maintainer: Anita Risch

en: grassland swiss-national-park ecosystem-functions grazing invertebrates ecosystem-multifunctionality ecosystem-coupling subalpine exclusion vertebrates

en: Datafile

en:
ID: Plot ID composited of Fence & Treatment number (90 plots total)

Grassland: Name of the six subalpine grasslands where the exclosure setups were erected. In large grasslands (GRIM, MING, STAB), we established four hierarchical exclosure setups (two in short- and two in tall-grass vegetation), whereas in the small grasslands (BOTS, DADA, MARG) only one setup was erected per vegetation type. BOTS = Val dal Botsch, GRIM = Grimmels, MING = Val Mingér, STAB = Alp Stabelchod, DADA = Stabelchod da daint, MARG = Margunet

Fence: Number of exclosure setup (1 - 18). Note that uneven numbers (1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17) represent setups established on short-grass vegetation, even numbers (2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18) setups established in tall-grass vegetation
Vegetation	Vegetation type, 1 = short-grass vegetation, 2 = tall-grass vegetation; (9 replicate fences on each vegetation type)
Treatment	Progressive animal exclusion, numbers indicate which animals had access to the plot: 1 = Large/medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access ("L/M/S/I"), 2 = Medium/small mammals, and invertebrates have access (“M/S/I”), 3 = Small mammals and invertebrates have access (“S/I”), 4 = Invertebrates have access (“I”), 5 = No animals have access (“None”)

Bulkden:	Fine fraction soil bulk density (g cm-3)

Soil.moist	: Soil moisture (%)

Soil.org.C: Rhizosphere soil C content (%)

pH: Soil pH

Nema.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Nema.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil nematode community composition

Micro.PC1: 	First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Micro.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil microbial community composition

Abv.Inv.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Abv.Inv.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the aboveground-dwelling invertebrate community composition

Arthr.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Arthr.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the soil arthropod community composition

Plant.PC1: First principal component (PC1) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Plant.PC2: Second principal component (PC2) of principal component analysis (PCA) of the plant community composition

Root.biomass: Root biomass (g m-2)

Micro.biomass	: Microbial biomass carbon (mg kg-1)

Plant.richness: Plant species richness

Plant.N: Plant tissue nitrogen content (%)

Soil.N.min: Soil net nitrogen mineralisation (kg ha-1 season)

Soil.resp: Soil carbon dioxide emissions (soil respiration; g m-2 h-1)

en:
This dataset contains all data on which the following publication below is based.

Paper Citation:
 > Risch AC, Ochoa-Hueso R, van der Putten WH, Bump JK, Busse MD, Frey B, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Page-Dumroese DS, Vandegehuchte ML, Zimmermann S, Schütz M. Size-dependent loss of aboveground animals differentially affects grassland ecosystem coupling and functions. 2018. Nature Communications 9: 3684. [doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06105-4).

Please cite this paper together with the citation for the datafile.

