en: wet-snow-avalanche avalanche climate-projections dry-snow-avalanche snow-stratigraphy snow-instability climate-change snow

en: Climate scenarios .smet

en: contains one .smet file per combination of station, climate model chain and RCP scenario. Each .smet file contains the downscaled meteorological data (time span 1.9.1981-31.8.2099) that was used to drive the SNOWPACK simulations.

en: Projections of avalanche activity

en: contains one file per IMIS station that indicates the daily probability for the occurrence of dry- or wet-snow avalanches in the vicinity of the respective station for each day during the time period 1.12.1981-31.05.2099 (months December to May) and all climate model chains and RCP scenarios.

en: SNOWPACK settings

en: contains .ini and .sno file indicating the settings used to drive SNOWPACK with the climate scenarios

en:
This data set includes 21st century projections of dry- and wet-snow avalanche activity for seven sites in the Swiss Alps as well as the downscaled climate scenarios and SNOWPACK configuration files used to produce these projections. The methods used to produce these data are described in the research article:
Mayer, S., Hendrick, M., Michel, A., Richter, B., Schweizer, J., Wernli, H., and van Herwijnen, A.: Changes in snow avalanche activity in response to climate warming in the Swiss Alps, EGUsphere, 2024, 1-32, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1026, 2024.
We used downscaled climate projections to drive the snow cover model SNOWPACK and evaluated future dry- and wet-snow avalanche occurrences in the vicinity of seven automatic weather stations from the IMIS network using machine learning models trained with observed records of avalanche activity. Projections are available for three different emission scenarios (Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and eight climate model chains from the CH2018 ensemble. The output of the model chain is given by a daily probability for dry- or wet-snow avalanche occurrences. These probabilities can then be used to classify a day as a dry- and wet-snow avalanche day (AvD) or non-avalanche day.

avalanche

display_name: avalanche

climate-projections

display_name: climate-projections

dry-snow-avalanche

display_name: dry-snow-avalanche

snow

display_name: snow

snow-instability

display_name: snow-instability

snow-stratigraphy

display_name: snow-stratigraphy

wet-snow-avalanche

display_name: wet-snow-avalanche

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal


maintainer: Jürg Schweizer

en: avalanche-size snow-avalanche avalanche-activity avalanche-forcasting danger-level

state: active

type: dataset

en: Readme

media_type: application/pdf

en: The Readme file contains the description of the two data files.

format: PDF

mimetype: application/pdf

en: Avalanche activity data

media_type: text/csv

en: This data file includes data on the avalanche activity per day aggregated from the avalanche data.

format: CSV

mimetype: text/csv

en: Snow avalanche data

en: This data file includes data on the avalanches mapped in the region of Davos.

en:
These data include all avalanches that were mapped in the region of Davos, Switzerland during the winters 1998-1999 to 2018-2019 (21 years), in total 13,918 avalanches, and the corresponding forecast danger level valid on the day of avalanche occurrence, 3533 days and danger ratings in total.

This avalanche activity data set was analysed and results published by Schweizer et al. (2020). They found that the
number of avalanches per day strongly increased with increasing danger level, but avalanche size was poorly related to avalanche danger level.

The data are provided in two files: the first includes the avalanche data (13,918 records); the second includes the avalanche activity per day (3533 records).
Please refer to the Read-me file for further details on the data.

These data are the basis of the following publication:
Schweizer, J., Mitterer, C., Techel, F., Stoffel, A. and Reuter, B., 2020. On the relation between avalanche occurrence and avalanche danger level. The Cryosphere, 14, 737-750, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-737-2020.

avalanche-activity

display_name: avalanche-activity

avalanche-forcasting

display_name: avalanche-forcasting

avalanche-size

display_name: avalanche-size

danger-level

display_name: danger-level

snow-avalanche

display_name: snow-avalanche

educ

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester

en: Snow avalanche data Davos, Switzerland, 1999-2019


bats-in-beaver-systems

title_for_slug: bats-in-beaver-systems

en: castor beaver nature-conservation deadwood ecosystem-engineer wetland habitat-heterogeneity chiroptera flying-arthropods

en:
site_info contains columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"location" (sampling location row within site),
"sample_nr" (sampling number within location)

media_type: text/plain

en: README text file providing context for the data. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions

format: TXT

en: R script bats_pool_size to test the beaver pool size on bat richness, activity and feeding activity

format: OCTET

en: R script bats_glmm to test the influence of beavers on bat richness, activity and feeding activity

en: sampling dates.xlsx

en:
For the time information about the research data, created (2022-09-23 to 2022-09-23) refers to the GIS data, collected (2022-06-13 to 2022-07-31) to the field sampling. Details can be found in the csv “sampling_dates”.

sampling_dates with columns
"site" (sampling site),
"bats_1" (first period of bat survey in June),
"bats_2" (second period of bat survey in June),
"bats_3" (first period of bat survey in July),
"bats_4" (second period of bat survey in July),
"flying_arthropods_1" (arthropod sampling in June),
"flying_arthropods_2" (arthropod sampling in July),
"deadwood survey" (date of deadwood survey),
"vegetation survey" (date of vegetation survey)

format: XLS

en: bats_raw_values_overview to produce raw value summaries and tables

en: R script bats_data_cleaning to clean the raw data

en:
Raw data data_bats with columns:
“Categories” (empty or "feeding", indicating that call sequence contains feeding buzz)
“Sequence” (sequence number)
“Timestamp” (recording time)
“Temperature” (temperature recorded by batlogger in degree celcius)
“Serial” (serial number of bat logger)
“Duration” (duration of call sequence in seconds)
“Call.Count” (call count number, how many calls could be detected)
“Verification.1” (bat sequence verification)
“Notes” (remarks for identification)
“treatment” (treatment ctrl = Control and Pool)
“slot” (slot number, 4 slots, two in June, two in July)
“Laufnummer” (unique identifier per sampling point)

en: R script bats_age to test the beaver pool age effect on bat richness, activity and feeding activity

en:
bats_biodiv.day with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"community" (species group),
"date" (sampling date),
"month" (sampling month),
"feeding" (number of feeding buzzes summed per 5 minutes and identification level), "abundance" (sequences per 5 minutes and identification level),
"richness" (species richness),
"richness_feeding" (species richness of feeding bats)

