the eddy-cycles and snow saltation cycles. From spectral analysis of the time-series a decoupling of the snow saltation from the turbulence forcing reveals two regimes of interaction: a turbulence-dependent regime occurring with weak saltation, and a turbulence-independent regime with strong saltation. Further details can be found at the link below.

Publication http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL068171/abstract

boundary-layer-winds

display_name: boundary-layer-winds

saltation

display_name: saltation

snow-cover

display_name: snow-cover

snow-depth

display_name: snow-depth

vertical-wind-motion

display_name: vertical-wind-motion

en: Wind tunnel measurement data of drifting snow and turbulent wind fluctuations


maintainer: Armin Sigmund

en: antarctica stable-water-isotopes lagrangian-analysis snow-sublimation evaporation backward-trajectories isotopic-distillation

en: Readme

en: Meta data

en: Model code

en: Model Sublimation and Model Air Parcel (python scripts)

en: Python scripts for data visualization

en: Scripts for generating the figures of the related research article and generating the data files (csv) from the model output

en: Data

en: Modeled data including the data shown in the figures of the related research article

en:
 Summary

This data set contains Python programming code and modeled data discussed in a related research article. We developed a simple isotope model to study the drivers of the particularly depleted vapour isotopic composition measured on the ship of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition close to the outlet of the Mertz glacier, East Antarctica, in the 6-day period from 27 January 2017 to 1 February 2017. The model considers the stable water isotopologues H2(16O), H2(18O), and HD(16O). It uses data from the ERA5 reanalysis product with a spatial resolution of 0.25° x 0.25° (Hersbach et al., 2018) and 10-day backward trajectories for the location of the ship, published by Thurnherr et al. (2020a). Our data set includes the model code, Python scripts for visualizing the results, and data produced by the model including the results shown in the figures of the related research article. Here, we summarize the most important model characteristics while further details can be found in the readme.txt file and the related research article including its supporting information.

 Main model characteristics

The modeling approach consists of two steps called *Model Sublimation* and *Model Air Parcel*. The former estimates the isotopic compositions of the snow and sublimation flux across the Antarctic Ice Sheet using an Eulerian frame of reference while the latter models the vapour isotopic composition and specific humidity along air parcel trajectories using a Lagrangian frame of reference. The isotope effects of most phase changes are represented by equilibrium fractionation. Only for ocean evaporation, kinetic fractionation is additionally taken into account (original Craig-Gordon formula). For snow sublimation, two assumptions are tested: *Run E* assumes that sublimation is associated with equilibrium fractionation while *Run N* assumes that sublimation occurs without isotopic fractionation.

 Model Sublimation
Model Sublimation uses a simple one-dimensional mass-balance approach in each grid cell, considering snow accumulation due to snowfall and vapour deposition and snow ablation due to sublimation. The snowpack is represented by 100 layers of equal thickness (e.g., 1 cm) and density (350 kg m-3). The isotopic composition of snowfall is parameterized by generalizing a site-specific, empirical relationship between the daily mean air temperature and snowfall isotopic composition. In the case of vapour deposition, Model Sublimation assumes equilibrium fractionation and estimates the isotopic composition of the atmospheric vapour as the average value for two idealized situations: (i) locally sourced vapour which has the same isotopic composition as the sublimation flux; (ii) non-locally sourced vapour in isotopic equilibrium with snowfall. Model Sublimation is run with a time step of 1 h, independently of Model Air Parcel.

 Model Air Parcel
Every hour, an ensemble of trajectories arrives at different heights in the ABL above the ship. For each of these trajectories, we consider an air parcel with a constant volume of 1 x 1 x 1 m3. The air parcels are initialized at the first suitable time when the trajectories are located in the ABL, either over the ice-free ocean in conditions of evaporation or over snow (Antarctic Ice Sheet or sea ice). Subsequently, the masses of the water isotopologues in the air parcels are simulated with a time step of 3 h, considering vapour uptake or removal due to the moisture flux at the snow or liquid ocean surface (only if the parcel is in the ABL) and cloud/precipitation formation (if the saturation specific humidity is reached). Sea ice is taken into account in a very simplified way. We represent the sea ice by grid cells with a sea-ice cover of more than 90% and assume the isotopic composition of the sublimation flux to be identical to that in the nearest grid cell of the Antarctic Ice Sheet. The isotopic composition of the sublimation flux is taken from Model Sublimation whereas the isotopic composition of the vapour deposition flux (over snow) and condensation flux (over ice-free ocean) is simulated assuming an isotopic equilibrium with the air parcel. Isotope effects of cloud/precipitation formation are represented using the classic Rayleigh distillation model with equilibrium fractionation, where the cloud water is assumed to precipitate immediately after formation.