#Methods
Study sites
The experimental exclosure setups were installed within the SNP (IUCN category Ia preserve; Dudley 2008), in south-eastern Switzerland. The park covers 172 km2 of forests and subalpine and alpine grasslands along with scattered rock outcrops and scree slopes. The entire area has been protected from human impact (no hunting, fishing, camping or off-trail hiking) since 1914. Large, fairly homogenous patches of short- and tall-grass vegetation, which originate from different historical management and grazing regimes, cover the park’s subalpine grasslands entirely. Short-grass vegetation developed in areas where cattle used to rest (nutrient input) prior to the park’s foundation (14th century to 1914) (Schütz and others 2003, 2006) and is dominated by lawn grass species such as Festuca rubra L., Briza media L. and Agrostis capillaris L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). Today, this vegetation type is intensively grazed by diverse vertebrate and invertebrate communities that inhabit the park and consume up to 60% of the available biomass (Risch and others 2013). Tall-grass vegetation developed where cattle formerly grazed, but did not rest, and is dominated by rather nutrient-poor tussocks of Carex sempervirens Vill. and Nardus stricta L. (Schütz and others 2003, 2006). This vegetation type receives considerably less grazing, with only roughly 20% of the biomass consumed (Risch and others 2013). Consequently, the two vegetation types together represent a long-term trajectory of changes in grazing regimes. Underlying bedrock of all grasslands is dolomite, which renders these grasslands rather poor in nutrients regardless of former and current land-use regimes.
Experimental design
To progressively exclude aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate animals, we established 18 size-selective exclosure setups (nine in short-grass, nine in tall-grass vegetation) distributed over six subalpine grasslands across the SNP (Risch and others 2013, 2015). Elevation differences of exclosure locations did not exceed 350 m (between 1975 and 2300 m a.s.l.). The exclosures were established immediately after snowmelt in spring 2009 and were left in place for five consecutive growing seasons (until end of 2013). They were, however, temporarily dismantled every fall (late October after first snowfall) to protect them from avalanches. They were re-established in the same location every spring immediately after snowmelt. Each size-selective exclosure setup consisted of five plots (2 x 3 m) that progressively excluded aboveground vertebrates and invertebrates from large to small. The plots are labelled according to the guilds that had access to them “L/M/S/I”, “M/S/I”, “S/I”, “I”, “None”; L = large mammals, M = medium mammals, S = small mammals, I = invertebrates, None = no animals had access. As we only had permission to have the experimental setup in place for five consecutive growing seasons, the experiment had to be completely dismantled in the late fall of 2013 and all material removed from the SNP.
Our exclosure design was aimed at excluding mammalian herbivores, but naturally also excluded the few medium and small mammalian predators, as well as the entire aboveground invertebrate food web. A total of 26 large to small mammal species can be found in the SNP, but large apex predators are missing (wolf, bear, lynx) . Reptiles, amphibians and birds are scarce to absent in the subalpine grasslands under study. Only two reptile species occur in the park and they are confined to rocky areas that warm up enough for them to survive. One frog species spawns in an isolated pond far from our grasslands. Only three bird species occasionally feed on the subalpine grasslands. Using game cameras (Moultrie 6MP Game Spy I-60 Infrared Digital Game Camera, Moultrie Feeders, Alabaster, AL, USA), we did observe that the medium- and small-sized mammals (marmot/hares and mice) were not afraid to enter the fences and feed on their designated plots. We never spotted reptiles, amphibians or birds on camera. We distinguished between 59 higher aboveground-dwelling invertebrate taxa that our size-selective exclosures excluded (see also methods for aboveground-dwelling invertebrates below).
The “L/M/S/I” plot (not fenced) was located at least 5 m from the 2.1 m tall and 7 x 9 m large main electrical fence that enclosed the other four plots. The bottom wire of this fence was mounted at 0.5 m height and was not electrified to enable safe access for medium and small mammals, while fencing out the large ones. Within each main fence, we randomly established four 2 x 3 m plots separated by 1-m wide walkways from one another and from the main fence line: 1) the “M/S/I” plots were unfenced, allowing access to all but the large mammals; 2) the “S/I” plots (10 x 10 cm electrical mesh fence) excluded all medium-sized mammals. Note that the bottom 10 cm of this fence remained non-electrified to enable safe access for small mammals; 3) the “I” plots (2 x 2 cm metal mesh fence) excluded all mammals. We double-folded the mesh at the bottom 50 cm to reduce the mesh size to smaller than 1 x 1 cm openings; and 4) the “None” plots were surrounded by a 1 m tall mosquito net (1.5 x 2 mm) to exclude all animals. The top of the plot was covered with a mosquito-meshed wooden frame mounted to the corner posts (roof). We treated these plots a few times with biocompatible insecticide (Clean kill original, Eco Belle GmbH, Waldshut-Tiengen, Germany) to remove insects that might have entered during data collection or that hatched from the soil, but amounts were negligible and did not impact soil moisture conditions within these plots.
To assess whether the design of the “None” exclosure (mesh and roof) affected the response variables within the plots and, therefore, influenced the results, we established an additional six “micro-climate control” exclosures (one in each of the six grasslands) (Risch and others 2013, 2015). These exclosures were built as the “None” exclosures but were open at the bottom (20 cm) of the 3-m side of the fence facing away from the prevailing wind direction to allow invertebrates to enter. A 20-cm high and 3-m long strip of metal mesh was used to block access to small mammals. Thus, this construction allowed a comparable micro-climate to the “None” plots, but also a comparable feeding pressure by invertebrates to the “I” plots. We compared various properties within these exclosures against one another to assess if our construction altered the conditions in the “None” plots. We showed that differences in plant (e.g., vegetation height, aboveground biomass) and soil properties (e.g., soil temperature, moisture) found between the “I” and the “None” treatments were not due to the construction of the “None” exclosure, but a function of animal exclusions, although the amount of UV light reaching the plant canopy was significantly reduced (Risch and others 2013).
Aboveground invertebrate sampling
Aboveground invertebrates were sampled with two different methods to capture both ground- and plant-dwelling organisms: 1) we randomly placed two pitfall traps (67 mm in diameter, covered with a roof) filled with 20% propylene glycol in one 1 x 1 m subplot of the 2 x 3 m treatment plots in spring 2013 (May) and emptied them every two weeks until late September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). A pitfall trap consisted of a plastic cylinder (13 cm depth, 6.75 cm diameter). Within each cylinder we placed a 100 ml plastic vial with outer diameter 6.70 cm and on top of the cylinder we placed a plastic funnel to guide the invertebrates into the vials. Each trap was cover with a cone-shaped and transparent plastic roof to protect the trap from rain (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). Note that in the “None” plots only one trap was placed as control to check for effectiveness of the exclosure. 2) We vacuumed all invertebrates from a 60 x 60 cm area on another 1 x 1 m subplot with a suction sampler (Vortis, Burkhard manufacturing CO, Ltd., Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire, UK) every month from June to September 2013 (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018). For this purpose, we quickly placed a square plastic frame (60 x 60 x 40 cm) with a closable mosquito mesh sleeve attached to the top edge into the plot from the outside. The suction sample was then inserted into through the sleeve and operated for 45 s to collect the invertebrates (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b, 2018).
We sorted the ≈100 000 individuals collected with both methods by hand and identified each individual morphologically to the lowest taxonomic level feasible (59 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families; phylum for Mollusca). These taxa belonged to the following feeding types: 19 herbivores, 16 detritivores, 9 predators, 8 mixed feeders, 5 omnivores and 2 non-classified feeders (or not feeding as adults) (Vandegehuchte and others 2017b). We summed the numbers from the two pitfall traps and the suction sampling over the course of the 2013 season to represent the aboveground invertebrate abundance and community composition of a plot. Note: we did not specifically attempt to catch flying invertebrates with e.g., sticky traps, thus a few flying insects may have been missed with our vacuum sampling approach.
Sampling of plant properties
The vascular plant species composition was assessed at peak biomass every summer (July) by estimating the frequency of occurrence of each species with the pin count method in each plot (Frank and McNaughton 1990). A total of 172 taxa occurred within our 90 plots and we calculated plant species richness for each plot separately. We used the 2013 data in this study. Plant quality was assessed every year in July and September; here we use plant quality at the end of the experiment (September 2013). Two 10 x 100 cm wide strips of vegetation per plot were clipped, combined, dried at 65°C, and ground (Pulverisette 16, Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) to pass through a 0.5 mm sieve. Twenty randomly selected samples across all treatments were analysed for N (Leco TruSpec Analyser, Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Nitrogen concentrations of the other samples were then estimated from models established for the experiment and the entire SNP relating Fourier transform-near infrared reflectance (FT-NIR) spectra to the measured values of N using a multi-purpose FT-NIR spectrometer (Bruker Optics, Fällanden, Switzerland) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Root biomass was sampled every fall by collecting five 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil samples (Giddings Machine Company, Windsor, CO, USA) per plot (450 samples year-1). The samples were dried at 30 °C and roots were sorted from the sample by hand. We sorted each sample for 1 h which allowed to retrieve over 90% of all roots present in the samples (Risch and others 2013). The roots were then dried at 65 °C for 48 and weighed to the nearest mg. We averaged the values per plot and used the 2013 data only in this study.
Sampling of edaphic communities
In 2009, 2010, and 2011 we collected three composited soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth; AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA) and assessed bacterial community structure using T-RFLP profiling (Liu and others 1997; Blackwood and others 2003; Hodel and others 2014). We detected a total of 89 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). These values are in accordance with other studies reporting OTU richness (Wirthner and others 2011; Zumsteg and others 2012; Meola and others 2014) using T-RFLP profiling, a method that detects the most abundant, and thus likely, the most relevant, taxa. We averaged the data over the three years of collections for our calculations. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined with the substrate-induced method (Anderson and Domsch 1978) every fall (September) between 2009 and 2013 by collecting three mineral soil samples (5 cm diameter × 10 cm mineral soil core, AMS Samplers, American Falls, ID, USA). The three samples were combined (90 samples for each sampling year), immediately put on ice, taken to the laboratory, passed through a 2-mm sieve and stored at 4°C. Again, we only used the 2013 data in this study.
Soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) to extract soil arthropods were collected in June, July, and August 2011 with a soil corer lined with a plastic sleeve to ensure an undisturbed sample (total of 270 samples). The plastic line core was immediately sealed on both ends using cling film and put into a cooler. All plots were sampled within three days and the extraction of arthropods started the evening of the sampling day using a high-gradient Tullgren funnel apparatus (Crossley and Blair 1991; Vandegehuchte and others 2015). Samples were kept in the extractor for four days and the soil arthropods were collected in 95% ethanol. All individuals were counted and each individual was identified morphologically to the lowest level feasible [76 taxa, including orders, suborders, subfamilies, families (Protura, Thysanoptera, Aphidina, Psylina, Coleoptera, Brachycera, Nematocera, Auchenorryncha, Heteroptera, Formicidae); sub-phylum for Myriapoda, for Acari and Collembola also including morpho-species). Note that we also included larval stages (nine of the 76 taxa) (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). All data were summed over the season. A detailed species list for mites and collembolans is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2017a) [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118679.s001]. Earthworms are rare in the SNP and therefore were not included. We collected eight random 2.2 cm diameter x 10 cm deep soil cores from each plot in September 2013 to determine the soil nematode community composition. The samples were mixed and the nematodes were extracted from 100 ml of fresh soil using Oostenbrink elutriators (Oostenbrink 1960). All nematodes in a 1 ml of the 10 ml extract were counted, a minimum of 150 individuals sample-1 were identified to genus or family level using (Bongers 1988), the numbers of all nematodes were extrapolated to the entire sample and expressed for a 100 g dry sample. In total we identified 63 genus or family levels (Vandegehuchte and others 2015). The list of all the nematodes found is published (Vandegehuchte and others 2015) [http://www.oikosjournal.org/appendix/oik-03341] or DOI: [doi: 10.1111/oik.03341].
We are aware that sampling soil microbes from 2009 to 2011 and soil arthropods in 2011 was not ideal, but we are positive that this does not bias the results. Most of the parameters measured in our experiment either already showed a treatment response after the first growing season (e.g., plant biomass) or did not respond over the entire time experiment (e.g., microbial biomass C). The microbial community composition (2009 – 2011) was highly influenced by inter-annual differences in temperature and precipitation, but did not differ between treatments or vegetation types (Hodel and others 2014). We therefore felt comfortable using the 2009 through 2011 data for describing the soil microbial community in our experimental treatments. Similarly, we are positive that our soil arthropod data are representative. We did assess soil arthropods in August 2012 and found no differences to the August 2011 data. However, we did not feel comfortable combining the 2011 June, July, August data with only August data for 2012 for our analyses.
Sampling of soil properties
We collected three soil samples (5 cm diameter x 10 cm depth) in each plot in September 2013 after removing the vegetation. First, we collected the top layer of mineral soil rich in organic matter, the surface organic layer or rhizosphere, typically 1 to 3 cm in depth with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA). Second, we collected a 10 cm mineral soil core beneath this surface layer. The cores for each layer were composited, dried at 65 °C for 48 h and fine-ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. We then analysed all samples for total C using a Leco TruSpec Analyser (Leco, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA). Mineral soil pH was measured potentiometrically in 1:2 soil:CaCl2 solution with an equilibration time of 30 min.
Soil net N mineralisation was assessed during the 2013 growing season (Risch and others 2015). For this purpose, we randomly collected a 5 cm diameter x10 cm deep soil sample with a soil corer (AMS Samples, American Falls, Idaho, USA) after clipping the vegetation in June 2013. After weighing and sieving (4 mm mesh) the soil, we extracted a 20 g subsample in 1 mol l-1 KCl for 1.5 h on an end-over-end shaker and thereafter filtered it through ashless folded filter paper (DF 5895 150, ALBET LabScience, Hahnenmühle FineArt GmbH, Dassel, Germany). From these filtrates NO3- concentrations were measured colorimetrically (Norman and Stucki 1981) and NH4+with flow injection analysis (FIAS 300, Perkin Elmer, Waltham Massachusetts, USA) (Risch and others 2015). We dried the rest of the sample 105 °C to constant mass to determine fine,fraction bulk density. A second soil sample was collected within each plot in June 2013 with a corer lined with a 5 x 13 cm aluminium cylinder. The corer was driven 11.5 cm deep into the soil so that the top 1.5 cm of the cylinder remained empty. Into this space we placed a polyester bag (250 µm) filled an ion-exchanger resin to capture the incoming N. The bag was filled with a 1:1 mixture of acidic and alkaline exchanger resin (ion-exchanger I KA/ion exchanger IIIAA, Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). We then removed 1.5 cm soil at the bottom of the cylinder and placed a second resin exchanger bag into this space to capture the N leached from the soil column. To assure that the exchange resin was saturated with H+ and Cl- prior to filling the bags, the mixture was stirred with 1.2 ml l-1 HCl for 1 h and then rinsed with demineralized water until the electrical conductivity of the water reached 5 µm cm-1. The cylinder with the resin bags in place was reinserted into the soil with the top flush to the soil surface and incubated for three months. We recollected the cylinders in September 2013. Each resin bag and 20 g of sieved soil (4 mm mesh) from each cylinder were then separately extracted with KCl and NO3- and NH4+ concentrations were measured. Nitrate and NH4+ concentrations of all samples were then converted to a content basis by multiplying their values with fine fraction bulk density. Net N mineralisation was thereafter calculated as the difference between the N content of the samples collected at the end of the three-month incubation (including the N extracted from the bottom resin bag) and the N content at the beginning of the incubation (Risch and others 2015).
Soil CO2 emissions were measured every two weeks between 0900 and 1700 hrs from early May through late September 2013 with a PP-Systems SRC-1 soil respiration chamber (15 cm high, 10 cm diameter; closed circuit) attached to a PP-Systems EGM-4 infrared gas analyser (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on two locations per plot (Risch and others 2013). The chamber was placed on randomly placed, permanently installed PVC collars (10 cm diameter) driven 5 cm into the soil at the beginning of the study (Risch and others 2013). Freshly germinated plants growing within the collars were removed prior to each measurement to avoid measuring plant respiration or photosynthesis. The two measurements collected per plot and sampling date were averaged.
Soil moisture (with time domain reflectometry; Field-Scout TDR-100, Spectrum Technologies, Plainfield, Illionois, USA) and temperature (with a waterproof digital pocket thermometer; Barnstead International, Dubuque, Iowa, USA) were measured at five random locations per plot every two weeks during the growing seasons during the experiment for the 0 to 10 cm depth (Risch and others 2013, 2015). As soil moisture and soil temperature were highly negatively correlated (Risch and others 2013), we only used soil moisture for this study. We used plot-level averages of all values available to capture soil moisture variability during the five years of the experiment. The results remained unchanged when we only used soil moisture from the 2013 growing season.
Numeral calculations and statistical analyses
Ecosystem coupling. We conducted principal component analyses (PCAs; unscaled) at the complete dataset level using the abundances of each taxonomical entity to describe each of the five different communities used in this study: aboveground-dwelling invertebrates, vascular plants, soil microorganisms, soil arthropods and soil nematodes. We retained the first two components (PCA axis 1 and PCA axis 2) of each analysis as we found them to adequately represent the temporal and spatial variability of our 90 treatment plots in previous studies55,67. Together they explained a total of 71.70% of the variation for aboveground invertebrates, 44.36% for plants, 44.85% for soil microorganisms, 61.85% for soil arthropods and 77.19% for soil nematodes. In addition, we used soil pH and soil organic C content as a proxy for soil chemical properties, soil bulk density as a proxy for soil physical properties and soil moisture (negatively correlated with soil temperature) as a proxy for soil micro-climatic conditions for an overall total of fourteen constituents.
We calculated ecosystem coupling9 for each exclosure treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., 2  5 treatment combinations in total) as an integrated measure of pairwise ecological interactions between ecosystem constituents representing ecological communities and the soil abiotic environment. These ecological interactions are defined by non-parametric Spearman rank correlation analyses between two constituents, excluding interactions involving two abiotic constituents (e.g., soil pH vs. soil moisture) and interactions between the first (PC1) and second (PC2) component of each community type, as these are orthogonal by definition. Interactions between abiotic constituents were excluded from the analyses because the focus of our study was on communities and how they interact with one another and their surrounding environment; therefore, including abiotic-abiotic interactions was not of interest here. Given that the effectiveness of our experimental design resulted in that no community composition data of aboveground-dwelling invertebrates was available for the “None” plots (all animals excluded), only thirteen instead of fourteen constituents were included in the ecosystem coupling calculations for this treatment. The complete absence of aboveground invertebrates represents the most extreme case of disturbance between aboveground animal communities and the rest of the ecosystem constituents. This may have resulted in a slight overestimation of ecosystem coupling for these plots.
	Average ecosystem coupling was calculated as follows:
Ecosystem coupling=
where Xi is the absolute Coupling was calculated value of the Spearman’s rho coefficient of the ith correlation for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering and n is the number of pairwise comparisons considered (n = a total of 80; interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).	Coupling was calculated for each treatment within each vegetation type (i.e., based on nine replicates each), considering a total of 80 interactions (56 in the case of the “None” treatment). We considered a total of 40 biotic-biotic interactions (i.e., concerning two community-level principal components such as plants and microbes; 24 in the case of the “None” treatment) and 40 abiotic-biotic (i.e., concerning one community-level principal component and one abiotic factor, e.g., plant community and soil properties; 32 in the case of the “None” treatment).
To establish whether constituents were significantly and positively coupled within treatments (i.e., the average of their correlation coefficients were greater than in a null model where correlation only happens by chance), we calculated one-tailed p-values based on permutation tests with 999 permutations.