en:
arthropods_flying the arthropod abundance with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"community" (species group),
"month" (sampling month),
"abundance" (number of flying arthropods)

en: R script bats_SEM to test the influence of the beaver on bat richness, activity and feeding activity through feeding and habitat heterogeneity

en:
bat_guilds with columns
"SP" (identification level),
"EndGuilde" (information on feeding guild)

en:
bats.environment with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"canopy" (modelled tree canopy cover, averaged across radius of 100 m, unitless),
"structure_ruggedness" (mean ruggedness of the total vertical structure > 3 m, averaged across radius of 100 m, unitless), "vegetation_ruggedness" (mean ruggedness of the canopy > 3 m, later called canopy_heterogenneity, averaged across radius of 100 m, unitless),
"pool_size" (maximum width of beaver pool in m),
"area_deadwood_monitoring" (total area of deadwood moonitoring in m3),
"age" (beaver presence in years)

en:
dead_wood for deadwood with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"type" (deadwood type),
"height_length" (the height or lenghth of a piece of deadwood in m),
"DBH_diamlarge" (diameter at breast height or diameter of larger end if lying in m),
"diamsmall (diameter of smaller end if lying in m",
"volume" (calculated volume in m3)

en:
bats_biodiv.day.guilds with columns
"laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"community" (species group),
"date" (sampling date),
"month" (sampling month),
"guild" (which feeding guild information),
"feeding" (number of feeding buzzes summed per 5 minutes and identification level), "abundance" (sequences per 5 minutes and identification level),
"richness" (species richness),
"richness_feeding" (species richness of feeding bats)

en:
vegetation_characteristics data on vegetation_cover and cumulative_cover with columns "laufnummer" (unique identifier per sampling point),
"site" (sampling site),
"sample" (sampling location within site),
"Vegetation_cover" (estimated vegetation cover over 5x1 m plot in %),
"Cumulative cover" (summed up cover over tree, shrub and herb layer in %),
"Cumulative cover trees" (tree cover level, higher than 3 metres in %),

en: R script bats_data_exploration_Figure_nighly to explore the data and display nightly species richness, activity and feeding activity

en:
gewichtungsfaktor with columns
"Project" (sampling site),
"Treatment" (sampling location within site, with levels ctrl for Control and pool for Pool),
"date" (sampling date),
"gew" (weighting factor to standardize night length)

en:
This dataset contains processed bat acoustic data collected to evaluate the ecological impacts of beaver-engineered ponds on bat species richness, activity, and feeding activity. It includes nightly activity and feeding call counts identified to species or species group level, site and treatment information (beaver pond vs. control areas along the same stream), and associated environmental covariates such as deadwood volume, arthropod abundance, and vegetation structure.

Methods: Bats were recorded using passive acoustic detectors placed at paired beaver-influenced and control sites. The resulting data was processed in the software Batscope. Arthropod abundance was estimated using flight-interception traps. The amount of deadwood and vegetation cover was measured in the field. Canopy cover and canopy heterogeneity were modelled from GIS models.

Temporal and Spatial Coverage:
Data were collected from eight sites in Switzerland between June and July 2022, each site sampled for 16 nights.

beaver

display_name: beaver

castor

display_name: castor

chiroptera

display_name: chiroptera

deadwood

display_name: deadwood

ecosystem-engineer

display_name: ecosystem-engineer

flying-arthropods

display_name: flying-arthropods

habitat-heterogeneity

display_name: habitat-heterogeneity

nature-conservation

display_name: nature-conservation

wetland

display_name: wetland

en: Bats in beaver systems


maintainer: Florian Lustenberger

en: hydrology estimation-methods flood engineering decision-making

en:
(English version below)
Ziel dieser Faktenblätter ist es Informationen zu den Schätzmethoden, Hinweise zur Parametrisierung und eine grobe Einschätzung der Güte der Resultate in übersichtlicher Form bereitzustellen. Ein zeitaufwändiges Zusammensuchen dieser Informationen aus unterschiedlichen Quellen entfällt daher weitgehend. Die Bearbeitenden sollen damit in der Lage sein, sich innerhalb weniger Minuten die wichtigsten Hintergrundinformationen zu jeder der vorgestellten Methoden in Erinnerung zu rufen. Der Leitfaden unterstützt bei der Plausibilisierung und bei der Mittelung der Ergebnisse der einzelnen Schätzmethoden zu einem repräsentativen Endergebnis. Vorausgesetzt wird Grundwissen und Erfahrung in der Thematik.
Der Leitfaden führt die Fachperson anhand eines Entscheidungsbaums in acht Schritten durch den Arbeitsablauf und unterstützt mit einem Fragenkatalog bei der Plausibilisierung der Ergebnisse.
Auf den Faktenblättern sind für jede Schätzmethode alle relevanten Informationen stichwortartig und grafisch übersichtlich auf einer DIN-A4 Seite zusammengefasst. Jedes Faktenblatt ist einheitlich gegliedert.
The aim of these fact sheets is to provide information on the flood estimation methods, notes on their parameterization and a rough assessment of the quality of the results in a clear form. A time-consuming research for this information from different sources is therefore largely eliminated. The users should be able to recall the most important background information on each of the methods presented within a few minutes. The guide provides support in checking plausibility and averaging the results of the individual estimation methods to produce a representative final result. Basic knowledge and experience in the subject are assumed.
The guide leads the expert through the workflow in eight steps using a decision tree and supports the plausibility check of the results with a list of questions.
On the fact sheets, all relevant information for each estimation method is summarized with key words and graphics on one DIN A4 page. Each fact sheet has a standardized structure.

decision-making

display_name: decision-making

engineering

display_name: engineering

estimation-methods

display_name: estimation-methods

flood

display_name: flood

hydrology

display_name: hydrology

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Faktenblätter und Leitfaden für Hochwasserschätzmethoden in der Praxis


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: forest microclimate biodiversity climate-change statistical-interpolation radiation-transfer ecology

media_type: application/zip

en: Predicted microclimate air temperatures at 100 cm above ground. 10 m spatial resolution raster files are provided for mean daily minimum (tmin), mean (tmean) and maximum (tmax) temperatures during each month from April (04) to October (10) over the period between 2012 to 2021.

