maintainer: Irene Cordero

en: land-use soil-nutrients soil soil-biodiversity drought heatwave pesticide

en: All soil data

en: Soil physicochemical characteristics

en:
Soil chemical and biological properties of soils affected by 10 different perturbations related with global change, applied individually or in combination. Greenhouse experiment. Perturbations applied to intact soil cores (15 cm diameter, 15 cm deep) collected in an extensively managed grassland on the WSL grounds in June 2023.
This dataset contains all data on which the publication below was based:
"Fioratti Junod M, Gombeer S, Holmes J, Zimmerman S, Rillig M, Risch AC and Cordero I. Soil functionality declines under multiple superimposed global change perturbations. XXXX "
Please, cite this publication together with the citation of the datafile.
Database includes:
Pot_ID: pot or soil core identifier.
Batch: numeric, 1 or 2.
Enzyme_plate: numeric, from 1 to 6.
Number_of_perturbations: numeric, from 0 to 10.
N_addition: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
P_addition: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Defoliation: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Trampling: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Insecticide: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Fungicide: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Herbicide: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Antibiotic: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Drought: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Heat_wave: binary. Yes = 1, No = 0.
Treatment: character. Description of the treatment, 15 levels.
SWC: soil water content. Numeric, unitless.
Green_biomass: green plant biomass. Numeric, g.
Brown_biomass: brown or dead plant biomass. Numeric, g.
Biomass_cut: plant biomass cut during defoliation treatments. Numeric, g.
CO2_flux_light: net CO2 flux under ambient light. Numeric, mg CO2 m-2 h-1.
CO2_flux_dark: ecosystem respiration. Numeric, mg CO2 m-2 h-1.
S: organic matter stabilisation factor (tea bag index). Numeric, unitless.
k: organic matter decomposition rate (tea bag index). Numeric, unitless.
DOC: dissolved organic carbon, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
IC: inorganic carbon, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
Ammonium_KCl: plant available ammonium, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
Nitrate_KCl: plant available nitrate, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
Phosphate: phosphate, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
MBC: microbial biomass carbon, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
MBN: microbial biomass nitrogen, mg Kg-1 dry soil.
PHO: phosphatase activity, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
BG: β-glucosidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
XYL: xylosidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
CBH: cellobiohydrolase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
NAG: N-acetylglucosaminidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
LAP: leucine aminopeptidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
POX: phenoloxidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
PER: peroxidase, nmol h-1 g-1 dry soil.
pH: soil pH, unitless
Water_stable_aggregates: water stable aggregates, %
Surface_infiltration_time: water surface infiltration time, s.

drought

display_name: drought

heatwave

display_name: heatwave

land-use

display_name: land-use

pesticide

display_name: pesticide

soil

display_name: soil

soil-biodiversity

display_name: soil-biodiversity

soil-nutrients

display_name: soil-nutrients

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Escalating effects of multiple perturbations on soil functionality


en: snow-avalanche snow snow-microstructure snow-mechanics lab-experiment

state: active

type: dataset

format: SERVICE

media_type: text/csv

en: Dataset containing both the experimental results and microstructural parameters.

format: CSV

en:
This repository hosts the experimental data accompanying our publication "The influence of snow microstructure on the compressive mechanical properties of weak snowpack layers" feautured in Acta Materialia.
- Experimental Data and microstructural descriptors:
Full dataset used for the main analysis of the paper. Contains the measured mechanical properties, µCT parameters, further analysis, etc. The column "ID" (e.g. 363) links this data with the 3D µCT dataset (e.g. e0000363).
- 3D Data of the segmented µCT scans:
Full dataset containing the raw segmented µCT scans in the MetaIO format. They can be opened using the SimpleITK package (`pip install SimpleITK`).
Note: the Files can be idenfied by their scan number in the filename, (e.g, e0000363)
 `import SimpleITK as sitk `
 `img = sitk.ReadImage("e0000363_crop_seg.mhd") `
 `array = sitk.GetArrayFromImage(img) ` shape: [z, y, x]
`array_xyz = np.transpose(array, (2, 1, 0))` (Optional) for array axes in [x, y, z]
 `spacing = img.GetSpacing() `         voxel size (x,y,z)

lab-experiment

display_name: lab-experiment

snow

display_name: snow

snow-avalanche

display_name: snow-avalanche

snow-mechanics

display_name: snow-mechanics

snow-microstructure

display_name: snow-microstructure

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

envidat

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester


maintainer: Mahdi Jafari

en: numerical-simulation openfoam snow-density-profile vapor-transport convection-in-snow

en: snowpackBuoyantPimpleFoam

media_type: application/zip

en:
This zipped folder includes (1) the source code files, (2) an example case for simulation, and (3) an instruction how to compile and use the new solver.

Note that the most updated version of snowpackBuoyantPimpleFoam can be found in the WSL/SLF GitLab repository: https://gitlabext.wsl.ch/snow-models/snowpackbuoyantpimplefoam

format: ZIP

en: snowpackBuoyantPimpleFoam is a two-phase solver implemented to model convection of water vapor with phase change in snowpacks. This new solver is based on the standard solver of buoyantPimpleFoam in the open-source fluid dynamics software, OpenFOAM 5.0 (www.openfoam.org).

convection-in-snow

display_name: convection-in-snow

numerical-simulation

display_name: numerical-simulation

openfoam

display_name: openfoam

snow-density-profile

display_name: snow-density-profile

vapor-transport

display_name: vapor-transport

en: snowpackBuoyantPimpleFoam: an OpenFOAM Eulerian–Eulerian two-phase solver for modelling convection of water vapor in snowpacks


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: cces tramm landslide-testsite landslides pore-water pressure-perturbations

en: TRAMM Ruedlingen data

en: TRAMM project data from the Ruedlingen site (exp 1 + 2). Measured parameters include soil suction, water level, soil volumetric water content, rain intensity, and soil temperature.

