en: plants grassland soil-biology soil-chemistry nematodes restoration bacteria fungi biodiversity topsoil-removal soil soil-biodiversity

en: Soil properties

en:
Plot.ID	consecutive numbers for plots (in total 36 plots)
Treatment	One restoration treatment and two reference treatments. Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Target= species-rich semi-wet to semi-dry grasslands
treat.yr	Treatment abbreviation. For restored grasslands: Treatment abbreviation + time since restoration; Initial + Target = NA
yr.trt	year when topsoil was removed; Initial + Target = NA
Age	time since restoration (sampling year 2018 - yr.trt); Initial + Target = NA
Age.class	restored sites of similar age grouped into four age classes. Y.4 = Year 3+4 (recently restored); Y.18 = Year 17+19 (mid-term); Y.24 = Year 23+25 (long-term); Y.30 = Year 27+32 (long-term); Initial + Target = NA
Cluster	clustered spatial arrangment of sites in the field (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)
Site	clustered spatial arrangment (replicates) of plots per site (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)
N.pool	Soil nitrogen pool (June 2017); corrected for bulk density and 12 cm sampling depth [kg ha-1 12cm-1]
Corg.pool	Soil organic carbon pool (June 2017); corrected for bulk density and 12 cm sampling depth [kg ha-1 12cm-1]
pH	soil pH [CaCl2]
BD	Bulk density [g cm-3]
FC	Field capacity [%]
Veg.1	principle coordinate axis 1 (vegetation)
Veg.1	principle coordinate axis 2 (vegetation)
Nem.1	principle coordinate axis 1 (nematoda)
Nem.2	principle coordinate axis 2 (nematoda)
Fun.1	principle coordinate axis 1 (fungi)
Fun.2	principle coordinate axis 2 (fungi)
Prok.1	principle coordinate axis 1 (prokaryota)
Prok.2	principle coordinate axis 2 (prokaryota)
Veg.H	Shannon diversity (vegetation)
Nem.H	Shannon diversity (nematoda)
Fun.H	Shannon diversity (fungi)
Prok.H	Shannon diversity (prokaryota)

en: Ecosystem coupling_interactions

en:
Treatment	Treatment groups; Y.4-18 = restored grasslands; Initial = intensively managed grasslands; Target = species-rich semi-wet to semi-dry grasslands
Type	Interactions type; A.A = abiotic.abiotic; A.B = abiotic.biotic; B.B = biotic.biotic
Correlation	non-parametric Spearman rank correlations between biotic and abiotic parameters (ecological interactions)

en: Vegetation data

en:
Plot.ID	consecutive numbers for plots (in total 36 plots)
Treatment	One restoration treatment and two reference treatments. Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Target= species-rich semi-wet to semi-dry grasslands
treat.yr	Treatment abbreviation. For restored grasslands: Treatment abbreviation + time since restoration; Initial + Target = NA
yr.trt	year when topsoil was removed; Initial + Target = NA
Age	time since restoration (sampling year 2018 - yr.trt); Initial + Target = NA
Age.class	restored sites of similar age grouped into four age classes. Y.4 = Year 3+4 (recently restored); Y.18 = Year 17+19 (mid-term); Y.24 = Year 23+25 (long-term); Y.30 = Year 27+32 (long-term); Initial + Target = NA
Cluster	clustered spatial arrangment of sites in the field (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)
Site	clustered spatial arrangment (replicates) of plots per site (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)
column I-LW	Plant abundance per species (in total 327 plant species) expressed as cover percentage estimation according to van der Maarel (vdM 1979; 7 classes: 1-7); nomenclature according to Lauber & Wagner (1996)

en: Fungi data

en:
Sample.data
Plot.ID	consecutive numbers for plots (in total 36 plots)
Treatment	One restoration treatment and two reference treatments. Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Target= species-rich semi-wet to semi-dry grasslands
treat.yr	Treatment abbreviation. For restored grasslands: Treatment abbreviation + time since restoration; Initial + Target = NA
yr.trt	year when topsoil was removed; Initial + Target = NA
Age	time since restoration (sampling year 2018 - yr.trt); Initial + Target = NA
Age.class	restored sites of similar age grouped into four age classes. Y.4 = Year 3+4 (recently restored); Y.18 = Year 17+19 (mid-term); Y.24 = Year 23+25 (long-term); Y.30 = Year 27+32 (long-term); Initial + Target = NA
Cluster	clustered spatial arrangment of sites in the field (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)
Site	clustered spatial arrangment (replicates) of plots per site (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)

Taxonomy
OTU.ID	consecutive numbers for operational taxonomic units (OTUe 1-7794)
Taxonomic rank	Domain, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species

Abundance
columns	Plot.ID (see Sample.data)
rows	OTU.ID (see Taxonomy)

en: Nematode data

en:
Sample.data
Plot.ID	consecutive numbers for plots (in total 36 plots)
Treatment	One restoration treatment and two reference treatments. Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Target= species-rich semi-wet to semi-dry grasslands
treat.yr	Treatment abbreviation. For restored grasslands: Treatment abbreviation + time since restoration; Initial + Target = NA
yr.trt	year when topsoil was removed; Initial + Target = NA
Age	time since restoration (sampling year 2018 - yr.trt); Initial + Target = NA
Age.class	restored sites of similar age grouped into four age classes. Y.4 = Year 3+4 (recently restored); Y.18 = Year 17+19 (mid-term); Y.24 = Year 23+25 (long-term); Y.30 = Year 27+32 (long-term); Initial + Target = NA
Cluster	clustered spatial arrangment of sites in the field (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)
Site	clustered spatial arrangment (replicates) of plots per site (see Supporting Information Fig. S1)

Taxonomy
ASV.ID	unit number.letter code per amplicon sequence variant (in total 904)
Taxonomic rank	Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species

Abundance
columns	Plot.ID (see Sample.data)
rows	ASV.ID (see Taxonomy)

en: Networks

en:
Treatment	Treatment groups; Y.4-18 = restored grasslands; Initial = intensively managed grasslands; Target = species-rich semi-wet to semi-dry grasslands
Correlation	non-parametric Spearman rank correlations
Vertex.1+2	Comparison between network components; N.pool = total soil nitrogen pool [kg ha-1 12 cm-1]; Corg.pool = soil organic carbon pool [kg ha-1 12 cm-1], pH = soil pH [CaCl2]; BD = bulk density [g cm-3]; FC = field capacity [%]
	PCoA 1 + 2 biotic communities [Veg = vegetation; Nem = nematoda; Fun = fungi; Prok = prokaryota]
Type	Interactions type; A.A = abiotic.abiotic; A.B = abiotic.biotic; B.B = biotic.biotic

en: Distance to target results

en:
Community	biotic community (vegetation, nematoda, fungi, prokaryota)
Treatment	Treatment groups; Y.4-30= restored grasslands (time since restoration); Initial=intensively managed grasslands (I)
Comparison	within- or between-community Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distance comparison
Label	within-community distances of initial/restored grasslands: treatment abbreviation; between-communities distances of initial/restored-to-target grasslands: treatment abbreviation plus Target (T; species-rich grasslands)
mean	Mean distance to Target (6 plots per treatment group)
sd	Standard deviation of distances to Target (6 plots per treatment group)

en:
This dataset contains all data, on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:

_Resch, M.C., Schütz, M., Ochoa-Hueso, R., Buchmann, N., Frey, B., Graf, U., van der Putten, W.H., Zimmermann, S., Risch, A.C. (in review). Long-term recovery of above- and belowground interactions in restored grassland after topsoil removal and seed addition. Journal of Applied Ecology_

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

Study area and experimental design
The study was conducted in and around two nature reserves, Eigental and Altläufe der Glatt, which were located approximately 5 km apart (47°27´ to 47°29´ N, 8°37´ to 8°32´ E, 417 to 572 m a.s.l., Canton of Zurich, Switzerland; Figure S1 and S2, Table S1). Mean annual temperature and precipitation are 9.8 ± 0.6 °C and 990 ± 168 mm (Kloten climate station 1988-2018; MeteoSchweiz, 2019). TFor this study, we used a space-for-time approach based on eight restoration sites that were between 3 and 32 years old. We measured recovery and restoration success by comparing the restored grasslands with intensively managed and semi-natural grasslands. Using a space-for-time approach requires high similarities in historical properties of the site, such as soil conditions and management regimes, to assure that temporal processes are appropriately represented by spatial patterns (Walker et al., 2010). This was the case in our study. The restored sites had similar soil conditions (i.e., soil type, structure, water availability) as the targeted semi-natural grasslands, while they shared the same agricultural legacy with intensively managed grasslands, i.e., biomass harvest and fertilization (manure and/or slurry) three to five times a year as well as tillage. We randomly established three 5 m x 5 m (25-m2) plots for plant identification and three 2 m x 2 m (4-m2) subplots for soil biotic and abiotic data collection at least 2 m away from the 25-m2 plots in each restoration site. Sites of similar age were grouped into four age classes: Y.4 (3 & 4 years after restoration), Y.18 (17 & 19 years), Y.24 (23 & 25 years), and Y.30 (27 & 32 years). Six intensively managed (Initial) and six semi-natural grassland (Target) sites complemented the experimental set-up, for a total of 36 plots. All plots were sampled under similar conditions, i.e., day of the year, air temperature, soil moisture, and time since last rain event, in June/July 2017 (intensively managed and semi-natural plots) and 2018 (restored plots).