 References

Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horanyi, A., Munoz Sabater, J.,... others (2018). *ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS)*. doi: 10.24381/cds.bd0915c6

Thurnherr, I., Wernli, H., & Aemisegger, F. (2020a). *10-day backward trajectories from ECMWF analysis data along the ship track of the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition in austral summer 2016/2017*. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4031705

antarctica

display_name: antarctica

backward-trajectories

display_name: backward-trajectories

evaporation

display_name: evaporation

isotopic-distillation

display_name: isotopic-distillation

lagrangian-analysis

display_name: lagrangian-analysis

snow-sublimation

display_name: snow-sublimation

stable-water-isotopes

display_name: stable-water-isotopes

en: Modeled Isotopic Composition of Water Vapour Along Air Parcel Trajectories in the Antarctic


maintainer: Anita Risch

en: vertebrates ecosystem-coupling grassland exclusion ecosystem-functions invertebrates subalpine swiss-national-park grazing ecosystem-multifunctionality

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


en: active-layer plastisphere conservation collections permafrost arctic bacteria glaciers extreme-habitat biobank biodiversity swiss-alps fungi

en: Complete collection of bacterial and fungal isolates from Permafrost, active layer and glaciers in Switzerland, Svalbard, northern Greenland and Russia.

en:
The cold habitats of the Swiss Alps and the Arctic are undergoing change and are at risk of disappearing completely or partially in the future. Along with them, a poorly known diversity of microorganisms that have adapted to life in these supposedly hostile places. By cryopreserving microorganisms from these habitats, some of today's biodiversity can be preserved in biobanks.
The collection contains cryopreserved bacteria and fungi isolated from permafrost and active layer of Muot da Barba Peider and Val Lavirun, from the glacier forefield and glacier toe of the Damma glacier, from active layer in northern Greenland and from plastic waste in Svalbard, as well as isolates from plastic incubations in Muot da Barba Peider, northern Greenland and arctic Russian soils.
Project overview: https://www.wsl.ch/en/projects/life-at-chilly-temperatures-a-collection-of-microorganisms-from-extreme-habitats/

active-layer

display_name: active-layer

arctic

display_name: arctic

bacteria

display_name: bacteria

biobank

display_name: biobank

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

collections

display_name: collections

conservation

display_name: conservation

extreme-habitat

display_name: extreme-habitat

fungi

display_name: fungi

glaciers

display_name: glaciers

permafrost

display_name: permafrost

plastisphere

display_name: plastisphere

swiss-alps

display_name: swiss-alps

en: Life at chilly temperatures - A collection of microorganisms from extreme habitats


en: fagus-sylvatica european-summer-drought leaf-senescence growth-reaction-to-drought-stress drought-2018 forests

en: Drought and Beech: 1000 beeches data set

en: The data set comprises data from the Drought and Beech 1000 beeches project. The actual data file with monitoring data of 963 beech trees in northern Switzerland over four years (Drought_and_Beech_1000beeches_Data_v1.0.csv), a metadata file with column descriptions (Drought_and_Beech_1000beeches_Legend_v1.0.csv), and a file defining the different survey periods (Drought_and_Beech_1000beeches_Survey_periods_v1.0.csv).

en: This study investigated multi-year drought impacts on beech forests through a unique large-scale monitoring of 963 individual beech trees, which showed either premature leaf discoloration during the drought in summer 2018 or no visible damage. We conducted the study in two highly drought-affected regions in northern Switzerland and one less drought-affected region located further south. We quantified the development of crown dieback and tree mortality as well as secondary drought damage, i.e. the presence of bleeding cankers and bark beetle infestations, in these trees for three consecutive years. We also determined the impact of several potential climate- and stand-related (predisposing) factors on mortality and drought legacy processes.

european-summer-drought

display_name: european-summer-drought

fagus-sylvatica

display_name: fagus-sylvatica

forests

display_name: forests

growth-reaction-to-drought-stress

display_name: growth-reaction-to-drought-stress

leaf-senescence

display_name: leaf-senescence

en: Data on multi-year drought impacts on European beech in northern Switzerland


en: character-species diagnostic-species phytosociology vegetation-type vegetation-classification typoch

en: How the TypoCH list was modified.pdf

en: Describes details on the modification procedure to improve the TypoCH reference list.