format: ZIP

en: Predicted microclimate topsoil temperatures at 5 cm below ground. 10 m spatial resolution raster files are provided for mean daily minimum (tmin), mean (tmean) and maximum (tmax) temperatures during each month from April (04) to October (10) over the period between 2012 to 2021.

en: Predicted microclimate air temperatures at 5 cm above ground. 10 m spatial resolution raster files are provided for mean daily minimum (tmin), mean (tmean) and maximum (tmax) temperatures during each month from April (04) to October (10) over the period between 2012 to 2021.

en: Climate data matching the scales at which organisms experience climatic conditions are often missing. Yet, such data on microclimatic conditions are required to better understand climate-change impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Here we combine a national network of microclimate temperature measurements with a novel radiative transfer model to map monthly minimum, mean and maximum temperatures during the vegetation period at a 10 meter spatial resolution across Switzerland. The temperature measurements took place in 107 sampling plots distributed across different habitat types, with 62 plots in forests, 22 below trees outside forests, and 23 in open grasslands. In each plot we measured temperature in the topsoil (-5cm), as well as in the air at 5cm and 100cm height above ground. Spatial interpolation was achieved by using a hybrid approach based on linear mixed effects models with input from detailed radiation estimates that account for topographic and vegetation shading, as well as other predictor variables related to the macroclimate, topography and vegetation height. Our data reveals strong horizontal and vertical variability in microclimate temperature, particularly for maximum temperatures at 5 cm above the ground and within the topsoil. Compared to macroclimate conditions as measured by weather stations outside forests, diurnal air and topsoil temperature ranges inside forests were reduced by up to 3.0 and 7.8 °C, respectively, while below trees outside forests, e.g. in hedges and below solitary trees, this buffering effect was 1.8 and 7.2 °C. We also found that in open grasslands, maximum temperatures at 5 cm above ground are on average 3.4 °C warmer than that of macroclimate, suggesting that in such habitats heat exposure close to the ground is often underestimated when using macroclimatic data. After accounting for macroclimate effects, microclimate patterns were primarily driven by radiation, with particularly strong effects on maximum temperatures. Results from spatial block cross-validation revealed predictive accuracies as measured by RSME’s ranging from 1.18 to 3.43 °C, with minimum temperatures generally being predicted more accurately than maximum temperatures. The microclimate maps presented here enable a more biologically relevant perspective when analysing climate-species interactions, which is expected to lead to a better understanding of biotic and ecosystem responses to climate and land use change.

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

ecology

display_name: ecology

forest

display_name: forest

microclimate

display_name: microclimate

radiation-transfer

display_name: radiation-transfer

statistical-interpolation

display_name: statistical-interpolation

en: Monthly topsoil and near surface microclimate temperature data for Switzerland


maintainer: Franziska Gerber

en: wrf static-data topography cryowrf cosmo-wrf landuse

en: Static data for WRF - Landuse

format: SERVICE

en: Static data for WRF - Soiltype top

en: Documentation

en: Documentation of the dataset

en: Example namelist.wps to use with the 1s static data

en: Static data for WRF - Soiltype bottom

en: Static data for WRF - Topography

en:
Example GEOGRID.TBL to use with the 1s static data;
Note about naming:
* 121 -> 1-2-1 topography smoothing applied to dataset
* 1 -> one smoothing cycle applied to the data (needs to be changed depending on the chosen resolution to avoid too steep slope angles)

en: Static input data (topography, landuse and soiltype) for the WRF preprocessing system WPS is provided for Switzerland and its neighboring countries between 45-49 N and 4-12 E. The data is provided at a resolution of 1 s. Topography is based on the Aster dataset, while landuse is extracted from the Corine landuse dataset. Soil type is set to silty clay loam for the entire domain. This static input data is valid for WRF and CRYOWRF.

cosmo-wrf

display_name: cosmo-wrf

cryowrf

display_name: cryowrf

landuse

display_name: landuse

static-data

display_name: static-data

topography

display_name: topography

wrf

display_name: wrf

en: High resolution static data for WRF over Switzerland


radar-wind-profiler-davos-wolfgang

maintainer: Maxim Hervo

title_for_slug: radar-wind-profiler-davos-wolfgang

en: raclets wind-speed radar wolfgangpass wind-direction

en: Radar Wind Profiler Data

en: A Vaisala Lap3000 was installed at Davos Wolfgang to record wind profiles. The time format is number of days fom January 0, 0000 in UTC with a 10 minute resolution.

mimetype: application/zip

en: The RADAR wind profiler from Meteoswiss was installed at Davos Wolfgang (LON: 9.853594, LAT: 46.835577) and measured from 2171 m above sea level to 11079 m, with a temporal resolution of 10 minutes.

raclets

display_name: raclets

radar

display_name: radar

wind-direction

display_name: wind-direction

wind-speed

display_name: wind-speed

wolfgangpass

display_name: wolfgangpass

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: RADAR Wind profiler Davos Wolfgang


maintainer: Anita Risch

en: grazing grassland subalpine vertebrates ecosystem-multifunctionality invertebrates ecosystem-functions exclusion ecosystem-coupling swiss-national-park

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


en: climate-change precipitation snowmelt hydrology soil-moisture discharge

en: Shapefile of 307 catchments in Switzerland

en: Shapefile of the 307 medium-sized catchments in Switzerland. The "gridcode" provides the ID of the catchment used in the datafiles.

en: Daily simulated data for the future period

en: Daily simulated discharge, precipitation, snowmelt, and soil moisture for the period 1981-2100 in mm for the 307 catchments.

en: Daily simulated data for the reference period

en: Daily simulated discharge, precipitation, snowmelt, and soil moisture for the reference period 1981-2017 in mm.