Collection of plants and selected soil biota data
Plant species cover (in %) was visually estimated in each 25-m2 plot in mid-June (Braun-Blanquet, 1964; nomenclature: Lauber & Wagner, 1996). We calculated Shannon diversity and assessed plant community structure. We included soil microbial (fungi, procaryotes) and nematodes in our study as they represent the majority of soil biotic diversity and abundance (Bardgett & van der Putten, 2014), cover various trophic levels of the soil food web (Bongers & Ferris, 1999), and play key roles in soil functioning and ecosystem processes (Bardgett & van der Putten, 2014). In particular, soil nematodes were found to be well suited belowground indicators to evaluate recovery/development after restoration (e.g. Frouz, et al. 2008; Kardol et al., 2009; Resch et al., 2019). We randomly collected ten soil cores (2.2 cm diameter x 12 cm depths; sampler from Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, USA) in the 4-m2 subplots to assess soil nematode and microbial (fungal, prokaryotic) diversities and community structures. For soil nematodes, eight of the soil cores were combined and gently homogenized, placed in coolers and stored at 4 °C and transported to the laboratory (Netherlands Institute of Ecology, NIOO, Wageningen, Netherlands) within three days after collection. Free-living nematodes were extracted from 200 g of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink, 1960). After extraction, each sample was divided into three subsamples, two for molecular identification and one to determine nematode abundance (see Resch et al., 2019). For the molecular work, two subsamples were stored in 70% ethanol (final volume 10 mL each) and transported to the laboratory at the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL (Birmensdorf, Switzerland). Each subsample was reduced to roughly 200 μL by centrifugation and removal of the supernatant. The remaining ethanol was vaporized (65 °C for 3 h). Thereafter, 180 μL ATL buffer solution (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was immediately added and samples were stored at 4 °C until further processing. From these samples, nematode metagenomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer`s protocol, except for the incubation step which was run at 56 °C for 4 h. PCR amplification of the V6-V8 region of the eukaryotic small-subunit (18S) was performed with 7.5 μL of genomic DNA template (ca. 1 ng/μL) in 25 μL reactions containing 5 μL PCR reaction buffer, 2.5 mM MgCL2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μM of each primer (NemF: Sapkota & Nicolaisen, 2015; 18Sr2b: Porazinska et al., 2009), 0.5 μL BSA, and 0.25 μL GoTaq G2 Hot Start Polymerase (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA). Amplification was using an initial DNA denaturation step of 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 sec, 58 °C for 40 sec, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min. Filtering, dereplication, sample inference, chimera identification, and merging of paired-end reads was implemented using the DADA2 pipeline (v.1.12; Callahan et al., 2016) to finally assign amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) as taxonomic units.
We combined and homogenized the remaining two soil cores to assess soil microbes, placed them in coolers (4 °C) and transported them to the laboratory at WSL. Metagenomic DNA was extracted from 8 g sieved soil (2 mm) using the DNAeasy PowerMax Soil Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer´s protocol. PCR amplification of the V3-V4 region of the small-subunit (16S) of prokaryotes (i.e., bacteria and archaea) and the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region (ITS2) of fungi was performed with 1 ng of template DNA using PCR primers and conditions as previously described (Frey et al., 2016). PCRs were run in triplicates, pooled and sent to the Genome Quebec Innovation Centre (Montreal, QC, Canada) for barcoding using the Fluidigm Access Array technology (Fluidigm) and paired-end sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq v3 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA). Quality filtering, clustering into operational taxonomic units (OTUs, 97% similarity cutoffs) and taxonomic assignment were performed as previously described (Resch et al., 2021).Taxonomic classification of nematode, prokaryotic and fungal sequences was conducted querying against the most recent versions of PR2 (v.4.11.1; Guillou et al., 2013), SILVA (v.132; Quast et al., 2013), and UNITE (v.8; Nilsson et al., 2019) reference sequence databases. Taxonomic assignment cutoffs were set to confidence rankings ≥ 0.8 (below ranked as unclassified). Prokaryotic OTUs assigned to mitochondria or chloroplasts as well as OTUs or ASVs assigned to other than Fungi or Nematoda were manually removed prior to data analysis. The three datasets were filtered to discard singletons and doubletons. Taxonomic abundance matrices were rarefied to the lowest number of sequences per community to achieve parity of the total number of reads between samples (Prokaryotes: 10,929 reads; Fungi: 18,337 reads; Nematodes: 6,662 reads). We calculated Shannon diversity and assessed community structures for soil nematodes, prokaryotes and fungi based on their relative abundances of ASV or OTU at the taxon level.

Collection of soil physical and chemical properties
We randomly collected one undisturbed soil core (5 cm diameter, 12 cm depth) per 4-m2 subplot using a steel cylinder that fit into the soil corer. The cylinders were capped to avoid disturbance during transport and used to measure field capacity, rock content and fine earth density as previously described (Resch et al., 2021). We randomly collected another three soil cores (5 cm diameter, 12 cm depths) in each 4-m2 subplot to determine soil chemical properties. The cores were pooled, dried at 60 °C for 48 h and passed through a 2 mm sieve. We measured soil pH (CaCl2) on dried samples, total nitrogen (N) and organic carbon (C) concentration on dried and fine-ground samples (≤ 0.5 mm; for details see Resch et al., 2021). We calculated total N and organic C pools after correcting its concentration for soil depth, rock content and fine earth density.

bacteria

display_name: bacteria

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

fungi

display_name: fungi

grassland

display_name: grassland

nematodes

display_name: nematodes

plants

display_name: plants

restoration

display_name: restoration

soil

display_name: soil

soil-biodiversity

display_name: soil-biodiversity

soil-biology

display_name: soil-biology

soil-chemistry

display_name: soil-chemistry

topsoil-removal

display_name: topsoil-removal

en: Long-term recovery of above-and belowground interactions in restored grasslands


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: winter-energy-production albedo shortwave-radiation photovoltaic snow

state: active

type: dataset

en: Data Forward Scattering

en: GROUNDEYE model for multiple forward scattering in snow-covered terrain. Meteorological and topographical input data set for the Meierhofertäli near Davos, Switzerland, September 2017 - August 2018. Output data for September 2017 - August 2018 at hourly resolution and every pixel. Post-processing scripts for plotting and analysis.

format: SERVICE

en:
 Overview
We present GROUNDEYE, a new model of radiative transfer over mountainous terrain, which considers for the first time the forward scattering properties of snow.
Embedded in the surface process model Alpine3D, the new terrain radiation model GROUNDEYE receives interpolated real weather data with diffuse and direct broadband shortwave radiation for each pixel as well as a spatially variable plane albedo from the module SNOWPACK.

 Format
The GROUNDEYE model is written in c++, as is the entire environment of Alpine3d. The input and output data sets are .xlsx or .txt format, pre- and postprocessing including the generation of all figures is in .R format.

 Structure
In Data_Forward_Scattering.zip you will find all necessary data and model details to
reproduce the results of the JGR publication "How forward-scattering snow and terrain change the Alpine radiation balance with application to solar panels"

 - 	Model Input Data contains the meteorological and topographic input data sets, the BRDF, and preprocessing scripts.
 - Model Code contains the full model Alpine3d including the radiative transfer module GROUNDEYE.
 - Model Output Data contains the results of the simulation of terrain irradiance and irradiance of solar panels; hourly resolution, 1. Sptember 2017 - 31. August 2018.
 - Measurements Solar Testsite contains information and measurements of the solar testsite at the Totalp near Davos, Switzerland.
 - Postprocessing contains all R-Scripts used for the analysis and
plotting of the corresponding data.

In each of these folders you will find detailed information in
the file 'About this Folder.txt'.

albedo

display_name: albedo

photovoltaic

display_name: photovoltaic

shortwave-radiation

display_name: shortwave-radiation

snow

display_name: snow

winter-energy-production

display_name: winter-energy-production

educ

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

en: Education, culture and sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester

en: Data, Code Link and Metadata on Forward Scattering of Snow at Totalp


en: forest-restoration public-perceptions household-surveys spain sweden socio-demographic-factors

en: This file contains anonymised survey responses from 241 individuals in Västerbotten County (Sweden) and Castilla y León (Spain), collected between March and September 2024. It includes variables on forest visitation, restoration awareness, perceptions of forest benefits and impacts, and socio-demographic characteristics. The responses are coded numerically and correspond to categories defined in the metadata file. The dataset supports analysis of public support for forest restoration as presented in the associated article.

format: XLS

en:
This metadata file provides detailed documentation for the survey dataset titled "Survey data on public support for forest restoration in Europe based on evidence from Sweden and Spain." It includes:
Variable Map (Variable names and descriptions): Each survey item is listed alongside a clear explanation of its content and purpose.
Labels Map: For categorical variables, response options are defined numerically and labelled (e.g., Likert scale options, age groups, gender).
Derived variables: Several composite indicators have been created from survey responses, including support for restoration, perceived forest benefits, and perceived restoration impacts.
The metadata enables accurate interpretation, reuse, and analysis of the dataset and is formatted in two Excel sheets:
Variable Map – detailing survey question codes and content.
Labels Map – providing categorical response scales for select questions.

en:
This dataset accompanies the article Factors influencing public support for forest restoration in Europe: Evidence from Sweden and Spain, published in the journal Ecosystems and People. It presents results from a multi-country survey exploring public perceptions of forests and support for forest restoration in Västerbotten County (Sweden) and the Castilla y León autonomous community (Spain).

Between March and September 2024, structured questionnaires were distributed to 3,000 randomly selected households, yielding 241 valid responses after data cleaning (171 from Sweden and 70 from Spain). The dataset includes anonymised survey responses measured on 5-point Likert scales, covering composite indicators for support for forest restoration, perceived forest benefits, and perceived impacts of restoration activities. It also contains socio-demographic information such as age, education level, and years of residence.

Sampling adhered to the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection. Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was used to construct composite indicators, and Generalised Linear Modelling (GLM) was applied to assess how socio-demographic and perceptual factors influence support for restoration.