mimetype: application/zip

en:
A landslide testsite dataset related to pore water pressure perturbations on the stability of unsaturated silty sand slopes leading to the initiation and propagation of the shear deformations and eventual rapid mass movements. This project was initiated and led by the Institute of Geotechnical Engineering (IGT) of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich) and was incorporated in a Swiss national (TRAMM) and a European Union (SafeLand) multidisciplinary research project. Field site: The experimental slope is 7.5 m wide by 35 m long, located in the Swiss lowlands on an east facing slope over-looking the river Rhine, at an altitude of ~ 350 masl. Originally there were forestry covertures of circa 80%, heights of 5-20 m. Shrubs up to 1-5 m high and a free herb layer covered ~ 50% of the surface. The average gradient was determined to be from 38° to 43° with a slightly concave surface. The underlying rock consists mainly of Molasse, which is formed by alternate layers of sea deposits under the Tethys Sea (Seawater Molasse) and land deposits (Freshwater Molasse). Several augured samples, as well as an outcrop of the bedrock about 20 m above the selected field, revealed horizontal layering of fine grained sand- and marlstone at the test site. The sandstone was later proven to be highly permeable and fissured. Grain-size distributions were determined and the soil was classified as medium-low plasticity silty sand. Site instrumentation:Measurements of soil suction, groundwater level, soil volumetric water content, rain intensity and soil temperature were taken and combined with geophysical monitoring using Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) and investigations into subsurface flow by means of tracer experiments. Deformations were monitored during the experiment, both on the surface via photogrammetrical methods and within the soil mass, using a flexible probe equipped with strain gauges at different points and two axis inclinometers on the top and acoustic sensors. Instruments were installed mainly in three clusters at depths of 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 cm below the ground surface over the slope, including jet-fill tensiometers, TDRs, Decagon TDRs, piezometers, soil temperature sensors, deformation probes, earth pressure cells, acoustic sensors and rain gauges. A ring-net barrier (provided by Geobrugg AG) was set up at the foot of the slope to protect the road. Experiments: A sprinkling experiment was carried out in September 2008 to investigate the hydrological and mechanical response of the slope (Experiment 1), followed by a second one to trigger a landslide in March 2009 (Experiment 2).

Publications

1. Lehmann, P., F. Gambazzi, B. Suski, L. Baron, A. Askarinejad, S. M. Springman, K. Holliger, and D. Or (2013), Evolution of soil wetting patterns preceding a hydrologically induced landslide inferred from electrical resistivity survey and point measurements of volumetric water content and pore water pressure, Water Resour. Res., 49, 7992–8004, doi:[10.1002/2013WR014560](http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014560).

2. Springman, S. M., Kienzler, P., Casini, F., & Askarinejad, A. (2009). Landslide triggering experiment in a steep forested slope in Switzerland. In 17th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt (pp. 1698-1701). doi: [10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-1698](http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-031-5-1698)

cces

display_name: cces

landslide-testsite

display_name: landslide-testsite

landslides

display_name: landslides

pore-water

display_name: pore-water

pressure-perturbations

display_name: pressure-perturbations

tramm

display_name: tramm

en: TRAMM project Ruedlingen experimental landslide dataset, Switzerland


maintainer: Anita Risch

en: ecosystem-coupling subalpine ecosystem-multifunctionality vertebrates grazing ecosystem-functions swiss-national-park invertebrates exclusion grassland

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

format: XLS

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


maintainer: Jonas Stillhard

en: swiss-plateau forest-reserves forest-in temperate-forests beech

en: Results lying deadwood

en: The file results_lying_deadwood.csv contains results of the lying deadwood survey.

en: Results trees

en:
The file results_trees.csv contains results of living, standing and lying and dead standing
trees as well as for stumps (trees found on the plot but broken / cut below 1.3 m).

en: Results regeneration

en: The file results_regeneration.csv contains results of the regeneration survey.

en: Lookup

en: The file lookup.csv contains description for the values shown in the 5 result tables.

en: Results habitat trees

en: The file results_habitat_trees.csv contains results for the number of habitat trees.

en: Results TreMs

en: The file results_trems.csv contains results for the density of TreMs per ha.

en: Data description

media_type: application/pdf

en: This document briefly describes the datasets.

format: PDF

en:
The Jorat is one of the largest continously forested areas in the Swiss Plateau. On a forested area of 778 ha, the Parc Naturel du Jorat (PNJ), a periurban parc, has been established in 2022. To document the initial state of the forest within the perimeter of the PNJ, a sample plot inventory (SPI) was carried out on 132 sample plots (SP) in winter 2021/22.
This dataset contains results from this sample plot inventory. It consists of the following files:
- results_trees.csv: Results for or living and dead trees.
- results_regeneration.csv: Results for trees with DBH < 7.0 cm, assessed in three height classes.
- results_lying_deadwood.csv: Results for lying deadwood, assessed no three line transects
- results_trems.csv: Results for occurence of tree related microhabitats (TreMs)
- results_habitat_trees.csv: Results for occurence / densities of trees carrying at least one TreM or with a DBH >= 80 for living trees or >= 36 cm for dead trees respectively.
- lookup.csv: Contains lookup tables which describe the respective results in-depth.
- data_description.pdf: Briefly describes the datasets mentioned above.

beech

display_name: beech

forest-in

display_name: forest-in

forest-reserves

display_name: forest-reserves

swiss-plateau

display_name: swiss-plateau

temperate-forests

display_name: temperate-forests

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Sample plot inventory data form the Parc Naturel du Jorat


en: century climate-layers minimum-temperature free-climate-data climate air-temperature timeseries maximum-temperature precipitation

en: CHELSA Technical Documentation

en: As the CHELSA project is continuously expanded, certain new parameters, time scales etc. are not included anymore in the original publication (Karger et al. 2017). We are therefore provide this document as a guideline of the current climatic parameters available and will expand it as new parameters or time periods will become available. Please refer to the version history for changes made in the document.

mimetype: application/pdf

en: Data Access

format: GeoTIFF

en:
CHELSAcruts is a delta change monthly climate dataset for the years 1901-2016 for mean monthly maximum temperatures, mean monthly minimum temperatures, and monthly precipitation sum. Here we use the delta change method by B-spline interpolation of anomalies (deltas) of the CRU TS 4.01 dataset. Anomalies were interpolated between all CRU TS grid cells and are then added (for temperature variables) or multiplied (in case of precipitation) to high resolution climate data from CHELSA V1.2 (Karger et al. 2017, Scientific Data). This method has the assumption that climate only varies on the scale of the coarser (CRU TS) dataset, and the spatial pattern (from CHELSA) is consistent over time. This is certainly a rather crude assumption, and for time periods for which more accurate data is available CHELSAcruts should be avoided if possible (e.g. use CHELSA V1.2 for 1979-2015). Different to CHELSA V1.2, CHELSAcruts does not take changing wind patterns, or temperature lapse rates into account, but rather expects them to be constant over time, and similar to the long term averages.