We considered six ecosystem functions and process rates commonly used to assess ecosystem functioning (Meyer and others 2015; Manning and others 2018). Plant N content represents a measure of forage quality, while plant richness has been shown to stabilise biomass production, thus allowing the system to respond to changes in herbivory. Soil net N mineralisation, soil respiration, root biomass, and microbial biomass represent fluxes or stocks of energy. For all functions and processes higher values represent higher functioning (Manning and others 2018). All these variables were measured in the last year of the experiment (2013). We then quantified ecosystem multifunctionality using the multiple threshold approach (Byrnes and others 2014; Manning and others 2018), which considers the number of functions that are above a certain threshold, over a series of threshold values (typically 10-99%) that are defined based on the maximum value of each function. We weighted all our functions equally for these calculations (Manning and others 2018). The number of functions in a plot with values higher than a given threshold value for the respective function is summed up. The sum represents ecosystem multifunctionality for that plot. Given that choosing any particular threshold as a measure of ecosystem multifunctionality is arbitrary, we calculated the average of thresholds from 10-90% (in 10% intervals) as a more integrated representation of ecosystem multifunctionality.
We used Pearson correlations to explore the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and ecosystem multifunctionality by calculating the slopes of all relationships between ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality for all thresholds between 10 and 99%. We also related ecosystem coupling with the average of multifunctionality at thresholds between 30-80% as explained before and considered this correlation as a robust indication of the type of association between these two variables. In addition, we explored the relationships between ecosystem coupling (all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving above- and belowground constituents, and all interactions, biotic-biotic interactions, abiotic-biotic interactions involving belowground constituents only) and individual ecosystem functions. The effects of exclosures and vegetation type on individual functions and multifunctionality were evaluated using linear mixed effects models ('lme' function of the nlme package), with exclosure and vegetation type as fixed effects and fence as a random factor. All statistical analyses and numerical calculations were done in R version 3.4.0 (R Core Team 2016).

#References

- Anderson J, Domsch K. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:215–21.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim S-H, Paul EA. 2003. Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Data Analysis for Quantitative Comparison of Microbial Communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:926–32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC143601/
- Bongers T. 1988. De nematoden von Nederland. Schoorl, The Netherlands: Pirola
- Byrnes JEK, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Duffy JE. 2014. Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–24.
- Crossley DAJ, Blair JM. 1991. A high-efficiency low-technology Tulgren-type extractor for soil microarthopods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 34:187–92.
- Dudley N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area managment categories. Gland: IUCN
- Frank DA, McNaughton SJ. 1990. Aboveground biomass estimation with the canopy intercept method: A plant growth form caveat. Oikos 57:57–60.
- Haynes AG, Schütz M, Buchmann N, Page-Dumroese DS, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Linkages between grazing history and herbivore exclusion on decomposition rates in mineral soils of subalpine grasslands. Plant Soil 374.
- Hodel M, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Frey B, Albrecht M, Busse MD, Risch AC. 2014. Does the aboveground herbivore assemblage influence soil bacterial community composition and richness in subalpine grasslands? Microb Ecol 68:584–95.
- Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ. 1997. Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC168770/
- Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol 2:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7
- Meola M, Lazzaro A, Zeyer J. 2014. Diversity, resistance and resilience of the bacterial communities at two alpine glacier forefields after a reciprocal soil transplantation. Environ Microbiol 16:1918–34. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1462-2920.12435
- Meyer ST, Koch C, Weisser WW. 2015. Towards a standardized Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment (REFA). Trends Ecol Evol 30:390–7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534715000968
- Norman R., Stucki JW. 1981. The determination of nitrate and nitrite in soil extracts by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:347–53.
- Ochoa-Hueso R. 2016. Non-linear disruption of ecological interactions in response to nitrogen deposition. Ecology 87:2802–2814.
- Oostenbrink M. 1960. Estimating nematode populations by some selected methods. In: Sasser NJ, Jenkins WR, editors. Nematology. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press. pp 85–101.
- R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Risch AC, Haynes AG, Busse MD, Filli F, Schütz M. 2013. The response of soil CO2 fluxes to progressively excluding vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores depends on ecosystem type. Ecosystems 16:1192–202.
- Risch AC, Schütz M, Vandegehuchte ML, Van Der Putten WH, Duyts H, Raschein U, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Busse MD, Page-Dumroese DS, Zimmermann S. 2015. Aboveground vertebrate and invertebrate herbivore impact on net N mineralization in subalpine grasslands. Ecology 96:3312–22.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Achermann G, Thiel-Egenter C, Page-Dumroese DS, Jurgensen MF, Edwards PJ. 2006. Phosphorus translocation by red deer on a subalpine grassland in the Central European Alps. Ecosystems 9:624–633.
- Schütz M, Risch AC, Leuzinger E, Krüsi BO, Achermann G. 2003. Impact of herbivory by red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) on patterns and processes in subalpine grasslands in the Swiss National Park. For Ecol Manage 181:177–88.
- Vandegehuchte ML, van der Putten WH, Duyts H, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2017a. Aboveground mammal and invertebrate exclusions cause consistent changes in soil food webs of two subalpine grassland types, but mechanisms are system-speciﬁc. Oikos 126:212–23.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Raschein U, Schütz M, Gwiazdowicz DJ, Risch AC. 2015. Indirect short- and long-term effects of aboveground invertebrate and vertebrate herbivores on soil microarthropod communities. PLoS One 10:e0118679.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Schütz M, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2017b. Mammal-induced trophic cascades in invertebrate food webs are modulated by grazing intensity in subalpine grassland. J Anim Ecol 86:1434–46.
- Vandegehuchte ML, Trivellone V, Schütz M, Firn J, de Schaetzen F, Risch AC. 2018. Mammalian herbivores affect leafhoppers associated with specific plant functional types at different timescales. Funct Ecol 32:545–55.
- Wirthner S, Frey B, Busse MD, Schütz M, Risch AC. 2011. Effects of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) rooting on the bacterial community structure in mixed-hardwood forest soils in Switzerland. Eur J Soil Biol 47:296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.07.003
- Zumsteg A, Luster J, Göransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, Bernasconi SM, Zeyer J, Frey B. 2012. Bacterial, Archaeal and Fungal Succession in the Forefield of a Receding Glacier. Microb Ecol 63:552–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9991-8

ecosystem-coupling

display_name: ecosystem-coupling

ecosystem-functions

display_name: ecosystem-functions

ecosystem-multifunctionality

display_name: ecosystem-multifunctionality

exclusion

display_name: exclusion

grassland

display_name: grassland

grazing

display_name: grazing

invertebrates

display_name: invertebrates

subalpine

display_name: subalpine

swiss-national-park

display_name: swiss-national-park

vertebrates

display_name: vertebrates

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Ecosystem coupling and multifunctionality - exclosure experiment


en: large-scale hydrology discharge hydrological-simulations european-alps

state: active

type: dataset

media_type: application/zip

format: ZIP

en: This data supplement contains the data associated with the manuscript: "Hyper-resolution large-scale hydrological modelling benefits from improved process representation in mountain regions" (Janzing et al., 2025). It contains the data to create the figures in the paper and consists of model output from **PCRaster Global Water Balance Model (PCR-GLOBWB) 2.0** model over the larger Alpine region at 30 arcsec resolution. As the full model output takes up very high memory space, we here mostly provide time series for the different measurement stations used for evaluation and some additional maps needed to recreate the figures in the manuscript.