The dataset provides insights into behavioural, perceptual, and demographic factors that shape public support for forest restoration, contributing to policy discussions, such as the EU Nature Restoration Regulation (2023). A full codebook is included to facilitate reuse.

forest-restoration

display_name: forest-restoration

household-surveys

display_name: household-surveys

public-perceptions

display_name: public-perceptions

socio-demographic-factors

display_name: socio-demographic-factors

spain

display_name: spain

sweden

display_name: sweden


en: digital-zoning-plans spatial-planning land-use-change land-use-transformations land-use-simulations

en: Legend simulated maps

en:
Table of Content: 1. General context of the data set "LUSzoning”; 2. Background and aims of the study using the data set LUSzoning; 3. The data set LUSzoning.
1. General context of the data set "LUSzoning".
The data set "LUSzoning" stands for Land-use simulations integrating zoning regulations in Spanish functional urban areas. The data set has been generated as part of the CONCUR research project (https://www.wsl.ch/en/projects/concur.html) led by Dr. Anna M. Hersperger and funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (ERC TBS Consolidator Grant (ID: BSCGIO 157789) for the period 2016-2021. The CONCUR research project is interdisciplinary and aims to develop a scientific basis for adequately integrating spatial policies (in this case, digital zoning plans) into quantitative land-change modelling approaches at the urban regional level.
2.	Background and aims of the study using the data set “LUSzoning”.
As part of the CONCUR project, a specific task was to integrate planning spatial policies in land-change modelling. Planning can be implemented in modelling using either hard or gradual restrictions. Different studies have addressed the inclusion of spatial planning policies in land-use change modelling. However, the integration of zoning constraints is generally established as hard or Boolean-based restrictions (e.g., whether urban development is allowed or not), while not accounting for the spatial heterogeneity or gradual characteristics within planning zones (e.g., whether planning regulations allow low, medium or high urban density), though these could improve real patterns simulations in urban areas. We assume Spanish General Zoning plans were suitable to explore the integration of planning into land-change modelling as soft constrains because they define land-use intensities in the buildable zoning areas. In light of the above considerations, the overall aim of the study was to model urban land-use changes using a multi-scenario approach that integrates digitized zoning plans for the Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) of Madrid, Barcelona, Valencia, and Zaragoza. The following specific objectives were addressed: i) to analyse the role of planning by defining three future scenarios that integrate digitized zoning plans and one scenario that assumes almost no planning intervention; ii) to introduce zoning constraints that reflect different degrees of urban densities; iii) to generate a transferable spatially-explicit modelling framework to integrate planning into land-use change simulations.
Four future land-use demands scenarios were defined for the FUAs. Storylines were created considering probable development scenarios related to zoning plans, current Spanish legislation and sustainability goals defined along two axes: a high market-oriented vs. high planning-intervention axis, and an axis of short-term economic growth vs. long-term sustainable growth. The sustainable development scenario (S1) is characterized by low gross floor area (GFA) growth that is limited to areas that are currently under development according to zoning plans. The business-as-usual scenario (S2) is characterized by medium GFA growth in the range of on-going trends. The strong development scenario (S3) is characterized by high GFA growth rates. Growth is restricted to buildable areas without urbanization project designated in zoning plans. The unrestricted development scenario (S4) prioritizes a high degree of market liberalization characterized by high GFA growth that surpasses population demands. S4 follows a rapid economic growth pattern with almost no planning intervention.
3.	 The data set “LUSzoning”.
The dataset includes 16 .asc raster layers providing the simulated land-uses under four defined scenarios for Barcelona, Madrid, Valencia and Zaragoza Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) for 2030. The simulated raster layers were created using CLUMondo simulation framework and have a spatial resolution of 30m. The .asc layers name include the name of the FUA and scenario number. For example, the output from simulating the urban growth for the city of Zaragoza under Scenario 2 is named “Zaragoza_S2.tif”. Furthermore, a .txt file named “Legend.txt” includes the numeric value of the land-use and the category of land-use that represents to interpret the .asc raster layers. The name of the land-use classes is a reclassification of the Urban Atlas 2012 land-use classes within the four Spanish FUAs analyzed.

digital-zoning-plans

display_name: digital-zoning-plans

land-use-change

display_name: land-use-change

land-use-simulations

display_name: land-use-simulations

land-use-transformations

display_name: land-use-transformations

spatial-planning

display_name: spatial-planning

en: LUSzoning: Land-use simulations integrating zoning regulations in Spanish functional urban areas


test-old-workflowasdasdas

title_for_slug: test-old-workflowasdasdas

en: aboveground-biomass aasda abies-alba abstracts abrasion

en: description description description description description description description description description description description

aasda

display_name: aasda

abies-alba

display_name: abies-alba

aboveground-biomass

display_name: aboveground-biomass

abrasion

display_name: abrasion

abstracts

display_name: abstracts

en: test old workflowasdasdas


en: soil-water stable-isotopes topsoil-interflow groundwater alptal overland-flow studibach electrical-conductivity rainfall plot

media_type: text/csv

format: CSV

en:
This dataset contains stable isotope ratios of oxygen and hydrogen (O-18 and H-2) and electrical conductivity (EC) in overland flow (OF), topsoil interflow (TIF), soil water, groundwater, and rainwater for 12 rainfall events during the snow-free seasons of 2021 and 2022 in the Studibach catchment, Alptal, Switzerland.

Overland flow, topsoil interflow (i.e., lateral flow from the more densely rooted soil layer), soil water, and groundwater were collected at 14 small trenched runoff plots (1 x 3 m) in three subcatchments (C2, C3, C5) of the Studibach catchment. Overland flow was collected from the surface up to 2-5 cm depth and thus includes biomat flow. A trench was used to collect topsoil interflow (up to 60 cm below the surface; see Table 1 in the manuscript for details). Rainwater was collected at two locations in the Studibach catchment (in C3 and C5, respectively). Soil water was collected in between the events from suction lysimeters installed at 12.5 cm and 20 cm below the soil surface in the middle of each plot. Groundwater was collected between events from wells installed near the plots up to the soil-bedrock interface.
The water samples were analysed for the stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen (O-18 and H-2) using with a cavity ring-down spectroscope (CRDS; L2140-i or L2130-i, Picarro, Inc., USA) at the Chair of Hydrology at the University of Freiburg, Germany. The isotope ratios are reported in per mil (‰) relative to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water.

A more detailed description of the field setup, data collection and preparation can be found in Leuteritz et al. (in press).

The dataset contains in addition to the sample identifier and the site and event identifiers that are used in the publication, also the sample collection date (typically one day after the event) and the coordinates for each plot (coordinate system: WGS84). For the plots for which samples were collected with an automatic sampler (ISCO), the date and time (UTC) of sample collection are given as well.

alptal

display_name: alptal

electrical-conductivity

display_name: electrical-conductivity

groundwater

display_name: groundwater

overland-flow

display_name: overland-flow

plot

display_name: plot

rainfall

display_name: rainfall

soil-water

display_name: soil-water

stable-isotopes

display_name: stable-isotopes

studibach

display_name: studibach

topsoil-interflow

display_name: topsoil-interflow

en: Stable water isotopes and EC in overland flow, topsoil interflow, soil water, groundwater, and rainwater for 12 rainfall events in the Studibach catchment, Alptal, Switzerland


maintainer: Avalanche Warning Service SLF

en: Avalanche fatalities per year in Switzerland since 1936/1937

mimetype: text/csv

en:
Attention: this data is not updated after 2022 anymore.
This dataset contains the statistics on the number of avalanche fatalities per hydrological year in Switzerland. The data set commences with the beginning of the hydrological year 1936/37 on 01/10/1936. After the completion of a hydrological year, the new data is appended to the existing dataset.
The following information is contained (by column and column title):
 - hydrological year
 - number of fatalities in the backcountry (=tour)
 - number of fatalities in terrain close to ski areas (=offpiste)
 - number of fatalities on transportation corridors including ski runs, roads, railway lines (=transportation.corridors)
 - number of fatalities in or around buildings or in settlements (= buildings)
 - sum (of all four categories)
The definition for these four categories as described in the guidelines to the avalanche accident database:
**tour**:
activities include back-country ski, snowboard or snow-shoe touring
**offpiste**:
access from ski area, generally from the top of a skilift with short hiking distances
**transportation.corridors** ([Techel et al., 2016](http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/147/2016/ )):
people travelling or recreating on open or temporarily closed
transportation corridors (e.g. a road user or a skier on a ski run) and people working on open or closed transportation corridors (e.g. maintenance crews on roads, professional rescue teams)
**buildings** ([Techel et al., 2016](http://www.geogr-helv.net/71/147/2016/ )):
people inside or just outside buildings, and workers on high alpine building
sites

avalanche-accident-statistics

display_name: avalanche-accident-statistics

avalanche-accidents

display_name: avalanche-accidents

avalanche-fatalities

display_name: avalanche-fatalities

fatalities-in-or-around-buildings

display_name: fatalities-in-or-around-buildings

fatalities-in-settlements

display_name: fatalities-in-settlements

fatalities-in-the-backcountry

display_name: fatalities-in-the-backcountry

fatalities-on-transportation-corridors

display_name: fatalities-on-transportation-corridors

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: Number of avalanche fatalities per hydrological year in Switzerland since 1936-1937


maintainer: Izabela Bujak-Ozga

en: data water-level drainage catchment drainage-network catchment-data erlenbach channel precipitation dynamics dataset

media_type: application/pdf

format: PDF

en: The dataset contains time series of water levels, precipitation measured in the two sub-catchments of the Erlenbach catchment and its vicinity during summer and autumn 2021, as well as flowing drainage network lengths calculated for these areas using the CEASE method developed by the authors. Detailed description of the dataset is provided in the documentation.

catchment

display_name: catchment

catchment-data

display_name: catchment-data

channel

display_name: channel

data

display_name: data

dataset

display_name: dataset

drainage

display_name: drainage

drainage-network

display_name: drainage-network

dynamics

display_name: dynamics

erlenbach

display_name: erlenbach

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

water-level

display_name: water-level

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Short-term Drainage Density Dynamics Dataset for the Erlenbach Catchment


en: energy mountain photovoltaic albedo snow irradiance reflection

media_type: application/zip

en: Windows users use the 7-zip app to extract the zip-file.

format: ZIP

mimetype: application/zip

en: PV Data

en:
 Overview
The SUNWELL Modelling Environment is a combination of data and code that models electricity production from satellite-derived irradiance data and other spatial data sets for all of Switzerland. This ensemble accompanies the publication "The bright side of PV production in snow-covered mountains", published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science and reproduces all results and figures of. Code and resources are in their original form (with documentation). A new version with a more generalized application to PV modelling and with more flexibility in terms of input and output formats will be released in the coming months.

 Format
All code is written and has to be executed in Matlab. The input and output data sets are also in the Matlab-specific .mat format. Whenever publicly available, the original data is provided as geotif, .xlsx or other common format.
This is the case for:

- Digital Elevation Model (InputsFromMatlab/MSG/OriginalData/ASTERDEM),
- Landsurface cover type (InputsFromMatlab/MSG/OriginalData/CORINE),
- Population Density (InputsFromMatlab/MSG/OriginalData/popdensRaster,
- Electricity production from three of our validation sites (/Validation/WSL),
- Measured irradiance for two validation sites (/Validation/ASRB)
The ‘Metadata’ documents in the respective folders provide further information about the data sources and processing. Figures are produced either in .pdf or .png format.