en: TypoCH_modified list.csv

en:
The file contains the vegetation types and the modified list of diagnostic species (based on Delarze et al. (2015). The numbers indicate the weight of a species in the particular vegetation type for the calculation of the TypoCH score:
1) accompanying species -> 1 point
2) dominant accompanying species (if >10% cover in the plot) -> 2 points
3) character species -> 4 points
4) dominant character species (if >10% cover in the plot) -> 8 points

en: The TypoCH scoring system (Eggenberg & Bornand 2023), which is widely used in Switzerland, provides good results as classification method for vegetation types based on Delarze et al. (2015). However, the reference list contained species with no diagnostic value and important character species were missing. We therefore made a first attempt to modify the list based on numerical methods and expert knowledge to improve the classification success, at least for vegetation types of the open land (i.e. grasslands, fens, bogs).

character-species

display_name: character-species

diagnostic-species

display_name: diagnostic-species

phytosociology

display_name: phytosociology

typoch

display_name: typoch

vegetation-classification

display_name: vegetation-classification

vegetation-type

display_name: vegetation-type

en: Modified TypoCH reference list of diagnostic species for the classification of vegetation types in Switzerland


en: preferential-deposition alpine3d lee-side-flow-field lidar tls

en: Dataset

en:
The data presented here corresponds to the publication "A Close-Ridge Small-Scale Atmospheric Flow Field and its Influence on Snow Accumulation" (Gerber et al., 2017), which investigates an eddy-like structure in the vicinity of the Sattelhorn in the Dischma valley (Davos Switzerland) and its influence on snow accumulation. The dataset contains:

* Alpine3D: Alpine3D snow depth grids (25 m resolution) for two simulations with and without snow redistribution.
* ARPS: 10 ARPS simulations (25 m horizontal resolution) with different model setups (wind direction, wind speed, stability).
* LiDAR: Processed LiDAR PPI (D2_PPI_1h) and RHI (D2_cross_1h) across the valley with a hourly resolution for the period 27 October 2015 01:00 - 29 October 2015c 21:00 (spatial resolution: 25 m).
* meteostations-dischma: Meteorological station data of two meteorological stations in the Dischma valley with 10 minute resolution for the period 28 October 2015 - 30 October 2015.
* TLS: Snow depth change data (m) between 28 October 2015 and 30 October 2015 based on terrestrial laser scans.

For more details about the simulation and observation data, see Gerber et al., 2017.

Publication: Gerber et al., 2017: A Close-Ridge Small-Scale Atmospheric Flow Field and its Influence on Snow Accumulation, submitted to JGR - Atmospheres.

lee-side-flow-field

display_name: lee-side-flow-field

lidar

display_name: lidar

preferential-deposition

display_name: preferential-deposition

tls

display_name: tls

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: DISCHMEX - Observations and simulations of the close-ridge small-scale atmospheric flow field and snow accumulation at Sattelhorn, Dischma valley, Davos, Switzerland.


en: raster sentinel-2 research-data-management time-series video-encoding core gridded-data geodata

en: View publication in the Digital Object Repository at WSL (DORA)

media_type: text/html

format: HTML

en: CORE Dataset (80 GB)

en: Disclaimer: provided for the Geomatics peer review in 2021 and left as additional information for the dataset. Software dependencies and libraries, as well as cloud storage paths, may change over time (after 2021).

en:
Acknowledgements: The CORE format was proudly inspired by the Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF ([COG](https://www.cogeo.org/)) format, by considering how to leverage the ability of clients issuing HTTP GET range requests for a time-series of remote sensing and aerial imagery (instead of just one image).

License: The Cloud Optimized Raster Encoding (CORE) specifications are released to the public domain under a Creative Commons 1.0 CC0 "No Rights Reserved" international license. You can reuse the information contained herein in any way you want, for any purposes and without restrictions.

-----------------------

Summary:
The Cloud Optimized Raster Encoding (CORE) format is being developed for the efficient storage and management of gridded data by applying video encoding algorithms. It is mainly designed for the exchange and preservation of large time series data in environmental data repositories, while in the same time enabling more efficient workflows on the cloud. It can be applied to any large number of similar (in pixel size and image dimensions) raster data layers. CORE is not designed to replace COG but to work together with COG for a collection of many layers (e.g. by offering a fast preview of layers when switching between layers of a time series).