discharge

display_name: discharge

european-alps

display_name: european-alps

hydrological-simulations

display_name: hydrological-simulations

hydrology

display_name: hydrology

large-scale

display_name: large-scale

educ

fr: Éducation, culture et sport

de: Bildung, Kultur und Sport

it: Istruzione, cultura e sport

fr: EnviDat: le portail de données environnementales

de: EnviDat: das Umwelt-Datenportal

it: EnviDat: il portale dei dati ambientali

fr: EnviDat est le portail de données du WSL; il offre un accès uniformisé et réglementé aux données de surveillance et de recherche en matière d’environnement. Ce portail est capable d’héberger et de publier des ensembles de données précieuses et uniques, qui sont partagées aux quatre coins de la planète. Ce faisant, EnviDat favorise la recherche et contribue à l’avancement des sciences environnementales.

de: EnviDat ist das Datenportal der WSL für einen einheitlichen und verwalteten Zugang zu Umweltdaten aus Monitoring- und Forschungsprojekten. Auf dem Portal können Datensätze gehostet und veröffentlicht werden. Durch die weltweite Bereitstellung einzigartiger und wertvoller Datensätze leistet EnviDat einen Beitrag zur Forschung im Bereich der Umweltwissenschaften.

it: EnviDat è il portale dati del WSL che fornisce un accesso unificato e gestito ai dati di monitoraggio ambientale e di ricerca. Il portale ha la capacità di ospitare e pubblicare serie di dati preziosi e unici che vengono condivisi in tutto il mondo. Così facendo, EnviDat promuove la ricerca e contribuisce al progresso della scienza ambientale.

political_level: other

wsl

capacity: public

type: organization

approval_status: approved

key: guid

key: uri

value: Envidat Harvester

en: Data supplement to Hyper-resolution large-scale hydrological modelling benefits from improved process representation in mountain regions


maintainer: Ueli Reber

en: policy-analysis switzerland environmental--policy policy-documents bgb biodiversity text-corpus

en: Replication files

format: SERVICE

en:
 Introduction

The ZIP file contains all data and code to replicate the analyses reported in the following paper.

Reber, U., Fischer, M., Ingold, K., Kienast, F., Hersperger, A. M., Grütter, R., & Benz, R. (2022). Integrating biodiversity: A longitudinal and cross-sectoral analysis of Swiss politics. *Policy Sciences*. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09456-4](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09456-4)

If you use any of the material included in this repository, please refer to the paper. If you use (parts of) the text corpus, please also refer to the sources used for its compilation listed below. The content of the texts may not be changed.

 Data folder

The data folder contains the following files.

* _corpus.parquet_: Text corpus of Swiss policy documents
* _dict_de.csv_: Biodiversity dictionary (German)
* _dict_fr.csv_: Biodiversity dictionary (French)
* _dict_it.csv_: Biodiversity dictionary (Italian)
* _topic_labels.csv_: labels/codes for policy sectors
* _topics.csv_: labels/codes for policy sectors

The corpus and the dictionary were compiled by the authors specifically for this project. The labels/codes for policy sectors are based on the [coding scheme](http://ws-old.parlament.ch/affairs/topics) of the Swiss Parliament.

 Text corpus

The text corpus consists of 439,984 Swiss policy documents in German, French, and Italian from 1999 to 2018. The corpus was compiled from the following source between 2020-10-01 and 2021-01-31.

* Transcripts and parliamentary businesses (e.g. questions, motions, parliamentary initiatives) via the [Web Services (WS)](https://www.parlament.ch/de/%C3%BCber-das-parlament/fakten-und-zahlen/open-data-web-services) provided by the Swiss Parliament
* The official compilation of federal legislation ("Amtliche Sammlung", AS) via [opendata.swiss](https://opendata.swiss/de/dataset/official-compilation-of-federal-legislation-bs-as-1947-2018) provided by the Swiss Federal Archives (SFA)
* The federal gazette ("Bundesblatt") via [fedlex.admin.ch](https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/de/fga/index)
* Decisions of federal courts via [entscheidsuche.ch (ES)](https://entscheidsuche.ch/)

The corpus is stored in a single data frame to use with R saved as [PARQUET](https://parquet.apache.org/) file (corpus.parquet). The data frame has the following structure.

* _text_id_: Unique identifier for each text (source information as prefix, e.g. "t_")
* _doc_type_: Document type (see coding scheme below)
* _branch_: Government branche (1 legislative, 2 executive, 3 judicative)
* _stage_: Stage of policy process (1 drafting, 2 introduction, 3 interpretation)
* _year_: Year of publication
* _topic_: Policy sector (coding scheme in separate file in data folder)
* _lang_: Language (de, fr, it)
* _text_: Text

The following list contains the coding scheme for the doc_type variable.

* 101: Federal gazette // Draft for public consultation ("Vernehmlassungsverfahren")
* 102: Federal gazette // Explanation of draft for parliament ("Botschaft")
* 103: Federal gazette // Strategy, action plan
* 104: Federal gazette // Federal council decree ("Bundesratsbeschluss")
* 105: Federal gazette // (Simple) Federal decree ("(Einfacher) Bundesbeschluss")
* 106: Federal gazette // General decree ("Allgemeinverfügung")
* 107: Federal gazette // Treaty ("Übereinkommen")
* 108: Federal gazette // Treaty ("Abkommen")
* 109: Federal gazette // Draft for parliament ("Entwurf")
* 110: Federal gazette // Report ("Bericht")
* 111: Federal gazette // Report of parliamentary comission ("Bericht")
* 112: Federal gazette // Report of federal council ("Bericht")
* 201: Parl. businesses // Submitted text
* 202: Parl. businesses // Reason text
* 203: Parl. businesses // Federal council response
* 204: Parl. businesses // Initial situation
* 205: Parl. businesses // Proceedings
* 301: Parl. transcripts // Speech of MP
* 302: Parl. transcripts // Speech of federal council
* 401: Federal legislation // Legal text of the official compilation (law, ordinances, etc.)
* 501: Court decisions // Federal Supreme Court
* 502: Court decisions // Federal Criminal Court
* 503: Court decisions // Federal Administrative Court

 Code folder

The code folder contains all R code for the analyses. The files are numbered chronologically.

* _1_classifier_training.R_: Training of classifiers for classification of policy sectors
* _2_classifier_application.R_: Classification of documents in corpus
* _3_dictionary_application.R_: Biodiversity indexing of documents in corpus
* _4_stm_truncation.R_: Truncation of indexed documents to keep only relevant parts
* _5_stm_translation.R_: Translation of FR and IT documents to DE
* _6_stm_model.R_: Preprocesssing and structural topic model
* _7_plots.R_: Plots and numbers as included in the paper

The code/functions folder contains custom functions used in the scripts, e.g. to support topic model interpretation.

Package versions and setup details are noted in the code files.

 Contact

Please direct any questions to Ueli Reber (ueli.reber@eawag.ch).

bgb

display_name: bgb

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

environmental--policy

display_name: environmental--policy

policy-analysis

display_name: policy-analysis

policy-documents

display_name: policy-documents

switzerland

display_name: switzerland

text-corpus

display_name: text-corpus

en: Replication files for "Integrating biodiversity: A longitudinal and cross-sectoral analysis of Swiss politics"


photogrammetric-drone-data-dorfberg

maintainer: Yves Bühler

title_for_slug: photogrammetric-drone-data-dorfberg

en: uav snow drone-data photogrammetry snow-distribution dsm orthophoto snow-depth-mapping

en: Data Access

en:
- 3cm-resolution Orthophoto
- 10cm-resolution DSM
- 10cm-resolution snow depth raster
- original RGB images
- Agisoft Metashape Report

All products are also available as a cloud optimized geotiff.

en: The data was collected with a Wingtra Gen II drone and a Sony RX1R II sensor. In total, 10 flights were conducted at different dates, both in summer and winter. A DSM, an orthophoto, a snow depth raster and the original drone images from every flight are available at a high resolution (10cm and 3cm, respectively).

drone-data

display_name: drone-data

dsm

display_name: dsm

orthophoto

display_name: orthophoto

photogrammetry

display_name: photogrammetry

snow

display_name: snow

snow-depth-mapping

display_name: snow-depth-mapping

snow-distribution

display_name: snow-distribution

uav

display_name: uav

en: Photogrammetric Drone Data Dorfberg


maintainer: EnviDat Support

en: catchment-data snow-hydrology snowpack rain-on-snow meteorological-data

media_type: text/plain

format: TXT

mimetype: text/plain

en: The file contains all data needed to run simulations with the snow cover model SNOWPACK.

mimetype: application/zip

en: Meteorological data used to run SNOWPACK for 58 catchments in the Swiss Alps. The data consists of a 2 km grid of "virtual meteorological stations" for each catchment. It was used to simulate snow cover processes during rain-on-snow events, therefore meteorological data of each catchment contains at least one rain-on-snow event. Further information can be found in the attached readme.txt and in Würzer & Jonas et al. (2017), currently under review in Hydrological Processes.

catchment-data

display_name: catchment-data

meteorological-data

display_name: meteorological-data

rain-on-snow

display_name: rain-on-snow

snow-hydrology

display_name: snow-hydrology

snowpack

display_name: snowpack

en: Meteorological data for investigation of rain-on-snow events in 58 catchments in Switzerland


en: cross-resistance fraxinus defense-chemistry ash-dieback intraspecific-variation emerald-ash-borer invasive-species

en: Raw data-Publication cross-resistance in ash-New Phytologist

en:
What are the research data files about: Raw data on perfomance (dry weight, development and mortality) of emerald ash borer larvae used in published bioassays. Raw data on ash dieback leasion lenghts. Raw data on untargeted and targeted specialized ash metabolites.
Which methods were used: Bioassays in greenhouses and climate chambers to collect data on emerald ash borer and ash dieback perfomance. Phytochemical analyses on ash phloem for quantifiying specialized metabolites
When and where was the data created / extracted: Summer 2020-2021

format: XLS

en:
 What are the research data files about: Raw data on perfomance (dry weight, development and mortality) of emerald ash borer larvae used in published bioassays. Raw data on ash dieback leasion lenghts. Raw data on untargeted and targeted specialized ash metabolites.

Which methods were used: Bioassays in greenhouses and climate chambers to collect data on emerald ash borer and ash dieback perfomance. Phytochemical analyses on ash phloem for quantifiying specialized metabolites.