 Structure
The central level of the SUNWELL environment holds the 5 Mains, which run the different modelling aspects of the paper; each code is documented separately. Additional code is located in the ‘DataProcessing’ and the ‘functions’ folder. Functions are called in the different Mains.

‘InputsFromMatlab’ contains the radiation and albedo input data sets in separate subfolders (SIS/SISDIR/ALB). The original data is not publicly available, but can be requested for research purposes free of charge. We provide a processed subset of the data set that was used to run the SUNWELL simulations. The MSG subfolder contains additional spatial input data sets.

‘Outputs’ contains the output files from the different mains (matching names, Main_CHallpixels.m  Prod_CHallpixels)

‘Publication_figures’ contains all individual figures from the PNAS publication, as well as the generating code (/code_plot) and the power point figures (/ppts) that provide the combined final figures.

‘Validation’ contains the data sets used in the model validation:

- Electricity production from three of our validation sites (/WSL),
- Measured irradiance for two validation sites (/ASRB)

Electricity production from a validation site at Lac des Toules in Wallis (/LDT), this data set was provided under an NDA and cannot be made publicly available.

Paper Citation:
 > _Annelen Kahl; Jérôme Dujardin; Michael Lehning (2018). Dataset on PV Production in Snow Covered Mountains. PNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (in press)_

albedo

display_name: albedo

energy

display_name: energy

irradiance

display_name: irradiance

mountain

display_name: mountain

photovoltaic

display_name: photovoltaic

reflection

display_name: reflection

snow

display_name: snow


en: weisfluhjoch snow-ssa snow-stratigraphy weissfluhjoch wfj-research-site snow-density snow-measurements microstructure snowmicropen snow

en: WFJ_DailySMP data access

en: A huge thanks goes to the countless PhD students, without whom collecting this dataset would not be possible.

en:
The WFJ_DailySMP dataset contains daily SnowMicroPen (SMP) measurements conducted throughout the winter seasons 2015-2025 (ongoing) at the Weissfluhjoch research site, Davos, Switzerland. The measurement program DailySMP started in winter 2015/2016 during which the measurement protocol was established as part of the RHOSSA campaign, described in the related publication.
Since then, measurements have been repeated every winter as part of the standard snow monitoring program by the PhD students at SLF. All published SMP files have undergone manual quality control by an expert, including a supervised detection of the snow surface, which is included in the dataset.
In addition to the raw data, we provide a rudimentary post-processing workflow in which the derived SSA and density profiles are adjusted by the total snow height obtained from the adjacent IMIS snow station (https://www.slf.ch/en/avalanche-bulletin-and-snow-situation/measured-values/description-of-automated-stations/) and their evolution is plotted over time. Please refer to the README for detailed information on how to get started.

microstructure

display_name: microstructure

snow-density

display_name: snow-density

snow-measurements

display_name: snow-measurements

snow-ssa

display_name: snow-ssa

snow-stratigraphy

display_name: snow-stratigraphy

snowmicropen

display_name: snowmicropen

weisfluhjoch

display_name: weisfluhjoch

weissfluhjoch

display_name: weissfluhjoch

wfj-research-site

display_name: wfj-research-site

en: WFJ_DailySMP - High-Resolution Snow Stratigraphy at Weissfluhjoch -- Davos 2015-ongoing


en: artificial-lighting alan outdoor-lighting sustainability ecosystem-services

en: R code of flight-active insects analysis.

format: OCTET

en: Raw data for ground-dwelling arthropod analysis

en: Raw data for flying insects and ground-dwelling arthropod combined analysis

en: R code for NMDS of ground-dwelling arthropods

en: Raw data for ground-dwelling arthropod NMDS analysis

en: R code for NMDS of flight-active insects

en: R code for PERMANOVA Analysis of flight-active insects.

en: Raw data Moran's I test

en: R code for PERMANOVA Analysis of ground-dwelling arthropods.

en: Raw data for flying insects analysis

en: Raw data for flying insects NMDS analysis

en: R code of ground-dwelling arthropod analysis.

en: R code of flight-active and ground-dwelling arthropod combined analysis.

en: Raw data and R Code to do all the analysis performed for the paper "Advancing sustainable LED solutions to mitigate light-pollution impacts on arthropods". Including data for both flight-active insects and ground-dwelling arthropods combined (PT_TRF_all.csv), flight-active insects alone (ALANeX_PT_all_clean_control.csv) and ground-dwelling insects alone (ALANeX_TRF_all_clean_control.csv). For the NMDS analysis, there is a data set for the flight-active insects (ALANeX_PT_NMDS.csv) and the ground-dwelling arthropods (ALANeX_TRF_NMDS.csv). For the Morans I use the 'ALANeX_MoransI.csv' dataset.

alan

display_name: alan

artificial-lighting

display_name: artificial-lighting

ecosystem-services

display_name: ecosystem-services

outdoor-lighting

display_name: outdoor-lighting

sustainability

display_name: sustainability


maintainer: Maria Elvira Murazzi

en: polystyrene uptake 13c-labelling nanoplastic forest-trees

en: Nanoplastic in forests experiment

en:
Data embargoed until August 2022, and it will be provided upon request

-  excel file containing: two working sheets (leaf supply and root supply experiment) with a table with the values 13C-nanopolystyrene in the different tissues of the two forest tree species; graph showing the differences between controls and treatments of 13C-nanopolystyrene enrichment for each tissue of each forest tree species; ANOVA table showing significant values after having exposed the tree species to 13C-nanopolystyrene

en:
The fate of plastic in the environment is of global concern, because its production recently has
increased strongly and it accumulates in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Although some knowledge on
its role in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems was gained in the recent decade, hitherto very little is known
about the impact of micro and nanoplastics in forest ecosystems.

The aim of this pioneering project was to explore if nanoplastics are taken up by forest trees species
through leaves or roots. In greenhouse experiments, we exposed leaves or roots of seedling of two forest
trees species to solutions with highly 13C-labelled polystyrene nanoparticles (13C-nPS, 99 atom%) and
examined if they were incorporated in different above- and belowground tissues.

Treated part of the trees for both species showed significant 13C-enrichment, indicating that trees take up nanoparticles. However, the overall 13C signal strength in tissues that were not exposed to the 13C label remained low (Δδ13C<1‰) and was confined to a few seedlings, leaving it ambiguous whether nanoplastic transport occurs or not.

We acknowledge that the new method developed might be not sensitive enough to unequivocally detect
mechanisms of nanoplastic uptake and transport at environmentally realistic concentrations.

forest-trees

display_name: forest-trees

nanoplastic

display_name: nanoplastic

polystyrene

display_name: polystyrene

uptake

display_name: uptake

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Nanoplastics in forests: Exploring the effects of nanoplastics on forest soils and tree physiology (NanoPlast)


global-cryosphere-watch-data-survey

maintainer: Mathias Bavay

title_for_slug: global-cryosphere-watch-data-survey

en: gcw data-exchange automatic-publication data-usage data-portal

en: Third party data usage

en: Data interoperability survey

en: Two surveys on the topic of data usage where conducted for the Global Cryosphere Watch data portal. The first one focused on the data provider point of view while the second one focused on the data user point of view. 37 data providers (ie institutions) worldwide provided their answers for the first survey (from fall 2017 until summer 2018) while 54 users (contacted through various mailing list such as the Cryolist) answered the questions on their third party data usage (fall 2019 until January 2020).

automatic-publication

display_name: automatic-publication

data-exchange

display_name: data-exchange

data-portal

display_name: data-portal

data-usage

display_name: data-usage

gcw

display_name: gcw

en: Global Cryosphere Watch data survey


en: tree-ring fagus-sylvatica dendroecology beech network-analysis dendrochronology

en: Model output

en: Output of the Mixed-effects model

en:
R code to run the model behind the results of the research article "No future growth enhancement expected at the northern edge for European beech due to continued water limitation".
Requires beech_rawtrw.txt.

media_type: text/plain

en:
This dataset contains the raw ring-width and climate data (1952-2020) used in the research article "No future growth enhancement expected at the northern edge for European beech due to continued water limitation".
RW= ring width
Year= Calendar year
CN = core number
ID3= plot identifier
longitude = longitude (°)
latitude = latitude (°)
elevation = elevation (m)
age= estimated age in calendar year
radius= estimated radius in calendar year (mm)
MAT= mean annual temperature (°C)
MAP= mean annual precipitation (mm)
MCWB= mean climatic water balance (P-PET; mm)
amplitude= simple continentality measure (July - January mean maximum temperatures)
MATspline1 and 2, MCWBspline1 and 2, radiusspline4 and 5= natural spline transformed values of MAT, MCWB and radius ns(x,2)
CWD_pMay_Jun= Climatic Water Balance of previous year May to June !!!#please note CWD here is NOT Climatic Water Deficit, this was a labeling error in the creation of the dataset headers
CWD_May_Jun= Climatic Water Balance of current year May to June
Tmax_pMay_Jun= mean monthly maximum temperature of previous year May to June
Tmax_May_Jun= mean monthly maximum temperature of current year May to June
weight = site replication-based weighting input for model
SOM= membership of regional cluster 1-8 based on Supervised Organized Mapping

format: TXT

en: This dataset contains the raw ring-width and climate data (1952-2020), as well as the R code to run the model and the model output used in the research article "No future growth enhancement expected at the northern edge for European beech due to continued water limitation".

beech

display_name: beech

dendrochronology

display_name: dendrochronology

dendroecology

display_name: dendroecology

fagus-sylvatica

display_name: fagus-sylvatica

network-analysis

display_name: network-analysis

tree-ring

display_name: tree-ring

en: European Beech tree-ring dataset 1952-2020


en: lake-level-regulation hydrologic-and-hydrodynamic-modelling switzerland perialpine-lakes climate-change

en: Lake outflow scenarios CH2018

en: Lake outflow scenarios for Lake Walen, Lake Zurich, Lake Brienz and Lake Thun.

en: Lake characteristics

en: Lake characteristics: stage-area relation for Lake Walen, Lake Zurich, Lake Brienz and Lake Thun, stage-discharge relations for the unregulated Lake Walen and semi-regulated Lake Brienz and, lake level management rules for the two regulated lakes Zurich and Thun.

en: Lake water level scenarios CH2018

en: Lake water level scenarios for Lake Walen, Lake Zurich, Lake Brienz and Lake Thun.

en:
The dataset "Lake_climate_change_scenarios_CH2018" provides simulation-based climate change impact scenarios for perialpine lakes in Switzerland. These transient future scenarios were produced by combining the hydrologic model PREVAH with the hydrodynamic model MIKE11 to simulate daily lake water level (Lake_water_level_scenarios_CH2018.xls) and outflow scenarios (Lake_outflow_scenarios_CH2018.xls) from 1981 to 2099, using the Swiss Climate Change Scenarios CH2018. The future scenarios contain a total of 39 model members for three Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP2.6 (concerted mitigation efforts), RCP4.5 (limited climate mitigation) and RCP8.5 (no climate mitigation measures). These scenarios result from the study titled "Lower summer lake levels in regulated perialpine lakes, caused by climate change," authored by Wechsler et al. in 2023.