en:
Daily discharge and the related hydro-meteorological variables precipitation, snowmelt, and soil moisture are provided for current (1981-2017) and for future climate conditions (1981-2100) for 307 medium-sized catchments in Switzerland. The catchments have a median catchment area of 117 km². The 307 catchments together form a set representative of the climatological conditions and runoff characteristics in Switzerland. The four variables were simulated at a daily resolution using the hydrological model PREVAH. PREVAH is a conceptual process-based model that was run in this study in its fully distributed version on a 500 m grid (Viviroli et al. 2009a). For the calibration, runoff time series from 140 mesoscale catchments covering the different runoff regimes were used. The model calibration was conducted over the period 1993-1997. Verification was performed on the period 1983-2005 using (i) volumetric deviation (Viviroli et al. 2007) and (ii) benchmark efficiency (Schäfli et al 2007) as objective functions. The calibration and validation procedures are described in detail in Köplin et al. (2010). The parameters for each model grid cell were derived by regionalizing the parameters obtained for the 140 catchments with a procedure based on ordinary kriging (Viviroli et al. 2009b, Köplin et al. 2010).
The calibrated and validated model was then driven with transient meteorological data (precipitation, temperature, radiation, and wind) representing both reference (1981-2017) and future climate conditions (2018-2099). The data were derived from the CH2018 climate scenarios (NCCS 2018) provided by the Swiss National Centre for Climate Services (NCCS). They were obtained from climate experiments produced with different climate modeling chains, consisting of a global and a regional circulation model each, within EUROCORDEX for three representative concentration pathways (RCP) emission scenarios. Downscaled output of ten climate model chains derived by quantile mapping were considered. The focus was on the chains of the EUR-11 domain with a horizontal resolution of 0.11 degrees (roughly 12.5 km). The climate model chains (GCM, RCM, RCP, and grid resolution) used are listed below:

- ICHEC-EC-EARTH	DMI-HIRHAM5	2.6	EUR-11
- ICHEC-EC-EARTH	DMI-HIRHAM5	4.5	EUR-11
- ICHEC-EC-EARTH	DMI-HIRHAM5	8.5	EUR-11
- ICHEC-EC-EARTH	SMHI-RCA4	2.6	EUR-11
- ICHEC-EC-EARTH	SMHI-RCA4	4.5	EUR-11
- ICHEC-EC-EARTH	SMHI-RCA4	8.5	EUR-11
- MOHC-HadGEM2-ES	SMHI-RCA4	4.5	EUR-11
- MOHC-HadGEM2-ES	SMHI-RCA4	8.5	EUR-11
- MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR	SMHI-RCA4	4.5	EUR-11
- MPI-M-MPI-ESM-LR	SMHI-RCA4	8.5	EUR-11

*References*:

-	Köplin, N., D. Viviroli, B. Schädler, and R. Weingartner (2010), _How does climate change affect mesoscale catchments in Switzerland? - A framework for a comprehensive assessment_, Advances in Geosciences, 27, 111-119, doi:10.5194/adgeo-27-111-2010.
-	National Centre for Climate Services (2018), CH2018 - _Climate Scenarios for Switzerland_, Tech. rep., NCCS, Zurich.
-	Schäfli, B., and H. V. Gupta (2007), _Do Nash values have value?_, Hydrological Processes, 21, 2075-2080, doi:10.1002/hyp.6825.
-	Viviroli, D., J. Gurtz, and M. Zappa (2007), _The hydrological modelling system PREVAH. Part II - Physical model description_, Geographica Bernensia, 40, 1-89.
-	Viviroli, D., M. Zappa, J. Gurtz, and R. Weingartner (2009a), _An introduction to the hydrological modelling system PREVAH and its pre- and post-processing-tools_, Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 1209-1222, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.04.001.
-	Viviroli, D., H. Mittelbach, J. Gurtz, and R. Weingartner (2009b), _Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland-Part II: Parameter regionalisation and flood estimation results_, Journal of Hydrology, 377 (1), 208-225, doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.022.

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

discharge

display_name: discharge

hydrology

display_name: hydrology

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

snowmelt

display_name: snowmelt

soil-moisture

display_name: soil-moisture

en: Simulated future discharge and climatological variables for medium-sized catchments in Switzerland


maintainer: Leo Gallus Bont

en: qgis-plugin cable-yarding swiss-geodata swisstopo open-source geoinformation-software seilaplan digital-planning digital-elevation-model

en: View video on youtube!

media_type: text/html

format: HTML

en: Herunterladen des DHM von swisstopo Website

en:
In order to use the QGIS plugin ‘Seilaplan’ for digital cable line planning, a digital terrain model (DTM) is required. As an alternative to using the ‘Swiss Geo Downloader’ plugin, the DTM can be obtained directly from Swisstopo. In this tutorial we explain step by step how to download the necessary DTM from the Swisstopo Website, and how to use it in QGIS for the digital planning of a cable line using the plugin ‘Seilaplan’. Please note that the tutorial language is German!

Link to the elevation model on the swisstopo website: https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/de/geodata/height/alti3d.html#technische_details

Link to the rope map website: https://seilaplan.wsl.ch

********************

Für die Verwendung des QGIS Plugins Seilaplan zur digitalen Seillinienplanung ist ein digitales Höhenmodell (DHM) nötig. Als Alternative zum Swiss Geo Downloader erklären wir in diesem Tutorial Schritt für Schritt, wie man das nötige Höhenmodell von der Swisstopo Webseite herunterladen und in QGIS zur Seillinienplanung verwenden kann.

Link zum Höhenmodell auf der swisstopo Webseite: https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/de/geodata/height/alti3d.html#technische_details

Link zur Seilaplan-Website: https://seilaplan.wsl.ch

cable-yarding

display_name: cable-yarding

digital-elevation-model

display_name: digital-elevation-model

digital-planning

display_name: digital-planning

geoinformation-software

display_name: geoinformation-software

open-source

display_name: open-source

qgis-plugin

display_name: qgis-plugin

seilaplan

display_name: seilaplan

swiss-geodata

display_name: swiss-geodata

swisstopo

display_name: swisstopo

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: Seilaplan Tutorial: DTM download from swisstopo website


maintainer: Camille Albouy

en: teleo dna-metabarcoding fish-composition bay-biscay atlantic-region actinopterygii edna chondrichthyes

en: Data access

en:
Environmental DNA complements scientific trawling in surveys of marine fish biodiversity (Dataset 2020)