When and where was the data created / extracted: Summer 2020-2021

ash-dieback

display_name: ash-dieback

cross-resistance

display_name: cross-resistance

defense-chemistry

display_name: defense-chemistry

emerald-ash-borer

display_name: emerald-ash-borer

fraxinus

display_name: fraxinus

intraspecific-variation

display_name: intraspecific-variation

invasive-species

display_name: invasive-species

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Raw data-Publication cross-resistance in ash - New Phytologist


maintainer: Felix Gugerli

en: genetic-structure monitoring genetic-diversity conservation-genetics melanargia-galathea

media_type: text/csv

format: CSV

en:
Individual genotypes assessed at six nuclear microsatellite loci (two alleles per locus) for individuals of the butterfly Melanargia galathea (Marbled white) that were collected throughout Switzerland, along the regular grid of the Biodiversity Monitoring (BDM) of Switzerland. For each individual, the sampling site (number) and the genotype are given. Note that due to privacy restrictions, the original geographic coordinates remain disclosed. For original coordinates, data holders should be contacted (Swiss Federal Office for the Environment; Biodiversity Monitoring Switzerland).
The data refer to the following publication: Terzer et al., Distinct spatial patterns of genetic structure and diversity in the butterfly Marbled White (Melanargia galathea) inhabiting fragmented grasslands. Conservation Genetics, https://doi.org/0.1007/s10592-023-01593-4.

conservation-genetics

display_name: conservation-genetics

genetic-diversity

display_name: genetic-diversity

genetic-structure

display_name: genetic-structure

melanargia-galathea

display_name: melanargia-galathea

monitoring

display_name: monitoring

en: Nuclear microsatellite genotypes of the butterfly Melanargia galathea


maintainer: Nander Wever

en: microstructure snowmicropen antarctica snow-density-profile snow-density

en: SnowMicroPen pts files and processed txt files

en: Zip archive containing the acquired *.pts files (binary files recorded by the SnowMicroPen), and the converted *.txt files using the SMP.ipynb jupyter notebook (see the python code in the other resources in this dataset)

en: Documentation SnowMicroPen measurements

en: This *.zip archive contains all available documentation of the SnowMicroPen measurements, including the mapping of the SMP measurements in the terrestrial laser scan field at PEA (see documentation for 20161220) and at the Hammarryggen Ice Rise (see documentation for 20190104 and 20190111).

en: List of SnowMicroPen measurements

en: List of all SnowMicroPen measurements, including date and location, and processing status. This list has been generated by the python code (see other resources in this dataset).

en: Python code exported from the Jupyter notebook for processing the SnowMicroPen files

en: Manual snow pits and other snow density measurements

en: Jupyter notebook for processing the SnowMicroPen files.

en: SnowMicroPen (SMP) measurements and manual snowpits from Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Measurements were taken in the vicinity of the Belgium Princess Elisabeth Station (PEA), in a transect towards the coast, and on the Lokeryggen and Hammarryggen Ice Rises near the coast. Measurements were taken during 3 individual campaigns in the 2016-2017, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 field seasons.

antarctica

display_name: antarctica

microstructure

display_name: microstructure

snow-density

display_name: snow-density

snow-density-profile

display_name: snow-density-profile

snowmicropen

display_name: snowmicropen

en: SnowMicroPen measurements and manual snowpits from Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica


en: place-attachment urban-ecology electrodermal-activity sense-of-place landscape

en: 05. Visuals

en: 00. EDA Raw Data

en: 03. Publication Ready Data

en: 02. Questionnaire Data

en: 01. EDA Processed Data

en: 04. Scripts

en: This repository contains data on EDA measurements of visitors with different cultural backgrounds in virtual urban park settings. The parks are a Persian garden (Shiraz, Iran) and a historical park in Zurich, Switzerland. The cultural background of the visitors is Persian and Central European. The repository contains raw data from EDA, processed time series and statistical procedures.

electrodermal-activity

display_name: electrodermal-activity

landscape

display_name: landscape

place-attachment

display_name: place-attachment

sense-of-place

display_name: sense-of-place

urban-ecology

display_name: urban-ecology

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Electrodermal Activity (EDA) of Bi-cultural Visitors In Virtual Park Settings


data-set-on-snow-instability

title_for_slug: data-set-on-snow-instability

en: rutschblock snow-avalanche slab-tensile-support weak-layer failure-initiation slab propgatoin-saw-test crack-propagation avalanche-forcasting snow-stability-evaluation

en: data set on snow instability

mimetype: text/csv

en: Read-me file on snow instability data

media_type: application/pdf

format: PDF

mimetype: application/pdf

en:
These data on snow instability include three data subsets that were analyzed and the results published by Reuter and Schweizer (2018) who suggest a novel framework on how to describe snow instability by failure initiation, crack propagation and slab tensile support.

Please refer to the Read-me file for further details on the data.

These data are the basis of the following publication:
Reuter, B. and Schweizer, J., 2018. Describing snow instability by failure initiation, crack propagation and slab tensile support. Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, doi: 10.1029/2018GL078069.

avalanche-forcasting

display_name: avalanche-forcasting

crack-propagation

display_name: crack-propagation

failure-initiation

display_name: failure-initiation

propgatoin-saw-test

display_name: propgatoin-saw-test

rutschblock

display_name: rutschblock

slab

display_name: slab

slab-tensile-support

display_name: slab-tensile-support

snow-avalanche

display_name: snow-avalanche

snow-stability-evaluation

display_name: snow-stability-evaluation

weak-layer

display_name: weak-layer

en: Data set on snow instability


en: climate-change avalanche hazard avalanche-mapping new-snow ramms

en:
To assess the possible consequences of potential changes in snow accumulation and temperature and their impact on avalanche hazard, we introduce a comprehensive multi-step framework. It includes the analysis of climate change scenarios as well as the modeling of future snow covers and the simulation of avalanches in a case study region in central Switzerland.
Using a downscaling and a quantile mapping approach, we considered the high emission RCP8.5 from the CH2018 Swiss climate change scenarios and simulated a potential snow cover of more than 100 future winters with the snow cover model SNOWPACK. Changing snow accumulation and snow cover temperature was taken into account for two future time frames. The changed parameters were used in the RAMMS::EXTENDED avalanche simulation software on large scale.

avalanche

display_name: avalanche

avalanche-mapping

display_name: avalanche-mapping

climate-change

display_name: climate-change

hazard

display_name: hazard

new-snow

display_name: new-snow

ramms

display_name: ramms

en: A novel approach for bridging the gap between climate change scenarios and avalanche hazard indication mapping


maintainer: Ionut Iosifescu Enescu

en: open-source open-data research-data-management jupyter-notebooks hpc reproducibility open-science

en: Open Science Support @ WSL (Poster)

en:
This poster was originally created for the swissuniversities Open Science Action Plan: Kick-Off Forum, and showed to the audience on 17.10.2019. It illustrates how the environmental data portal EnviDat provides the tools for fostering Open Science and Reproducibility of scientific research at WSL.

Supporting open science is a highly relevant user requirement for EnviDat and for implementing FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability) principles at dataset level.
EnviDat encourages WSL scientists to complement data publication with a complete description of research methods and the inclusion of the open source software, code or scripts used for processing the dataset or for obtaining the published results. By openly publishing open software (e.g. as Jupyter notebooks) alongside research data sets, researchers can contribute to mitigate reproducibility issues.

EnviDat also promotes and supports, where possible and practical, the publication of software as Jupyter notebooks. Jupyter notebooks provide a solution for improved documentation and interactive execution of open code in a wide range of programming languages (Python, R, Octave/Matlab, Java or Scala). These programming languages are widely used in environmental research at WSL and well supported by the Jupyter-compatible kernels. We have sucessfully interfaced EnviDat-hosted notebooks with the WSL High-Performance Computing (HPC) Linux Cluster through a JupyterHub/JuypterLab beta installation on the HPC cluster implemented in close collaboration with the WSL IT-Services.
For existing software that cannot be easily migrated to Jupyter Notebooks, the Open Science and Reproducibility is assisted by containerisation. We have proven that several Singularity containers can successfully run on WSL's HPC cluster.

Finally, the researchers can upload the data/results complemented by code (e.g. as Jupyter Notebooks, or Singularity containers) and any additional documentation in EnviDat. Consequently, they will receive a DOI for the entire dataset, which they can reference in their science paper in order to publish a more reproducible research.

_License_: This poster is released by WSL and the EnviDat team to the public domain under a Creative Commons 4.0 CC0 "No Rights Reserved" international license. You can reuse this poster in any way you want, for any purposes and without restrictions.

hpc

display_name: hpc

jupyter-notebooks

display_name: jupyter-notebooks

open-data

display_name: open-data

open-science

display_name: open-science

open-source

display_name: open-source

reproducibility

display_name: reproducibility

research-data-management

display_name: research-data-management

en: Open Science Support at the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL. The EnviDat Concept


en: fagus-sylvatica beech water-isotopes picea-abies cryogenic-extraction isotopes xylem-water hydrology soil-water hydrogen-isotopes oxygen-isotopes forest europe ecohydrology critical-zone spruce

en: All canopy pictures in one ZIP file.

en: Dataset containing the information on the canopy cover.

en: Dataset containing the metadata of the sampling sites, including site-, soil-, tree-specific information.

en: Dataset containing information about sample weights, cryogenic water extraction and the actual hydrogen and oxygen isotope data of the study.

en: WATSON_Canopy_Pictures (individual JPG files)

en: All canopy pictures as individual files.

en: Here, we present a comprehensive isotope dataset of soil and stem xylem water collected during two pan-European sampling campaigns in spring and summer 2023. The dataset includes samples from 40 forest sites featuring beech (Fagus sylvatica), spruce (Picea abies), or mixed beech-spruce forests, and is supplemented with detailed site-specific, soil-specific, and tree-specific metadata. Samples and metadata were collected by various researchers across Europe following a standardized protocol. Soil samples were taken at up to five depths (ranging from 0 to 90 cm), and stem xylem samples were collected from three beech and/or spruce trees at each site. All samples were sent to a single laboratory for analysis, where water was extracted using cryogenic vacuum distillation and analyzed with an isotope laser spectrometer. Additionally, a subset of the samples underwent analysis with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer. The complete description of the data can be found in a publication in Earth System Science Data (in review).