WARNING: Currently only applicable to RGB/Byte imagery. The final CORE specifications may probably be very different from what is written herein or CORE may not ever become productive due to a myriad of reasons (see also 'Major issues to be solved').

With this early public sharing of the format we explicitly support the Open Science agenda, which implies "shifting from the standard practices of publishing research results in scientific publications towards sharing and using all available knowledge at an earlier stage in the research process" (quote from: European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation, 2016. Open innovation, open science, open to the world).

CORE Specifications:

1) a MP4 or WebM video digital multimedia container format (or any future video container playable as HTML video in major browsers)

2) a free to use or open video compression codec such as H.264, VP9, or AV1 (or any future video codec that is open sourced or free to use for end users)

Note: H.264 is currently recommended because of the wide usage with support in all major browsers, fast encoding due to acceleration in hardware (which is currently not the case for AV1 or VP9) and the fact that MPEG LA has allowed the free use for streaming video that is free to the end users. However, please note that H.264 is restricted by patents and its use in proprietary or commercial software requires the payment of royalties to [MPEG LA](https://www.mpegla.com/programs/avc-h-264/). However, when AV1 matures and accelerated hardware encoding becomes available, AV1 is expected to offer 30% to 50% smaller file size in comparison with H.264, while retaining the [same quality](https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Encode/AV1).

3) the encoding frame rate should be of one frame per second (fps) with each layer segmented in internal tiles, similar to COG, ordered by the main use case when accessing the data: either layer contiguous or tile contiguous;

Note: The internal tile arrangement should support an easy navigation inside the CORE video format, depending on the use case.

4) a CORE file is optimised for streaming with the moov atom at the beginning of the file (e.g. with -movflags faststart) and optional additional optimisations depending on the codec used (e.g. -tune fastdecode -tune zerolatency for H.264)

5) metadata tags inside the moov atom for describing and using geographic image data (that are preferably compatible with the [OGC GeoTIFF standard](https://www.ogc.org/standards/geotiff) or any future standard accepted by the geospatial community) as well as list of original file names corresponding to each CORE layer

6) it needs to encode similar source rasters (such as time series of rasters with the same extent and resolution, or different tiles of the same product; each input raster should be having the same image and pixel size)

7) it provides a mechanism for addressing and requesting overviews (lower resolution data) for a fast display in web browser depending on the map scale (currently external overviews)

Major issues to be solved:

- Internal overviews (similar to COG), by chaining lower resolution videos in the same MP4 container for fast access to overviews first); Currently, overviews are kept as separate files, as external overviews.

- Metadata encoding (how to best encode spatial extent, layer names, and so on, for each of the layer inside the series, which may have a different geographical extent, etc...; Known issues: adding too many tags with FFmpeg which are not part of the standard MP4 moov atom; metadata tags have a limited string length.

- Applicability beyond RGB/Byte datasets; defining a standard way of converting cell values from Int16/UInt16/UInt32/Int32/Float32/Float64/ data types into multi-band Byte values (and reconstructing them back to the original data type within acceptable thresholds)

Example

Notice: The provided CORE (.mp4) examples contain modified Copernicus Sentinel data [2018-2021].

For generating the CORE examples provided, 50 original Sentinel 2 (S-2) TCI data images from an area located inside Switzerland were downloaded from www.copernicus.eu, and then transformed into CORE format using ffmpeg with H.264 encoding using the [x264 library](https://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html).

DISCLAIMER: Basic scripts are provided for the Geomatics peer review (in 2021) and kept as additional information for the dataset. Nevertheless, please note that software dependencies and libraries, as well as cloud storage paths, may quickly become deprecated over time (after 2021). For compatibility, stable dependencies and libraries released around 2020 should be used.

core

display_name: core

geodata

display_name: geodata

gridded-data

display_name: gridded-data

raster

display_name: raster

research-data-management

display_name: research-data-management

time-series

display_name: time-series

video-encoding

display_name: video-encoding


en: cross-resistance invasive-species fraxinus ash-dieback defense-chemistry emerald-ash-borer intraspecific-variation

en: Raw data-Publication cross-resistance in ash-New Phytologist

en:
What are the research data files about: Raw data on perfomance (dry weight, development and mortality) of emerald ash borer larvae used in published bioassays. Raw data on ash dieback leasion lenghts. Raw data on untargeted and targeted specialized ash metabolites.
Which methods were used: Bioassays in greenhouses and climate chambers to collect data on emerald ash borer and ash dieback perfomance. Phytochemical analyses on ash phloem for quantifiying specialized metabolites
When and where was the data created / extracted: Summer 2020-2021

en:
 What are the research data files about: Raw data on perfomance (dry weight, development and mortality) of emerald ash borer larvae used in published bioassays. Raw data on ash dieback leasion lenghts. Raw data on untargeted and targeted specialized ash metabolites.