In October 2020 we chose 16 sites from the 2020 EVHOE survey for eDNA sampling. The French international EVHOE bottom trawl survey is carried out annually during autumn in the BoB to monitor demersal fish resources. All sites were located on the continental shelf (26–170 m depth), except one on the upper slope with a depth of 1045 m. To perform eDNA sampling, we collected water samples at 15 sites (Figure 1a). At each site, we sampled seawater using Niskin bottles deployed with a circular rosette. There were nine bottles on the rosette, each of them able to hold ∼5 l of water. At each site, we first cleaned the circular rosette and bottles with freshwater, then lowered the rosette (with bottles open) to 5 m above the sea bottom, and finally closed the bottles remotely from the boat. The 45 l of sampled water was transferred to four disposable and sterilized plastic bags of 11.25 l each to perform the filtration on-board in a laboratory dedicated to the processing of eDNA samples. To speed up the filtration process, we used two identical filtration devices, each composed of an Athena® peristaltic pump (Proactive Environmental Products LLC, Bradenton, Florida, USA; nominal flow of 1.0 l min–1 ), a VigiDNA 0.20 μm filtration capsule (SPYGEN, le Bourget du Lac, France), and disposable sterile tubing. Each filtration device filtered the water contained in two plastic bags (22.5 l), which represent two replicates per sampling site. We followed a rigorous protocol to avoid contamination during fieldwork, using disposable gloves and single-use filtration equipment and plastic bags to process each water sample. At the end of each filtration, we emptied the water inside the capsule that we replaced by 80 ml of CL1 conservation buffer and stored the samples at room temperature following the specifications of the manufacturer (SPYGEN, Le Bourget du Lac, France). We processed the eDNA capsules at SPYGEN, following the protocol proposed by Polanco-Fernández et al., (2020). We performed library preparation and sequencing at Fasteris (Geneva, Switzerland). Specifically, we prepared four libraries using the MetaFast protocol (a ligation-based method) and sequenced them separately. We carried out paired-end sequencing using a MiSeq sequencer (2 × 125 bp, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) on two MiSeq Flow Cell Kits (v3; Illumina), following the manufacturer’s instructions. We analysed the sequence reads using the OBITools package (http:
//metabarcoding.org/obitools; Boyer et al., 2016), following the protocol described by Valentini et al. (2016).

Data content:
	* rawdata/: contains the raw reads for each individual sample. One archive contains the paired-end reads specified by the _R1 or _R2 suffix as well as individually tagged PCR replicates (if available) together with an archive containing all extraction and PCR blank samples of the library. Reads have been demultiplexed using cutadapt but not trimmed, individual demultiplexing tags and primers remain present in the sequences.
	* taxadata/: contains the table with all detected taxonomy for each sample after bioinformatic processing (see Polanco et al. 2020 for details; https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.140) and associated field metadata.
	* metadata/: contains two metadata files, one related to the data collected in the field for each filter, and the second related to the sequencing process in the lab (including the tag sequence, library name, and marker information for each sample)

actinopterygii

display_name: actinopterygii

atlantic-region

display_name: atlantic-region

bay-biscay

display_name: bay-biscay

chondrichthyes

display_name: chondrichthyes

dna-metabarcoding

display_name: dna-metabarcoding

edna

display_name: edna

fish-composition

display_name: fish-composition

teleo

display_name: teleo

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Environmental DNA Marine France Evhoe 2020


maintainer: Matthias Haeni

en: par precipitation meteo meteorology temperature relative-humidity long-term swiss-forest-lab wind-speed climate-change

en: Data plot of the forest station (ALB)

en: Data overview for air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, PAR, wind speed.

en: Site aerial photo (Alpthal)

en: Site aerial photo from the Alpthal forest station. Source: Google. 2016. Site aerial photo from the Alpthal forest station. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://www.google.ch/maps

mimetype: image/jpeg

en: Forest station data (ALB)

en: High quality meteorological data are needed for long-term forest ecosystem research, particularly in the light of global change. The long-term data series published here comprises almost 20 years of measurements for one meteorological station in Alpthal in Switzerland which is located within a natural coniferous forest (ALB) with Norway spruce (_Picea abies_; 180-230 yrs) as dominant tree species. The meteorological time series are presented in hourly time resolution of air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and wind speed. Alpthal is part of the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF) established and maintained by the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

long-term

display_name: long-term

meteo

display_name: meteo

meteorology

display_name: meteorology

par

display_name: par

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

relative-humidity

display_name: relative-humidity

swiss-forest-lab

display_name: swiss-forest-lab

temperature

display_name: temperature

wind-speed

display_name: wind-speed

en: Alpthal, Switzerland: Long-term forest meteorological data from the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF), from 1997 onwards


maintainer: Dirk Nikolaus Karger

en: climate climate-layers free-climate-data temperature climatology climate-change precipitation bioclim

en: CHELSA V1.2 (deprecated)

en: CHELSA Version 1.2 based on ERA-Interim forcings and CMIP5

format: GeoTIFF

en: CHELSA V2.1 (current)

en: CHELSA Version 2.1 based on ERA5 forcings and CMIP6

en: CHELSA Technical Documentation

en: Technical documentation document including the variable names, units, scaling, offset, and background.

en:
High-resolution information on climatic conditions is essential to many applications in environmental and ecological sciences. Here we present the CHELSA (Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas) data of downscaled temperature and precipitation to a high resolution of 30 arc sec. The temperature algorithm is based on statistical downscaling of atmospheric temperatures. The precipitation algorithm incorporates orographic predictors including wind fields, valley exposition, and boundary layer height, with a subsequent bias correction.

CHELSA data published in EnviDat includes the deprecated version 1.2 (originally published under 10.5061/dryad.kd1d4). Please use the current 2.1 version.