CHELSAcruts is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license.

air-temperature

display_name: air-temperature

century

display_name: century

climate

display_name: climate

climate-layers

display_name: climate-layers

free-climate-data

display_name: free-climate-data

maximum-temperature

display_name: maximum-temperature

minimum-temperature

display_name: minimum-temperature

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

timeseries

display_name: timeseries

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: CHELSAcruts -  High resolution temperature and precipitation timeseries for the 20th century and beyond


en: discrete-choice renewable-energy survey energy-transition landscape-perception

en: Energyscape2 Covariates

en: This data includes the recoded covariates used in the publication (Cov_1, Cov_2, Cov_3). They can be merged with the column "sys_RespNum" to the basis dataset of the Energyscape 2 survey.

en: Energyscape2 basis data with original Respondent ID

en: This is solely the Energyscape 2 basis data including the original respondents ID "sys_RespNum" to be merged with the covariated data set.

en: Energyscape1 & Energyscape2 basis data

en: This is the already cleaned and ready to use basis dataset for the comparison of stated choice preferences across the 2018 (Energyscape 1, n=844) and the 2022 (Energyscape 2, n=1006) surveys. The first four numbers in the first column "sys_RespNum" of the dataset refer to the year of the surveys, followed by the original Respondent ID. The date can be uploaded as is to analysis software (like Sawtooth) and can be filtered by survey with the help of the very last column "surveytime".

en: This repository presents the basis data of both the Energyscape 1 (2018) and the Energyscape 2 (2022) survey about renewable energy infrastructure related landscape preferences in Switzerland. Both datasets are based on Swiss-national representatative online panel surveys (BILENDI). Information about the choice design and landscape visualizations can be derived from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340921003097#fig0001

discrete-choice

display_name: discrete-choice

energy-transition

display_name: energy-transition

landscape-perception

display_name: landscape-perception

renewable-energy

display_name: renewable-energy

survey

display_name: survey

en: Energyscape 2 - Comparing stated preferences of renewable energy landscapes in Switzerland in 2018 and 2022


en: radiation-transfer statistical-interpolation climate-change biodiversity ecology forest microclimate

en: Predicted microclimate air temperatures at 5 cm above ground. 10 m spatial resolution raster files are provided for mean daily minimum (tmin), mean (tmean) and maximum (tmax) temperatures during each month from April (04) to October (10) over the period between 2012 to 2021.

en: Predicted microclimate topsoil temperatures at 5 cm below ground. 10 m spatial resolution raster files are provided for mean daily minimum (tmin), mean (tmean) and maximum (tmax) temperatures during each month from April (04) to October (10) over the period between 2012 to 2021.

en: Predicted microclimate air temperatures at 100 cm above ground. 10 m spatial resolution raster files are provided for mean daily minimum (tmin), mean (tmean) and maximum (tmax) temperatures during each month from April (04) to October (10) over the period between 2012 to 2021.

en: Climate data matching the scales at which organisms experience climatic conditions are often missing. Yet, such data on microclimatic conditions are required to better understand climate-change impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Here we combine a national network of microclimate temperature measurements with a novel radiative transfer model to map monthly minimum, mean and maximum temperatures during the vegetation period at a 10 meter spatial resolution across Switzerland. The temperature measurements took place in 107 sampling plots distributed across different habitat types, with 62 plots in forests, 22 below trees outside forests, and 23 in open grasslands. In each plot we measured temperature in the topsoil (-5cm), as well as in the air at 5cm and 100cm height above ground. Spatial interpolation was achieved by using a hybrid approach based on linear mixed effects models with input from detailed radiation estimates that account for topographic and vegetation shading, as well as other predictor variables related to the macroclimate, topography and vegetation height. Our data reveals strong horizontal and vertical variability in microclimate temperature, particularly for maximum temperatures at 5 cm above the ground and within the topsoil. Compared to macroclimate conditions as measured by weather stations outside forests, diurnal air and topsoil temperature ranges inside forests were reduced by up to 3.0 and 7.8 °C, respectively, while below trees outside forests, e.g. in hedges and below solitary trees, this buffering effect was 1.8 and 7.2 °C. We also found that in open grasslands, maximum temperatures at 5 cm above ground are on average 3.4 °C warmer than that of macroclimate, suggesting that in such habitats heat exposure close to the ground is often underestimated when using macroclimatic data. After accounting for macroclimate effects, microclimate patterns were primarily driven by radiation, with particularly strong effects on maximum temperatures. Results from spatial block cross-validation revealed predictive accuracies as measured by RSME’s ranging from 1.18 to 3.43 °C, with minimum temperatures generally being predicted more accurately than maximum temperatures. The microclimate maps presented here enable a more biologically relevant perspective when analysing climate-species interactions, which is expected to lead to a better understanding of biotic and ecosystem responses to climate and land use change.

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

ecology

display_name: ecology

forest

display_name: forest

microclimate

display_name: microclimate

radiation-transfer

display_name: radiation-transfer

statistical-interpolation

display_name: statistical-interpolation

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Monthly topsoil and near surface microclimate temperature data for Switzerland


en: cross-resistance invasive-species defense-chemistry emerald-ash-borer ash-dieback fraxinus intraspecific-variation

en: Raw data-Publication cross-resistance in ash-New Phytologist

en:
What are the research data files about: Raw data on perfomance (dry weight, development and mortality) of emerald ash borer larvae used in published bioassays. Raw data on ash dieback leasion lenghts. Raw data on untargeted and targeted specialized ash metabolites.
Which methods were used: Bioassays in greenhouses and climate chambers to collect data on emerald ash borer and ash dieback perfomance. Phytochemical analyses on ash phloem for quantifiying specialized metabolites
When and where was the data created / extracted: Summer 2020-2021

en:
 What are the research data files about: Raw data on perfomance (dry weight, development and mortality) of emerald ash borer larvae used in published bioassays. Raw data on ash dieback leasion lenghts. Raw data on untargeted and targeted specialized ash metabolites.