beech

display_name: beech

critical-zone

display_name: critical-zone

cryogenic-extraction

display_name: cryogenic-extraction

ecohydrology

display_name: ecohydrology

europe

display_name: europe

fagus-sylvatica

display_name: fagus-sylvatica

forest

display_name: forest

hydrogen-isotopes

display_name: hydrogen-isotopes

hydrology

display_name: hydrology

isotopes

display_name: isotopes

oxygen-isotopes

display_name: oxygen-isotopes

picea-abies

display_name: picea-abies

soil-water

display_name: soil-water

spruce

display_name: spruce

water-isotopes

display_name: water-isotopes

xylem-water

display_name: xylem-water

en: Soil and stem xylem water isotope data from two pan-European sampling campaigns


climarctic-seasons

title_for_slug: climarctic-seasons

en: microbial-functions microbial-biodiversity greenhouse-gases soil arctic

en: Climarctic seasons dataset Envidat.xlsx

en:
Samples description
•	sample number: sample list number (S1 to S126)
•	season: season during which the samples were collected
•	location: one of the two location where the samples were collected in the vicinity of Ny Alesund on Svalbard
•	slope site: sites where the samples were collected along the toposequence (upslope = top of the slope, midslope = middle of the slope, downslope = bottom of the slope)
•	soil layer: depth layer where the sample were collected (biocrust = 0-2 cm and mineral soil = 5-10 cm)
•	replicate: replicated sampled (3 replicates per site)
Environmental variables
•	pH = pH value of the soil
•	sand = proportion of sand of the soil [%]
•	silt = proportion of silt of the soil [%]
•	clay = proportion of clay of the soil [%]
•	GWC = Gravimetric Water content in the soil [%]
•	OM = Organic Matter content in the soil [g]
•	N = Total Nitrogen content in soil [mg/g]
•	C = Total Carbon content in soil [mg/g]
•	C/N = ration of C content over N content [ratio]
•	NO3 = Nitrate content in soil [mg/kg]
•	NO2 = Nitrite content in soil [mg/kg]
•	NH4 = Ammonium content in soil [mg/kg]
•	Ptot = Total Phosphorus content in soil [mg/kg]
•	Pavail = Available Phosphorus content in soil [mg/kg]
•	PO4 = Phsphate content in soil [mg/kg]
•	CO2 = CO2 fluxes from soil [mmol CO2 m-2 d-1]
•	CH4 = CH4 fluxes from soil [umol CH4 m-2 d-1]
•	N2O = N2O fluxes from soil [umol CH4 m-2 d-1]
•	GPP = Gross Primary Production [mmol CO2 m-2 d-1]
•	ER = Ecosystem respiration [mmol CO2 m-2 d-1]
•	NEE = Net Ecosystem Exchange [mmol CO2 m-2 d-1]
•	glucoOM = glucosidase enzyme activity [mmol h-1 gOM-1]
•	23 xyloOM = xylosidase enzyme activity [mmol h-1 gOM-1]
•	chitOM = N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (chitinase) enzyme activity [mmol h-1 gOM-1]
•	phosOM = phosphatase enzyme activity [mmol h-1 gOM-1]
•	leuOM = leucine-aminopeptidase enzyme activity [mmol h-1 gOM-1]
•	PPOM = Polyphenol Peroxidase enzyme activity [mmol h-1 gOM-1]
•	POOM = Polyphenol Oxidase enzyme activity [mmol h-1 gOM-1]
•	30. Bac16SOM = Bacterial 16S gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	31. BacamoAOM = Bacterial amoA gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	32. ArchamoAOM = Archaeal 16S gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	33. nifHOM = nifH gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	34. nirSOM = nirS gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	35. nosZOM = nosZ gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	36. nxrBOM = nxrB gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	37. mcrAOM = mcrA gene abundance [copies gOM-1]
•	38. pmoAOM = pmoA gene abundance [copies gOM-1]

en: This dataset includes measurements of potential microbial functions (potential extracellular enzyme activities and microbial functional genes abundance) and soil physico-chemical properties (pH, nutrients, texture, etc) in biocrusts and underlying mineral soils in High-Arctic tundra near Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard) during each season along a toposequence.

arctic

display_name: arctic

greenhouse-gases

display_name: greenhouse-gases

microbial-biodiversity

display_name: microbial-biodiversity

microbial-functions

display_name: microbial-functions

soil

display_name: soil

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Climarctic seasons


bryophytes-of-europe-traits-bet-dataset

title_for_slug: bryophytes-of-europe-traits-bet-dataset

en: red-list hornworts bioclimatic-variables indicator-values iucn life-history-traits mosses liverworts

en: PDF including the (trait) explanations.

en: Text file including the BET dataset.

en: Excel file including the BET dataset and (trait) explanations.

en: The Bryophytes of Europe Traits (BET) dataset includes values for 65 biological and ecological traits and 25 bioclimatic variables for all 1816 bryophytes included in the European Red List (Hodgetts et al. 2019). The traits are compiled from several regional trait datasets and manually complemented using Floras, species-specific literature and expert knowledge. The bioclimatic variables are calculated using the European range of each species. Details regarding the trait compilation and extraction of bioclimatic variables can be found in the corresponding data paper (Van Zuijlen et al. 2023).

bioclimatic-variables

display_name: bioclimatic-variables

hornworts

display_name: hornworts

indicator-values

display_name: indicator-values

iucn

display_name: iucn

life-history-traits

display_name: life-history-traits

liverworts

display_name: liverworts

mosses

display_name: mosses

red-list

display_name: red-list


en: snow-saltation experiments metamorphism wind-tunnel water-isotopes blowing-snow cold-lab drifting-snow

en: Wind tunnel water vapour isotopic composition

en: The water vapour and its calibrated isotopic composition sampled inside the wind tunnel at 46cm height during the experiments. The vapour was pumped through a heated copper tube at a rate of 0.2 l/min to the CRDS instrument located in a temperate room outside the cold laboratory. The data has 1 second resolution with the timestamp in UTC (CRDS reference time). The measured variables are the calibrated d18O (‰), dD (‰) and d-excess (‰) signals and the uncalibrated ("H2Oraw", ppmv) and calibrated ("H2Ocali",ppmv) humidity readings of the CRDS and converted to specific humidity ("spechum", g/kg). The isotope data was corrected for its humidity-isotope dependency and referenced against the VSMOW-SLAP scale. Calibration runs were performed daily and details can be found in Wahl et al. (2024) including the Supplementary Materials.

en:
The dataset contains the stable water isotopic composition (d18O, dD. d-excess) of the snow samples taken during the ring wind tunnel experiments in January and May 2023 at the SLF cold laboratory facilities in Davos. The snow samples were collected in air-tight WhirlPaks and kept frozen at -20°C until they were melted in the closed sampling bags, filtered and 1.8ml were transferred into a 2ml glass vial and shipped to the Paul Scherrer Institut in Villigen, Switzerland where they were analysed following established laboratory procedures. The combined uncertainty on the individual isotopic composition is <0.5‰ for dD and <0.1‰ for d18O which yields an uncertainty of 0.9‰ on d-excess.
Timestamps are given for local Davos time (LT) and synchronised to the CRDS instrument which is in UTC. The "ExpNo" column refers to the experiment numbers given in Wahl et al. (2024), Table 1. The "type" of the snow samples is: "ini" = initial snow before introduction to the wind tunnel, "airborne" = snow sampled out of the air, "acc_in" = inner part of accumulated snow, "acc_out" = outer surface layer of accumulated snow.

en: Snow samples - sphere size statistics files

en: The individual measurement reports of the microCT scan for each snow sample as combined zip file. The file names and the sample number indicate which snow sample it is, see "Snow samples - microCT measurements". Each file contains the statistics and the count of fitted sphere size diameters and the respective share (in-%) in the frequency distribution. Immediately after snow sampling, a small portion of snow was transferred to the cylindrical μCT sample holder with a diameter of 15 mm and analysed at -20°C using a Scanco® CT-40 scanner. The analysis followed Hildebrand and Rüegsegger (1997).

en: Snow samples - microCT measurements

en: The data of the snow samples that were analysed in a Scanco® CT-40 scanner using a sample holder of 15 mm diameter which allowed for a high-resolution analysis with voxel size of 8 μm. The timestamp (local time, Davos, Switzerland) of snow sampling is given as well as the type of snow sample (see Snow samples - stable water isotopic composition dataset), the corresponding wind tunnel experiment number ("ExpNo", Wahl et al. (2024), Table 1) and the time since the snow introduction to the wind tunnel. The measured SSA is given in units 1/mm. The column "hist_filename" lists the name of the corresponding .txt file which contains the sphere size statistics of the snow samples. The sphere size statistics files are compressed in a .zip file.

en: Meteorological variables measured inside the wind tunnel during the January 2023 experiments

en: The dataset contains the 1-minute averages of the calibrated meteorological variables: temperature (T, °C), relative humidity (RH, %), relative humidity referenced against saturation over ice (RHice, %), specific humidity (q, g/kg) and wind speed (WS, m/s) as measured in the observation section of the wind tunnel at different heights. The measurement heights correspond to: "Top"=42.5cm, "Mid"=30cm, "Bot"=15cm, "PT100_Ta"=3cm. "WS" was measured at 36.5cm height. The timestamp is in local time (UTC+1) and indicates the start of the averaging period.

en: Meteorological variables measured inside the wind tunnel during the May 2023 experiments

en: The dataset contains the 1-minute averages of the calibrated meteorological variables: temperature (T, °C), relative humidity (RH, %), relative humidity referenced against saturation over ice (RHice, %), specific humidity (q, g/kg) and wind speed (WS, m/s) as measured in the observation section of the wind tunnel at different heights and the room temperature of the laboratory measured outside the wind tunnel (Lab_Ta, °C). The measurement heights correspond to: "Top"=42.5cm, "Mid"=30cm, "Bot"=15cm, "PT100_Ta"=3cm. "WS" was measured at 36.5cm height. The time was synchronised to the concurrent CRDS measurements (which are UTC) and adjusted for the time lag resulting from pumping vapour from inside the wind tunnel to the CRDS. The timestamps indicate the beginning of the averaging period.