Paper Citation:
 > _Karger DN. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas, Scientific Data, 4, 170122 (2017) [doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.122](https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122)._

bioclim

display_name: bioclim

climate

display_name: climate

climate-layers

display_name: climate-layers

climatology

display_name: climatology

free-climate-data

display_name: free-climate-data


maintainer: Albrecht von Boetticher

en: debris-flow barrier-impact-simulation hangmuren interfoam finite-volumes shallow-landslide murgang natural-hazard dberisintermixing

en: debrisInterMixing for OF-Version 6

en: These are the installation instructions for debrisInterMixing4

en: Installation Instructions for debrisInterMixing-6

en: These are the installation instructions for debrisInterMixing6

en:
Please install OpenFOAM 7 on a UBUNTU Linux system following the instructions given in readme_debrisintermixing-7.pdf
After a successful OpenFOAM installation, copy the applications-Folder from putMyContent-.zip into the OpenFOAM-User directory and follow the instructions in readme_debrisintermixing-7.pdf to install debrisInterMixing 7.

If you use UBUNTU 24-04 you might have troubles getting openmpi, I attached a modifiesd instruction installtionOF7Ubuntu20.04.5LTS.txt for a workaround.

en:
This version of debrisInterMixing is based on OpenFOAM Version 4.x and was tested on Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS.
Please follow the instructions given in ReadMe_debrisInterMixing4.pdf for installation.

en:
Here debrisInterMixing until version 7 is provided for download. Further versions as well as installation instructions and tutorials and discussion forums (mostly in german) can be acessed at murgang.org (choose "als Gast anmelden" and then scroll to the bottom). The first OpenFoam-compatible Version 2.3.x are available as supplement to v. Boetticher, A., Turowski, J. M., McArdell,W. B., Rickenmann, D., Hürlimann, M., Scheidl, C., and Kirchner, J. W.: DebrisInterMixing-2.3: A Finite Volume solver for three dimensional debris flow simulations based on two calibration parameters. Part two: model validation with experiments. Geoscientific Model Development, 10, 11: 3963-3978. doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-3963-2017.
DebrisInterMixing is a Volume-of-Fluid based Finite Volume code that accounts for shear-thinning sensitive shares of fine sediment suspension together with pressure-sensitive components of the gravel grains within debris flow mixtures. All model properties can be derived from a material sample except for a grid-sensitive calibration parameter.
For more information, please contact albrecht.vonboetticher@wasserbau.ch.

For a recent summary on applications see the DFHM8 contribution at https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2023/52/e3sconf_dfhm82023_02024/e3sconf_dfhm82023_02024.html - DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341502024

UPDATE: DebrisInterMixing for OpenFOAM-7 is available, please contact albrecht.vonboetticher@wasserbau.ch. DebrisInterMixing with OpenFOAM-10 is ready but not yet validated.

barrier-impact-simulation

display_name: barrier-impact-simulation

dberisintermixing

display_name: dberisintermixing

debris-flow

display_name: debris-flow

finite-volumes

display_name: finite-volumes

hangmuren

display_name: hangmuren

interfoam

display_name: interfoam

murgang

display_name: murgang

natural-hazard

display_name: natural-hazard

shallow-landslide

display_name: shallow-landslide

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Three-dimensional debris flow simulation tool debrisInterMixing


en: findelengletscher uav orthoimage griesgletscher alps orthophoto glacier dsm gletscher drone dem sankt-annafirn

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Findelengletscher on the 30th of August 2016.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Findelengletscher on the 22th of September 2016.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Findelengletscher on the 2nd of July 2016.

en: Bulk Data Access

en: Link to the S3 bucket where all the data resources can be downloaded in bulk

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Sankt Annafirn on the 28th of September 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Findelengletscher on the 21th of July 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Griesgletscher on the 26th of September 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Griesgletscher on the 3rd of August 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Griesgletscher on the 15th of August 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Findelengletscher on the 15th of September 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Sankt Annafirn on the 15th of July 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Griesgletscher on the 13th of September 2016.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Findelengletscher on the 09th of April 2015.

en: This folder contains all UAV flights paths that we created for the Sankt Annafirn, the Findelengletscher and Griesgletscher. They have been created with the software eMotion2, that was developped for the eBee platform from Sensefly.

en: This .pdf contains an orthoimage for each dataset as well as a Table which displays the number of flights made, image acquired, number of GCP set and the total area covered.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Sankt Annafirn on the 15th of April 2015.

en:
This .zip folder contains:

 - An orthoimage (oi) of 0.1m resolution

- A Digital Surface Model (dsm) of 0.1m resolution

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report

for the UAV field campaign conducted on the Findelengletscher on the 19th of April 2016.

en:
 UAV-derived DSMs and orthoimages

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) surveys were conducted between 2015 and 2016 on the Sankt Annafirn, Findelen- and Griesgletscher, situated in the Swiss Alps. Three surveys at the Sankt Annafirn allowed for a full glacier coverage, four surveys at Griesgletscher allowed an almost full glacier coverage and seven surveys at Findelengletscher allowed for a partial coverage of the glacier tongue (see individual datasets for exact extent). For each survey, a high resolution orthoimage and a Digital Surface Model (DSM) was created.

 UAV surveys:

Prior flight, Ground Control Points (GCPs) were deployed on the glacier surface and measured with a differential GPS (Trimble R7 or Leica GPS 1200). They allowed precise georeferencing of the UAV-derived datasets. UAV flight plans were planned with the software *eMotion 2* and a SenseFly eBee was used as surveying platform. The images were then processed with the software Agisoft Photoscan Pro 1.1.6 .

The location and dates of each survey can be found in the table together with the number of flights performed (Nflights), the number of acquired images (Nimages), the number of GCPs set (NGCPs) and the surveyed area.

A folder for each dataset is available (see folder name in table), which contains:

- An orthoimage *glacier_date_photoscan_oi_CH1903+_LV95_0.1m.tif*

- A Digital Surface Model *glacier_date_photoscan_dsm_CH1903+_LV95_0.1m.tif*

- The Agisoft Photoscan automatic processing report  *glacier_date_photoscan_report.pdf*

where:

- *glacier* is the name of the surveyed glacier

- *date* is the date of the UAV image acquisition

- *photoscan* is the name of the photogrammetric software

- *oi* or *dsm* the type of dataset

- *CH1903+_LV95* is the coordinate system and datum of the dataset

- *0.1m* is the resolution of the dataset in meter

- *.tif* is the extention of the dataset

Details about the UAV surveys, the image processing and the accuracy of the UAV-derived products can be found in this publication below.