Which methods were used: Bioassays in greenhouses and climate chambers to collect data on emerald ash borer and ash dieback perfomance. Phytochemical analyses on ash phloem for quantifiying specialized metabolites.

When and where was the data created / extracted: Summer 2020-2021

ash-dieback

display_name: ash-dieback

cross-resistance

display_name: cross-resistance

defense-chemistry

display_name: defense-chemistry

emerald-ash-borer

display_name: emerald-ash-borer

fraxinus

display_name: fraxinus

intraspecific-variation

display_name: intraspecific-variation

invasive-species

display_name: invasive-species

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: Raw data-Publication cross-resistance in ash - New Phytologist


en: numerical-simulations field-data crack-speed weak-layer crack-propagation dry-snow-avalanche

media_type: text/plain

en: Video analyze data up-slope

format: TXT

en: Video analyze data cross slope

en: DAM data slope terrain

en: MPM data flat terrain

en: DEM data flat terrain

en: MPM data slope terrain

en: Field data PST <30deg

format: OCTET

en: Field data PST >30deg

en:
Compilation of normalized crack-propagation speeds (expressed as a fraction of the slab shear-wave speed).

The dataset contains crack-propagation speeds from DEM simulations (79 flat and 6 tilted; Bobillier et al., 2024), MPM simulations (48 flat and 191 tilted; Trottet et al., 2022), and field measurements: PSTs (222 data points, including 192 from low-angle terrain < 30°; van Herwijnen et al., 2016) and avalanche-video analyses (6 cross-slope and 5 down-slope speeds; Trottet et al., 2022).

The dataset also includes Python scripts that generate the relative-frequency distribution of the compiled, normalized crack-propagation speeds.

Bobillier, G., Bergfeld, B., Dual, J., Gaume, J., van Herwijnen, A., 55 and Schweizer, J.: Numerical investigation of crack propagation regimes in snow fracture experiments, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-024-01423-5 2024

Trottet, B., Simenhois, R., Bobillier, G., Bergfeld, B., van Herwijnen, A., Jiang, C. F. F., and Gaume, J.: Transi- 55 tion from sub-Rayleigh anticrack to supershear crack propagation in snow avalanches, Nat. Phys., 18, 1094–1098, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01662-4, 2022.

van Herwijnen, A., Gaume, J., Bair, E. H., Reuter, B., Birkeland, K. W., and Schweizer, J.: Estimating the effective elastic modulus and specific fracture energy of snowpack layers from field experiments, J. Glaciol., 62, 997–1007, https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2016.90, 2016a.

crack-propagation

display_name: crack-propagation

crack-speed

display_name: crack-speed

dry-snow-avalanche

display_name: dry-snow-avalanche

field-data

display_name: field-data

numerical-simulations

display_name: numerical-simulations

weak-layer

display_name: weak-layer

en: Compilation of normalized  crack propagation speeds


carabid-beetles-in-forests

maintainer: Martin K. Obrist

title_for_slug: carabid-beetles-in-forests

en: arthropoda insects coleoptera carabidae running-beetles forest trapping

en: Data query used on Fauna Database to retrieve the submitted data.

en: Data extract in TAB-delimted format. First row is header, first column is counter.

en: SQL query used to extract the data from fauna database.

en: Tab-delimited data of the according sql query.

en:
Carabidae data from all historic up to the recent projects (21.10.2019) of WSL, collected with various methods in forests of different types.

Version 2 ('FIDO_global_extract 2019-11-22_18-11-24 WSL-Forest-Carabidae') contains additional data field PROJ_FALLENBEZEICHNUNG.

Data are provided on request to contact person against bilateral agreement.

arthropoda

display_name: arthropoda

carabidae

display_name: carabidae

coleoptera

display_name: coleoptera

forest

display_name: forest

insects

display_name: insects

running-beetles

display_name: running-beetles

trapping

display_name: trapping

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Carabid beetles in forests


en: typoch diagnostic-species vegetation-classification phytosociology vegetation-type character-species

en: TypoCH_modified list.csv

en:
The file contains the vegetation types and the modified list of diagnostic species (based on Delarze et al. (2015). The numbers indicate the weight of a species in the particular vegetation type for the calculation of the TypoCH score:
1) accompanying species -> 1 point
2) dominant accompanying species (if >10% cover in the plot) -> 2 points
3) character species -> 4 points
4) dominant character species (if >10% cover in the plot) -> 8 points

en: How the TypoCH list was modified.pdf

en: Describes details on the modification procedure to improve the TypoCH reference list.

en: The TypoCH scoring system (Eggenberg & Bornand 2023), which is widely used in Switzerland, provides good results as classification method for vegetation types based on Delarze et al. (2015). However, the reference list contained species with no diagnostic value and important character species were missing. We therefore made a first attempt to modify the list based on numerical methods and expert knowledge to improve the classification success, at least for vegetation types of the open land (i.e. grasslands, fens, bogs).

character-species

display_name: character-species

diagnostic-species

display_name: diagnostic-species

phytosociology

display_name: phytosociology

typoch

display_name: typoch

vegetation-classification

display_name: vegetation-classification

vegetation-type

display_name: vegetation-type

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: Modified TypoCH reference list of diagnostic species for the classification of vegetation types in Switzerland