The dataset emphasizes four specific Swiss lakes, each subject to different degrees of lake level management: an unregulated lake (Lake Walen), a semi-regulated lake (Lake Brienz), and two regulated lakes (Lake Zurich and Lake Thun).

In addition, the file (Lake_characteristics.xlsx) includes data used in the modeling process, encompassing the stage-area relation for the four lakes, stage-discharge relations for the unregulated and semi-regulated lakes, and lake level management rules for the two regulated lakes.

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

hydrologic-and-hydrodynamic-modelling

display_name: hydrologic-and-hydrodynamic-modelling

lake-level-regulation

display_name: lake-level-regulation

perialpine-lakes

display_name: perialpine-lakes

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

en: Lake climate change scenarios CH2018


maintainer: Michael Lehning

en: snowpack snow-farming snow snow-conservation winter-tourism terrestrial-laser-scanning

en: Martell .smet

en: Meteodata used as input for SNOWAPCK simulations, orginating from Station Hintermartell.

en: Fluela .smet

en: Meteodata used as input for SNOWAPCK simulations, orginating from Station Windtunnel and DAV.

en: HS Martell autumn 2015

en:
Snow depth/ height of snow heap in autumn 2015 obtained by terrestrial laserscanning
cell size: 10 cm
spatial reference: European Datum 1950 UTM
Nodata: -9999

mimetype: text/plain

en: HS Fluela spring 2015

en:
Snow depth/ height of snow heap in spring 2015 obtained by terrrestrial laserscanning
cell size: 10 cm
spatial reference: CH1903

en: Martell .sno

en: Input snow profile (.sno file) used for SNOWPACK simulations of the Martell heap

en: Fluela .sno

en: Input snow profile (.sno file) used for SNOWPACK simulations of the Flüela heap

en: HS Martell spring 2015

en:
Snow depth/ height of snow heap in spring 2015 obtained by terrestrial laserscanning
cell size: 10 cm
spatial reference: European Datum 1950 UTM
Nodata: -9999

en: HS Fluela autumn 2015

en:
Snow depth/ height of snow heap in autumn 2015 obtained by terrestrial laserscanning
cell size: 10 cm
spatial reference: CH1903
Nodata: -9999

en:
Two data sets obtained for snow farming projects (Fluela, Davos, CH and Martell, IT) in 2015.

The data set contains for each site:

* 10 cm GIS raster of snow depth calculated from terrestrial laserscanning surveys (TLS) in the end of winter season (April/May)

* 10 cm GIS raster of snow depth calculated from TLS in the end of summer season (October)

Input files for SNOWPACK model:

* .sno: snow profile at the end of winter

* .smet: meteorological data measured by weather stations in the area

For more details see Grünewald, T., Lehning, M., and Wolfsperger, F.: Snow farming: Conserving snow over the summer season, The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-93, in review, 2017.

snow

display_name: snow

snow-conservation

display_name: snow-conservation

snow-farming

display_name: snow-farming

snowpack

display_name: snowpack

terrestrial-laser-scanning

display_name: terrestrial-laser-scanning

winter-tourism

display_name: winter-tourism

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Snowfarming data set Davos and Martell 2015


data-broedlin-cnp

title_for_slug: data-broedlin-cnp

en: forest stoichiometry mineralization phosphorus drying-rewetting dissolved-organic-matter carbon soil nitrogen

en: Data Broedlin-CNP-Release

en: Raw data of C-N-P mobilization experiment from Oi, Oe/Oa, and A horizons of beech forest soils along a nutrient availability gradient.

en: Data Broedlin-CNP

en: Mircocosm experiment to identify the individual patterns and controls of C, N, and P mobilization in soils under beech forests. Organic and mineral horizons sampled along a nutrient availability gradient in Germany were exposed to either permanent moist conditions or to dry spells in microcosms and quantified the release of inorganic and organic C, N, and P.

carbon

display_name: carbon

dissolved-organic-matter

display_name: dissolved-organic-matter

drying-rewetting

display_name: drying-rewetting

forest

display_name: forest

mineralization

display_name: mineralization

nitrogen

display_name: nitrogen

phosphorus

display_name: phosphorus

soil

display_name: soil

stoichiometry

display_name: stoichiometry

en: Data Broedlin CNP


maintainer: Frank Techel

en: avalanche-release-probability spatial-modelling avalanche-forecast machine-learning forecast-models

en: Natural avalanches 2022/2023

en: Natural avalanche observation (dry avalanches). 2022-2023 forecasting season.

en: Human-triggered avalanches 2023/2024

en: The file contains the reported human-triggered avalanches. The variables are as follows: id, release date (date), name, Swiss coordinates (x,y), elevation (ele), remark, reported avalanche size expressed using avalanche activity index (sizeAAI), aspect, event type (type), event (yes = 1, no = 0)

en: GPS data and human-triggered avalanches

en: Contains (1) the subset of points extracted from GPS tracks recorded during backcountry touring and uploaded to the website skitourenguru.ch and (2) the corresponding subset of human-triggered avalanches. Data (1) was provided by Skitourenguru GmbH and data (2) was collected by SLF. - Variables contained are date, Swiss coordinates (x, y), aspect (N = 0, NE = 45, ...), elevation (ele), and event (event = 1, non-event = 0).

en: Snowline estimates 2023/2024

en: Daily snowline estimates provided by observers for North (aspect = 0) and South (aspect = 180) slopes for the 2023/2024 season. For aspects in between North and South, values are interpolated. Contains observation date (date), coordinates (Swiss coordinates x, y), snowline elevation (snowline), and aspect.

en: Natural avalanches 2023/2024

en: Natural avalanche observation (dry avalanches). 2023/2024 forecasting season.

en: Randomly sampled subset of grid points from 1 km DEM

en: Contains the randomly sampled subset of grid points from 1 km DEM. Three variables: coordinates (x, y) and elevation (elev).

en: Human-triggered avalanches 2022/2023

en: Snowline estimates 2022/2023

en: Daily snowline estimates provided by observers for North (aspect = 0) and South (aspect = 180) slopes for the 2022/2023 season. For aspects in between North and South, values are interpolated. Contains observation date (date), coordinates (Swiss coordinates x, y), snowline elevation (snowline), and aspect.

en: Model predictions (interpolated)

en: The zip file contains csv-files the interpolated model predictions for three models, in forecast and nowcast-mode, for the three different data sets, as described in the publication.

en: Avalanche forecast

en: Data contains forecasts relating to dry-snow avalanche conditions only. Forecast issued at 17.00 local time. Contains variables for the warning region (sector_id), publication date (date), danger level - sub-level combination expressed using numeric values (integer value of danger level -0.33 for sub-level minus, -0 for sub-level neutral, +0.33 for sub-level plus, altitude as indicated in the bulletin, and whether aspect (North = 0, Northeast = 45, ...) was indicated in the bulletin (no: 0, yes: 1).

en: Model predictions (raw data)

en: Model predictions (raw data) for three models, in nowcast and forecast mode. Not all models are available for both seasons. - These data are the basis for the interpolated predictions, which can be found in the other zip-folder

en:
This data set was used in the analysis by Techel et al. **Can model-based avalanche forecasts match the discriminatory skill of human danger level forecasts? A comparison from Switzerland**. Please note that the title of the preprint was *Forecasting avalanche danger: human-made forecasts vs. fully automated model-driven predictions*, submitted to *Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences* on 20 Aug 2024.
The final manuscript used data from three forecasting seasons (2022/2023, 2023/2024, 2024/2025) , the preprint two forecasting seasons (2022/2023, 2023/2024) .
Currently, the repository contains data from two avalanche forecasting seasons in Switzerland. The third season will be added (to be done, 30 June 2025).
**Interpolated predictions**
- The .zip file contains the interpolated predictions for the three models in nowcast- and forecast- mode. This data is needed to reproduce the figures and tables in the submitted preprint.
The other data are the **raw data** underlying the interpolations:
- Avalanche forecast by WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, published at 17.00 local time, valid for the following 24 hours and relating to dry snow avalanche conditions.
- Model predictions in *nowcast*- and *forecast*-mode for three models (*danger level*, *instability*, *natural avalanche*), valid for 12.00 local time
- Subset of points extracted from GPS tracks (courtesy of Skitourenguru GmbH)
- Avalanche observations - natural avalanches and human-triggered avalanches
- Estimates of the snowline
- Randomly chosen subset of grid points used for generating reference distributions
For details regarding the data sets refer to the publication.

avalanche-forecast

display_name: avalanche-forecast

avalanche-release-probability

display_name: avalanche-release-probability

forecast-models

display_name: forecast-models

machine-learning

display_name: machine-learning

spatial-modelling

display_name: spatial-modelling

en: Evaluating the predictive performance of human avalanche forecasts and model predictions in Switzerland


soil-respiration-exclosure-experiment

title_for_slug: soil-respiration-exclosure-experiment

en: ungulates subalpine soil-respiration grazing grassland

en: Soil respiration Switzerland

en:
ID: Fence number

Year	:Year of sampling

mean.CO2: soil respiration measured with PP-systems SRC-1 soil respriation chamber attached to a EGM-4 infrared gas analyser; units CO2 g m-2 h-1