Paper Citation:
 > _Gindraux et al. 2017. Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles’Imagery on Glaciers, Remote Sensing, 9, 186, 1-15, [doi: 10.3390/rs9020186](https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9020186)._

The folder UAV_flight_paths.zip contains all UAV flights performed on the Sankt Annafirn, Findelengletscher and Griesgletscher. The flights were planned with the software eMotion2 and have the .afp extention.

alps

display_name: alps

dem

display_name: dem

drone

display_name: drone

dsm

display_name: dsm

findelengletscher

display_name: findelengletscher

glacier

display_name: glacier

gletscher

display_name: gletscher

griesgletscher

display_name: griesgletscher

orthoimage

display_name: orthoimage

orthophoto

display_name: orthophoto

sankt-annafirn

display_name: sankt-annafirn

uav

display_name: uav

en: UAV-derived Digital Surface Models and orthoimages for three alpine glaciers


en: piloderma-croceum rhythmic-growth cenococcum-geophilum ectomycorrhiza quercus-robur oak

en:
Contains phenotypic data assessed during the destructive sampling step of the experiment.
Columns:
- ID = Tree identifier.
- Treatment = Experimental treatment.
- nSF = Number of completed shoot flushes.
- Max_Stages_Reached = Total number of growth stages reached during the experiment.
- n_L_SF1 = Number of leaves of the second newest shoot flush at time of sampling.
- n_L_SF2 = Number of leaves of the newest shoot flush at time of sampling.
- Alive = Plant alive or not.
- Contamination = Plant contaminated or not.
- Exclude = Exclude plant or not.
- Shoot_Length_Init = Shoot length at start of the experiment.
- Shoot_Length = Shoot length at sampling.
- Delta_Length = Shoot length increase during experiment.
- FW_Plant = Fresh weight total plant.
- DW_Plant = Dry weight total plant.
- FW_Shoot = Fresh weight shoot.
- DW_Shoot = Dry weight shoot.
- FW_Stem = Fresh weight stem.
- DW_Stem = Dry weight stem.
- FW_L_SF1 = Fresh weight leaves second newest shoot flush.
- DW_L_SF1 = Dry weight leaves second newest shoot flush.
- FW_L_SF2 = Fresh weight leaves newest shoot flush.
- DW_L_SF2 = Dry weight leaves newest shoot flush.
- FW_L_Rest = Fresh weight remaining leaves.
- DW_L_Rest = Dry weight remaining leaves.
- FW_Bud = Fresh weight bud.
- DW_Bud = Dry weight bud.
- FW_Roots_Total = Fresh weight total roots.
- DW_Roots_Total = Dry weight total roots.
- FW_PR = Fresh weight principal roots.
- DW_PR = Dry weight principal roots.
- FW_LR = Fresh weight lateral roots.
- DW_LR = Dry weight lateral roots.
- A_L_SF1 = Leave area second newest shoot flush.
- A_L_SF2 = Leave area newest shoot flush.
- N_Ceno = Number of root tips mycorrhized by *Cenococcum geophilum*.
- N_Pilo = Number of root tips mycorrhized by *Piloderma croceum*.
- N_Other = Number of root tips mycorrhized by other species.
- N_No = Number of not mycorrhized root tips.
- Length_Tot = Total root length.
- Area_Tot = Total root surface area.
- Diameter_Avg = Average root diameter.
- Root_Vol = Total root volume.
- Tips = Total number root tips.
- Forks = Total number root forks.
- Crossings = Total number root crossings.
- Length_Fine = Root length fine roots (diameter < 1mm).
- SA_Fine = Surface area fine roots (diameter < 1mm).
- Vol_Fine = Volume fine roots (diameter < 1mm).

en:
Contains growth stage data assessed over the experimental period.
Columns:
- ID = Tree identifier.
- Set = Date of plant preparation.
- Treatment = Experimental treatment.
- Date = Date of growth stage assessment,
- Days = Number of past days since start of experiment.
- Stage = Growth stage (XY = Groth cycle & development stage).
- Week = Experimental week.

en:
In this experiment, we investigated the inoculation-effects of two ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) species with contrasting evolutionary histories, ecological properties, host-preferences, and habitat-ranges on phenotypic responses and growth dynamics of pedunculate oak (*Quercus robur*), an ecologically and economically important temperate forest tree species.

We set up the mycorrhization experiment using 96 plants of a genetically uniform *Q. robur* clone (DF159) and applied four treatments: A control treatment; an inoculation-treatment with the cosmopolitan Ascomycete *Cenococcum geophilum*, which is commonly found in oak forests; an inoculation-treatment with the Basidiomycete *Piloderma croceum*, which has not yet been found in natural oak forests but has been shown in previous experiments to support oak growth; and a co-inoculation treatment. We then assessed growth stage development of the trees over eight experimental weeks and measured various phenotypic traits during a destructive sampling.

cenococcum-geophilum

display_name: cenococcum-geophilum

ectomycorrhiza

display_name: ectomycorrhiza

oak

display_name: oak

piloderma-croceum

display_name: piloderma-croceum

quercus-robur

display_name: quercus-robur

rhythmic-growth

display_name: rhythmic-growth

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Phenotypic and Growth Stage Development Data of a Quercus robur Mycorrhization Experiment


maintainer: Joan Casanelles Abella

en: hylaeus-communis osmia-cornuta zurich trap-nest tartu antwerp paris chelostoma-florisomne urban-ecology poznan osmia-bicornis cavity-nesting-bees plant-pollinator-interactions dna-metabarcoding

en: Explanation data variables

en: Information on the study sites

en: For each site, IDs, city, coordinates, structure where trapnest was attahced and height of the trapnest is provided

en: Larval food composition

en: Urbanization poses threats and opportunities for the biodiversity of wild bees. A main gap relates to the food preferences of wild bees in urban ecosystems, which usually harbour large numbers of plant species, particularly at the larval stage. This data sets describes the larval food of four wild bee species (i.e. Chelostoma florisomne, Hylaeus communis, Osmica bicornis and Osmia cornuta) and three genera (i.e. Chelostoma sp., Hylaeus sp, and Osmia sp.) common in urban areas in five different European cities (i.e. Antwerp, Paris, Poznan, Tartu and Zurich). This data results from a European-level study aimed at understanding the effects of urbanization on biodiversity across different cities and citiscapes, and a Swiss project aimed at understanding the effects of urban ecosystems in wild bee feeding behaviour. Wild bees were sampled using standardized trap-nests in 80 sites (32 in Zurich and 12 in each of the remaining cities), selected following a double gradient of available habitat at local and landscape scales. Larval pollen was obtained from the bee nests and identified using DNA metabarconding. The data provides the plant composition at the species or genus level of the different bee nests of the studied species in the studied sites of the five European cities. For Hylaeus communis, this is the first study in reporting larval food composition.