historical-vegetation-height-model-nfi

maintainer: Mauro Marty

title_for_slug: historical-vegetation-height-model-nfi

en: nfi historical forest vhm photogrammetry dsm

en: 1985-1991 Vegetation Height Model

en: 1990-1998 Vegetation Height Model

en: 1979-1985 Vegetation Height Model

en: 1998-2006 Vegetation Height Model

en: Description of available data

en:
The main datasets available are 4 nationwide **Digital Surface Models (DSMs)** and corresponding **Vegetation Height Models (VHMs)** with a spatial resolution of 1 m.
The Vegetation Height Models are calculated by subtraction of a Digital Terrain Model (swissAlti3d version 2017, swisstopo) from the generated DSMs. DSMs were derived by image matching of **scanned historical images** (panchromatic 8-bit) acquired with a RC10 frame camera, in the context of the swisswide image acquisition campaigns of swisstopo.
Nationwide products could be generated for the **four epochs**
 1979-1985 / 1985-1991 / 1990-1998 / 1998-2006.
Additional information about successful image matching vs. interpolation of pixels and about the year of image acquisition are available in the corresponding files (**matched_area_xxxx_xxxx_binay.tif** and **meta_acquisition_year_xxxx_xxxx.json**, respectively).
To separate vegetation from non-vegetation areas a mask derived from a combination of information of the Topographic landscape model - TLM (swisstopo) and a NDVI layer was used and is supplied as **"TLM_mask.tif"**
Due to the occurrence of unrealistic vegetation height values caused by the failure of the image matching process (mainly overexposed images and clouds or very steep rocky terrain), pixel values > 60 m were set to NoData and < 0 m to 0.
All datasets are available in the Reference System **LV95 (EPSG: 2056) LN02 (EPSG: 5728)** and share the common **extent definition** (xmin ymin xmax ymax): 2480000 1070000 2840000 1300000

dsm

display_name: dsm

historical

display_name: historical

nfi

display_name: nfi

photogrammetry

display_name: photogrammetry

vhm

display_name: vhm

en: Historical Vegetation Height Model NFI


maintainer: Peter Bebi

en: soil-temperature carbon-dioxide experiment climate-change vegetation stillberg

en: Data FACE Stillberg

en: Folder in .zip format containing the FACE datasets.

en: Metadata FACE Stillberg Data File Description

en: List of descriptions for each of the .csv FACE data files.

en: Metadata FACE Stillberg Experimental Design

en: Schematic illustration and tabular listing of the FACE experimental design.

en:
 Background information

High elevation ecosystems are important in research about environmental change because shifts in climate associated with anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are predicted to be more pronounced in these areas compared to most other regions of the world. This project involved a Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) and soil warming experiment located in a natural treeline environment near Davos, Switzerland (Stillberg, 2200 m a.s.l.). Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations (+200 ppm) were applied from 2001 until 2009, and a soil warming treatment (+4 °C) was applied from 2007 until 2012. The combined CO2 enrichment and warming treatment reflects conditions expected to occur in this region in approximately 2050. A broad range of ecological and biogeochemical research was carried out as part of this environmental change project.

 Experimental design

The experiment consisted of 40 hexagonal 1.1 m² plots, 20 with a *Pinus mugo* ssp. *uncinata* (mountain pine, evergreen) individual in the centre and 20 with a *Larix decidua* (European larch, deciduous) individual in the centre. A dense cover of understorey vegetation surrounded the tree in each plot, including the dominant dwarf shrub species *Vaccinium myrtillus* (bilberry), *Vaccinium gaultherioides* (group *V. uliginosum agg.*, northern bilberry) and *Empetrum nigrum* ssp. *hermaphroditum* (crowberry) plus several herbaceous and non-vascular species.
At the beginning of the experimental period, the 40 plots were assigned to ten groups of four neighbouring plots (two larch and two pine trees per group) in order to facilitate the logistics of CO2 distribution and regulation. Half of these groups were randomly assigned to an elevated CO2 treatment, while the remaining groups served as controls and received no additional CO2. In spring 2007, one plot of each tree species identity was randomly selected from each of the 10 CO2 treatment groups and assigned a soil warming treatment, yielding a balanced design with a replication of five individual plots for each combination of CO2 level, warming treatment and tree species.

 Data description

Soil and air conditions have been monitored closely throughout the study period, with most measurements made during the combined CO2 x warming experiment (2007-2009). The data comprise of air temperature, soil temperature, soil moisture, sapflow, tree diameter and CO2 measurements.

carbon-dioxide

display_name: carbon-dioxide

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

experiment

display_name: experiment

soil-temperature

display_name: soil-temperature

stillberg

display_name: stillberg

vegetation

display_name: vegetation

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: FACE: Stillberg CO2 enrichment and soil warming study


en: arthropoda dna-metabarcoding birds urban-biodiversity trophic-networks

en: Bioinformatic report.

en: Raw data including fasta files, OTU counts and taxonomic assignments.

en:
We captured birds in urban parks and peri-urban forests in the cities of Lugano, Zurich (Switzerland) and Napoli (Italy). The urban sites were located in urban forests (Lugano, Napoli) and in a cemetery (Zurich). Bird faecal samples were stored in a screw-capped tube (2 ml), which was previously filled with 1 ml ethanol puriss. (Sigma-Aldrich) under sterile conditions. We wore single-use nitrile gloves and used sterile toothpicks to collect solid samples. The tubes were initially stored in the refrigerator during the field campaign and no later than seven days after collection at -20°C until prepared for DNA extraction.

DNA extraction and library preparation was performed at WSL Phytopathology facilites, Sequencing was performed at Lausanne Genomic Technologies Facility (University of Lausanne; https://wp.unil.ch/gtf/) on an AVITI benchtop sequencing system (Element Biosciences). Bioinformatics was performed at the Genetic Diversity Center (ETH Zurich) using a custom pipeline.