en: This dataset collection contains all datasets collected during the ring wind tunnel experiments in January and May 2023 at the SLF cold laboratory facilities in Davos. A full description of the experiment set-up can be found in Wahl et al. (2024). The collection contains data from 19 experiments. The dataset collection entails measurements of the stable water isotopic composition of snow samples and the water vapour inside the wind tunnel, measurements of the meteorological variables inside the wind tunnel and snow sample properties as measured with microCT measurements (sphere size distribution and specific surface area (SSA)).

blowing-snow

display_name: blowing-snow

cold-lab

display_name: cold-lab

drifting-snow

display_name: drifting-snow

experiments

display_name: experiments

metamorphism

display_name: metamorphism

snow-saltation

display_name: snow-saltation

wind-tunnel

display_name: wind-tunnel

en: Ring wind tunnel experiments - airborne snow metamorphism and stable water isotopes


maintainer: Frank Techel

en: european-alps danger-level avalanche-forecast snow warning-regions

en: Forecast avalanche danger level

en: contains the highest forecast danger level (dangerLevelMax) for each day and warning region

en: shape file warning regions Alps

en:
This dataset contains the data used in the publication by Techel et al., 2018 _Spatial consistency and bias in avalanche forecasts - a case study in the European Alps_ (Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci).
For details on the data please refer to this publication.
The dataset contains the following:
- shape files for the warning regions in the Alps
- highest forecast danger level for each warning region and day

avalanche-forecast

display_name: avalanche-forecast

danger-level

display_name: danger-level

european-alps

display_name: european-alps

snow

display_name: snow

warning-regions

display_name: warning-regions

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Forecast avalanche danger level European Alps 2011 - 2015


en: forest monitoring long-term-monitoring long-term-forest-ecosystem-research air-pollution

en: FORECOMON – Proceedings

en: Latest version

en: Link to Proceedings in DORA WSL

en: Deprecated version 1.0

en: First version of the proceedings containing errors. This early version it is kept, for traceability purposes, in conformance with DOI rules.

en:
Forest monitoring to assess forest functioning under air pollution and climate change. Proceedings.
FORECOMON 2021 - the 9th forest ecosystem monitoring conference.
7-9 June 2021, WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

The goal of FORECOMON 2021 is to highlight the extensive ICP Forests data series on forest growth, phenology and leaf area index, biodiversity and ground vegetation, foliage and litter fall, ambient air quality, deposition, meteorology, soil and crown condition. We combine novel modeling and assessment approaches and integrate long-term trends to assess air pollution and climate effects on European forests and related ecosystem services. Latest results and conclusions from local scale to European scale studies will be presented and discussed.

Copyright © 2021 by WSL, Birmensdorf
The authors are responsible for the content of their contribution.

air-pollution

display_name: air-pollution

forest

display_name: forest

long-term-forest-ecosystem-research

display_name: long-term-forest-ecosystem-research

long-term-monitoring

display_name: long-term-monitoring

monitoring

display_name: monitoring

en: Forest monitoring to assess forest functioning under air pollution and climate change. Proceedings. FORECOMON 2021 - the 9th forest ecosystem monitoring conference. 7–9 June 2021, Birmensdorf, Switzerland


maintainer: Leonie Schönbeck

en: photosynthesis vpd acclimation fluorescence pinus-sylvestris gas-exchange drought

en: Methods light response

en: Methods and parameters for light response curves

en: Methods fluorescence

en:
Parameters and methodology for Fluorescence measurements

Metadata format from
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Methods survey

en: Parameters and methods for point measurements / survey measurements

en: Variable names and units

en: Variable names, description and units for the Pfynwald Gas exchange data

en: Pfynwald gas exchange

en:
Full dataset of Pfynwald gas exchange data taken in the period from June 2013 to October 2020.
All metdata can be found in attached documents.
Data uploaded after quality control using guidelines by Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Instrument details

en:
Instrument details for all LiCor instruments used during collection of dataset.

Metatdata created following guidelines from
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Methods ACi curves

en:
Parameters and methods for CO2 response curves of Photosynthesis.

Metatdata format by
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en: Methods diurnal measurements

en:
Parameters and methodology for diurnal measurements

Metadata format from
Ely et al (2021). A reporting format for leaf-level gas exchange data and metadata. Ecological Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101232

en:
Gas exchange was measured on control, irrigated and irrigation-stop trees at the irrigation experiment Pfynwald, during the years 2013, 2014, 2016-2020. The measurement campaigns served different purposes, resulting in a large dataset containing survey data, CO2 response curves of photosynthesis, light response curves of photosynthesis, and fluorescence measurements. Measurements were done with LiCor 6400 and LiCor 6800 instruments. Until 2016, measurements were done on excised branches or branches lower in the canopy. From 2016 onwards, measurements were done in the top of the canopy using fixed installed scaffolds.
All metadata can be found in the attached documents.

acclimation

display_name: acclimation

drought

display_name: drought

fluorescence

display_name: fluorescence

gas-exchange

display_name: gas-exchange

photosynthesis

display_name: photosynthesis

pinus-sylvestris

display_name: pinus-sylvestris

vpd

display_name: vpd

en: 2013-2020 gas exchange at Pfynwald


maintainer: Marcus Schaub

en: irrigation crown-condition lwf forest swiss-forest-lab tree tree-species scots-pine drought dbh diameter-at-breast-height

en: Site photo 2

en: Site photo 3

en: Site photo 1

en: Long-term Irrigation	Experiment Pfynwald homepage

media_type: text/html

format: HTML

mimetype: text/html

en: Shapefile	of measurement location

en: Dataset

en: Swiss Forest Health Inventory

en: To study the performance of mature Scots pine (_Pinus sylvestris_ L.) under chronic drought conditions in comparison to their immediate physiological response to drought release, a controlled long-term and large-scale irrigation experiment has been set up in 2003. The experiment is located in a xeric mature Scots pine forest in the Pfynwald (46° 18' N, 7° 36' E, 615 m a.s.l.) in one of the driest inner-Alpine valleys of the European Alps, the Valais (mean annual temperature: 9.2°C, annual precipitation sum: 657 mm, both 1961-1990). Tree age is on average 100 years, the top height is 10.8 m and the stand density is 730 stems ha-1 with a basal area of 27.3 m2 ha-1. The forest is described as _Erico Pinetum sylvestris_ and the soil is a shallow pararendzina characterized by low water retention. The experimental site (1.2 ha; 800 trees) is split up into eight plots of 1'000 m2 each. During April-October, irrigation is applied on four randomly selected plots with sprinklers of 1 m height at night using water from an adjacent water channel. The amount of irrigation corresponds to a supplementary rainfall of 700 mm year-1. Trees in the other four plots grow under naturally dry conditions. Soil moisture has been monitored since the beginning of the project at 3 soil depths (10, 20 and 60 cm). The crown condition of each tree is being assessed each year since 2003. Tree measurement data such as diameter at breast height, tree height, and social status were assessed in 2002, 2009 and 2014. The duration of the irrigation experiment is planned for 20 years.

crown-condition

display_name: crown-condition

dbh

display_name: dbh

diameter-at-breast-height

display_name: diameter-at-breast-height

irrigation

display_name: irrigation

lwf

display_name: lwf

scots-pine

display_name: scots-pine

swiss-forest-lab

display_name: swiss-forest-lab

tree

display_name: tree

tree-species

display_name: tree-species

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Tree measurements 2002-2016 from the long-term irrigation experiment Pfynwald, Switzerland


maintainer: EnviDat

en: metadata-convention csv research-data-management nead meteorological-data-format

en: NEAD on GitHub

en: PyNEAD (future reference implementation)

en: MeteoIO (future reference implementation)

en: NEAD syntax v0.1 (EBNF)

en:
Important note: From 2025 the NEAD format is being transformed into the interoperable CSV (iCSV) format, a formalized and standardized evolution of the NEAD format. Furthermore, iCSV should be backwards compatible with NEAD. More information on the new iCSV format will be linked here in due time.

Acknowledgement: The NEAD format includes NetCDF metadata and is proudly inspired by both SMET and NetCDF formats. NEAD is designed as a long-term data preservation and exchange format.

The NEAD specifications were presented at the "WMO Data Conference 2020 - Earth System Data Exchange in the 21st Century" (Virtual Conference).

-----------------------

Summary:
The Non-Binary Environmental Data Archive (NEAD) format is being developed as a generic and intuitive format that combines the self-documenting features of NetCDF with human readable and writeable features of CSV. It is designed for exchange and preservation of time series data in environmental data repositories.