Grassland: Grasslands where fences were errected. Note that on large grasslands (STAB, GRIM, MING) 2 pairs of fences were errected (2 in short, 2 in tall-grass vegetation), on small grasslands (DADA, MARG, BOTS) only one pair of fences was errected (1 short-grass; one-tallgrass vegetation)

Fence: Fence number; un-even numbers on short-grass vegetation (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17), even numbers on tall-grass vegetation (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18)

Vegetation:	1 = shortgrass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)

Treatment	: 1 = all herbivores grazing, 2 = large ungulates (red deer, chamois) excluded

en:
Location of data collection
The Swiss National Park (SNP) is located in the southeastern part of Switzerland, and covers an area of 170 km2, 50 km2 of which is forested, 33 km2 is occupied by alpine and 3 km2 by subalpine grasslands. Elevations range from 1350 to 3170 m a.s.l., and mean annual precipitation and temperature are 871 mm and 0.6°C measured at the Park’s weather station in Buffalora (1980 m a.s.l.) between 1960 and 2009 (MeteoSchweiz 2011). Founded in 1914, the SNP received minimal human disturbance for almost 100 years (no hunting, fishing, or camping, visitors are not allowed to leave the trails). Large (> 1 ha) homogeneous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation characterize the subalpine grasslands. The average vegetation height of short-grass vegetation is 2 to 5 cm. Red fescue (Festuca rubra L.), quaking grass (Briza media L.) and common bent grass (Agrostis tenuis Sipthrob) are the predominating plant species in this vegetation type. Tussocks of evergreen sedge (Carex sempervirens Vill.) and mat grass (Nardus stricta L.) are predominant in the tall-grass vegetation, which averages 20 cm in vegetation height (Schütz and others 2006). Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle and sheep rested (high nutrient input) during agricultural land-use (from 14th century until 1914); tall-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle and sheep used to graze, but did not rest (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Herbivores were shown to consume > 60% of the biomass in short-grass compared to < 20% in tall-grass vegetation (Schütz and others 2006). The herbivore community present in the SNP can be divided into four groups based on body size/weight: large [red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) and chamois (Rupricapra rupricapra L.); 30 - 150 kg], medium [marmot (Marmota marmota L.) and snow hare (Lepus timidus L.); 3 – 6 kg], and small vertebrate herbivores (small rodents: e.g. Clethrionomys spp., Microtus spp., Apodemus spp.; 30 – 100 g) as well as invertebrates (e.g. grasshoppers, caterpillars, cicadas, < 5 g).

Experimental design
We selected 18 subalpine grassland sites (9 short-grass, 9 tall-grass vegetation). The sites were spread across the entire park on dolomite parent material at altitudes of 1975 to 2300 meters. At each site we established an exclosure network (fences) in spring 2009 (early June), immediately after snowmelt. Each exclosure network consisted of a total of five 2 × 3 m sized plots that progressively excluded the different herbivores listed above (further labeled according to the herbivore guilds that had access to the respective plots “All”, “Marmot/Mice/Invertebrates”, “Mice/Invertebrates”, “Invertebrates”, “None”). The “All” treatment was thus accessible to all herbivores, was not fenced and was located at least 5 m away from a 2.1 m tall and 7 × 9 m main fence that enclosed the other four treatments. This fence was constructed of 10 × 10 cm wooden posts and electrical equestrian tape (AGRARO ECO, Landi, Bern, Switzerland; 20 mm width) mounted at 0.7 m, 0.95 m, 1.2 m, 1.5 m and 2.1 m above the ground that were connected to a solar charged battery (AGRARO Sunpower S250, Landi, Bern, Switzerland). We also mounted non-electrically charged equestrian tape at 0.5 m to help exclude deer and chamois, yet allow marmots and hares to enter safely. Within each main fenced area we randomly established four 2 × 3 m plots: (1) The “Marmot/Mice/Invertebrates” plot remained unfenced, thus, with the exception of red deer and chamois, all herbivores were able to access the plot, (2) The “Mice/Invertebrates” plot consisted of a 90 cm high electric sheep fence (AGRARO Weidezaunnetz ECO, Landi, Bern, Switzerland; mesh size 10 × 10 cm) connected to the solar panel and excluded all medium sized mammals (marmots, hares), but provided access for small mammals and invertebrates, (3) The “Invertebrates” plot provided access for invertebrates only and was surrounded by 1 m high metal mesh (Hortima AG, Hausen, Schweiz; mesh size 2 × 2 cm), (4) The “None” plot was surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (Sala Ferramenta AG, Biasca, Switzerland; mesh size 1.5 × 2 mm) to exclude all herbivores. This plot was covered with a roof constructed of a wooden frame lined with mosquito mesh that was mounted on the wooden corner posts. We also treated this plot with a biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) when needed to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil.

!!! The here published data set only contains data for “All”, and “Marmot/Mice/Invertebrates” (= ungulates excluded) plots !!!

Data collection
In-situ soil CO2 emissions were measured with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyzer (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two randomly selected locations on one subplot within each of the 90 plots. For each measurement the soil chamber (15 cm high; 10 cm diameter) was placed on a permanently installed PVC collar (10 cm diameter) driven five centimeters into the soil at the beginning of the study (June 2009). The measurements were conducted between 0900 and 1700 hours every two weeks from early to early September 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2013. Freshly germinated plants growing within the PVC collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration/photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot every two weeks were averaged.

Please acknowledge the funding of the study: funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, SNF grant-no 31003A_122009/1 to Anita C. Risch, Martin Schütz and Flurin Filli

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

soil-respiration

display_name: soil-respiration

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

ungulates

display_name: ungulates

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Soil respiration - exclosure experiment


en: caribbean-region environmental-dna coral-reefs marine fish curacao teleo fish-composition edna

en: Data access

en:
Fish taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic composition variations recovered from eDNA metabarcoding along the coast of Curacao

In February 2020, we collected a total of 20 water samples, from 10 stations, with two filtration replicates per station, in the two investigated coastal areas. Each station consisted of a transect of 2 km at an overall constant distance from the coast. We recorded the GPS coordinates at the start and end of the transect, which we used to map the transect positions. We conducted eDNA sampling by using a filtration device composed of an Athena® peristaltic pump (Proactive Environmental Products LLC, Bradenton, Florida, USA; nominal flow of 1.0 L/min), a VigiDNA® 0.20 μM cross-flow filtration capsule (SPYGEN, le Bourget du Lac, France) and disposable sterile tubing for each filtration capsule. We performed two filtration replicates in parallel on each side of a boat, at each station, for 30 min corresponding to a volume of ~30 L of water filtered by each capsule. At the end of each filtration, the water inside the capsules was emptied, and we filled the capsules with 80 ml of CL1 Conservation buffer (SPYGEN, le Bourget du Lac, France) and stored at room temperature. We followed a strict contamination control protocol in both field and laboratory stages (Valentini et al., 2016). Each water sample processing included the use of disposable gloves and single-use filtration equipment to avoid any risk of contamination. Libraries were prepared with ligation using the MetaFast protocol (Fasteris).

caribbean-region

display_name: caribbean-region

coral-reefs

display_name: coral-reefs

curacao

display_name: curacao

edna

display_name: edna

environmental-dna

display_name: environmental-dna

fish

display_name: fish

fish-composition

display_name: fish-composition

marine

display_name: marine

teleo

display_name: teleo

en: Environmental DNA Marine Curacao 2020


tree-species-map-of-switzerland

maintainer: Tiziana Li Koch

title_for_slug: tree-species-map-of-switzerland

en: switzerland forest map tree-species remote-sensing

media_type: image/png

en: Image of the tree species map

format: PNG

en:
Dominant tree species map of Switzerland
We created a tree species map of Switzerland for the dominant tree species in the forested areas. The spatial resolution of the map is 10 m and the coordinate system is ETRS89-extended / LAEA Europe (EPSG 3035). The map comprises Sentinel-2 index time series from the year 2020, a digital elevation model and species reference data from the Swiss National Forest Inventory. The map is available as raster (.tif) or vector dataset (.gpkg).
**Access will be granted upon request.**
In total, the following 15 species were mapped:
*Abies alba*, *Acer pseudoplatanus*, *Alnus glutinosa*, *Alnus incana*, *Betula pendula*, *Castanea sativa*, *Fagus sylvatica*, *Fraxinus excelsior*, *Picea abies*, *Pinus cembra*, *Pinus mugo arborea*, *Pinus sylvestris*, *Quercus petraea*, *Quercus robur*, *Sorbus aucuparia*.

 Approach

 Data
- Swiss National Forest Inventory Data (stand species with > 60 % dominance in upper canopy; on at least more than 9 plots dominant)
- Sentinel-2 time series (2020, Indices: CCI, CIRE, NDMI, EVI, NDVI)
- Digital elevation model (DEM) (swissalti3d, 5 m)
- Biogeographical regions (Federal Office for the Environment FOEN)
- Forest mask 2017 (Approach: Waser et al., 2015)

 Modeling approach
We identified the most meaningful variables that led to separation of the respective groups by using random forest models with a forward feature selection (Meyer et al., 2018; Ververidis & Kotropoulos, 2005). In this approach, the final random forest model is solely built from the selected meaningful variables. By identifying meaningful variables, we can determine which variables might influence the grouping. Further, to avoid overfitting and overly optimistic results, we applied 10-fold spatial cross-validation and put all pixels from a plot in the same spatial fold.
The modeling was realized using the CAST package in R (Meyer et al., 2022), based on the well-known caret package (Kuhn, 2022). We used the ranger package in R (Wright & Ziegler, 2017) to implement the random forest models, due to its short computation time.