arthropoda

display_name: arthropoda

birds

display_name: birds

dna-metabarcoding

display_name: dna-metabarcoding

trophic-networks

display_name: trophic-networks

urban-biodiversity

display_name: urban-biodiversity

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

en: Metabarcoding of urban and forest bird faecal samples


en: built-up-classification planning-outcome spatial-modelling urban-compactness forest-persistence urban-morphology forest-gain urban-sprawl topography land-use-and-cover-change basic-services nature-conservation

en: Ecological-Economic Zoning (EEZ)

format: SHP

en: Human Development Index (HDI) per municipality (change per year)

en: isolated

en: New built-up pixels classified as isolated

en: Axial

en: New built-up pixels classified as axial

en: slope

en: Slope °

en: Descricao dos dados em portiuguês

en: Portugues description

en: Master plan Ubatuba (zones)

en: Increase in clean water provision service

en: infill

en: New built-up pixels classified as infill

en: Native forest cover gains from 2005 to 2015

en: Variables description

en: Table of content. Variables description, source, and other important information

en:
Basic education in % per census sector (change per
year)

en: Permanent housing density increase

en: Increase in sanitation service

en: Increase in waste collection service

en: Mean income in Reais (R$) per census sector (change per year)

en: Master plan Ihabela (zones)

en: Native forest cover persistence from 2005 to 2015

en: Population density per pixel (change per year)

en: Urban persistence: Built-up 2005 = Built-up 2015

en: Topographic Index Position (TPI)

en: Increase in Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

en:
The present dataset is part of the published scientific paper entitled “The role of spatial planning in land change: An assessment of urban planning and nature conservation efficiency at the southeastern coast of Brazil” (Pierri Daunt, Inostroza and Hersperger, 2021). In this work, we evaluated the conformance of stated spatial planning goals and the outcomes in terms of urban compactness, basic services and housing provision, and nature conservation for different land-use strategies. We evaluate the 2005 Ecological-Economic Zoning (EEZ) and two municipal master plans from 2006 in a coastal region in São Paulo State, Brazil. We used Partial Least Squares Path Modelling (PLS-PM) to explain the relationship between the plan strategies and land-use change ten years after implementation in terms of urban compactness, basic services and housing increase, and nature conservation.

We acquired the data for the explanatory variables from different sources listed on Table 1. Since the model is spatially explicit, all input data were transformed to a 30 m resolution raster. Regarding the evaluated spatial plans, we acquired the zones limits from the São Paulo State Environmental Planning Division (CPLA-SP), Ilhabela and Ubatuba municipality.

1)	Land use and cover data: Urban persistence, Urban axial, Urban infill, Urban Isolates, Forest cover persistence, Forest cover gain, NDVI increase

We acquired two Landsat Collection 1 Higher-Level Surface Reflectance images distributed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), covering the entire study area (paths 76 and 77, row 220, WRS-2 reference system, https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/). We classified one image acquired by the Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) sensor on 2005-05-150, and one image from the Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) sensor from 2015-08-15. We collected 100 samples for forest cover, 100 samples for built-up cover and 100 samples for other classes. We then classified these three classes of land cover at each image date using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) supervised algorithm (Hsu et al., 2003), using ENVI 5.0 software.

Land-use and land-cover changes from 2005 to 2015 were quantified using map algebra, by mathematically adding them together in pairs (10*LULC2015 + LULC2005). We reclassified the LULC data into forest gain (conversion of any 2005 LULC to forest cover in 2015); forest persistence (2005 forested pixels that remained forested in 2015); new built-up area (conversion of any 2005 LULC to built-up in 2015); and urban maintenance (2005 built-up pixels that remained built-up in 2015).

To describe the spatial configuration of the urban expansion, we classified the new built-up areas into axial, infill and isolated, following Inostroza et al. (2013) (For details, please refer to Supplementary Material I at the original publication).

The NDVI was obtained from the same source used for the LULC data. With the Google Engine platform, we used an annual average for the best pixels (without clouds) for 2005 and 2015, and we calculated the changes between dates. We used increases of > 0.2 NDVI to represent an improvement in forest quality.

2)	Federal Census data organization: Urban Basic Services and Housing indicator, socioeconomic and population:

The data used to infer the values of basic services provision, socioeconomic and population drivers was derived from the Brazilian National Census data (IBGE, 2000 and 2010). Population density, permanent housing unit density, mean income, basic education, and the percentage of houses receiving waste collection, sanitation and water provision services, called basic services in the context of this study, were calculated per 30 m pixel. The Human Development Index is only available at the municipality level. We attributed the HDI for the vector file with the municipality border, and we rasterized (30 m resolution) this file in QGIS. Annual rates of change were then calculated to allow comparability between LULC periods. To infer the BSH, we used only areas with an increase in permanent housing density and basic services provision (See Supplementary Material I at the original publication).

3)	Topographic drivers

To infer the values of the topographic driver, we used the slope data and the Topographic Index Position (TPI) based on the digital elevation model from SRTM (30 m resolution) produced by ALOS (freely available at eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/about/about_index.htm), and both variables were considered constant from 2005 to 2015 (See Supplementary Material I at the original publication).

basic-services

display_name: basic-services

built-up-classification

display_name: built-up-classification

forest-gain

display_name: forest-gain

forest-persistence

display_name: forest-persistence

land-use-and-cover-change

display_name: land-use-and-cover-change

nature-conservation

display_name: nature-conservation

planning-outcome

display_name: planning-outcome

spatial-modelling

display_name: spatial-modelling

topography

display_name: topography

urban-compactness

display_name: urban-compactness

urban-morphology

display_name: urban-morphology

en: Spatially explicit data to evaluate spatial planning outcomes in a coastal region in São Paulo State, Brazil


en: hypervolume hengduan-mountains habitat-heterogeneity model-residuals phytodiversity

en: HDM heterogeneity scales

en: The Heterogeneity matrics in the Hengduan mountain scale

en: Eurasia SR and heteorgeneity

en: This table is used for the Eurasia scale analyses, including both family level species richness map and different heterogeneity predictors

en: Eurasia plant family richness map

en: This is the plant family level richness map at the Eurasia scale calculated from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-021-00997-6

en: Plant range map at Hengduan scale

en: This is the plant range map at the Hengduan mountain scale based on species distribution model, elevation, and county level distribution information

en: Hengduan plant family richness map

en: This is the family level plant richness map in the Hengduan mountain scale at 1km resoution

en: This research data is used to re includes 1 km resolution seed plant species range maps for the Hengduan mountain region (southwest China), elevation information for each species, family-level plant richness data, and habitat heterogeneity data at both Eurasia and Hengduan mountain regions. This research data includes 1 km resolution seed plant species range maps for the Hengduan mountain region (southwest China), elevation information for each species, family-level plant richness data, and habitat heterogeneity data at both Eurasia and Hengduan mountain regions.