Which methods were used: Bioassays in greenhouses and climate chambers to collect data on emerald ash borer and ash dieback perfomance. Phytochemical analyses on ash phloem for quantifiying specialized metabolites.

When and where was the data created / extracted: Summer 2020-2021

ash-dieback

display_name: ash-dieback

cross-resistance

display_name: cross-resistance

defense-chemistry

display_name: defense-chemistry

emerald-ash-borer

display_name: emerald-ash-borer

fraxinus

display_name: fraxinus

intraspecific-variation

display_name: intraspecific-variation

invasive-species

display_name: invasive-species

en: Raw data-Publication cross-resistance in ash - New Phytologist


maintainer: Albrecht von Boetticher

en: hangmuren murgang interfoam shallow-landslide debris-flow dberisintermixing finite-volumes barrier-impact-simulation natural-hazard

en: debrisInterMixing for OF-Version 6

en: Installation Instructions for debrisInterMixing-6

en: These are the installation instructions for debrisInterMixing6

mimetype: application/pdf

en:
Please install OpenFOAM 7 on a UBUNTU Linux system following the instructions given in readme_debrisintermixing-7.pdf
After a successful OpenFOAM installation, copy the applications-Folder from putMyContent-.zip into the OpenFOAM-User directory and follow the instructions in readme_debrisintermixing-7.pdf to install debrisInterMixing 7.

If you use UBUNTU 24-04 you might have troubles getting openmpi, I attached a modifiesd instruction installtionOF7Ubuntu20.04.5LTS.txt for a workaround.

en:
This version of debrisInterMixing is based on OpenFOAM Version 4.x and was tested on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS.
Please follow the instructions given in ReadMe_debrisInterMixing4.pdf for installation.

en: These are the installation instructions for debrisInterMixing4

en:
Here debrisInterMixing until version 7 is provided for download. Further versions as well as installation instructions and tutorials and discussion forums (mostly in german) can be acessed at murgang.org (choose "als Gast anmelden" and then scroll to the bottom). The first OpenFoam-compatible Version 2.3.x are available as supplement to v. Boetticher, A., Turowski, J. M., McArdell,W. B., Rickenmann, D., Hürlimann, M., Scheidl, C., and Kirchner, J. W.: DebrisInterMixing-2.3: A Finite Volume solver for three dimensional debris flow simulations based on two calibration parameters. Part two: model validation with experiments. Geoscientific Model Development, 10, 11: 3963-3978. doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017.
DebrisInterMixing is a Volume-of-Fluid based Finite Volume code that accounts for shear-thinning sensitive shares of fine sediment suspension together with pressure-sensitive components of the gravel grains within debris flow mixtures. All model properties can be derived from a material sample except for a grid-sensitive calibration parameter.
For more information, please contact albrecht.vonboetticher@wasserbau.ch.

For a recent summary on applications see the DFHM8 contribution at https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2023/52/e3sconf_dfhm82023_02024/e3sconf_dfhm82023_02024.html - DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341502024

UPDATE: DebrisInterMixing for OpenFOAM-7 is available, please contact albrecht.vonboetticher@wasserbau.ch. DebrisInterMixing with OpenFOAM-10 is ready but not yet validated.

barrier-impact-simulation

display_name: barrier-impact-simulation

dberisintermixing

display_name: dberisintermixing

debris-flow

display_name: debris-flow

finite-volumes

display_name: finite-volumes

hangmuren

display_name: hangmuren

interfoam

display_name: interfoam

murgang

display_name: murgang

natural-hazard

display_name: natural-hazard

shallow-landslide

display_name: shallow-landslide

en: Three-dimensional debris flow simulation tool debrisInterMixing


maintainer: Frank Techel

en: observations snow avalanches alps shapefile

en: Selected wet snow avalanche activity data Davos, Switzerland (2011-2014)

en: Zip archive with shapefiles for the selected wet snow avalanche polygons, including metadata.

en:
Polygons of wet snow avalanches in the Davos area, as documented by the Swiss avalanche warning service. The georeferenced outlines of the avalanches contain both the release as well as the deposit area, but without separating between both.