 Training data for modeling
- 295 Sentinel-2, DEM & Biogeographical variables
- 10525 tree species pixels

 Selected variables for final model
1. EVI of 2020.05.16
2. NDMI of 2020.03.12
3. CIRE of 2020.04.16
4. NDMI of 2020.07.05
5. CCI of 2020.05.11
6. dem
7. CCI of 2020.08.14
8. NDMI of 2020.08.24
9. CCI of 2020.12.22
10. NDMI of 2020.04.21
11. NDMI of 2020.11.17
12. NDMI of 2020.08.09
13. CIRE of 2020.03.22
14. CIRE of 2020.08.09
14. CCI of 2020.11.02
15. CIRE of 2020.06.10

 Overall Accuracy of final model
- 0.759

 Nationwide prediction
- Predicted throughout forest mask 2017 (Approach: Waser et al., 2015)
- Not applied on incomplete Sentinel-2 time series (own category in final map: incomplete_ts)
- Applied the Area of Applicability (Meyer 2022) to sort out pixels outside of the feature space; basically where the model had not the same values for pixels as in the available training data

 *Be aware that the map is only validated with the training data itself, an independent validation with other data sources remains missing*

 References
- Kuhn, M. (2022). Classification and Regression Training. 6.0-93.
- Meyer, H., Reudenbach, C., Hengl, T., Katurji, M., & Nauss, T. (2018). *Improving performance of spatio-temporal machine learning models using forward feature selection and target-oriented validation*. Environmental Modelling and Software, 101, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.001
- Meyer, H., Milà, C., & Ludwig, M. (2022). *CAST: 'caret' Applications for Spatial-Temporal Models*. 0.7.0.
- Ververidis, D., & Kotropoulos, C. (2005). *Sequential forward feature selection with low computational cost*. 2005 13th European Signal Processing Conference.
- Waser, L., Fischer, C.,Wang, Z., & Ginzler, C. (2015). *Wall-to-Wall Forest Mapping Based on Digital Surface Models from Image-Based Point Clouds and a NFI Forest Definition*. Forests, 6, 12, 4510–4528.
- Wright, M. N., & Ziegler, A. (2017). *ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and R*. Journal of Statistical Software, 77(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/doi:10.18637/jss.v077.i01

forest

display_name: forest

map

display_name: map

remote-sensing

display_name: remote-sensing

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

tree-species

display_name: tree-species

en: Tree species map of Switzerland


maintainer: Irene Cordero

en: drought land-use pesticide soil-nutrients soil soil-biodiversity heatwave

en: All soil data

en: Soil physicochemical characteristics

en:
Soil chemical and biological properties of soils affected by 10 different perturbations related with global change, applied individually or in combination. Greenhouse experiment. Perturbations applied to intact soil cores (15 cm diameter, 15 cm deep) collected in an extensively managed grassland on the WSL grounds in June 2023.
This dataset contains all data on which the publication below was based:
"Fioratti Junod M, Gombeer S, Holmes J, Zimmerman S, Rillig M, Risch AC and Cordero I. Soil functionality declines under multiple superimposed global change perturbations. XXXX "
Please, cite this publication together with the citation of the datafile.
Database includes:
Pot_ID: pot or soil core identifier.
Batch: numeric, 1 or 2.
Enzyme_plate: numeric, from 1 to 6.
Number_of_perturbations: numeric, from 0 to 10.
N_addition: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
P_addition: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Defoliation: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Trampling: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Insecticide: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Fungicide: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Herbicide: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Antibiotic: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Drought: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Heat_wave: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Treatment: character. Description of the treatment, 15 levels.
SWC: soil water content. Numeric, unitless.
Green_biomass: green plant biomass. Numeric, g.
Brown_biomass: brown or dead plant biomass. Numeric, g.
Biomass_cut: plant biomass cut during defoliation treatments. Numeric, g.
CO2_flux_light: net CO2 flux under ambient light. Numeric, mg CO2 m-2 h-1.
CO2_flux_dark: ecosystem respiration. Numeric, mg CO2 m-2 h-1.
S: organic matter stabilisation factor (tea bag index). Numeric, unitless.
k: organic matter decomposition rate (tea bag index). Numeric, unitless.
DOC: dissolved organic carbon, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
IC: inorganic carbon, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
Ammonium_KCl: plant available ammonium, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
Nitrate_KCl: plant available nitrate, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
Phosphate: phosphate, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
MBC: microbial biomass carbon, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
MBN: microbial biomass nitrogen, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
PHO: phosphatase activity, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
BG: β-glucosidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
XYL: xylosidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
CBH: cellobiohydrolase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
NAG: N-acetylglucosaminidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
LAP: leucine aminopeptidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
POX: phenoloxidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
PER: peroxidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
pH: soil pH, unitless
Water_stable_aggregates: water stable aggregates, %
Surface_infiltration_time: water surface infiltration time, s.

drought

display_name: drought

heatwave

display_name: heatwave

land-use

display_name: land-use

pesticide

display_name: pesticide

soil

display_name: soil

soil-biodiversity

display_name: soil-biodiversity

soil-nutrients

display_name: soil-nutrients

en: Escalating effects of multiple perturbations on soil functionality


maintainer: M. Carol Resch

en: grassland vegetation diversity long-term-experiment nematodes topsoil-removal restoration

en: Nemadotes and vegetation

en:
Plot: Plot ID combining treatment code and plot number (in total 55 plots)

Treatment: Three restoration treatments and two reference treatments. Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Harvest only= multiple hay harvest (2-3 times) per years; Topsoil= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm); Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Target= species-rich ancient grasslands

X: X-Coordinate

Y: Y-Coordinate

Ri.veg: Total number of plant species

Div.veg: Shannon diversity of plant species

Ri.nem: Total number of nematode families

Div.nem: Shannon diversity of nematode families

abund: Total nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil)

MI: Maturity index according to Bongers 1990; calculations done in online tool NINJA (Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014)

PPI: Plant parasite index according to Bongers 1990; calculations done in online tool NINJA (Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014)

PPI.MI: Plant parasite to Maturity index according to Bongers, van der Meulen, & Korthals 1997; calculations done in online tool NINJA (Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014)

CI: Channel index according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001 (%); calculations done in online tool NINJA (Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014)

EI: Enrichment index according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001 (%); calculations done in online tool NINJA (Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014)

SI: Structure index according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001 (%); calculations done in online tool NINJA (Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014)

He.a: Herbivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

He.ecto.a: Herbivorous ectoparasite nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

He.endo.a: Herbivorous endoparasite nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Ba.a: Bacterivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Fu.a: Fungivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Om.a: Omnivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Ca.a: Carnivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Om.Ca.a	Sum of omnivorous and carnivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014
CP1.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 1 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990; equivalent to enrichment indicators according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001

CP2.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 2 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990; equivalent to stress indicators according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001

CP3.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 3 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990

CP4.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 4 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990

CP5.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 5 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990

CP3-5.a: Sum of C-P3, C-P4 and C-P5 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil) equivalent to structure indicators according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001

protect.sp.pro: plant species categorized into species of concern based on their red list status in Switzerland as well as their protection status in Switzerland and the Canton Zurich (Moser, Gygax, Bäumler, Wyler, & Palese, 2002)

tar.sp: Number of target species (all species recorded in the eleven target plots plus propagules of species applied by hand, resulting in a total of 143 species)

Indi.moist: Plant indicator values for soil moisture according to Landolt et al. 2010

Indi.nutri: Plant indicator values for soil nutrients according to Landolt et al. 2010

Management: level of mowing and manuring frequency (35-40 kg N ha-1 application-1); intensity1 = mowing once and no manure; intensity2 = 2-3 times mowing and no manure; intensity3 = 2-3 times mowing and manuring; intensity4 = 4-5 times mowing and manuring

Tillage: last time of tillage

Land.use.history: for Initial plots = recent agricultural use; for all restored sites = agricultural use before restoration
Mowing	earliest date of biomass harvesting (excluding “Initial”) based on contracts between farmers and the Nature Protection Agency of Zurich

Soil.type: based on soil mapping survey 1991 (before restoration)

Soil.texture: determined by the sediment method (Gee & Bauder 1986) and classified into soil textural classes according to FAO (1990)

pH: soil pH (CaCl2)

Slope: slope gradient classes according to FAO (1990; %)

en: Nematode colonizer-persister classes

en:
Plot: Plot ID combining treatment code and plot number (in total 55 plots)

Treatment: Three restoration treatments and two reference treatments. Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Harvest only= multiple hay harvest (2-3 times) per years; Topsoil= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm); Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Target= species-rich ancient grasslands

CP1.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 1 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990; equivalent to enrichment indicators according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001
CP2.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 2 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990; equivalent to stress indicators according to Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede 2001
CP3.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 3 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990
CP4.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 4 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990
CP5.a: C-P (colonizer-persister) class 5 nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); C-P classification according to Bongers 1990

en: Nematode feeding types

en:
Plot: Plot ID combining treatment code and plot number (in total 55 plots)

Treatment: Three restoration treatments and two reference treatments. Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Harvest only= multiple hay harvest (2-3 times) per years; Topsoil= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm); Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Target= species-rich ancient grasslands

He.ecto.a: Herbivorous ectoparasite nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

He.endo.a: Herbivorous endoparasite nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Ba.a: Bacterivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Fu.a: Fungivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Om.a: Omnivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

Ca.a: Carnivorous nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil); classification according to Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014

en: Plant community composition (plant species)

en:
Plot: Plot ID combining treatment code and plot number (in total 55 plots)

Treatment: Three restoration treatments and two reference treatments. Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Harvest only= multiple hay harvest (2-3 times) per years; Topsoil= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm); Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Target= species-rich ancient grasslands

column 3-252: Plant abundance per species (in total 252 plant species) expressed as cover percentage estimation according to van der Maarel (vdM 1979; 7 classes: 1-7); nomenclature according to Lauber & Wagner (1996)

en: Nematode families

en:
Plot: Plot ID combining treatment code and plot number (in total 55 plots)

Treatment: Three restoration treatments and two reference treatments. Initial=intensively managed grasslands; Harvest only= multiple hay harvest (2-3 times) per years; Topsoil= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm); Topsoil+Propagules= Topsoil removal (upper 10-30 cm) combined with introduction of target plant species; Target= species-rich ancient grasslands

column 3-41: Nematode abundance (individuals per 100g dry soil) per family; nomenclature according to Bongers 1988

en: Coordinates of one research plot were wrong. This was corrected in the current version of the file.