habitat-heterogeneity

display_name: habitat-heterogeneity

hengduan-mountains

display_name: hengduan-mountains

hypervolume

display_name: hypervolume

model-residuals

display_name: model-residuals

phytodiversity

display_name: phytodiversity

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Phytodiversity is associated with habitat heterogeneity from Eurasia to Hengduan


maintainer: Michael Eisenring

en: phytochemistry european-beech alan insect-herbivores light-pollution

en: Raw_data_Ceppi et al..xlsx

en: Raw data for the Publication Ceppi et al. 2025 in Journal of Applied Ecology: ARTIFICAL NIGHT LIGHT INTENSITY MODULATES HERBIVORY AND PHYTOCHEMISTRY IN EUROPEAN BEECH

en: Raw data on plant morphological traits, phytochemistry and herbivory that were analyzed in the study entitled: Artificial night light intensity modulates herbivory and phytochemistry in European beech

alan

display_name: alan

european-beech

display_name: european-beech

insect-herbivores

display_name: insect-herbivores

light-pollution

display_name: light-pollution

phytochemistry

display_name: phytochemistry

en: Raw data - Artificial night light intensity modulates herbivory and phytochemistry in European beech


en: snow-mechanics x-ray-tomography slow-snow-compression-experiments microstructure ice

en: README

en: README file gives an overview of the organization of the data

en: slow snow compression experiments

en: Compression experiments, X-ray images and with supplemented README file

en:
We conducted consecutive loading-relaxation experiments at low strain rates to study the viscoplastic behavior of the intact ice matrix in snow. The experiments were conducted using a micro-compression stage within the X-ray tomography scanner in the SLF cold laboratory.

Next, to evaluate the experiments, a novel, implicit solution of a transient scalar model was developed to estimate the stress exponent and time scales in the effective creep relation (Glen's law). The result reveals that, for the first time, a transition in the exponent in Glen's law depends on geometrical grain size. A cross-over of stress exponent $n=1.9$ for fine grains to $n=4.4$ for coarse grains is interpreted as a transition from grain boundary sliding to dislocation creep.

The dataset includes compression force data from 11 experiments and corresponding 3D image data from tomography scans.

ice

display_name: ice

microstructure

display_name: microstructure

slow-snow-compression-experiments

display_name: slow-snow-compression-experiments

snow-mechanics

display_name: snow-mechanics

x-ray-tomography

display_name: x-ray-tomography

en: A grain-size driven transition in the deformation mechanism in slow snow compression


en: bay-biscay fish-composition atlantic-region chondrichthyes teleo metabarcoding edna actinopterygii

en: Data access

en: Please use cyberduck to download for the moment

en:
Environmental DNA complements scientific trawling in surveys of marine fish biodiversity (Dataset 2021)

At the end of October and the beginning of November 2021, we selected 18 sites from the 2021 EVHOE survey for eDNA sampling. The French international EVHOE bottom trawl survey is conducted annually in autumn in the Bay of Biscay (BoB) to monitor demersal fish resources. All selected sites were located on the continental shelf at depths ranging from 30 to 230 m. At each site, we sampled seawater using an underwater pump equipped with two peristaltic heads (subspace), mounted on Ifremer’s Pagure sledge. We collected approximately 30 liters of water directly from the seabed at a flow rate of 1.0 L min⁻¹. For filtration, we used VigiDNA 0.20 μm filtration capsules (SPYGEN, Le Bourget-du-Lac, France) along with disposable sterile tubing. Each filtration device processed water along a transect, representing two replicates per sampling site. To prevent contamination during fieldwork, we adhered to strict protocols, including the use of disposable gloves and single-use filtration equipment. At the end of each filtration, we emptied the remaining water from the capsule and replaced it with 80 mL of CL1 conservation buffer before storing the samples at room temperature. We processed the eDNA capsules at SPYGEN, following the protocol outlined by Polanco-Fernández et al. (2020). Library preparation and sequencing were performed at Fasteris (Geneva, Switzerland). Specifically, we prepared four libraries using the MetaFast protocol (a ligation-based method) and sequenced them separately. Paired-end sequencing was conducted using a MiSeq sequencer (2 × 125 bp, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) on two MiSeq Flow Cell Kits (v3; Illumina), following the manufacturer’s instructions. We analyzed the sequence reads using the OBITools package (http://metabarcoding.org/obitools; Boyer et al., 2016), following the protocol described by Valentini et al. (2016).

Data content:
	* rawdata/: contains the raw reads for each individual sample. One archive contains the paired-end reads specified by the _R1 or _R2 suffix as well as individually tagged PCR replicates (if available) together with an archive containing all extraction and PCR blank samples of the library. Reads have been demultiplexed using cutadapt but not trimmed, individual demultiplexing tags and primers remain present in the sequences.
	* taxadata/: contains the table with all detected taxonomy for each sample after bioinformatic processing (see Polanco et al. 2020 for details; https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.140) and associated field metadata.
	* metadata/: contains two metadata files, one related to the data collected in the field for each filter, and the second related to the sequencing process in the lab (including the tag sequence, library name, and marker information for each sample)

actinopterygii

display_name: actinopterygii

atlantic-region

display_name: atlantic-region

bay-biscay

display_name: bay-biscay

chondrichthyes

display_name: chondrichthyes

edna

display_name: edna

fish-composition

display_name: fish-composition

metabarcoding

display_name: metabarcoding

teleo

display_name: teleo

en: Environmental DNA Marine France Evhoe 2021


maintainer: Frank Techel

en: avalanche-forecast spatial-modelling machine-learning forecast-models avalanche-release-probability

en: Avalanche forecast

en: Data contains forecasts relating to dry-snow avalanche conditions only. Forecast issued at 17.00 local time. Contains variables for the warning region (sector_id), publication date (date), danger level - sub-level combination expressed using numeric values (integer value of danger level -0.33 for sub-level minus, -0 for sub-level neutral, +0.33 for sub-level plus, altitude as indicated in the bulletin, and whether aspect (North = 0, Northeast = 45, ...) was indicated in the bulletin (no: 0, yes: 1).

en: Snowline estimates 2022/2023

en: Daily snowline estimates provided by observers for North (aspect = 0) and South (aspect = 180) slopes for the 2022/2023 season. For aspects in between North and South, values are interpolated. Contains observation date (date), coordinates (Swiss coordinates x, y), snowline elevation (snowline), and aspect.