The dataset is a subset of the total record of 1615 avalanches classified as wet snow avalanches from October 2011 - September 2014, containing those 255 avalanches exceeding 0.0125 km^2. Every polygon comes with meta data, including the date of occurrence.

This dataset is the underlying dataset to:
Wever, N., Vera Valero, C. and Techel, F. (2018) _Coupled snow cover and avalanche dynamics simulations to evaluate wet snow avalanche activity_. Submitted to J. Geophys. Res., in review.

alps

display_name: alps

avalanches

display_name: avalanches

observations

display_name: observations

shapefile

display_name: shapefile

snow

display_name: snow

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.


maintainer: Yves Bühler

en: uav orthophoto wingtra dsm snow-depth-mapping drone-data photogrammetry

en: Data Access

en:
- DSM (10 cm resolution)
- Ortho (3 cm resolution)
- HS (10 cm resolution)
- original RGB drone images
- Agisoft Metashape Processing Report

All products are also available as a cloud optimized geotiff.

en: To map and assess snow depth on different dates, 9 flights were conducted in the winter season of 2020/21 at the Latschüelfurgga in Davos. The data was captured with a Sony RX1R II mounted on a Wingtra drone and was processed with the Agisoft Metashape software. High-resolution DSMs, orthomosaics and snow height rasters, as well as the original RGB images from each flight are available.

drone-data

display_name: drone-data

dsm

display_name: dsm

orthophoto

display_name: orthophoto

photogrammetry

display_name: photogrammetry

snow-depth-mapping

display_name: snow-depth-mapping

uav

display_name: uav

wingtra

display_name: wingtra

en: Photogrammetric Drone Data Latschuelfurgga


bats-in-beaver-systems

title_for_slug: bats-in-beaver-systems

en: castor ecosystem-engineer wetland nature-conservation habitat-heterogeneity chiroptera deadwood flying-arthropods beaver

en:
vegetation_characteristics data on vegetation_cover and cumulative_cover with columns "laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"Vegetation_cover" (estimated vegetation cover over 5x1 m plot in %),
"Cumulative cover" (summed up cover over tree, shrub and herb layer in %),
"Cumulative cover trees" (tree cover level, higher than 3 metres in %),

en: R script bats_glmm to test the influence of beavers on bat richness, activity and feeding activity

en:
bats.environment with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"canopy" (modelled tree canopy cover, averaged across radius of 100 m, unitless),
"structure_ruggedness" (mean ruggedness of the total vertical structure > 3 m, averaged across radius of 100 m, unitless), "vegetation_ruggedness" (mean ruggedness of the canopy > 3 m, later called canopy_heterogenneity, averaged across radius of 100 m, unitless),
"pool_size" (maximum width of beaver pool in m),
"area_deadwood_monitoring" (total area of deadwood moonitoring in m3),
"age" (beaver presence in years)

en: bats_raw_values_overview to produce raw value summaries and tables

en: sampling dates.xlsx

en:
For the time information about the research data, created (2022-09-23 to 2022-09-23) refers to the GIS data, collected (2022-06-13 to 2022-07-31) to the field sampling. Details can be found in the csv “sampling_dates”.

sampling_dates with columns
"site" (sampling site),
"bats_1" (first period of bat survey in June),
"bats_2" (second period of bat survey in June),
"bats_3" (first period of bat survey in July),
"bats_4" (second period of bat survey in July),
"flying_arthropods_1" (arthropod sampling in June),
"flying_arthropods_2" (arthropod sampling in July),
"deadwood survey" (date of deadwood survey),
"vegetation survey" (date of vegetation survey)

en: R script bats_SEM to test the influence of the beaver on bat richness, activity and feeding activity through feeding and habitat heterogeneity

en:
dead_wood for deadwood with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"type" (deadwood type),
"height_length" (the height or lenghth of a piece of deadwood in m),
"DBH_diamlarge" (diameter at breast height or diameter of larger end if lying in m),
"diamsmall (diameter of smaller end if lying in m",
"volume" (calculated volume in m3)

en:
arthropods_flying the arthropod abundance with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"community" (species group),
"month" (sampling month),
"abundance" (number of flying arthropods)

en:
Raw data data_bats with columns:
“Categories” (empty or "feeding", indicating that call sequence contains feeding buzz)
“Sequence” (sequence number)
“Timestamp” (recording time)
“Temperature” (temperature recorded by batlogger in degree celcius)
“Serial” (serial number of bat logger)
“Duration” (duration of call sequence in seconds)
“Call.Count” (call count number, how many calls could be detected)
“Verification.1” (bat sequence verification)
“Notes” (remarks for identification)
“treatment” (treatment ctrl = Control and Pool)
“slot” (slot number, 4 slots, two in June, two in July)
“Laufnummer” (unique identifier per sampling point)