License: The NEAD specifications are released to the public domain under a Creative Commons CC0 "No Rights Reserved" international license. You can reuse the information contained herein in any way you want, for any purposes and without restrictions.

csv

display_name: csv

metadata-convention

display_name: metadata-convention

meteorological-data-format

display_name: meteorological-data-format

nead

display_name: nead

research-data-management

display_name: research-data-management

en: Non-Binary Environmental Archive Data (NEAD) format


en: hydrology nonlinear-deconvolution ecohydrology streamflow nonstationarity precipitation rainfall-runoff-modelling time-series

en: {{deprecated version}} ERRA_scripts.zip

en: Zip-compressed folder containing two versions of the ERRA script. ERRA_v1.0.R uses Rcpp to speed up several key calculations, but requires a C++ compiler. ERRA_v1.0_no_Rcpp.R is a bit slower but does not require a C++ compiler or Rcpp. Public use of these scripts is permitted under GNU General Public License 3 (GPL3); for details see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/

en: Demonstration scripts.zip

en: Zip-compressed folder containing demonstration scripts, source data, and output files for the ERRA results shown in "Introduction to ERRA" and in J.W. Kirchner, "Characterizing nonlinear, nonstationary, and heterogeneous hydrologic behavior using Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA): proof of concept", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2024.

en: An introduction to ERRA v1.06.pdf

en: "An introduction to ERRA" presents a series of vignettes that introduce some of the capabilities of the Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA) script, and that show how to invoke them. This introduction also includes documentation for ERRA function calls, largely reproducing the documentation embedded in the ERRA script itself.

en: Zip-compressed folder containing two versions of the ERRA script. ERRA_v1.06.R uses Rcpp to speed up several key calculations, but requires a C++ compiler. ERRA_v1.06_no_Rcpp.R is a bit slower but does not require a C++ compiler or Rcpp. Public use of these scripts is permitted under GNU General Public License 3 (GPL3); for details see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/

en: {{deprecated version}} An introduction to ERRA.pdf

en:
ERRA is a data-driven, nonparametric, model-independent method for quantifying rainfall-runoff relationships across a spectrum of time lags, in systems that may be nonlinear, nonstationary, and spatially heterogeneous.
Researchers using ERRA in published work should cite J.W. Kirchner, "Characterizing nonlinear, nonstationary, and heterogeneous hydrologic behavior using Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA): proof of concept", Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4427-2024, 2024 (for ERRA itself) and J.W. Kirchner, "Impulse response functions for nonlinear, nonstationary, and heterogeneous systems, estimated by deconvolution and de-mixing of noisy time series", Sensors, 22(9), 3291, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093291, 2022 (for the underlying mathematics).
This data set includes two versions of the ERRA script written in the open-source programming language R, a detailed user's guide, and sample scripts and source data for all of the results in Kirchner (2024).
These scripts are made publicly available under GNU General Public License 3; for details see https://www.gnu.org/licenses/. The data and documentation are made available under Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike CC-BY-SA.
ETH Zurich, WSL, and James Kirchner make ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, including NO WARRANTIES, expressed or implied, that this software is free of errors or is suitable for any particular purpose. Users are solely responsible for determining the suitability and reliability of this software for their own purposes.

ecohydrology

display_name: ecohydrology

hydrology

display_name: hydrology

nonlinear-deconvolution

display_name: nonlinear-deconvolution

nonstationarity

display_name: nonstationarity

precipitation

display_name: precipitation

rainfall-runoff-modelling

display_name: rainfall-runoff-modelling

streamflow

display_name: streamflow

time-series

display_name: time-series

en: ERRA -- an R script for Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis


en: mobile-laser-scanning unmanned-aerial-vehicle-laser-scanning 3d-point-cloud terrestrial-photogrammetry lidar terrestrial-laser-scanning structure-from-motion forest-inventory

en:
Close Range Remote Sensing Benchmark for different LiDAR and photogrammetric Sensors in a mixed temperate forest.
Benchmarks are needed to evaluate the performance of different close-range remote sensing devices and approaches, both in terms of efficiency as well as accuracy. In this study we evaluate the performance of two terrestrial (TLS), one handheld mobile (PLS) and two drone based (UAVLS) laser scanning systems to detect trees and extract the diameter at breast height (DBH) in three plots with a steep gradient in tree and understorey vegetation density. As a novelty, we also tested the acquisition of 3D point-clouds using a low-cost action camera (GoPro) in conjunction with the Structure from Motion (SfM) technique and compared its performance with those of the more costly LiDAR devices.

forest-inventory

display_name: forest-inventory

lidar

display_name: lidar

mobile-laser-scanning

display_name: mobile-laser-scanning

structure-from-motion

display_name: structure-from-motion

terrestrial-laser-scanning

display_name: terrestrial-laser-scanning

terrestrial-photogrammetry

display_name: terrestrial-photogrammetry

unmanned-aerial-vehicle-laser-scanning

display_name: unmanned-aerial-vehicle-laser-scanning

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Ramerenwald Close Range Remote Sensing Benchmark


en: sdms frost-change-velocity soil aridity precipitation ground-temperature

media_type: image/tiff

en: Soil pH modified from SoilGrids

format: TIFF

en: Precipitation of driest quarter modified from CHELSA

en: Mean diurnal range modified from CHELSA

en: Mean annual temperature modified from CHELSA

en: Precipitation seasonality from CHELSA

en: Soil organic carbon content modified from SoilGrids

en: Soil clay content modified from SoilGrids

en: Frost change frequency modified from CHELSA

en: The dataset contains seven environmental layers (average annual temperature, aridity [annual precipitation divided by annual potential evapotranspiration], frost change frequency, precipitation in the driest quarter, mean diurnal temperature range, and precipitation seasonality) modified from CHELSA (https://chelsa-climate.org/) and three soil layers (soil organic matter content, pH water, and clay content) modified from SoilGrids (https://soilgrids.org/).

aridity

display_name: aridity

frost-change-velocity

display_name: frost-change-velocity

ground-temperature

display_name: ground-temperature

sdms

display_name: sdms

soil

display_name: soil

en: Environmental layers for SDM simulations (GDPlants)


maintainer: Thorsten Bartels-Rausch

en: snow antarctica arctic laboratory-study interface ozone metamorphism reaction solution chemistry brine alpine heterogeneous

en: Matlab Script to view and plot data

en: Matlab Data

en: All data as Matlab mat file

en: Readme file

en: This file shows data, code, and plots.

en: Earth’s snow cover is very dynamic on diurnal time scales. The changes to the snow structure during this metamorphism have wide ranging impacts such as on avalanche formation and on the capacity of surface snow to exchange trace gases with the atmosphere. Here, we investigate the influence of dry metamorphism, which involves fluxes of water vapor, on the chemical reactivity of bromide in the snow. For this, the heterogeneous reactive loss of ozone at a concentration of 5-6E12 molecules cm-3 is investigated in artificial, shock-frozen snow samples doped with 6.2 uM sodium bromide and with varying metamorphism history. The oxidation of bromide in snow is one reaction initiating polar bromine releases and ozone depletions.

alpine

display_name: alpine

antarctica

display_name: antarctica

arctic

display_name: arctic

brine

display_name: brine

chemistry

display_name: chemistry

heterogeneous

display_name: heterogeneous

interface

display_name: interface

laboratory-study

display_name: laboratory-study

metamorphism

display_name: metamorphism

ozone

display_name: ozone

reaction

display_name: reaction

snow

display_name: snow

solution

display_name: solution

en: Data set on bromide oxidation by ozone in snow during metamorphism from laboratory study


en: conservation habitat-availability forest-management habitat-heterogeneity biodiversity dead-wood sloss colonisation saproxylic-beetles

en: Forest and environmental variables

en: Data on the branch bundle, forest and environmental variables

en: Community matrix (saproxylic beetles)

en: Abundances of saproxylic beetle species for each branch bundle

en: Variable description

en: Detailed description of the forest and environmental variables

en: Community matrix (all beetles)

en: Abundances of all beetle species for each branch bundle

en:
The data was generated during a landscape experiment performed on 69 plots in Sihlwald forest between 2016 and 2019. Branch bundles of different sizes consisting of beech branches were exposed in the forest for one year to be colonized by saproxylic beetles and later reared for one year in emergence traps. All beetles emerging from the branches were collected. Overall 244 branch bundles are included and we found 66 beetles species (23511 individuals) of which 43 were classified as saproxylic (20873 individuals).
 Species data (2 tables)
Two community matrices (including abundance): one for saproxylic beetles and one for all beetles. Beetles were classfied as saproxylic following an extended list of the list reported in Schmidl & Bussler (2004).
 Model data (1 table)
*Response variables*
Species richness and abundance of (saproxylic) beetles.
*Branch bundles*
Branch bundles consisted of 1, 3, 6 or 12 branches and each bundle size was installed at each of the 69 plots. The bundles consisted of standardized freshly cut beech branches (Fagus sylvatica) with a length of 80 cm and a diameter between 3 and 6 cm. Total surface and volume of each bundle is reported.
*Tree on which the bundle was installed*
Information on the tree to which the bundles were attached (tree species, dbh, distance and azimut from the plot center).
*Temperature and light availability*
Temperature (plot level) and light availability (bundle level) were calculated.
*Deadwood availability in the landscape*
Based on a map of lying dead wood, dead wood amount and isolation were calculated for concentric circles with a radius ranging from 20 to 200 m (in 10 m steps) around each branch bundle.
 Variable descriptions (1 table)

biodiversity

display_name: biodiversity

colonisation

display_name: colonisation

conservation

display_name: conservation

dead-wood

display_name: dead-wood

forest-management

display_name: forest-management

habitat-availability

display_name: habitat-availability

habitat-heterogeneity

display_name: habitat-heterogeneity

saproxylic-beetles

display_name: saproxylic-beetles

sloss

display_name: sloss

educ

en: Education, culture and sport

envidat

en: EnviDat: the Environmental Data Portal

en: EnviDat is the WSL data portal providing unified and managed access to environmental monitoring and research data. The portal has the capability to host and publish data sets. Through the sharing of unique and high-value data sets worldwide, EnviDat fosters research and contributes to advancing environmental science.

en: Beetle communities reared from beech branches and associated forest and environmental variables


maintainer: James W. Kirchner

en: nonlinear-deconvolution arma-noise deconvolution impulse-response-function irfnnhsr irf system-identification de-mixing greens-function time-series-analysis transfer-function

en: README file for IRFnnhs.R and benchmark demonstration scripts

en: Impulse Response Function script

en: Benchmark demonstration scripts and results

en:
The R script IRFnnhs.R, which efficiently estimates impulse response functions for environmental systems that are nonlinear, nonstationary, or heterogeneous, based on their input and output time series.

Scripts and results for a series of benchmark tests are also provided, to accompany Kirchner, J.W., Impulse response functions for heterogeneous, nonstationary, and nonlinear systems, estimated by deconvolution and demixing of noisy time series, _Sensors_, 22(9), 3291, https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093291, 2022.

arma-noise

display_name: arma-noise

de-mixing

display_name: de-mixing

deconvolution

display_name: deconvolution

greens-function

display_name: greens-function

impulse-response-function

display_name: impulse-response-function

irf

display_name: irf

irfnnhsr

display_name: irfnnhsr

nonlinear-deconvolution

display_name: nonlinear-deconvolution

system-identification

display_name: system-identification

time-series-analysis

display_name: time-series-analysis

transfer-function

display_name: transfer-function

en: Impulse response functions for nonlinear nonstationary and heterogeneous systems