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Resch, M.C., Schütz, M., Graf, U., Wagenaar, R., van der Putten, W.H., Risch, A.C. 2019. Does topsoil removal in grassland restoration benefit both soil nematode and plant communities? Journal of Applied Ecology 56: 1782-1793.

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

 Methods
 Study area and experimental settings
The study was conducted in a nature reserve (Eigental: 47° 27’ to 47° 29’ N, 8° 37’ E, 461 to 507 m a.s.l.) that is located on the Swiss Central plateau close to Zurich airport (Canton Zurich, Switzerland). The mean annual temperature in this area ranges from 8.9 to 10.6 °C, mean annual precipitation from 910 to 1260 mm [10-year average (2007-2017); MeteoSchweiz, 2018]. The main soil types are calcaric to gleyic Cambisol and Gleysols. The reserve was established in 1967 to protect small remnants of oligotrophic semi-natural grasslands (roughly 12 ha). The plant community can be characterized as Molinion and Mesobromion (semi-wet to semi-dry), depending on the site-specific groundwater level and slope inclination (Delarze, Gonseth, Eggenberg, & Vust, 2015). These remnants represent species-rich islands in an otherwise intensively managed agricultural landscape. Semi-natural grasslands covered an area of 60,000 ha in the Canton Zurich in 1939, however, by 2005 only roughly 600 ha remained (Baudirektion Kanton Zürich, 2007). In 1990, the government of Canton Zurich decided to enlarge the nature reserve Eigental. The goal was to incorporate eleven patches of 20 ha adjacent intensively farmed land and transform these patches into semi-natural grasslands. The patches had a different agricultural history, ranging from permanent (no tillage for >50 years) to temporary grassland (as part of crop rotation; last tillage <5 years). On all freshly integrated patches fertilization was stopped in 1992 and from then on biomass was harvested three times a year and removed. After 5 years without noticeable effects on vegetation composition, the Nature Conservation Agency of Canton Zurich decided to increase the restoration efforts. In 1995, a large-scale experiment was initialized to evaluate if certain treatments can facilitate restoration within a reasonable timeframe of 5 to 10 years after treatment implementation.
The three restoration treatments used were:
i. “Harvest only”: Plots are being mowed two to three times a year and the biomass is removed.
ii. “Topsoil”: Topsoil was removed to a depth of 10 to 20 cm, depending on the depth of the O and A horizon, in four randomly selected areas within each of the eleven patches in late autumn 1995. The size of each topsoil removal area depended on individual patch size and was between 2700 and 7000 m2.
iii. “Topsoil+Propagules”: Propagules from target vegetation were added on half of the area where topsoil was removed, using fresh, seed-containing hay originating from a mixture of semi-dry to semi-wet species-rich grasslands of local provenance (within a radius of 7 km). Hay applications were conducted twice in 1995 and 1996. Repeated applications were chosen to account for the low quantity of available plant material per transfer, since area ratio between receptor and donor sites was roughly 1:1. In addition, hand-collected propagules from 15 selected target species of regional provenance (within a radius of 30 km) were equally applied in 1996 and 1997.
“Topsoil” and “Topsoil+Propagules” plots are mowed once a year, and the biomass is removed. Mowing on these plots started five years after the treatment was implemented.
Eleven permanent plots of 5 m x 5 m were randomly established in each treatment to monitor the vegetation development. The experiment was complemented with 11 control plots that represent the initial state of intensively managed grasslands, further referred to as “Initial”, and 11 control plots that represent the targeted state of donor sites for “Topsoil+Propagules”, further referred to as “Target”. Consequently, the experiment consists of 55 plots (5 treatments x 11 replicates). Management of intensively used grasslands includes mowing and fertilizing (manure) between two to five times a year, as well as different tillage regimes (no tillage for >50 years; last time of tillage <5 years).

 Nematode and plant sampling
Soil nematodes were sampled in 2 m x 2 m plots, randomly established at least 2 m away from the vegetation plots. We collected eight soil cores with a 2.2 cm diameter soil core sampler (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) to a depth of 12 cm (representing the majority of the plant rooting system) in each plot at the beginning of July 2017. The eight cores within each replicate plot were combined, gently homogenized, placed in coolers and transported to the laboratory of NIOO in Wageningen, the Netherlands, within one week. Free-living nematodes were extracted from 200 g of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriator (Oostenbrink, 1960) and concentrated, resulting in 6 mL nematode solution. The nematode solution was subdivided into three subsamples, two for morphological identification and quantification, and one for molecular work (not used in this study). For morphological identification and quantification, nematodes were heat-killed at 90 °C and fixed in 4 % formaldehyde solution (final volume 10 mL per subsample). All nematodes in 1 mL of formaldehyde solution were counted, and a minimum of 150 individuals per 1 mL sample (or all if less nematodes were present) were identified to family level using Bongers (1988). We then extrapolated the numbers of each nematode taxa identified to the entire sample and expressed them per 100 g dry soil for further analyses.
We calculated number of nematode taxa and Shannon diversity and assessed nematode community composition. In addition, we classified the nematode taxa into feeding types (herbivores, bacterivores, fungivores, omni-carnivores), structural and functional guilds (Table S4). Structural guilds assign nematode taxa according to life-history traits into five colonizer-persister (C-P) classes, ranging from one (early colonizers of new resources) to five (persisters in undisturbed habitats; Bongers 1990). C-P classes can be categorized as indicators for nutrient-enriched (C-P1), stressed (C-P2) and structured (C-P3 + C-P4 + C-P5) soil conditions (Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede, 2001). Functional guilds assign nematode taxa according to their C-P classification combined with their feeding habits (Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede, 2001). Based on the structural and functional guild classification we calculated five additional indices to assess soil nutrient status, disturbance and food web characteristics using NINJA (Sieriebriennikov, Ferris, & de Goede, 2014). 1) The Maturity index indicates the degree of different environmental perturbations (e.g., tillage, nutrient enrichment, pollution) and is used to monitor colonization and subsequent succession after disturbances (Bongers, 1990). 2) The ratio between the Plant Parasite (C-P of herbivorous nematodes only) to Maturity index is used to monitor the recovery of disturbed habitats incorporating information of life-history traits for all feeding types (Bongers, van der Meulen, & Korthals, 1997). 3) The Enrichment index indicates nutrient-enriched soils and agricultural management practices (Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede, 2001). 4) The Structure index provides information about the succession stage of the soil food web and therefore correlates with the degree of maturity of an ecosystem (Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede, 2001). 5) The Channel index provides information about the predominant decomposition pathways, where higher values stand for a higher proportion of energy transformed through the slow fungal decomposition channel (Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede, 2001). In addition, the Structure and Enrichment indices can be displayed in a biplot where nematode assemblages are plotted along a structure (x-axis) and enrichment (y-axis) trajectory (increasing index values). Each biplot quadrat reflects different levels of disturbance, soil nutrient pools and decomposition pathways (Ferris, Bongers, & de Goede, 2001).
The plant surveys were conducted on the 25 m2 permanent plots in June 2017. Plant species cover was visually assessed according to the semi-quantitative cover-abundance scale of Braun-Blanquet (1964; nomenclature: Lauber & Wagner, 1996). We calculated number of species and Shannon diversity, and assessed plant community composition. We also counted the number of target species (all species recorded in the eleven target plots plus propagules of species applied by hand, resulting in a total of 143 species) and categorized plant species into species of concern based on their red list status in Switzerland as well as their protection status in Switzerland and the Canton Zurich (Moser, Gygax, Bäumler, Wyler, & Palese, 2002). Furthermore, we calculated indicator values for soil moisture and soil nutrients for each species according to Landolt et al. (2010).

 References
Baudirektion Kanton Zürich (2007). 10 Jahre Naturschutz-Gesamtkonzept für den Kanton Zürich 1995-2005 – Stand der Umsetzung. Zürich: Baudirektion Kanton Zürich.
Bongers, T. (1988). De nematoden van Nederland. Utrecht: Stichting Uitgeverij Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging.
Bongers, T. (1990). The maturity index: an ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia, 83, 14-19. doi:10.1007/BF00324627
Bongers, T., van der Meulen, H., & Korthals, G. (1997). Inverse relationship between the nematode maturity index and plant parasite index under enriched nutrient conditions. Applied Soil Ecology, 6, 195-199. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(96)00136-9
Braun-Blanquet, J. (1964). Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde (3rd ed.). Wien: Springer.
Delarze, R., Gonseth, Y., Eggenberg, S., & Vust, M. (2015). Lebensräume der Schweiz: Ökologie - Gefährdung - Kennarten (3rd ed.). Bern: Ott.
Ferris, H., Bongers, T., & de Goede, R.G.M. (2001). A framework for soil food web diagnostics: extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Applied Soil Ecology, 18, 13-29. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00152-4
Landolt, E., Bäumler, B., Erhardt, A., Hegg, O., Klötzli, F., Lämmler, W., … Wohlgemuth, T. (2010). Flora indicativa. Ecological indicator values and biological attributes of the Flora of Switzerland and the Alps (2nd ed.). Bern: Haupt.
Lauber, K., & Wagner, G. (1996). Flora Helvetica. Flora der Schweiz. Bern: Haupt.
MeteoSchweiz (2018). Klimabulletin Jahr 2017, Zürich: MeteoSchweiz.
Moser, D., Gygax, A., Bäumler, B., Wyler, N., & Palese, R. (2002) Rote Liste der gefährteten Farn- und Blütenpflanzen der Schweiz. Bern: BUWAL.
Oostenbrink, M. (1960). Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In N.J. Sasser & W.R. Jenkins (Eds.), Nematology (pp. 85-101). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Sieriebriennikov, B., Ferris, H., & de Goede, R.G.M (2014). NINJA: An automated calculation system for nematode-based biological monitoring. European Journal of Soil Biology, 61, 90-93. doi:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.02.004

diversity

display_name: diversity

grassland

display_name: grassland

long-term-experiment

display_name: long-term-experiment

nematodes

display_name: nematodes

restoration

display_name: restoration

topsoil-removal

display_name: topsoil-removal

vegetation

display_name: vegetation

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: Grassland restoration: nematodes and plant communities