en:
gewichtungsfaktor with columns
"Project" (sampling site),
"Treatment" (sampling location within site, with levels ctrl for Control and pool for Pool),
"date" (sampling date),
"gew" (weighting factor to standardize night length)

en: README text file providing context for the data. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions

en: R script bats_pool_size to test the beaver pool size on bat richness, activity and feeding activity

en:
site_info contains columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"location" (sampling location row within site),
"sample_nr" (sampling number within location)

en:
bats_biodiv.day with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"community" (species group),
"date" (sampling date),
"month" (sampling month),
"feeding" (number of feeding buzzes summed per 5 minutes and identification level), "abundance" (sequences per 5 minutes and identification level),
"richness" (species richness),
"richness_feeding" (species richness of feeding bats)

en:
bat_guilds with columns
"SP" (identification level),
"EndGuilde" (information on feeding guild)

en:
bats_biodiv.day.guilds with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"community" (species group),
"date" (sampling date),
"month" (sampling month),
"guild" (which feeding guild information),
"feeding" (number of feeding buzzes summed per 5 minutes and identification level), "abundance" (sequences per 5 minutes and identification level),
"richness" (species richness),
"richness_feeding" (species richness of feeding bats)

en: R script bats_data_cleaning to clean the raw data

en: R script bats_data_exploration_Figure_nighly to explore the data and display nightly species richness, activity and feeding activity

en: R script bats_age to test the beaver pool age effect on bat richness, activity and feeding activity

en:
This dataset contains processed bat acoustic data collected to evaluate the ecological impacts of beaver-engineered ponds on bat species richness, activity, and feeding activity. It includes nightly activity and feeding call counts identified to species or species group level, site and treatment information (beaver pond vs. control areas along the same stream), and associated environmental covariates such as deadwood volume, arthropod abundance, and vegetation structure.

Methods: Bats were recorded using passive acoustic detectors placed at paired beaver-influenced and control sites. The resulting data was processed in the software Batscope. Arthropod abundance was estimated using flight-interception traps. The amount of deadwood and vegetation cover was measured in the field. Canopy cover and canopy heterogeneity were modelled from GIS models.

Temporal and Spatial Coverage:
Data were collected from eight sites in Switzerland between June and July 2022, each site sampled for 16 nights.

beaver

display_name: beaver

castor

display_name: castor

chiroptera

display_name: chiroptera

deadwood

display_name: deadwood

ecosystem-engineer

display_name: ecosystem-engineer

flying-arthropods

display_name: flying-arthropods

habitat-heterogeneity

display_name: habitat-heterogeneity

nature-conservation

display_name: nature-conservation

wetland

display_name: wetland

en: Bats in beaver systems


maintainer: Staatskanzlei Zug

fr: votation federal

de: national abstimmung

it: nazionale votazione

author: Staatskanzlei Zug

fr: Formatbeschreibung

de: Formatbeschreibung

en: Formatbeschreibung

it: Formatbeschreibung

fr: Description du format

de: Description du format

en: Description du format

it: Description du format

fr: Descrizione del formato

de: Descrizione del formato

en: Descrizione del formato

it: Descrizione del formato

fr: Descripziun dal format

de: Descripziun dal format

en: Descripziun dal format

it: Descripziun dal format

mimetype: text/csv

identifier: csv

media_type: application/json

format: JSON

mimetype: application/json

identifier: json

rm: Resultats finals da la votaziun federala "Volksinitiative vom 17. Dezember 2013 «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»", 25 da settember 2016, Kanton Zug, ordinà tenor vischnancas.

fr: Résultats finaux du vote fédéral "Volksinitiative vom 17. Dezember 2013 «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»", 25 septembre 2016, Kanton Zug, répartis par municipalités.

de: Schlussresultate der eidgenössischen Abstimmung "Volksinitiative vom 17. Dezember 2013 «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»", 25. September 2016, Kanton Zug, aufgeschlüsselt nach Gemeinden.

it: Risultati finali della votazione federale "Volksinitiative vom 17. Dezember 2013 «AHVplus: für eine starke AHV»", 25 settembre 2016, Kanton Zug, suddivisi per municipalit.

abstimmung

display_name: abstimmung

federal

display_name: federal

national

display_name: national

nazionale

display_name: nazionale

plaun-naziunal

display_name: plaun-naziunal

votation

display_name: votation

votazione

display_name: votazione

votaziun

display_name: votaziun

gove

fr: Gouvernement et secteur public

de: Regierung und öffentlicher Sektor

en: Government and public sector

it: Governo e settore pubblico

staatskanzlei-zug

de: Staatskanzlei Zug

de:
Hier veröffentlicht das Team von Open Data Zug von der kantonalen Fachstelle für Daten und Statistik schrittweise offene Behördendaten der kantonalen Verwaltung.