en: Human-triggered avalanches 2022/2023

en: The file contains the reported human-triggered avalanches. The variables are as follows: id, release date (date), name, Swiss coordinates (x,y), elevation (ele), remark, reported avalanche size expressed using avalanche activity index (sizeAAI), aspect, event type (type), event (yes = 1, no = 0)

en: Model predictions (interpolated)

en: The zip file contains csv-files the interpolated model predictions for three models, in forecast and nowcast-mode, for the three different data sets, as described in the publication.

en: GPS data and human-triggered avalanches

en: Contains (1) the subset of points extracted from GPS tracks recorded during backcountry touring and uploaded to the website skitourenguru.ch and (2) the corresponding subset of human-triggered avalanches. Data (1) was provided by Skitourenguru GmbH and data (2) was collected by SLF. - Variables contained are date, Swiss coordinates (x, y), aspect (N = 0, NE = 45, ...), elevation (ele), and event (event = 1, non-event = 0).

en: Snowline estimates 2023/2024

en: Daily snowline estimates provided by observers for North (aspect = 0) and South (aspect = 180) slopes for the 2023/2024 season. For aspects in between North and South, values are interpolated. Contains observation date (date), coordinates (Swiss coordinates x, y), snowline elevation (snowline), and aspect.

en: Randomly sampled subset of grid points from 1 km DEM

en: Contains the randomly sampled subset of grid points from 1 km DEM. Three variables: coordinates (x, y) and elevation (elev).

en: Model predictions (raw data)

en: Model predictions (raw data) for three models, in nowcast and forecast mode. Not all models are available for both seasons. - These data are the basis for the interpolated predictions, which can be found in the other zip-folder

en: Human-triggered avalanches 2023/2024

en: Natural avalanches 2022/2023

en: Natural avalanche observation (dry avalanches). 2022-2023 forecasting season.

en: Natural avalanches 2023/2024

en: Natural avalanche observation (dry avalanches). 2023/2024 forecasting season.

en:
This data set was used in the analysis by Techel et al. **Can model-based avalanche forecasts match the discriminatory skill of human danger level forecasts? A comparison from Switzerland**. Please note that the title of the preprint was *Forecasting avalanche danger: human-made forecasts vs. fully automated model-driven predictions*, submitted to *Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences* on 20 Aug 2024.
The final manuscript used data from three forecasting seasons (2022/2023, 2023/2024, 2024/2025) , the preprint two forecasting seasons (2022/2023, 2023/2024) .
Currently, the repository contains data from two avalanche forecasting seasons in Switzerland. The third season will be added (to be done, 30 June 2025).
**Interpolated predictions**
- The .zip file contains the interpolated predictions for the three models in nowcast- and forecast- mode. This data is needed to reproduce the figures and tables in the submitted preprint.
The other data are the **raw data** underlying the interpolations:
- Avalanche forecast by WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, published at 17.00 local time, valid for the following 24 hours and relating to dry snow avalanche conditions.
- Model predictions in *nowcast*- and *forecast*-mode for three models (*danger level*, *instability*, *natural avalanche*), valid for 12.00 local time
- Subset of points extracted from GPS tracks (courtesy of Skitourenguru GmbH)
- Avalanche observations - natural avalanches and human-triggered avalanches
- Estimates of the snowline
- Randomly chosen subset of grid points used for generating reference distributions
For details regarding the data sets refer to the publication.

avalanche-forecast

display_name: avalanche-forecast

avalanche-release-probability

display_name: avalanche-release-probability

forecast-models

display_name: forecast-models

machine-learning

display_name: machine-learning

spatial-modelling

display_name: spatial-modelling

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Evaluating the predictive performance of human avalanche forecasts and model predictions in Switzerland


maintainer: Ariel Bergamini

en: grassland fungicide pandiv bryophytes moss biodiversity-experiment functional-traits nitrogen biomass species-richness

en: main data as used in Lin et al. 2025

en:
This dataset was used to analyse effects of different biodiversity and functional group treatments, fertilizer and fungicide applications as well as weeding of vascular plants on the species richness and species composition of bryophytes for the following publication: Lin M., Bergamini A., Pichon N.A., Allan E, Boch S. 2025. Nitrogen enrichment and vascular plant richness loss reduce bryophyte richness. Scientific Reports.
In this study we surveyed 96 of 216 2 m x 2 m experimental plots of the PaNDiv experiment, a large grassland field experiment in the Swiss lowlands (Pichon et al. 2020). In the PaNDiv experiment four experimental treatments were applied in a full-factorial design manipulating: (1) the nitrogen availability (through fertilization), (2) the presence of fungal pathogens (through fungicide application), (3) the functional composition of the vascular plant community (represented here by community-weighted mean (CWM) SLA), and (4) the vascular plant richness (sowing of either 1, 4, 8 or 20 species). To maintain the original sown vascular plant species richness and composition, one part of each plot (1.5 m × 2 m) was weeded, while the other part has been left unweeded since the beginning of the experiment (0.5 m × 2 m).
On each plot we surveyed two subplots, the unweeded subplot and a weeded subplot of the same area (0.5 m × 2 m). On each subplot we established a complete list of all bryophyte species together with an estimate of their cover.
The provided excel file contains three sheets:
1.	A sheet with raw species lists of all plots surveyed together with information on all treatments and an estimation of the percentage cover of vascular plants in a summer campaign in August 2022. Cover of bryophytes was estimated for each species in percent.
2.	A sheet with a list of all bryophyte species with its growth form (acroarpous/pleurocarpous)
3.	A sheet with some explantations
By means of the provided R code and the data in the excel file, all analyses can be repeated.
More details to the data sampled can be found in Lin et al (2025).

biodiversity-experiment

display_name: biodiversity-experiment

biomass

display_name: biomass

bryophytes

display_name: bryophytes

functional-traits

display_name: functional-traits

fungicide

display_name: fungicide

grassland

display_name: grassland

moss

display_name: moss

nitrogen

display_name: nitrogen

pandiv

display_name: pandiv

species-richness

display_name: species-richness

en: Data on bryophyte diversity and treatment factors in the PaNDiv experiment