antwerp

display_name: antwerp

cavity-nesting-bees

display_name: cavity-nesting-bees

chelostoma-florisomne

display_name: chelostoma-florisomne

dna-metabarcoding

display_name: dna-metabarcoding

hylaeus-communis

display_name: hylaeus-communis

osmia-bicornis

display_name: osmia-bicornis

osmia-cornuta

display_name: osmia-cornuta

paris

display_name: paris

plant-pollinator-interactions

display_name: plant-pollinator-interactions

poznan

display_name: poznan

tartu

display_name: tartu

trap-nest

display_name: trap-nest

urban-ecology

display_name: urban-ecology

zurich

display_name: zurich

en: Larval food composition of four wild bee species in five European cities


en: meteorology relative-humidity long-term swiss-forest-lab meteo wind-speed temperature par climate-change precipitation

en: Site photo of the forest station (VOB)

en: Site photo of the forest station from the side.

en: Forest station data (VOB)

en: Data file.

en: Site aerial photo (Vordemwald)

en: Site aerial photo from both Vordemwald stations. Source: Google. 2016. Site aerial photo from both Vordemwald stations. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://www.google.ch/maps

en: Data plot of the field station (VOF)

en: Data overview for air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, PAR, wind speed.

en: Site photo of the field station (VOF)

en: Site photo of the field stationfrom the side.

en: Data plot of the forest station (VOB)

en: Field station data (VOF)

en: High quality meteorological data are needed for long-term forest ecosystem research, particularly in the light of global change. The long-term data series published here comprises almost 20 years of measurements for two meteorological stations in Vordemwald in Switzerland where one station is located within a natural mixed forest stand (VOB) with European silver fir (_Abies alba_; 110 yrs) and oak trees (_Quercus sp._; 190-210 yrs) as dominant tree species. A second station is situated in the very vicinity outside of the forest (field station, VOF). The meteorological time series are presented in hourly time resolution of air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and wind speed. Vordemwald is part of the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF) established and maintained by the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL.

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

long-term

display_name: long-term

meteo

display_name: meteo

meteorology

display_name: meteorology

par

display_name: par

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

relative-humidity

display_name: relative-humidity

swiss-forest-lab

display_name: swiss-forest-lab

temperature

display_name: temperature

wind-speed

display_name: wind-speed

en: Vordemwald, Switzerland: Long-term forest meteorological data from the Long-term Forest Ecosystem Research Programme (LWF), from 1996 onwards


en: snow snow-mechanics snow-failure fiber-bundle-model sintering acoustic-emissions snow-avalanche viscous-deformation

en: fiber-bundle-model-for-snow-failure

en: Data underlying Figures in publication "Modelling Snow Failure Behavior and Concurrent Acoustic Emissions Signatures with a Fiber Bundle Model" submitted to "Geophysical Research Letters"

en:
This dataset contains modeled and experimental results for laboratory snow failure experiments and the concurrent acoustic emissions signatures for different loading rates. For modelling the snow failure we used a fiber bundle model that includes sintering and viscous deformation.

The data underlay the figures in the publication "Modelling Snow Failure Behavior and Concurrent Acoustic Emissions Signatures with a Fiber Bundle Model" submitted for publication to "Geophysical Research Letters".

acoustic-emissions

display_name: acoustic-emissions

fiber-bundle-model

display_name: fiber-bundle-model

sintering

display_name: sintering

snow

display_name: snow

snow-avalanche

display_name: snow-avalanche

snow-failure

display_name: snow-failure

snow-mechanics

display_name: snow-mechanics

viscous-deformation

display_name: viscous-deformation

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Fiber Bundle Model for snow failure and concurrent Acoustic Emissions


maintainer: Manuel R. Popp

en: species-observations vascular-plants photo plant-species testing

en:
Zipped directory containing approximately 5'600 photographs of vascular plants from the Swiss flora, taken at 153 sampling locations. Sampling locations were assigned a TypoCH habitat type.
Folder structure:
 - Each folder represents a plant population, defined by the same species, sampling date, and location.
 - Higher-level directories organize populations observed within the same sampling plot.
Naming convention:
Each image is names img_<index>_<plant organ>.jpg whereby <index> is the number of the photograph within the folder. For each observed population, images have consecutive integers as index. <plant organ> is a single letter indicating the depicted part(s) of the plant:
b = bark
i = inflorescense
f = infructescense
s = several parts
v = vegetative parts

en:
This data set contains roughly 5600 photographs of plants and plant parts from 153 sites recorded in all major biogeographic regions of Switzerland using smartphone cameras. Image names contain a letter referring to depicted plant parts: b = bark, i = inflorescence, f = infructescense, s = several parts, v = vegetative parts.
Photos are grouped in folders by observation (individual or population), i.e., photos in the same folder are of the same species, observed at the same time and sampling plot. At a higher organisational level, these folders are grouped by sampling plot (usually 3×3 m in open areas and 10×10 m in forests). The main folder contains metadata including taxon name, sampling time and location, as well as the TypoCH habitat type encoded as integers.
This data set accompanies the following publication:
Popp, M. R., Zimmermann, N. E. & Brun, P. Evaluating the use of automated plant identification tools in biodiversity monitoring—a case study in Switzerland. _Ecological Informatics_ **103316** (2025) doi:[10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103316](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103316).

photo

display_name: photo

plant-species

display_name: plant-species

species-observations

display_name: species-observations

testing

display_name: testing

vascular-plants

display_name: vascular-plants

en: Photos of vegetative and reproductive parts of 560 vascular plant species taken in all biogeographic regions of Switzerland