Weitere Informationen unter https://zg.ch/opendata

political_level: canton

value: ZG-Kt - Staatskanzlei - DCAT Harvester


maintainer: LUSTAT Statistik Luzern

de: subjektive-lebensbedingungen lebensbedingungen bevolkerung befragung lebensqualitat

en: subjective-living-conditions population quality-of-life survey living-conditions

de: Antworten zu den Fragen

en: Answers to the questions

identifier: bbf-lu-antworten

de: Grundgesamtheit

en: Universe

identifier: bbf-lu-grundgesamtheit

de:
Die Datensammlung zur Bevölkerungsbefragung Kanton Luzern 2023 besteht aus zwei Distributionen/Ressourcen:
- Individualdaten mit den Antworten zu den Fragen (bbf-lu-antworten.csv)
- Angaben zur Grundgesamtheit der gewichtungsrelevanten Variablen für die Endlichkeitskorrektur (bbf-lu-grundgesamtheit.csv)

en:
The data set for the population survey Canton of Lucerne 2023 consists of two distributions/resources:
- Individual data with the answers to the questions (bbf-lu-antworten.csv)
- Information on the population of the weighting-relevant variables for the finiteness correction (bbf-lu-grundgesamtheit.csv)

befragung

display_name: befragung

bevolkerung

display_name: bevolkerung

lebensbedingungen

display_name: lebensbedingungen

lebensqualitat

display_name: lebensqualitat

living-conditions

display_name: living-conditions

population

display_name: population

quality-of-life

display_name: quality-of-life

subjective-living-conditions

display_name: subjective-living-conditions

subjektive-lebensbedingungen

display_name: subjektive-lebensbedingungen

survey

display_name: survey

spatial: Kanton Luzern

soci

fr: Population et société

de: Bevölkerung und Gesellschaft

en: Population and society

it: Popolazione e società

fr: LUSTAT Statistik Luzern

en: LUSTAT Statistik Luzern

de: LUSTAT Statistik Luzern

it: LUSTAT Statistik Luzern

lustat

fr: LUSTAT statistique Lucerne

en: LUSTAT Statistics Lucerne

it: LUSTAT statistica Lucerna

fr:
LUSTAT statistique Lucerne est le centre de compétences et de services pour la statistique publique du canton de Lucerne. Avec ses informations statistiques objectives, LUSTAT accompagne les processus de formation d'opinion et de prise de décision dans la politique, l'administration, la société et les affaires.
LUSTAT statistique Lucerne publie ici progressivement des jeux de données appropriées de la statistique cantonale sous forme de données OGD.

en:
LUSTAT Statistics Lucerne is the competence and service center for public statistics in the Canton of Lucerne. With its objective statistical information, LUSTAT accompanies opinion-forming and decision-making processes in politics, administration, society and business.
LUSTAT Statistics Lucerne is gradually publishing here suitable datasets from the cantonal statistics as OGD data.

de:
LUSTAT Statistik Luzern ist das Kompetenz- und Dienstleistungszentrum der öffentlichen Statistik im Kanton Luzern. Mit ihren objektiven statistischen Informationen begleitet LUSTAT Meinungsbildungs- und Entscheidungsprozesse in Politik, Verwaltung, Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft.
LUSTAT Statistik Luzern veröffentlicht hier schrittweise geeignete Datensammlungen der kantonalen Statistik als OGD-Daten.

it:
LUSTAT statistica Lucerna è il centro di competenza e servizi per la statistica pubblica nel cantone di Lucerna. Con le sue informazioni statistiche oggettive, LUSTAT accompagna i processi di formazione delle opinioni e decisionali in politica, amministrazione, società e affari.
LUSTAT statistica Lucerna sta gradualmente pubblicando qui oportuni set di dati della statistica cantonale come dati OGD.

value: I14Y DCAT Harvester LUSTAT

en: Population survey Canton of Lucerne 2023